|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERS, ION CHANNELS, AND PUMPS
,1
lender,1
11Molecular Toxicology, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Zagreb, Croatia; and 2Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Submitted 28 March 2008 ; accepted in final form 28 May 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
I,
karica M, Gorboulev V, Ljubojevi
M, Balen D, Herak-Kramberger CM, Koepsell H. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: 913–926, 2006). However, the antibody gave some false-positive reactions in immunochemical studies. Using a shortened peptide for immunization, we have presently generated an improved, more specific anti-rat SGLT1 antibody (rSGLT1-ab), which in immunochemical studies with isolated membranes and tissue cryosections from male (M) and female (F) rats exhibited 1) in kidneys and small intestine, labeling of a major protein band of
75 kDa; 2) in kidneys of adult animals, localization of rSGLT1 to the proximal tubule (PT) brush-border membrane (S1 < S2 < S3) and intracellular organelles (S1 > S2 > S3), with zonal (cortex < outer stripe) and sex differences (M < F) in the protein expression, which correlated well with the tissue expression of its mRNA in RT-PCR studies; 3) in kidneys of castrated adult M rats, upregulation of the protein expression; 4) in kidneys of prepubertal rats, weak and sex-independent labeling of the 75-kDa protein band and immunostaining intensity; 5) in small intestine, sex-independent regional differences in protein abundance (jejunum > duodenum = ileum); and 6) thus far unrecognized localization of the transporter in cortical thick ascending limbs of Henle and macula densa in kidney, bile ducts in liver, enteroendocrine cells and myenteric plexus in the small intestine, and initial ducts in the submandibular gland. Our improved rSGLT1-ab may be used to identify novel sites of SGLT1 localization and thus unravel additional physiological functions of this transporter in rat organs. brain; enteroendocrine cells; sex differences; kidney; liver; myenteric plexus; proximal tubule; salivary gland; small intestine
660 amino acid residues that share 59% homology and may function as glycosylated monomers of 70–80 kDa (18, 26, 28, 50, 52, 58, 59). Transport and mRNA studies in isolated nephron segments and membrane vesicles from various tissue zones of the rat and rabbit kidneys have indicated segmental and zonal differences in the expression of two major SGLTs; SGLT2 was largely localized to the proximal tubule S1 and S2 segments in the cortex, whereas SGLT1 was localized more to the proximal tubule S3 segments in the medullary rays and outer stripe (3, 34, 45, 54–56, 60). However, the exact immunolocalization of these transporters and the level of their expression along the renal nephron are not entirely clear due to the lack of specific antibodies. Several polyclonal anti-peptide antibodies have been raised against SGLT1 that recognize proteins in the brush border of rat and rabbit small intestine and renal tubules; in kidney, the transporter protein was localized to either the entire proximal tubule or more abundantly to the tubules of renal outer medulla (10, 29, 45, 50, 52).
In our recent studies, we used a polyclonal antibody against the synthetic COOH-terminal peptide of the rat SGLT1 (rSGLT1-ab), generated by us, which in rats immunostained the apical domain of small intestine and endothelial cells in capillaries of the brain, skeletal, and heart muscles (17, 18), whereas in rat and mouse kidneys, this antibody stained with varying intensity brush border along the entire proximal tubule, exhibiting zonal differences due to segmental heterogeneity (S1 = S2 < S3) and female-dominant sex differences in staining intensity (50). However, in the latter study, it turned out that the antibody also stained the walls of small and large arteries, basolateral and apical membranes of distal tubules and collecting ducts, and smooth muscles in the renal capsule and external blood vessels, whereas in Western blots of isolated renal membranes, in addition to the rSGLT1-related
75-kDa protein band, it strongly labeled the 40-kDa protein band. Because both bands were blocked by the immunizing peptide and followed the same labeling/staining pattern in various immunochemical experiments, the 40-kDa band has been considered as the splitting product of the 75-kDa band. However, using the database search program BLAST, we have compared the amino acid sequence of our old rSGLT1-peptide with the sequences of other proteins and detected a limited similarity with relevant sequences in the two members of Coxsackie- and adenovirus receptor-like membrane proteins (CAR-LMP) that reside in junctional complexes between endothelial or epithelial cells and seem to participate in cell-cell adhesion (16, 48, 50). Our old rSGLT1 antibody was generated 2 yr before the sequences of CAR-LMP were published, and this limited similarity could not be recognized earlier. By following the search data, the critical common three-amino acid residues in the old synthetic peptide have been removed, and a new polyclonal antibody against the shorter peptide has been generated. As shown in this report, the new antibody proved to be more specific for rSGLT1 in both immunoblotting and immunocytochemical studies.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Gonadectomy was performed on the adult animals. Male rats were castrated by scrotal route, whereas female rats were ovariectomized by dorsal (lumbar) approach under proper anesthesia (Narketan, 80 mg/kg body mass-Xylapan, 12 mg/kg body mass ip). The sham-operated animals underwent the same procedure but without removal of the organs.
