Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (July 23, 2003). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00050.2003
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/5/C1101    most recent
00050.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stuhr, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. K
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stuhr, L. E
Right arrow Articles by Reed, R. K
Submitted on February 5, 2003
Accepted on July 2, 2003

Fluid pressure in human dermal fibroblast aggregates measured with micropipettes

Linda E Stuhr1*, Alison Reith1, Sigrid Lepsoe1, Reidar Myklebust2, Helge Wiig1, and Rolf K Reed1

1 Department of Physiology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
2 Department of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: linda.stuhr{at}pki.uib.no.

Previous studies have indicated that the connective tissue cells in dermis are involved in control of interstitial fluid pressure (Pif). The aim of this study was to develop and characterize an in vitro model, representative of loose connective tissue, to study dynamic changes in fluid pressure (Pf) over a time-course of a few minutes. Pf was measured using micropipettes in cell aggregates of human dermal fibroblasts. Pf was measured in fibroblast cell aggregates which varied in size (<100 µm and >100 µm in diameter), age (day1-4) that were kept at different temperatures (approximately15, 25 and 35 °C. Pressures were measured at different depths of micropipette penetration and following treatment with Prostaglandin E1 isopropyl ester (PGE1), Latanoprost (PGF2{alpha}) and Ouabain. Pf was positive (Pf>+2 mmHg) during control conditions and increased with increasing aggregate size (day 2), age (day 4 vs day1), temperature and depth of penetration of the micropipette. Pf decreased from 2.9 mmHg to 2.0 mmHg during the first 10 min after applying 10 µl of 1 mM PGE1 (P<0.001). Pf increased from 3.0 mmHg to 4.8 mmHg (P<0.01) after administration of 10 µl of 1.4 µM Ouabain and from 3.1 mmHg to 4.4 mmHg after the addition of 5 µl of 1.42 mM PGF2{alpha} (P> 0.05). In conclusion, we have developed and validated a new in vitro method for studying fluid pressure in loose connective tissue elements having the advantage of allowing reliable and rapid screening of substances that have a potential to modify Pf as well as to study in more detail specific cell types involved in control of Pf. This study also provides evidence that fibroblasts in the connective tissue can actively modulate Pf.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1976 by the American Physiological Society.