|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX, CELL INTERACTIONS
1Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, 2Department of Physiology, and 3Center of Gene Regulation and Signal Transduction, National Cheng Kung University Medical College, Tainan, Taiwan
Submitted 23 April 2008 ; accepted in final form 4 October 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
focal adhesion kinase; β1-integrin activation; β1-integrin clustering; lipid raft; actin cytoskeleton
and β, that form connections between the cytoskeleton and ECM. Each
β heterodimer has its own binding and signal specificity (25). The initiation of integrin-mediated activities involves two steps, namely, integrin activation and clustering. Integrins are locked in the inactive form without stimulation of extracellular ligands. After binding to its ligand with the extracellular domain (outside-in) (19) or stimulation by intracellular signals (inside-out) (38), an integrin is activated and its extracellular domain undergoes conformational changes, which lead to exposure of several ligand-induced binding sites (LIBS) (49). In addition to conformation changes, ligand binding also induces elevation of lateral mobility and clustering of integrins in the plasma membrane (31). Both ligand binding and clustering of integrins are critically important to activate intracellular signals. However, the regulatory mechanisms of controlling integrin activation and clustering are still unclear.
Activation of integrin leads to the recruitment and organization of a number of different cytoskeletal proteins (
-actinin, talin, paxillin, etc.) and signaling molecules [focal adhesion kinase (FAK), Src, etc.] into focal adhesion sites (9, 18, 30, 59, 61). Among numerous focal adhesion complex proteins, FAK is a key regulator (26). It transmits information from integrin to the various signaling pathways, including those that regulate cellular events such as cell shape, migration, growth, differentiation, and apoptosis (22, 23, 44, 52). FAK is a 125-kDa cytoplasmic tyrosine kinase and is autophosphorylated at Tyr397 immediately after integrin clustering. This creates a binding site for the src homology 2 (SH2) domain of Src (46, 58). The recruited, active Src phosphorylates several other tyrosine residues in FAK and creates phosphotyrosine binding sites for other signaling molecules, such as Grb2, p130cas, and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (6, 24). There are five major sites phosphorylated by Src: Y407, Y576/577, Y861, and Y925. Phosphorylation at Y576/577 and Y861 enhances FAK kinase activity (3), and Y925 is a binding site for the SH2 domain protein Grb2 (47).
Current understanding of how ECM affects cell behaviors has been taken primarily from in vitro studies in which cells were cultured on rigid dishes coated with a thin layer of ECM. However, resent studies showed that sensing mechanical stimuli is also crucial for cells to detect several useful signals from the external environment during development and tumorigenesis (14, 15, 27, 42, 51). The three-dimensional collagen gel culture system has been used as a model to study ECM signaling because it provides not only biochemical signals but also biophysical properties (52, 53). The elastic modulus of soft tissue is in the few hundreds to several thousands of pascals range that can be made by collagen gel (37, 46, 57). Previous studies showed that low substratum rigidity downregulates focal adhesion complex protein expression and phosphorylation (13, 54). However, the mechanosensing machinery as well as its mode of action are unclear.
In this study, we attempted to examine whether and how collagen gel affects ECM signaling via its biophysical property. Our data indicate that cells sense external mechanical stimulation by using a set of mechanical sensing machinery that is composed of lipid rafts, β1-integrin, FAK, and the actin cytoskeleton. We also delineated the mode of action of this mechanical sensing machinery.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Preparation of collagen gel and polyacrylamide gel. For preparation of collagen gel, type I collagen was prepared according to the established procedure described previously (29) from tendons of rat tails provided by the National Cheng Kung University Medical College animal center. To prepare 0.3% collagen gel, collagen stock was mixed with 5.7x DMEM, 2.5% NaHCO3, 0.1 M HEPES, 0.17 M CaCl2, 1 N NaOH, and culture medium. The mixtures were dispensed in the culture dish (4 ml/100 mm dish) and allowed to gelate. To prepare the collagen gel-coated dish, 0.3% collagen gel solution was added to culture dishes to cover the surface. The culture dish was then tilted, and the excess amount of collagen gel was aspirated. The collagen gel-coated dishes were air-dried and washed twice with normal culture medium before use. Polyacrylamide gel was prepared according to a previously described method (55) with the following modifications. Gels were prepared with 5% acrylamide and bisacrylamide ranging from 0.02% to 0.085%. The elastic modulus of the gels was detected by rheometer (Thermo, HAAK Rheometer). The polyacrylamide gel was coated with 200 µg/ml type I collagen (from BD) by using a photoactivatable sulfonated cross-linker, sulfo-SANPAH (from Pierce), before addition of cells.
