Extracellular acidification has been shown to generate action potentials (APs) in several types of neurons. In this study, we investigated the role of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) in acid-induced AP generation in brain neurons. ASICs are neuronal Na+ channels that belong to the epithelial Na+ channel/degenerin family and are transiently activated by a rapid drop in extracellular pH. We compared the pharmacological and biophysical properties of acid-induced AP generation with those of ASIC currents in cultured hippocampal neurons. Our results show that acid-induced AP generation in these neurons is essentially due to ASIC activation. We demonstrate for the first time that the probability of inducing APs correlates with current entry through ASICs. We also show that ASIC activation in combination with other excitatory stimuli can either facilitate AP generation or inhibit AP bursts, depending on the conditions. ASIC-mediated generation and modulation of APs can be induced by extracellular pH changes from 7.4 to slightly <7. Such local extracellular pH values may be reached by pH fluctuations due to normal neuronal activity. Furthermore, in the plasma membrane, ASICs are localized in close proximity to voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels, providing the conditions necessary for the transduction of local pH changes into electrical signals.
- cellular excitability
- neuronal signaling
acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are non-voltage-gated Na+ channels that are transiently activated by a rapid drop in extracellular pH (18, 20, 30). They are members of the epithelial Na+ channel (ENaC)/degenerin family of channel proteins. ASICs are expressed in the peripheral and central nervous systems. In the brain, functional ASICs are formed by homomeric or heteromeric assembly of ASIC subunits 1a (ASIC1a), 2a (ASIC2a), and 2b (ASIC2b). These ASIC subunits show a similar widespread distribution pattern in brain. High expression levels were found in the hippocampus, the cerebellum, the neo- and allocortical regions, and the olfactory bulb (reviewed in Refs. 18, 30).
Many noxious stimuli are associated with extracellular acidification, such as that caused by injury, inflammation, or ischemia (23, 26). ASICs in central neurons might contribute to the neuronal death associated with brain ischemia and epilepsy, which are accompanied by extracellular acidification (7, 23). In addition, fluctuation in extracellular pH occurs during normal brain function. The content of synaptic vesicles is acidic, and synaptic release during neuronal activity is expected to create extracellular acidification in the synaptic cleft. Consistent with a role for ASICs in physiological function, ASIC1a knockout mice showed a mild defect in spatial learning and fear conditioning (31, 32).
It has been known for a long time that extracellular acidification can induce action potentials (APs) in neurons; however, the acid sensors involved in this process have not been identified (7, 8, 21, 28). The aim of this study was to determine whether ASICs can mediate acid-induced generation and modulation of APs in brain neurons. For this purpose, we compared the pharmacological and biophysical properties of acid-induced AP generation determined under current clamp in cultured hippocampal neurons with those of the ASIC-like currents in these neurons characterized under voltage clamp and with the known properties of cloned ASICs. We show that acid-induced AP generation in hippocampal neurons is essentially due to activation of ASICs. We demonstrate for the first time a direct dependence of the probability of inducing APs on the density of functional ASICs at the cell surface and the pH to which the extracellular solution is changed. We show that ASIC activation can modulate AP generation and, depending on the conditions, can facilitate AP generation or inhibit AP bursts. ASICs are localized in close proximity to voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels in the neuronal plasma membrane. Thus the functional properties and the localization of ASICs in hippocampal neurons suggest that these channels can sense local extracellular pH changes in hippocampus and transduce them into neuronal activity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Isolation and culture of mouse hippocampal neurons.