Antibodies and other material.
Polyclonal immune serum against the peptide specific for the COOH-terminal sequence of rSGLT1 (PKDTIEIDAEAPQKEK, amino acids 585–600) was raised in rabbits. This 16-meric peptide was shorter by 3 amino acids in the rSGLT1 COOH-terminal domain (EED, amino acids 582–584) than the peptide used in our previous antibody production (17, 18). The novel rSGLT1-ab was affinity-purified from the immune serum via the antigenic peptide-coupled support on a column (17). The eluates with the highest titers were used for immunocytochemical studies, whereas the eluates with lower titers were used for Western blotting. The use of polyclonal anti-Na+/K+-ATPase
-subunit antibody (Na/K-ATPase-ab) and commercially available monoclonal anti-
-actin antibody (
-actin-ab) (Chemicon International, Temecula, CA) has been described previously (2, 11, 50). Secondary antibodies were purchased commercially from Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories (West Grove, PA) or Kirkegaard and Perry (Gaithersburg, MD) and included the CY3-labeled (GARCY3) or FITC-labeled (GARF) goat anti-rabbit IgG or alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit (GARAP) or goat anti-mouse (GAMAP) IgG.
Anesthetics (Narketan and Xylapan) were purchased from Chassot (Bern, Switzerland); the molecular weight standards were obtained from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA); and inhibitors (PMSF, antipain, and benzamidine) were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). All other chemicals and reagents were analytical grade and obtained from commercial sources such as Sigma or Fisher Scientific (Pittsburgh, PA). The sources of specific reagents and equipment for Western blotting, immunocytochemistry, RNA isolation, and end-point RT-PCR assay are indicated in the text related to these methods.
Tissue fixation and immunocytochemistry. In adult rats, various organs were fixed by perfusion in vivo (36, 37, 50). The circulatory system of anesthetized animals was perfused via the left ventricle of the heart, using the Masterflex pump (Cole-Parmer, Chicago, IL), first with aerated (95% O2-5% CO2) and temperature-equilibrated (37°C) phosphate-buffered saline (PBS; in mM: 137 NaCl, 2.7 KCl, 8 Na2HPO4, and 2 K2PO4, pH 7.4) for 2–3 min (to remove blood via the incised abdominal vena cava) and then with 150 ml of fixative (4% paraformaldehyde in PBS) for 4–5 min. The organs (kidneys, small intestine, brains, liver, submandibular glands, heart, and skeletal muscle) were removed, sliced, and kept overnight in the same fixative at 4°C, followed by extensive washing in PBS and storage in PBS containing 0.02% NaN3 at 4°C until further use. Prepubertal rats were killed by cervical dislocation, the abdominal cavity was opened, and the kidneys were removed, rinsed with ice-cold PBS, sliced, put in a fixative, and further processed as described for tissue slices from adult rats.
To cut 4-µm frozen sections, tissue slices were infiltrated with 30% sucrose (in PBS) overnight, embedded in OCT medium (Tissue-Tek, Sakura, Japan), frozen at –25°C, and sectioned in a Leica CM 1850 cryostat (Leica instruments, Nussloch, Germany). Sections were collected on Superfrost/Plus microscope slides (Fischer Scientific), dried at room temperature for 2–3 h, and kept refrigerated until further use.