Collection of cell lysate and Western blot. Cell lysates were harvested in modified RIPA buffer (150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EGTA, 50 mM Tris pH 7.4, 10% glycerol, 1% Triton X-100, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS, and protease inhibitor cocktail), and the lysates were analyzed by Western blot with antibodies against FAK (from Transduction Lab), FAKY397P, FAKY407P, FAKY577P, FAKY861P, and FAKY925P (from Biosource), β1-integrin, activated β1-integrin (clone B44) (from Chemicon), Myc, hemagglutinin, discoidin domain receptor (DDR)-1 (from Santa Cruz Biotechnology), and β-actin (from Amersham) and an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) system (from Amersham-Pharmacia).
Immunofluorescence and confocal study. Cells cultured on collagen gel-coated dishes or collagen gel for 30 min were washed three times with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and fixed and permeabilized with 4% paraformaldehyde and 0.5% Triton X-100 prepared in PBS for 15 min at room temperature. Fixed cells were incubated with anti-FAK or anti-phosphorylated FAKY397 antibody overnight at 4°C. Cells were then washed and incubated with the proper Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated secondary antibody (from Molecular Probes) and phalloidin-tetramethylrhodamine isothiocyanate (from Sigma) for 1 h at room temperature. The immunofluorescence images were taken by confocal microscopy (Olympus, FV-1000).
Raft fractionation and staining. Cells were cultured under different substratum rigidities for 30 min and were lysed in ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mM Tris pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl) containing 1% Triton X-100, 1 mM sodium orthovanadate, and protease inhibitor cocktail. Equal amounts of these cell lysates were brought to a volume of 2 ml with 40% OptiPrep and then overlaid with 4 ml of 30% OptiPrep and 2 ml of sucrose 5% OptiPrep. Lysates were then ultracentrifuged in a SW40.1Ti rotor (Beckman, Palo Alto, CA) at 40,000 rpm for 16 h to separate lipid rafts from the cytosol. Aliquots of 1 ml of gradient fractions were then collected to yield a total of eight fractions. Proteins were concentrated in each fraction by TCA precipitation. The resulting pellets of each fraction were dissolved in lysis buffer and stored at –80°C before being tested.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurement.
Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) efficiency was measured as described previously (34). In brief, 293T cells were transiently transfected with wild-type, constitutively activated, or autoclustering β1-integrin for 48 h and were suspended or cultured on different substratum rigidities for 30 min. Cells exhibiting relatively similar intensity levels of monomeric cyan fluorescent protein (mCFP) and yellow fluorescent protein (mYFP) under confocal microscope (Olympus, FV-1000) were selected for experiments. Ten to fifteen regions of interest (ROIs) at adhesion points of the mCFP image were randomly chosen and analyzed. Each data set contains
100 individual ROIs from 10–15 individual cells in at least 3 separate experiments. ROIs exhibiting saturation in either the CFP or YFP channel were eliminated from the analysis. FRET efficiency (E, %) was calculated as E = {1 – [FmCFP(Pre)/FmCFP(Post)]} x 100, where FmCFP(Pre) and FmCFP(Post) are intensity of mCFP emission before and after mYFP photobleaching, respectively. Data were fit to Lineweaver-Burk plots (1/E = 1/Emax+ K/Emax x 1/F) with Prism software. K was calculated from the slope of Lineweaver-Burk plots (K/Emax) and 1/Emax at the y-intercept. The curves shown in Figs. 5 and 6 were drawn by using the K and Emax values with Prism software.