Murine embryonic hippocampal neurons were obtained from timed pregnant mice at 17 days' gestation. Mice were killed by cervical dislocation according to Swiss animal care guidelines. Embryos were removed, hippocampi were dissected, and individual cells were either immediately isolated or isolated after storage of the hippocampi in Hibernate medium (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) at 4°C for 1 h to 3 days (5). Dissociation of individual cells was done mechanically by trituration with a Pasteur pipette with a fire-polished tip in culture medium (Neurobasal; GIBCO BRL, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 2% B-27 (GIBCO BRL) as well as with glutamine and glutamate at final concentrations of 500 and 25 μM, respectively. The cell suspension was centrifuged for 5 min at 1,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed, and cells were resuspended in fresh culture medium. Cells were plated on polylysine-coated coverslips, usually at a density of 10,000 cells/coverslip of 11-mm diameter, and kept in 95% air-5% CO2 at 37°C. The ASIC current density, measured as the ratio of the pH 6-induced peak inward current (IpH6) to the membrane capacitance, changed only slightly with time in culture and was 43 ± 14 pA/pF after 2–3 days in culture (n = 10) and 34 ± 4 pA/pF after 9–14 days in culture (n = 52). For the experiments shown, the neurons were used after 9–14 days in culture.
Recombinant expression of ASICs.
To obtain clues about the molecular identity of ASICs that mediate the H+-induced currents in hippocampal neurons, we compared ASIC currents in hippocampal neurons with currents of cloned ASICs in recombinant expression systems. For the expression of heteromeric ASICs, we performed transient transfections in COS cells. We used a COS cell line that was selected for low endogenous expression of K+- and H+-gated channels. These cells were controlled for endogenous H+-gated currents, which were either absent or <150 pA. Equal concentrations of cDNA in the pcDNA3.1 vector (ASIC1a, ASIC2a) were cotransfected at a 10:1 ratio with either the CD8 antigen or green fluorescent protein (for identification of transfected cells) at 3 μg/35-mm dish with the use of PerFectin (Gene Therapy Systems, San Diego, CA) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Cells were split 1 day after transfection and were studied on days 2 and 3 after transfection. Cells were cultured in DMEM with 10% fetal calf serum, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin at 37°C.
Cell lines that stably expressed ASICs were established for homomultimeric assembly of ASIC1a and of ASIC2a. The cDNAs were subcloned into the pEAK8 expression vector (Edge Biosystems, Gaithersburg, MD). DNA (4 μg/35-mm dish) was used to transfect Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, which have no endogenous transient H+-gated currents, with the use of Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. ASIC-expressing cells were isolated by selection in culture medium (DMEM/NutMix F-12, 3.6% fetal calf serum, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin) containing 10 μg/ml puromycine.
We used an EPC-9 amplifier and Pulse and PulseFit software (HEKA Electronik, Lambrecht, Germany) for data acquisition and analysis. The sampling interval was 50–100 μs for current-clamp experiments, 1–5 ms for voltage-clamp experiments to measure ASIC currents, and 100 μs for voltage-gated currents, and filtering was set to 5 kHz in all experiments. Experiments were performed in the whole cell and the excised outside-out configuration of the patch-clamp technique (13). For rapid changes of extracellular solutions, we used either an array of nine tubes whose position in front of the cell or the excised patch could rapidly be changed (Rapid Solution Changer RSC-200; Biologic, Grenoble, France) or a micromanifold that brings nine tubes into one outlet tube (Ala Scientific Instruments, Westbury, NY). The solution flow was controlled by computer-driven solenoid valves. For whole cell measurements, the perfusion outlet was positioned close to the cell body. With excised outside-out patches, we used the RSC-200 device exclusively and placed the patch pipette containing the membrane patch in front of the tube array. Extracellular solutions contained (in mM) 140 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, 10 MES, 10 HEPES, and 10 glucose, and pH was adjusted to 7.4 or to the values indicated. Pipettes were pulled from borosilicate glass (World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). When filled with the pipette solution, the pipettes used for whole cell measurements had a resistance of 2–4 MΩ and those used for excised outside-out patches had a resistance of 4–8 MΩ. The pipette solution for whole cell measurements contained (in mM) 90 K-gluconate, 60 HEPES, 10 KCl, 10 NaCl, 1 MgCl2, and 10 EGTA, pH 7.3. For outside-out patches, the pipette solution contained (in mM) 130 KF, 2 MgCl2, 10 NMDG, 10 EGTA, 10 HEPES, and 5 HCl, pH 7.35. Hippocampal neurons had a resting potential of −45 ± 14 mV (n = 51). When APs were induced in current-clamp mode by short (3 ms) depolarizing current pulses from a holding potential of −75 mV in current-clamp mode, the AP threshold was −37 ± 7 mV (n = 46), the current injection needed for AP generation was 378 ± 302 pA, and the mean AP duration was 0.85 ± 0.20 ms (measured at 50% of AP amplitude, n = 46; all values shown are means ± SD). An effective holding potential of −75 mV in current-clamp experiments was chosen to reproduce the membrane potential in hippocampal neurons in vivo.
