Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (April 23, 2008). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00512.2007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
295/1/C138    most recent
00512.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Thieme, K.
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira-Souza, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Thieme, K.
Right arrow Articles by Oliveira-Souza, M.
Submitted on October 30, 2007
Accepted on April 22, 2008

The effect of Angiotensin II on intracellular pH is mediated by AT1 receptor translocation

Karina Thieme1, Debora Mai Nakamura Eguti2, Margarida Mello-Aires3, and Maria Oliveira-Souza2*

1 Physiolgy and Biophysics, Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
2 Physiology and Biophysics, Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
3 Physiology and Biophysics, Instituto de Ciencias Biomedicas, Brazil

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: souza{at}icb.usp.br.

The effect of ANG II on pHi recovery rate and AT1 receptor translocation were investigated in transfected MDCK cells. The pHi recovery rate was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy using the fluorescent probe BCECF/AM. The hAT1 receptor translocation was analyzed by immunofluorescence and confocal microscope. Our data show that, transfected cells, in control situation, have a pHi recovery rate of [0.219 ± 0.017 pH units/min (n = 11)]. This value was similar to non transfected cells [0.211 ± 0.009 pH units/min (n = 12)]. Both values were significantly increased with ANG II (10-9 M) but not with ANG II (10-6 M). Losartan (10-7 M) and Dimethyl-Bapta-AM (10-7 M) decreased significantly the stimulatory effect of ANG II (10-9 M) and induced an increase on NHE1 activity with ANG II (10-6 M). Immunofluorescence studies indicated that in control situation, the hAT1 receptor was predominantly expressed in cytosol. However, it was translocated to plasma membrane with ANG II (10-9 M) and internalized with ANG II (10-6 M). Losartan (10-7 M) induced hAT1 translocation to plasma membrane in all studied groups. Dimethyl-Bapta-AM (10-7 M) did not change the effect of ANG II (10-9 M) on the hAT1 receptor distribution, but induced its accumulation at plasma membrane in cells treated with ANG II (10-6 M). With Ionomycin (10-6 M), the receptor was accumulated in cytosol. The results indicate that, in MDCK cells, the effect of ANG II on NHE1 activity is associated to ligand binding to AT1 receptor and intracellular signaling events related to AT1 translocation.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.