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
2β1-integrin-induced signal (51), was involved in low-rigidity-regulated β1-integrin inactivation (data not shown). Recent studies suggested that the membrane microdomain, lipid raft, participated in regulation of integrin function (36). We employed live cell imaging to observe the distribution of lipid rafts in cells seeded and allowed to spread on a collagen-coated dish and collagen gel within 4 h. Cells were stained with Alexa Fluor 488-conjugated cholera toxin (CTX) B as a lipid raft marker. We found that low rigidity delayed the formation of lipid rafts (Fig. 3, A and B). A disperse distribution of lipid raft on the cell membrane was observed when cells were seeded and allowed to spread on collagen gel-coated dishes for 30 min. In contrast, little rafts were seen when cells were seeded on collagen gels for the same time. An immunofluorescence study was performed in order to delineate the localization of β1-integrins and rafts in the cell membrane. We found that active β1-integrins were present and colocalized with lipid rafts when cells were cultured on the collagen gel-coated dish but not the collagen gel for 30 min (Fig. 3C). Furthermore, we employed a sucrose gradient to separate raft and nonraft fractions of cells. β1-Integrin was not present in raft fractions when cells were cultured on collagen gel (Fig. 3D). Thus our data show that the activated β1-integrin is associated with markers of lipid rafts. To further confirm this, cells were cultured on a collagen gel-coated dish with treatment with MβCD, an inhibitor of lipid raft formation by depletion of membrane cholesterol. We found that MβCD inhibited β1-integrin activation as well as FAKY397P, while repletion of membrane cholesterol by exposing cells to MβCD saturated with cholesterol (39) reversed both β1-integrin activation and FAKY397 phosphorylation (Fig. 3E). These results indicate that under rigid substratum the activation of β1-integrin requires lipid rafts.
|
|
Actin cytoskeleton contributes to β1-integrin clustering. We also explored whether internal forces provided by the cytoskeleton are also involved in regulating β1-integrin clustering. Cells were cultured on a collagen gel-coated dish and then treated with cytochalasin D, myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) inhibitor ML-7, Rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor Y27632, or colcemide to disrupt actin filaments or microtubules. Cells still spread out when microtubules were disrupted but spread very little after the disruption of actin filaments (Fig. 6A). Although β1-integrin activation was not affected by disruption of the actin filaments or microtubules, β1-integrin clustering and FAKY397 phosphorylation level were downregulated by cytochalasin D, ROCK inhibitor Y27632, and MLCK inhibitor ML-7 but not by colcemide (Fig. 6, B–D). These data indicate that β1-integrin clustering but not activation depends on internal force provided by the actin cytoskeleton.
Augmentation of β1-integrin clustering enhances interaction of β1-integrin, FAK, and talin. We further investigated the molecular mechanism by which β1-integrin clustering leads to FAKY397 phosphorylation. Recent evidence revealed that FAK activity is regulated through the interaction of its FERM-like NH2-terminal domain with the cytoplasmic domain of β1-integrin to release an autoinhibitory interaction of FERM domain with its kinase domain (11, 12). Other evidence also showed that talin is important in regulating integrin signaling (22). Therefore, whether β1-integrin clustering affects the interaction between β1-integrin, FAK, and talin was determined. HEK293T cells transiently transfected with GFP-conjugated wild-type β1-integrin were cultured on polyacrylamide gel with different substratum rigidities, and the interactions between exogenous β1-integrin, FAK, and talin were examined. With the substratum rigidity increase, the interaction between exogenous β1-integrin, FAK, and talin increases (Fig. 7A). The response of the amount of β1-integrin associate protein fits a simple hyperbola in elastic modulus (Fig. 7B). Transient transfection of equal amounts of GFP-conjugated wild-type, constitutively active (G429N), or autoclustered (V737N) β1-integrin into HEK293T cells was performed (Fig. 7C). Cells were seeded and allowed to spread on a collagen gel-coated dish, collagen gel, or polyacrylamide gel with different moduli of rigidity for 30 min, and the interactions between exogenous β1-integrin, FAK, and talin were examined. When cells harboring wild-type or constitutively active β1-integrin were cultured on collagen gel, little interaction between β1-integrin, FAK, and talin was observed. Only cells harboring autoclustered β1-integrin displayed higher interaction between exogenous β1-integrin, FAK, and talin under low substratum rigidity (Fig. 7D). Together, these data suggest that β1-integrin clustering, but not activation, leads to FAKY397 phosphorylation by augmentation of the interaction between β1-integrin, FAK, and talin.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We showed that lipid raft externalization to the membrane is associated with cell spreading. A recent study showed that adhesion-induced lipid raft externalization depends on microtubules (2). To test whether the cytoskeleton is also involved in regulating raft transport in our model, HEK293T cells were cultured on a collagen gel-coated dish for 4 h and treated with or without drugs to disrupt actin filaments or microtubules. However, our data showed that disruption of actin filament or microtubules does not affect the raft transport (data not shown). Although the cell spreading process is impeded by low substratum rigidity, we found that disruption of lipid rafts by MβCD reduced β1-integrin activation, FAK phosphorylation (Fig. 3E), the level of β1-integrin clustering, and cell spreading as well (data not shown). Thus we deduced that raft formation is prior to β1-integrin signaling. Recent work also suggested that line tension, the interfacial energy at the raft domain edge, is a key parameter determining the distribution of rafts (17). Applying lateral tension on the membrane increases raft formation through increasing line tension (1). Thus it is also possible that substratum rigidity regulates raft formation by controlling the physical property of the cell membrane. The details of this mechanism will be investigated in the future.