Psalmopoeus cambridgei venom was obtained from Spider Pharm (Yarnell, AZ) and was used in all experiments at a 1:20,000 dilution. The P. cambridgei venom inhibits ASIC1a currents because of the toxin Psalmotoxin-1 contained in the venom (11). Preapplication of the venom at this dilution blocked 94 ± 1% (n = 5) of IpH6 in ASIC1a homomultimers expressed in CHO cells. Within the pH range 6–4, the current inhibition by the venom was not relieved by the application of more acidic stimuli (Vukicevic M and Kellenberger S, unpublished observations). Under the same experimental conditions, the P. cambridgei venom did not inhibit H+-induced current of all other ASICs tested (ASIC1b, ASIC2a, and ASIC3; Poirot O and Kellenberger S, unpublished observations). The other chemicals were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich or Fluka. The pH activation curves were fit by using the Hill equation where Imax is the maximal current, pH0.5 is the pH at which one-half of the channels are opened, and nH is the Hill coefficient. Data are presented as means ± SE when different mean values are compared; otherwise, as indicated, values are expressed as means ± SD; n represents the number of experiments.
Acidification-induced AP generation is mediated by ASICs.
It is known that extracellular acidification can induce APs in neurons (7, 8, 21, 28). However, the activity of a number of electrogenic transporters depends on extracellular pH, and the contribution of ASICs to acid-induced AP generation has not been specified to date. To determine the role of ASICs in acid-induced AP generation, we investigated the pharmacological and biophysical aspects of acid-induced AP generation in murine hippocampal pyramidal neurons. A previous study showed that the dominant ASIC type in these neurons is the homomultimeric ASIC1a and that, in addition, heteromultimeric channels exist that are composed of ASIC1a together with ASIC2a and/or ASIC2b (2). In neurons of intermediate size, we measured an average whole cell capacitance of 32 ± 96 pF (mean ± SD; n = 93). Neurons were studied under current clamp, and current injection was adapted to obtain a membrane potential of −75 mV in the absence of stimuli. Extracellular acidification to pH 6 induced a transient depolarization of the membrane potential and generated APs, as illustrated in Fig. 1A (solid trace). After a short delay due to the perfusion system, the membrane potential was depolarized and APs were generated ∼200 ms after the onset of depolarization. The membrane potential then returned to the baseline, while the extracellular pH was still 6. In the same neuron under voltage clamp, extracellular acidification to pH 6 induced a transient inward current (Fig. 1B), with kinetics typical of ASIC currents (30). In neurons, no transient H+-gated Na+ currents other than ASIC currents are known. Further indications that the transient acid-induced currents in hippocampal neurons are indeed ASIC currents are the observations that they display the same pharmacological properties as, and pH dependence similar to that of, cloned ASICs (see Figs. 1C and 7). In addition to transient currents, extracellular acidification may induce sustained currents due to effects on ion channels other than ASICs that are potentially present in hippocampal neurons. Activation of the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 or inhibition of the background K+ channels TASK-1 or TASK-3 could induce a sustained inward current (6, 25). However, as illustrated in Fig. 1B, the main current response to acidification was transient. The transient current was only in some cells followed by a sustained current the amplitude of which in all experiments was <10% of the transient peak current (data not shown). Comparison of the traces in Fig. 1, A and B, shows that the pH 6-induced depolarization in current clamp had kinetics roughly similar to those of the pH 6-induced inward current under voltage clamp. An exponential fit to the time course of the onset of the pH 6-induced depolarization or the inward current in such experiments yielded similar time constants (τon) of 145 ± 32 ms for depolarization under current clamp and 176 ± 27 ms (n = 6) for the inward current measured in voltage clamp. The durations of the depolarization measured in current clamp and of the inward current measured under voltage clamp, at 20% of the peak amplitude, also were similar: 4.0 ± 0.3 s (depolarization) and 3.4 ± 0.3 s (inward current) (n = 6). This close correlation of the time course suggests that the pH 6-induced depolarization was due to ASIC activation.