Before the primary antibody was applied, cryosections underwent an antigen retrieval procedure to expose cryptic antibody binding sites. The following consecutive steps were used: 1) rehydration in PBS for 15 min; 2) heating in 10 mM citrate buffer, pH 6, for 20 min in a microwave oven (4 cycles, 5 min each at 800 W); after each cycle, the level of buffer was checked and the evaporated amount replenished; 3) cooling down to room temperature in the same buffer for 20 min; 4) rinsing in PBS (3 times, 5 min each); 5) incubation in 0.5% Triton X-100 (in PBS) for 15 min; 6) incubation in 2% Triton X-100 (in PBS) for 30 min; 7) rinsing in PBS (3 times, 5 min); 8) incubation in bovine serum albumin (1% BSA in PBS; to block the nonspecific antibody binding) for 30 min; 9) incubation with the old (diluted 1:50 with PBS) (50) or new rSGLT1-Ab (diluted 1:2,000–1:500 in PBS) overnight (10–12 h) in a refrigerator; 10) incubation in 0.1% Triton X-100 (in PBS) for 10 min; 11) rinsing in PBS (2 times, 5 min); 12) incubation with GARCY3 (1.6 µg/ml in PBS) or GARF (15 µg/ml) at room temperature for 60 min; 13) incubation in 0.1% Triton X-100 (in PBS) for 10 min; 14) rinsing in PBS (2 times, 5 min); and 15) mounting in a fluorescence fading retardant (Vectashield; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA).
To costain rSGLT1 and Na+/K+-ATPase with their specific (both polyclonal) antibodies, we had to adapt incubation times with the secondary antibodies; the adaptations were optimized in preliminary experiments (data not shown). Shortly, cryosections were incubated with the first primary antibody overnight and then with the first secondary antibody for 2 h at room temperature to saturate the primary antibody-related binding sites. Next followed incubation with the second primary antibody overnight and then with the second secondary antibody for only 20 min to diminish labeling by the first primary antibody. Thus, in one approach, sections were incubated (in sequence) with the rSGLT1-ab (1:1,000) in a refrigerator overnight, rinsed with 0.1% Triton X-100 and PBS as described above, incubated with GARCY3 at room temperature for 2 h, rinsed with 0.1% Triton X-100 and PBS, incubated with the Na/K-ATPase-ab (1:50) in a refrigerator overnight, rinsed with 0.1% Triton X-100 and PBS, incubated with GARF (15 µg/ml in PBS) at room temperature for 20 min, and rinsed with 0.1% Triton X-100 and PBS. In another approach, the sequence of primary and secondary antibodies was reversed, e.g., the Na/K-ATPase-ab was applied first overnight, followed by GARCY3 at room temperature for 2 h, and then rSGLT1-ab was applied overnight, followed by GARF for 20 min at room temperature. Either way, the sections were finally covered with Vectashield and prepared for microscopy.
To test the staining specificity, we performed the following steps: 1) rSGLT1-ab was blocked with the immunizing peptide (final concentration of peptide: 0.5 mg/ml) for 4 h at room temperature before use in the above-described immunofluorescence assay; 2) the rSGLT1-ab-related immunostaining was tested in the organs in which the presence of SGLT1 was not to be expected (stomach, colon); and 3) tissue sections were incubated with the secondary antibodies only.
The stained sections were examined and photographed with an Opton III RS fluorescence microscope (Opton Feintechnik, Oberkochen, Germany) using a Spot RT Slider camera and software (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI). The images of CY3-related red fluorescence and FITC-related green fluorescence were taken separately using specific cut-off filters with no bleed-through effects. The images were imported into Adobe Photoshop 6.0 for processing, assembling, and labeling. Using the same software, we converted most CY3-related images into black-and-white mode, whereas the separate red and green images from double-staining experiments were adequately merged. The images were then assembled in panels and labeled.
Preparation of tissue homogenates and membranes. Animals were killed by decapitation. Kidneys were removed and either used in toto or sagittally sliced. From the slices, the cortex and outer stripe were dissected manually and used as separate tissue pools, whereas the inner stripe and inner medulla were processed as a single sample. The small intestine (mucosa scraped separately from duodenum, jejunum, and ileum), hearts, skeletal muscles, salivary glands, livers, brains, and abdominal aortas collected from four male and four female rats were processed as separate tissue pools. The details of tissue homogenization and differential centrifugation of the homogenates in refrigerated centrifuges were described previously (36, 37, 50). Total cell membranes (TCM) were collected as the pellet between 6,000 and 150,000 g. Brush-border membranes (BBM) from the renal (whole kidney, cortex, and outer stripe) and small intestinal mucosal tissue (duodenum, jejunum, and ileum) were isolated using the Mg2+-EGTA precipitation method (4). The final membrane preparations were resuspended in buffer that contained (in mM) 150 mannitol, 2.5 EGTA, and 12 Tris·HCl, pH 7.4, and were stored at –70°C until further use for immunoblotting studies. The protein was measured using the Bradford assay (5).
SDS-PAGE and Western blotting.
