Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (March 25, 2009). doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00022.2009
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/6/C1383    most recent
00022.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goll, D. E
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goll, D. E
Submitted on January 14, 2009
Revised on March 19, 2009
Accepted on March 19, 2009

Properties of easily releasable myofilaments (ERMS): Are ERMS the first step in myofibrillar protein turnover?

Girija Neti1, Stefanie M Novak1, Valery F Thompson1*, and Darrel E Goll1

1 University of Arizona

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: valery.thompson{at}arizona.edu.

Myofibrillar proteins must be removed from the myofibril before they can be turned over metabolically in functioning muscle cells. It is uncertain how this removal is done without disrupting the contractile function of the myofibril. It has been proposed that the calpains could remove the outer layer of filaments from myofibrils as a first step in myofibrillar protein turnover. Several studies have found that myofilaments can be removed from myofibrils by trituration in the presence of ATP. These easily releasable myofilaments (ERMs) were proposed to be intermediates in myofibrillar protein turnover. It was unclear, however, whether the ERMs were an identifiable entity in muscle, or whether additional trituration would remove more myofilaments until the myofibril was gone, and whether calpains could release ERMs from intact myofibrils. The present study shows that few ERMs could be obtained from the residue after the first removal of ERMs, and yield of ERMs from well washed myofibrils was reduced, probably because some ERMs had been removed during washing. Mild calpain treatment of myofibrils released filaments that had a polypeptide composition and that were ultrastructurally similar to ERMs. The yield of calpain-released ERMs was 2-3-fold greater than the normal yield. Hence, ERMs are an identifiable entity in myofibrils and calpain releases filaments that are similar to ERMs. The role of ERMs in myofibrillar protein turnover is unclear because only filaments on the surface of the myofibril would turnover, and changes in myofibrillar protein isoforms during development could not occur by the ERM mechanism.







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 1977 by the American Physiological Society.