To further test the role of ASICs for acid-induced AP generation, we inhibited ASICs with the use of 100 μM amiloride, a known blocker of ENaC/degenerin channels. At this concentration, amiloride inhibits 93 ± 3% of the acid-induced current in hippocampal neurons, as illustrated in Fig. 1, B and C. The shaded trace in Fig. 1A shows the response of the same neuron under current clamp to acidification to pH 6 in the presence of 100 μM amiloride. This illustrates that amiloride strongly inhibited the depolarization of the membrane potential and prevented AP generation. In the presence of 100 μM amiloride, the pH 6-induced depolarization (ΔVm, Fig. 1D) was 15 ± 3 mV, while it was 48 ± 3 mV (measured between APs) in the absence of amiloride. In 10 of 12 experiments, H+-induced AP generation was prevented by coapplication of 100 μM amiloride. The failure of amiloride to prevent AP generation in two experiments is likely due to the high expression of functional ASICs in these two neurons, allowing AP generation caused by activation of the fraction of ASICs not blocked by amiloride, although implication of other H+-sensitive electrogenic transporters in these two experiments cannot be completely excluded.
Probability of inducing APs by acidification correlates with amplitude of ASIC inward current.
We tested whether there is a correlation between the density of functional ASICs at the plasma membrane and the probability of inducing APs. As a measure of the density of functional ASICs at the plasma membrane, we determined the IpH6 density, which we defined as the ratio of the IpH6 under voltage clamp to cell capacitance. To establish this correlation, we took advantage of the fact that the IpH6 density showed great cell-to-cell variation (34 ± 31 pA/pF, mean ± SD; n = 52). To calculate the probability of AP induction, we determined in each experiment whether acidification to pH 6 under current clamp induced APs (one or more). Experiments were then grouped according to their IpH6 density, and for each group, the probability of AP induction was calculated as the frequency of experiments with successful pH 6-induced AP generation. In Fig. 2A, we plot the probability of AP induction against the IpH6 density. This graph shows that the probability of AP induction increased with higher IpH6 density and that it was maximal at IpH6 densities >40 pA/pF. For comparison, in Fig. 2A, we also plotted the pH 6-induced depolarization ΔVm, which illustrates that the capacity of the extracellular acidification to induce APs strictly correlates with its capacity to induce depolarization.
We then tested, in the pH range 7–6, whether the probability of successful AP generation depends on the pH to which the extracellular solution is acidified. We were especially interested in the pH values close to 7 that are sufficient for ASIC activation (threshold for ASIC activation pH ∼6.9; see Fig. 7A) and that may be reached during neuronal activity. To reduce variation due to ASIC current density, we considered for this analysis only neurons with a pH 6 density >25 pA/pF. Acidification from pH 7.4 to 7.0 never induced APs under our experimental conditions (n = 7) (Fig. 2B). However, pH changes to 6.8 induced APs in 50 ± 22% of the neurons tested, and the probability of AP induction further increased with more acidic pH and was maximal at pH 6.4 and 6 (Fig. 2B). This shows that submaximal activation of ASICs in many hippocampal neurons is sufficient for AP induction. The comparison with the dependence of the depolarization ΔVm on pH (Fig. 2B) shows that the increased probability of inducing APs at more acidic pH in the range of 6–7 is due to the increased depolarization.
pH dependence of AP train duration.