If not stated differently, the preparation of membrane samples in Laemmli buffer [without β-mercaptoethanol (β-ME)], denaturation at 65°C for 15 min, and separation of the proteins through 10% SDS-PAGE mini gels, as well as electrophoretic wet-transfer to an Immobilon membrane (Millipore, Bedford, MA), were performed exactly as described previously (50). The amount of protein per lane in SDS-PAGE is as indicated. The transfer membrane was blocked in blotting buffer (5% nonfat dry milk, 0.15 M NaCl, 1% Triton X-100, and 20 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.4) and incubated at 4°C overnight (12–14 h) in the same buffer containing our old (50) or new rSGLT1-ab (1:1,000) or
-actin-ab (0.5 µg/ml). The membrane was then washed four times for 15 min with blotting buffer, incubated for 60 min in the same buffer that contained either 0.1 µg/ml GARAP or 0.5 µg/ml GAMAP, washed again, and stained for alkaline phosphatase activity using the BCIP/NBT [5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl phosphate (1.65 mg/ml)/nitroblue tetrazolium (3.3 mg/ml) in 20 mM Tris·HCl buffer, pH 9.0] method as an indicator. The labeled protein bands were evaluated using densitometry; the quantification was performed using the Quantity One 1-D analysis software (Bio-Rad Laboratories) after marking an area of the broadest 75-kDa protein band in the blot, and an equal area was applied to all other bands in the same blot. The area density of each band was expressed in arbitrary units relative to the strongest band density (1 unit) in the corresponding control samples. In preliminary experiments, with the use of isolated BBM from the outer stripe of male and female kidneys and isolated BBM from the male duodenum and jejunum, the density of the 75-kDa protein band was approximately linear between 20 and 80 µg protein/lane (data not shown). Our experiments were performed using the amounts of protein per lane within the linear range of band density. To demonstrate specific labeling, rSGLT1-ab was preincubated with the immunizing peptide (final concentration of peptide: 0.5 mg/ml) for 4 h at room temperature and then used in an immunoblotting assay as described above.
Isolation of RNA and end-point RT-PCR. The animals were killed by decapitation. The kidneys were removed, decapsulated, and cut into 1-mm-thick sagittal slices, and one slice was immediately submerged into the RNAlater solution (Sigma). Cortical and outer stripe tissues were manually separated, and total cellular RNA from these zones was extracted using Trizol according to the manufacturer's instructions (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). RNA concentration and purity were estimated by spectrophotometric measurement of the optical density at 260/280 nm. The quality and integrity of RNAs were tested by agarose gel electrophoresis. Isolated preparations of RNA were stored at –70°C until use.
The first-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using the First-Strand cDNA synthesis kit following the prescribed instructions (Fermentas International, Burlington, ON, Canada). Isolated RNA (3 µg) was denatured at 70°C for 5 min in reaction mixture containing 0.5 µg of oligo(dT)18 and then reverse transcribed in a total volume of 20 µl of reaction mixture containing 1x reverse transcription buffer, 20 units of ribonuclease inhibitor, 1 mM dNTP mix, and 40 units of Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase. This mixture was incubated first at 37°C for 60 min and then at 72°C for 10 min. The generated cDNAs were diluted 5x in DNase/RNase-free water (GIBCO/Invitrogen), and stored at –20°C until use. PCR was performed in a total volume of 20 µl using 1 µl of 5x diluted first-strand cDNA, 0.4 µM rSGLT1-specific primers (Invitrogen Online), and ready-to-use PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) following the manufacturer's instructions. The housekeeping gene β-actin was used as a control for variations in the input of RNA. For PCR, the sequences of specific forward and reverse rSGLT1 and β-actin intron over-spanning primers, custom purchased from Invitrogen Online, were used to avoid amplification of genomic DNA (Table 1). The PCR conditions were as follows: initial denaturation for 3 min at 94°C, denaturation for 30 s at 95°C, annealing for 30 s at 59°C, and elongation for 45 s at 72°C, with 30 cycles for both rSGLT1 and β-actin. The optimal number of PCR cycles within the exponential phase of the PCR reaction was determined in preliminary experiments (data not shown). In each PCR, nontemplate control reactions (cDNA was substituted with DNase/RNase-free water) were also included, but no PCR products were detected, indicating the absence of possible contamination (data not shown). RT-PCR products were resolved by electrophoresis in 1% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, visualized under ultraviolet light, and photographed with a digital camera, and images were imported into Adobe Photoshop 6.0 for processing and labeling.
