Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Heart and Circulatory Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (March 11, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00581.2008
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/5/C1058    most recent
00581.2008v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Callander, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bathgate, R. A. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Callander, G. E.
Right arrow Articles by Bathgate, R. A. D.
Submitted on November 11, 2008
Revised on February 27, 2009
Accepted on March 6, 2009

Prolonged RXFP1 and RXFP2 signaling can be explained by poor internalization and a lack of {beta}arrestin recruitment

Gabrielle Elizabeth Callander1*, Walter G Thomas2, and Ross A. D. Bathgate1

1 Howard Florey Institute
2 The University of Queensland

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: gab.c{at}florey.edu.au.

Relaxin induces sustained physiological responses, which brings into question the deactivation processes typical of most G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) for its receptor, relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1). Here, we examined relaxin-dependent phosphorylation of RXFP1 and the related insulin-like peptide 3 (INSL3) receptor, RXFP2, as well as the capacity of these receptors to recruit {beta}arrestins and internalize in response to ligand stimulation. We confirmed in HEK293T cells, expressing RXFP1 or RXFP2, that both receptors elicit prolonged cAMP responses up to 6 hours after stimulation. Receptors immunoprecipitated from 32P metabolically labeled cells were used to investigate the agonist-specific phosphorylation. Rapid and robust receptor phosphorylation was not observed for either RXFP1 or RXFP2, although some 32P-incorporation was observed at 30 min, however this was not statistically significant. In accord with this result, RXFP1 and RXFP2 demonstrated poor internalization in response to relaxin or INSL3, as compared to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), which undergoes rapid and robust phosphorylation and internalization in response to angiotensin II. Additionally co-expression of GPCR kinases (GRKs) has no effect on the rate of internalization for either RXFP1 or RXFP2. Confocal microscopy was utilized to follow the trafficking of GFP-labeled {beta}arrestins after receptor activation. Neither RXFP1 nor RXFP2 activation results in recruitment of barrestins to the cell surface, whereas AT1R rapidly recruits both {beta}arrestins-1 and -2. The apparent lack of classical regulation for RXFP1 and RXFP2 provides the molecular basis for the prolonged signaling and physiological actions of relaxin and related peptides.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.