Talin is a cytoplasmic protein with a globular head domain and an elongated rod domain that acts as an essential linkage between integrins and the actin cytoskeleton. Previous studies showed that talin is also crucial in regulating integrin signaling. The NH2-terminal globular head domain of talin is responsible for promoting integrin activation and clustering (4, 10, 44, 56). Since force-induced exposure of vinculin-binding sites on talin through a conformational change leads to the reinforcement of the focal adhesions, talin is also considered as a key mechanotransduced molecule in focal adhesions (5, 20, 28, 35). Furthermore, previous evidence suggested that talin is functionally associated with the lipid rafts (33, 41, 45). Together, the retardation of the lipid rafts as well as talin externalization may lead to decreased β1-integrin activation under low substratum rigidity. However, the exact role of talin in this mechanosensing machinery still needs further investigation.
The mechanosensing machinery responsible for sensing the rigidity beyond the range of 58–386 Pa could be more comprehensive. A recent study showed that substratum rigidity controls mesenchymal stem cell lineage specification (15). Stem cells differentiate into myogenic and osteogenic lineages under rigidities of 11 kPa and 34 kPa, respectively. Moreover, our recent study showed that low substratum rigidity-induced apoptosis is inversely correlated with substratum rigidity. Nevertheless, a significant difference of apoptosis ratio still exists when cells are cultured under substratum rigidity between 20 and 103 Pa (52), in which range β1-integrin is neither activated nor clustered. We noted that other stretch-activated ion channels or capacitative calcium entries may be involved in detecting matrix rigidity at this range (7, 8). In light of these findings, it is feasible that various tissues may possess different sets of mechanical sensing machinery to detect different substratum rigidities.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Balasubramanian N, Scott DW, Castle JD, Casanova JE, Schwartz MA. Arf6 and microtubules in adhesion-dependent trafficking of lipid rafts. Nat Cell Biol 9: 1381–1391, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Calalb MB, Polte TR, Hanks SK. Tyrosine phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase at sites in the catalytic domain regulates kinase activity: a role for Src family kinases. Mol Cell Biol 15: 954–963, 1995.
4. Calderwood DA. Talin controls integrin activation. Biochem Soc Trans 32: 434–437, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
5. Chen H, Choudhury DM, Craig SW. Coincidence of actin filaments and talin is required to activate vinculin. J Biol Chem 281: 40389–40398, 2006.
6. Chen HC, Appeddu PA, Isoda H, Guan JL. Phosphorylation of tyrosine 397 in focal adhesion kinase is required for binding phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase. J Biol Chem 271: 26329–26334, 1996.
7. Chiu WT, Wang YH, Tang MJ, Shen MR. Soft substrate induces apoptosis by the disturbance of Ca2+ homeostasis in renal epithelial LLC-PK1 cells. J Cell Physiol 212: 401–410, 2007.[CrossRef][Medline]
8. Chiu WT, Tang MJ, Jao HC, Shen MR. Soft substrate up-regulates the interaction of STIM1 with store-operated Ca2+ channels that lead to normal epithelial cell apoptosis. Mol Biol Cell 19: 2220–2230, 2008.
9. Clark EA, Brugge JS. Integrins and signal transduction pathways: the road taken. Science 268: 233–239, 1995.
10. Cluzel C, Saltel F, Lussi J, Paulhe F, Imhof BA, Wehrle-Haller B. The mechanisms and dynamics of
vβ3 integrin clustering in living cells. J Cell Biol 171: 383–392, 2006.
11. Cohen LA, Guan JL. Residues within the first subdomain of the FERM-like domain in focal adhesion kinase are important in its regulation. J Biol Chem 280: 8197–8207, 2005.
12. Cooper LA, Shen TL, Guan JL. Regulation of focal adhesion kinase by its amino-terminal domain through an autoinhibitory interaction. Mol Cell Biol 23: 8030–8041, 2003.
