Am J Physiol Cell Physiol  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (June 30, 2004). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00229.2004
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
287/5/C1256    most recent
00229.2004v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Reuss, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Reuss, L.
Submitted on May 10, 2004
Accepted on June 25, 2004

MECHANISM OF ACTIVATION OF XENOPUS CFTR BY STIMULATION OF PKC

Yongyue Chen1, Guillermo A Altenberg1, and Luis Reuss1*

1 Sealy Center for Structural Biology and Department of Neuroscience and Cell Biology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: lreuss{at}utmb.edu.

PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the regulatory domain (R-domain) plays a major role in the activation of the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (hCFTR). In contrast, the effect of PKC-mediated phosphorylation is controversial, smaller than that of PKA and dependent on the cell type. In the present study, we expressed Xenopus CFTR (XCFTR) and hCFTR in Xenopus oocytes and examined their responses (macroscopic membrane conductance) to maximal stimulation by PKC and PKA agonists. With XCFTR, the average response to PKC was approximately 6-fold that to PKA stimulation. In contrast, with hCFTR the response to PKC was about 90% of that to PKA stimulation. The reason for these differences was the small response of XCFTR to PKA stimulation. Using the substituted-cysteine-accessibility method we found no evidence for insertion of functional CFTR channels in the plasma membrane in response to PKC stimulation. The increase in macroscopic conductance in response to PKC stimulation of XCFTR was due to an approximately 5-fold increase in single-channel open probability (Po), with a minor (ca. 30%) increase in single-channel conductance. The responses of XCFTR to PKC stimulation and of hCFTR to PKA stimulation were mediated by similar increases in Po. In both instances, there were no changes in the number of channels in the membrane. We speculate that, in other animals than humans, PKC stimulation may be the dominant mechanism for activation of CFTR.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Renal Physiol.Home page
C. Perry, J. Blaine, H. Le, and I. I. Grichtchenko
PMA- and ANG II-induced PKC regulation of the renal Na+-HCO3- cotransporter (hkNBCe1)
Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, February 1, 2006; 290(2): F417 - F427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JGPHome page
S. G. Bompadre, T. Ai, J. H. Cho, X. Wang, Y. Sohma, M. Li, and T.-C. Hwang
CFTR Gating I: Characterization of the ATP-dependent Gating of a Phosphorylation-independent CFTR Channel ({Delta}R-CFTR)
J. Gen. Physiol., March 28, 2005; 125(4): 361 - 375.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
Y. Chen, B. Button, G. A. Altenberg, and L. Reuss
Potentiation of effect of PKA stimulation of Xenopus CFTR by activation of PKC: role of NBD2
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, November 1, 2004; 287(5): C1436 - C1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.