Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C164-C177, 2007. First published August 2, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00193.2006
0363-6143/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
292/1/C164    most recent
00193.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vo, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Palsson, B. O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vo, T. D.
Right arrow Articles by Palsson, B. O.

SPECIAL SECTION ON SYSTEMS BIOLOGY OF THE MITOCHONDRION

Building the power house: recent advances in mitochondrial studies through proteomics and systems biology

Thuy D. Vo and Bernhard O. Palsson

Department of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California

Submitted 19 April 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 July 2006

The emerging field of systems biology seeks to develop novel approaches to integrate heterogeneous data sources for effective analysis of complex living systems. Systemic studies of mitochondria have generated a large number of proteomic data sets in numerous species, including yeast, plant, mouse, rat, and human. Beyond component identification, mitochondrial proteomics is recognized as a powerful tool for diagnosing and characterizing complex diseases associated with these organelles. Various proteomic techniques for isolation and purification of proteins have been developed; each tailored to preserve protein properties relevant to study of a particular disease type. Examples of such techniques include immunocapture, which minimizes loss of posttranslational modification, 4-iodobutyltriphenylphosphonium labeling, which quantifies protein redox states, and surface-enhanced laser desorption ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry, which allows sequence-specific binding. With the rapidly increasing number of discovered molecular components, computational models are also being developed to facilitate the organization and analysis of such data. Computational models of mitochondria have been accomplished with top-down and bottom-up approaches and have been steadily improved in size and scope. Results from top-down methods tend to be more qualitative but are unbiased by prior knowledge about the system. Bottom-up methods often require the incorporation of a large amount of existing data but provide more rigorous and quantitative information, which can be used as hypotheses for subsequent experimental studies. Successes and limitations of the studies reviewed here provide opportunities and challenges that must be addressed to facilitate the application of systems biology to larger systems.

constraint-based modeling; kinetics-based modeling; data integration; standards; bioinformatics



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: B. Palsson, Dept. of Bioengineering, Univ. of California, San Diego, MC 0412, La Jolla, CA 92093 (e-mail: palsson{at}ucsd.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.