13. Cukierman E, Pankov R, Stevens DR, Yamada KM. Taking cell-matrix adhesions to the third dimension. Science 294: 1708–1712, 2001.
14. Discher DE, Janmey P, Wang YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 310: 1139–1143, 2005.
15. Engler AJ, Sen S, Sweeney HL, Discher DE. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 126: 677–689, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16. Fernandez C, Clark K, Burrows L, Schofield NR, Humphries MJ. Regulation of the extracellular ligand binding activity of integrins. Front Biosci 3: d684–d799, 1998.[Medline]
17. Garcia-Saez AJ, Chiantia S, Schwille P. Effect of line tension on the lateral organization of lipid membranes. J Biol Chem 282: 33537–33544, 2007.
18. Geiger B, Bershadsky A, Pankov R, Yamada KM. Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix-cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2: 793–805, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Giancotti FG, Ruoslahti E. Integrin signaling. Science 285: 1028–1032, 1999.
20. Giannone G, Jiang G, Sutton DH, Critchley DR, Sheetz MP. Talin1 is critical for force-dependent reinforcement of initial integrin-cytoskeleton bonds but not tyrosine kinase activation. J Cell Biol 163: 409–419, 2003.
21. Ginsberg MH, Partridge A, Shattil SJ. Integrin regulation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 17: 509–516, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Guan JL. Role of focal adhesion kinase in integrin signaling. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 29: 1085–1096, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Guan JL. Focal adhesion kinase in integrin signaling. Matrix Biol 16: 195–200, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
24. Han DC, Guan JL. Association of focal adhesion kinase with Grb7 and its role in cell migration. J Biol Chem 274: 24425–24430, 1999.
25. Hynes RO. Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110: 673–687, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Ilic D, Damsky CH, Yamamoto T. Focal adhesion kinase: at the crossroads of signal transduction. J Cell Sci 110: 401–407, 1997.[Abstract]
27. Ingber DE. Mechanical control of tissue morphogenesis during embryological development. Int J Dev Biol 50: 255–266, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
28. Jiang G, Giannone G, Critchley DR, Fukumoto E, Sheetz MP. Two-piconewton slip bond between fibronectin and the cytoskeleton depends on talin. Nature 424: 334–337, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
29. Jiang ST, Liao KK, Liao MC, Tang MJ. Age effect of type I collagen on morphogenesis of Madin-Darby canine kidney cells. Kidney Int 57: 1539–1548, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Jockusch BM, Bubeck P, Giehl K, Kroemker M, Moschner J, Rothkegel M, Rudiger M, Schluter K, Stanke G, Winkler J. The molecular architecture of focal adhesions. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 11: 379–416, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
31. Jongstra-Bilen J, Harrison R, Grinstein S. Fc
-receptors induce Mac-1 (CD11b/CD18) mobilization and accumulation in the phagocytic cup for optimal phagocytosis. J Biol Chem 278: 45720–45729, 2003.
32. Juliano RL. Signal transduction by cell adhesion receptors and the cytoskeleton: functions of integrins, cadherins, selectins, and immunoglobulin-superfamily members. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 42: 283–323, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
33. Khoshnan A, Bae D, Tindell CA, Nel AE. The physical association of protein kinase C
with a lipid raft-associated inhibitor of
B factor kinase (IKK) complex plays a role in the activation of the NF-
B cascade by TCR and CD28. J Immunol 165: 6933–6940, 2000.
34. Kim M, Carman CV, Yang W, Salas A, Springer TA. The primacy of affinity over clustering in regulation of adhesiveness of the integrin
Lβ2. J Cell Biol 167: 1241–1253, 2004.
35. Lee SE, Kam RD, Mofrad MR. Force-induced activation of talin and its possible role in focal adhesion mechanotransduction. J Biomech 40: 2096–2106, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
36. Leitinger B, Hogg N. The involvement of lipid rafts in the regulation of integrin function. J Cell Sci 115: 963–972, 2002.
37. Levental I, Georges PC, Janmey PA. Soft biological materials and their impact on cell function. Soft Matter 3: 299–306, 2007.[CrossRef]
38. Liddington RC, Ginsberg MH. Integrin activation takes shape. J Cell Biol 158: 833–839, 2002.
39. Liu J, Liang M, Liu L, Malhotra D, Xie Z, Shapiro JI. Ouabain-induced endocytosis of the plasmalemmal Na/K-ATPase in LLC-PK1 cells requires caveolin-1. Kidney Int 67: 1844–1854, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
40. Luo BH, Strokovich K, Walz T, Springer TA, Takagi J. Allosteric β1 integrin antibodies that stabilize the low affinity state by preventing the swing-out of the hybrid domain. J Biol Chem 26: 27466–27471, 2004.
