Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Cell Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (August 17, 2005). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00630.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
290/1/C189    most recent
00630.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, T. E
Right arrow Articles by Tuana, B. S
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, T. E
Right arrow Articles by Tuana, B. S
Submitted on December 22, 2004
Accepted on August 15, 2005

The Activating E2Fs Mediate the Transcriptional Regulation of the Human E2F6 Repressor

Tarrah E Lyons1, Maysoon Salih1, and Balwant S Tuana1*

1 Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University od Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: btuana{at}uottawa.ca.

E2F6 is believed to repress E2F responsive genes and therefore serve a role in cell cycle regulation. Analysis of the human E2F6 promoter region revealed the presence of two putative E2F binding sites both of which were found to be functionally critical since deletion or mutations of these sites abolished promoter activity. Ectopic expression of E2F1 protein was found to increase E2F6 mRNA levels as well as significantly up-regulated E2F6 promoter activity. The deletion or mutation of the putative E2F binding sites nullified the effects of E2F1 on the E2F6 promoter activity. Studies on the temporal induction of the E2F family members demonstrated that the activating E2Fs, and most notably E2F1, were upregulated prior to E2F6 during cell cycle progression at the G1/S phase, and this coincided with the time course induction experienced by the E2F6 promoter during the course of the cell cycle. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays indicated the specific binding of nuclear complexes to the E2F6 promoter which contained E2F1 related species whose binding was specifically competed by the consensus E2F binding site. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with the anti-E2Fs demonstrated the association of the E2F family members with the E2F6 promoter in vivo. These data indicate that the expression of the E2F6 repressor is influenced at the transcriptional level by the E2F family members, and suggests that interplay among these transcriptional regulators, especially E2F1, may be critical for cell cycle regulation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Virol.Home page
M. E. McLaughlin-Drubin, K.-W. Huh, and K. Munger
Human Papillomavirus Type 16 E7 Oncoprotein Associates with E2F6
J. Virol., September 1, 2008; 82(17): 8695 - 8705.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
M. Agromayor, E. Wloga, B. Naglieri, J. Abrashkin, K. Verma, and L. Yamasaki
Visualizing Dynamic E2F-Mediated Repression In Vivo
Mol. Cell. Biol., June 15, 2006; 26(12): 4448 - 4461.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.