Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (April 16, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.90623.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
294/6/C1430    most recent
90623.2007v2
90623.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zamudio, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gerometta, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zamudio, A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Gerometta, R.
Submitted on December 13, 2007
Revised on April 1, 2008
Accepted on April 2, 2008

SURFACE CHANGE OF THE MAMMALIAN LENS DURING ACCOMMODATION

Aldo Cesar Zamudio1, Oscar A. Candia1*, Chi-Wing Kong1, Brian Wu1, and Rosana Gerometta2

1 Mount Sinai School of Medicine
2 Universidad Nacional Del Nordeste (UNNE)

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: oscar.candia{at}mssm.edu.

Classical theories suggest that the surface area of the crystalline lens changes during accommodation while the lens volume remains constant. Our recent work challenged this view by showing that the lens volume decreases as the lens flattens during un-accommodation. In this paper we investigate: a) the magnitude of changes in the surface of the in vitro isolated cow lens during simulated accommodation, as well as that of human lens models, determined from lateral photographs and the application of the first theorem of Pappus; and b) the velocity of the equatorial diameter recovery of pre-stretched cow and rabbit lenses using a custom-built software-controlled stretching apparatus synchronized to a digital camera. Our results showed that the in vitro cow lens surface changed in an unexpected manner during accommodation depending upon how much tension was applied to flatten the lens. In this case, the anterior surface collapsed with a reduction in surface initially followed by an increase in surface, when the stretching was applied. In the human lens model, the surface increased when the lens un-accommodated. The lens volume always decreases as the lens flattens. An explanation for the unexpected surface change is presented and discussed. Furthermore, we determined that the changes in lens volume, as reflected by the speed of the equatorial diameter recovery in in vitro cow and rabbit lenses during simulated accommodation occurred within a physiologically relevant time frame (200 ms), implying a rapid movement of fluid to and from the lens during accommodation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.