In most experiments, ASIC activation induced bursts (“trains”) of APs. In the pH range 6.0–6.8, AP trains were of longer duration at less acidic pH, as shown in Fig. 3 and Table 1. Acidification to pH 6 or 6.4 induced strong depolarizations (ΔVm of 54 ± 2 and 47 ± 2 mV, respectively) (Table 1) that lasted several seconds. AP trains, however, were short despite continued depolarization. The absence of APs during this plateau phase likely reflects the accumulation of voltage-gated Na+ channels in the inactivated state, in which they remain trapped until the membrane is repolarized. A similar phenomenon was recently observed in hippocampal neurons in which AP trains were induced by activation of heterologously expressed TRPV1 channels (34). Thus, for pH changes from 7.4 to the 7–6 range, the duration of induced AP trains is inversely correlated with the extent of acidification, while the probability of AP induction correlates with the extent of acidification (Fig. 2B).
Modulation of AP generation by ASIC activation.
So far, our analysis has shown that activation of ASICs in a resting neuron can induce APs. The analysis shows also that the duration of AP bursts decreases with more acidic pH, thus suggesting a potential inhibitory effect of ASICs. To test for an inhibitory action of ASICs, we induced long-lasting bursts of APs by injecting a constant depolarizing current for several seconds. We then repeated the same current injection and, just after the beginning of the AP burst, simultaneously activated the ASICs by extracellular acidification. This ASIC activation depolarized the membrane further and terminated the AP burst. In some experiments, APs reappeared when the transient acid-induced depolarization was over. Figure 4 shows traces from a representative experiment. The extracellular acidification increased the depolarization and reduced the number of APs in the burst, as shown in Table 2. The kinetics of the acid-induced depolarization resemble closely those of the ASIC-mediated depolarization shown in Figs. 1 and 3, indicating that this inhibition is due to ASIC activation. Because short bursts rather than single APs are the predominant information carriers in the central nervous system, the premature termination of the bursts is expected to have an inhibitory effect on neuronal signaling.
A modulatory excitatory role of ASICs may also be possible. In neurons with weak excitatory input, ASIC activation may add to other incoming subthreshold stimuli to facilitate AP induction. We found that in a substantial fraction of neurons that had relatively low IpH6 density, acidification to pH values >6 was not sufficient to induce APs. To test whether facilitation can occur in such situations, we combined two activating stimuli in hippocampal neurons that displayed a comparably low IpH6 density: 1) a short (3 ms) depolarizing current injection through the patch pipette and 2) activation of ASICs by extracellular acidification. First, a current-clamp protocol with current injections of increasing amplitude was performed to determine the current injection required for AP generation. In a second protocol, a series of acidic pH solutions were tested for their capacity to induce APs. The combined stimulation was then achieved by switching the extracellular solution to a pH that was not sufficient in this particular neuron to generate APs. A depolarizing current was injected simultaneously with the peak of the acid-induced depolarization, and the current injection needed for AP generation was determined under this condition. Figure 5A illustrates an experiment in which the combination of subthreshold current injection and subthreshold acidification induce an AP. The results of such experiments are summarized in Fig. 5B. They show that the current injection needed for AP generation is decreased if ASICs are activated at the time of current injection, indicating that ASIC activation can have a modulatory excitatory role in AP generation.
ASICs in the plasma membrane are localized in close proximity to voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels.
In the brain, rapid extracellular pH changes may be locally restricted and may not activate all ASICs on the cell membrane of a neuron. For an efficient coupling of ASICs with voltage-gated Na+ channels, ASICs and voltage-gated Na+ channels must be colocalized to a certain degree. We measured voltage-gated and H+-induced currents in small membrane patches from the soma of hippocampal neurons. Within such small membrane areas, estimated to ∼0.25 μm2, we found evidence for the simultaneous presence of voltage-gated Na+ and K+ channels and ASICs (Fig. 6). These experiments were performed in the excised outside-out configuration with a pipette solution containing K+ as the major cation. Rapid changes of the extracellular pH were used to measure ASIC currents, and voltage protocols were applied in the presence of extracellular Na+ or K+ to measure voltage-gated Na+ and K+ currents. The current amplitudes in these patches were −16 ± 5 pA for pH 5-induced currents (n = 5), −128 ± 30 pA for voltage-gated Na+ currents (−20 mV pulse potential; n = 5), and 119 ± 29 pA for voltage-gated K+ currents (+40 mV pulse potential; n = 3), indicating an eightfold higher current density for voltage-gated currents than for H+-induced currents.
AP generation is predominantly mediated by ASIC1a homomultimers.
We have shown in this study that acid-induced AP generation is mediated essentially by ASICs. Which ASIC types mediate these currents? The pH dependence of the peak amplitude of the transient current, measured in voltage clamp to −60 mV, is illustrated in Fig. 7A. The pH for half-maximal current, pH0.5, was 6.25 ± 0.23, and the Hill coefficient was 1.4 ± 0.2, indicating cooperative gating (mean of 3 preparations and 3–8 measurements each). The P. cambridgei venom, which selectively blocks currents mediated by ASIC1a homomultimers (11) (see materials and methods), inhibited ≥95% of the IpH6 in 60% of the tested neurons (ntotal = 20), indicating that in these neurons, the ASIC-like current was essentially due to activation of ASIC1a homomultimers. In the remaining 40% of neurons, the H+-induced current was only partially blocked by the P. cambridgei venom, suggesting the presence of one or several additional ASIC types. In these neurons, the venom-resistant current contributed 42 ± 10% (n = 8) of the total IpH6. These results confirm two previous analyses of ASIC currents in rat hippocampal neurons (1, 2).
The pH dependence of the venom-resistant ASIC current is shown in Fig. 7B. This current had a pH0.5 of 5.9 ± 0.1 and a Hill coefficient of 1.9 ± 0.3 (n = 7). For comparison, in parallel to the experiments in hippocampal neurons, we determined the pH dependence of peak currents of cloned ASICs that were expressed in COS or CHO cells (Fig. 7B). The comparison indicates that the pH dependence of the venom-resistant H+-induced current is similar but not equal to that of ASIC1a2a heteromers. Therefore, in agreement with the study by Baron et al. (2), the venom-resistant component is most likely mediated by one type or several types of heteromeric ASICs composed of ASIC1a together with ASIC2a and/or ASIC2b. This finding is also consistent with the absence of ASIC currents in hippocampal neurons of ASIC1a knockout mice (32). The functional importance of the ASIC1a homomeric current (>95% of IpH6 in 60% of neurons, 42% of IpH6 in the remaining 40% of neurons) is illustrated by our observation that the presence of the P. cambridgei venom prevented AP generation in the pH range 5.5–6.8 (n = 8).
By comparing the pharmacological and biophysical properties of acid-induced AP generation with those of ASIC currents in hippocampal neurons, we show in this study that acid-induced AP generation is essentially due to ASIC activation. We demonstrate for the first time that the probability of inducing APs by extracellular acidification correlates with current entry through ASICs. It increases with increasing density of functional ASICs at the plasma membrane and with the acidity of the test solution in the pH range of 7–6, which corresponds to the pH range in which hippocampal ASIC activity shows the steepest pH dependence. Interestingly, the bursts of APs induced by acidification were longer at the less acidic pH values in this pH range. We also show that ASIC activation can have a modulatory role in AP generation. ASIC activation by pH changes to pH slightly <7 was sufficient to generate and modulate APs. Such extracellular pH values may be reached locally by the pH fluctuations due to normal neuronal activity (7, 8), suggesting a role of ASICs in neuronal signaling.
AP induction and modulation by extracellular acidification.
ASICs are not the only neuronal ion channels whose function depends on extracellular pH. Extracellular acidification, for example, has been shown to inhibit N-methyl-d-aspartate channels, voltage-gated Na+ channels, and the two-pore domain TASK channels; to activate the capsaicin receptor TRPV1 and the chloride channel CLC-2; and to be a coactivator for the inhibitory GABAA receptors (8, 14, 15, 17, 25). Thus extracellular acidification might depolarize the membrane by inhibiting the background K+ channels TASK-1 or TASK-3 or by activating TRPV1. ASIC currents are transient, in contrast to the TASK and TRPV1 currents, which do not inactivate. Extracellular acidification induces predominantly a transient inward current in hippocampal neurons (>90% of total pH 6-induced current). These transient, acid-induced currents display pH dependence similar to that of cloned ASICs and are blocked by the ENaC/degenerin inhibitor amiloride, which clearly identifies them as ASIC-mediated currents. Two recent studies that either used a pharmacological approach (2) or took advantage of ASIC1 and ASIC2 knockout mice (1) indicated that ASIC1a homomultimers and heteromers composed of ASIC1a together with ASIC2a and/or ASIC2b mediate ASIC currents in hippocampal neurons. We confirmed these observations and found a higher prevalence of ASIC1a homomultimers than of the heteromers. The presence of functional ASICs in cultured hippocampal neurons is consistent with observations of ASIC1a, ASIC2a, and ASIC2b mRNA in rodent hippocampus and of ASIC-like currents in acutely isolated hippocampal neurons (4, 12, 22, 29).
It previously was shown that extracellular acidification induces APs in hippocampal neurons, and recently it was shown that the induced depolarization correlates with acidification and ASIC current density, suggesting a role for ASICs in acid-induced AP generation (2). The aim of this study was to provide direct evidence for the implication of ASICs in acid-induced AP generation, to show how acidification induces APs by activating ASICs despite a potential inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels (14), and to investigate potential modulatory roles of ASICs in AP generation. The following observations in our analysis indicate that acid-induced AP generation in hippocampal neurons is essentially mediated by ASICs. 1) The kinetics of acid-induced depolarization are similar to the kinetics of ASIC currents measured under voltage clamp. 2) Acid-induced membrane depolarization and AP generation are inhibited by amiloride. 3) The probability of successful acid-induced AP generation depends on Na+ entry through ASICs, because it is higher in neurons with an increased density of functional ASICs at the membrane and increases with the extent of acidification in the pH range in which ASIC activity is steeply pH dependent. The observations that the probability of inducing APs by acidification increased with more acidic pH in the range 7.0–6.0 and that the voltage-threshold for AP generation did not depend on pH indicate that in this pH range, the pH-dependent inhibition of voltage-gated Na+ channels did not affect AP generation. Because homomultimeric ASIC1a is activated at higher pH than the other ASIC types in these neurons [pH0.5 = 6.4 (ASIC1a) compared with 5.9 (venom-resistant, acid-induced currents in hippocampal neurons)], it probably mediates AP generation induced by pH changes to pH ≥6.5. The important role of ASIC1a homomultimers is further supported by our observation that the presence of the P. cambridgei venom prevented acid-induced AP generation.
We show that ASIC activation induces APs but that the duration of the induced AP bursts decreases with stronger depolarization. Consistent with these observations, ASIC activation facilitates AP generation when combined with subthreshold excitatory stimuli, and if it occurs during bursting activity of a neuron, the ASIC activation can terminate the burst. The mechanism of this inhibitory effect of ASIC activity on neuronal signaling is analogous to that of depolarizing blocking agents at the neuromuscular junction (e.g., suxamethonium) that cause a maintained depolarization. Thus ASICs are modulators that, depending on the conditions present, are excitatory or inhibitory. The type of electrical response of a neuron to acidification thus depends on the extent of the pH change, on the expression level of ASICs present in the neuron, and on the momentary signaling activity of the neuron. ASIC expression is likely to change in response to the (patho)physiological situation. For example, upregulation of ASIC2a expression in brain after global ischemia and downregulation of ASIC1a and ASIC2b after status epilepticus were recently demonstrated (3, 16).
Localization of pH changes and ASICs.
Brain ischemia, hypoxia, and epilepsy are accompanied by acidosis (7, 23). On the basis of the current understanding of ASIC function, during long-lasting acidification such as that induced by brain ischemia or hypoxia, ASICs are expected to be briefly activated and then to inactivate and remain inactive. During global brain ischemia, extracellular pH decreases by ∼1 pH unit (reviewed in Ref. 23). Under these conditions, ASIC1a homomultimers and ASIC1a-containing heteromers are inactivated. During seizure activity, rapid extracellular acidification by 0.2–0.5 pH unit has been observed (19, 27, 33). In these studies, pH was measured using pH-sensitive microelectrodes. Because of limitations in spatiotemporal resolution, the actual pH changes may have been underestimated with the use of this approach. Thus ASICs may be activated during seizure activity and are expected to be inhibitory under these conditions. Fluctuations of extracellular pH also occur during normal brain function. Several studies with brain slices have indicated that neuronal activity causes rapid changes in extracellular pH (7, 8, 21). Much interest has been focused on the pH changes in the synaptic cleft during synaptic activity. Direct information regarding the exact pH changes in extracellular microdomains such as the synaptic cleft is currently not available (7). However, the pH in hippocampal synaptic vesicles has been determined to be pH 5.7 (24), and extracellular acidification due to the release of presynaptic vesicular contents has been detected indirectly (10). In addition to synaptic pH changes, there is evidence for glial acid secretion in response to neural activity. This acid secretion is expected to induce pH changes with a time course on the order of seconds (7); thus these pH changes would also be fast enough to activate ASICs. Currently, it is not clear whether the extent of acidification by glial acid secretion would be sufficient to activate ASICs. The pH changes reported during seizure activity were relatively small but might have been underestimated because of the limited spatiotemporal resolution of pH microelectrodes that were used in these studies (8).
For a better appreciation of the role of ASICs with regard to their potential involvement in synaptic functions, it is important to know their subcellular localization with respect to synapses. The subcellular localization in brain neurons has thus far been addressed only for the ASIC1a subunit. Studies conducted at two different laboratories produced somewhat divergent results. Wemmie and colleagues (31, 32) showed evidence for preferential localization of ASIC1a at synapses and for involvement in synaptic functions. De la Rosa et al. (9), however, reported that the ASIC1a protein is equally distributed in plasma membrane of soma, axons, and dendrites of hippocampal and other brain neurons.
While functional roles of synaptic ASICs can be imagined and were proposed in recent studies (31, 32), the potential roles of extrasynaptic ASICs are less clear. Extrasynaptic ASICs might be activated by glial cell-dependent acid secretion or during seizure activity, or they may play as yet undefined roles in signaling during ischemia. To elucidate the role of the venom-resistant ASIC current in hippocampus, it is important to determine in addition the subcellular and synaptic vs. extrasynaptic localization of ASIC2a and ASIC2b.
In conclusion, we have shown in this study that acid-induced AP generation in hippocampal neurons is due to the activation of ASICs. Our study suggests that ASICs in hippocampus are likely to change the electrical properties of neurons in response to even small pH changes. The effect on hippocampal neuron excitability due to ASIC activation depends on the extent of the pH change, on the expression level of ASICs present in the neuron, and on the activity of the neuron at the moment of ASIC activation.
This research was supported by Grant 3100-065233 from the Swiss National Science Foundation to S. Kellenberger.
We thank Coryse Pelofi for showing us the isolation and culture of hippocampal neurons, and we thank Laurent Schild, Hugues Abriel, Jean-Daniel Horisberger, and Olivier Poirot for comments on a previous version of the manuscript and for many discussions. We thank D. Corey (Harvard University, Boston, MA) for providing the ASIC1a and ASIC2a clones and E. Honoré (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Nice, France) for providing the COS cell line.
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked “advertisement” in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
- Copyright © 2004 the American Physiological Society