41. Morford LA, Forrest K, Logan B, Overstreet LK, Goebel J, Brooks WH, Roszman TL. Calpain II colocalizes with detergent-insoluble rafts on human and Jurkat T-cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 295: 540–546, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
42. Nelson CM, Bissell MG. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 22: 287–309, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. Parsons JT, Martin KH, Slack JK, Taylor JM, Weed SA. Focal adhesion kinase: a regulator of focal adhesion dynamics and cell movement. Oncogene 19: 5606–5613, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
44. Ratnikov BL, Partridge AW, Ginsberg MH. Integrin activation by talin. J Thromb Haemost 3: 1783–1790, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
45. Rodgers W, Farris D, Mishra S. Merging complexes: properties of membrane raft assembly during lymphocyte signaling. Trends Immunol 26: 97–103, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
46. Schaller MD, Hildebrand JD, Shannon JD, Fox JW, Vines RR, Parsons JT. Autophosphorylation of the focal adhesion kinase, pp125FAK, directs SH2-dependent binding of pp60src. Mol Cell Biol 14: 1680–1688, 1994.
47. Schlaepfer DD, Hunter T. Evidence for in vivo phosphorylation of the Grb2 SH2-domain binding site on focal adhesion kinase by Src-family protein-tyrosine kinases. Mol Cell Biol 16: 5623–5633, 1996.
48. Schlaepfer DD, Hauck CR, Sieg DJ. Signaling through focal adhesion kinase. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 7: 435–478, 1999.
49. Shimaoka M, Takagi J, Springer TA. Conformational regulation of integrin structure and function. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct 31: 485–516, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
50. Vogel V, Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 7: 265–275, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
51. Wang CZ, Su HW, Hsu YC, Shen MR, Tang MJ. A discoidin domain receptor 1/SHP-2 signaling complex inhibits
2β1-integrin-mediated signal transducers and activators of transcription 1/3 activation and cell migration. Mol Biol Cell 17: 2839–2852, 2006.
52. Wang YH, Chiu WT, Wang YK, Wu CC, Chen TL, Teng CF, Chang WT, Chang HC, Tang MJ. Deregulation of AP-1 protein family in collagen gel-induced epithelial cell apoptosis mediated by low substratum rigidity. J Biol Chem 282: 752–763, 2007.
53. Wang YK, Lin HH, Tang MJ. Collagen gel overlay induces two phases of apoptosis in MDCK cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280: C1440–C1448, 2001.
54. Wang YK, Wang YH, Wang CZ, Sung JM, Chiu WT, Lin SH, Chang YH, Tang MJ. Rigidity of collagen fibrils controls collagen gel-induced down-regulation of focal adhesion complex proteins mediated by
2β1 integrin. J Biol Chem 278: 21886–21892, 2003.
55. Wang YL, Pelham RJ. Preparation of a flexible, porous polyacrylamide substrate for mechanical studies of cultured cells. Methods Enzymol 298: 489–496, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
56. Wegener KL, Partridge AW, Han J, Pickford AR, Liddington RC, Ginsberg MH, Campbell ID. Structural basis of integrin activation by talin. Cell 128: 171–182, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
57. Wu CC, Ding SJ, Wang YH, Tang MJ, Chang HC. Mechanical properties of collagen gels derived from rats of different ages. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 16: 1261–1275, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
58. Xing Z, Chen HC, Nowlen JK, Taylor SJ, Shalloway D, Guan JL. Direct interaction of v-Src with the focal adhesion kinase mediated by the Src SH2 domain. Mol Biol Cell 5: 413–421, 1994.[Abstract]
59. Yamada KM, Miyamoto S. Integrin transmembrane signaling and cytoskeletal control. Curr Opin Cell Biol 7: 681–689, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
60. Zacharias DA, Violin JD, Newton AC, Tsien RY. Partitioning of lipid-modified monomeric GFPs into membrane microdomains of live cells. Science 296: 913–916, 2002.
61. Zamir E, Geiger B. Molecular complexity and dynamics of cell matrix adhesions. J Cell Sci 114: 3583–3590, 2001.[Web of Science][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |