Am J Physiol Cell Physiol  AJP: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (March 11, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00031.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/5/C1133    most recent
00031.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lu, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S.-F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lu, S.-C.
Right arrow Articles by Chang, S.-F.
Submitted on January 16, 2009
Revised on February 18, 2009
Accepted on February 24, 2009

The essential role of Oct-2 in LPS-induced expression of iNOS in Raw 264.7 Macrophages and its Regulation by Trichostatin A

Shao-Chun Lu1, Hsiao-Wen Wu1, Yen-Jen Lin2, and Shwu-Fen Chang2*

1 College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
2 Taipei Medical University

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: cmbsfc21{at}tmu.edu.tw.

This paper reports on a study of the effect of trichostatin A (TSA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, on lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced expression of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) in RAW 264.7 macrophages and its underlying mechanisms. TSA pretreatment potently diminishes LPS-stimulated nitric oxide (NO) release and both mRNA and protein levels of iNOS in macrophages. The effects of TSA and LPS on transcription factors binding to two LPS-responsive elements within the iNOS promoter, one binding the NF-{kappa}B site and the other the octamer element, were investigated. Results show that TSA did not alter the LPS-activated NF-{kappa}B activity demonstrated by the nuclear translocation of p50 and p65, and by a NF-{kappa}B driven reporter gene expression system. In addition, neither TSA nor LPS changes the expression of Oct-1, a ubiquitously expressed octamer binding protein. However, TSA suppresses the LPS-induced expression of Oct-2, another octamer binding protein, at both mRNA and protein levels. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays reveal that binding of Oct-2 to the iNOS promoter is enhanced by LPS treatment; however, pretreatment with TSA resulted in loss of this binding. Moreover, forced expression of Oct-2 by transfection of pCG-Oct-2 plasmid restores the TSA-suppressed iNOS expression elevated by LPS stimulation, further indicating that Oct-2 activation is a crucial step for transcriptional activation of the iNOS gene in response to LPS stimulation in macrophages. Taken together, this study demonstrates that TSA diminishes iNOS expression in LPS-treated macrophages by inhibiting Oct-2 expression, and thus reducing the production of NO.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.