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In Fig. 1, we compared immunochemical potency of the old (A) and novel rSGLT1-ab (B). In accordance with our previous data (50), in Western blot of isolated renal BBM from the outer stripe, the old antibody strongly labeled two protein bands, one at
40 kDa and another at
75 kDa, and by immunocytochemistry it stained not only the BBM of proximal tubule S3 segments in the outer stripe and smooth muscles of the renal blood vessels (Fig. 1A) but also capillary epithelium and various other structures in kidney and other organs (not shown). However, the novel rSGLT1-ab in the same membrane preparation labeled strongly the rSGLT1-related protein band at
75 kDa and faintly the band at
105 kDa, whereas the 40-kDa protein band was absent (Fig. 1B). On closer inspection, the strong
75-kDa protein band appeared as a complex, closely spaced triplet of bands stretched between 70 and 80 kDa. In addition, in tissue cryosections, the novel antibody stained strongly the BBM of S3 segments in the outer stripe, whereas the capillaries and blood vessels in kidney (Fig. 1B), brain, and heart (not shown) remained unstained. In both cases, the labeled protein bands and immunostaining were blocked after preincubation of the antibodies with the relevant immunizing peptides (cf. data in Ref. 50 and present Fig. 2).
|
|
60 (weak),
75 (strong), and 105 kDa (faint), whereas in nonreducing conditions, two bands, e.g., the strong 75- and the faint 105-kDa bands, were labeled. In the jejunal BBM in reducing conditions, the novel antibody labeled the bands of
65 (weak) and
80 kDa (strong), whereas in nonreducing conditions, only one fat band of
80 kDa was labeled. In optimal conditions (no β-ME, 65°C, 15 min), the bands in BBM from both tissues, including the faint 105-kDa band in the renal BBM, were blocked after preincubation of the rSGLT1-ab with the immunizing peptide. In further experiments, the 105-kDa band was proven to be always very weak and similar in TCM and BBM preparations from the kidney cortex and outer stripe of both sexes and independent on various treatments. This band was thus considered to be a contaminating, rSGLT1-unrelated protein that weakly cross-reacted with our novel rSGLT1-ab and was not systematically followed in further studies. In tissue cryosections in optimal conditions, the antibody strongly stained the apical domain of proximal tubule S3 segments in the outer stripe and jejunum. This staining was abolished after preincubation of the antibody with the immunizing peptide (Fig. 2B). The background staining with the peptide-blocked antibody was not different from the staining observed with the secondary antibody only (data not shown). In the following studies in cryosections of various tissues, the rSGLT1-related immunostaining was always tested without and with the peptide-blocked antibody; in most cases, only the specific, peptide-blockable data are shown.
Distribution of rSGLT1 along the nephron: zonal and sex differences.
Figure 3 shows zonal and sex differences in distribution of rSGLT1 in the cells of rat nephron. As shown in Fig. 3A, in kidneys of adult male and female rats, the rSGLT1-ab stained with variable intensity the BBM and intracellular organelles in proximal tubule epithelial cells and the apical domain of macula densa and cortical thick ascending limb of Henle (TALH; cf. Fig. 4 for details). Other renal structures in the cortex, including renal capsula, glomeruli, other nephron segments, peritubular capillaries, and blood vessels, were not stained (data not shown). In both sexes, the intensity of proximal tubule staining increased toward S3 segments, thus exhibiting segmental S1 < S2 < S3 and zonal (cortex < outer stripe) differences. The staining was stronger in females in all proximal tubule segments, confirming the presence of sex differences (male < female). However, a relatively weak staining intensity in macula densa and cortical TALH was similar in males and females (data not shown). The immunoblotting data of BBM isolated from the whole kidneys confirmed the presence of sex differences in the abundance of rSGLT1-related 75-kDa protein; the band in females was
130% stronger than in males (Fig. 3, B and C). Furthermore, the end-point RT-PCR data indicated that zonal (cortex < outer stripe; Fig. 3D) and sex (male < female; Fig. 3E) differences in the rSGLT1 mRNA expression completely correlated with the expression of rSGLT1 protein.
|
|
To better characterize the rSGLT1-positive intracellular organelles, we double-stained cryosections of the female kidney with the rSGLT1-ab and monoclonal or chicken-raised polyclonal antibodies for 1) basolateral membrane (BLM) marker Na+/K+-ATPase, 2) lysosomal marker LAMP1, 3) mitochondrial marker Ox-Phos, 4) BBM marker NHE3, 5) BBM and endosomal marker megalin, and 6) V-ATPase (31-kDa subunit), a protein localized to the BBM, endocytic vesicles, and other intracellular vacuoles. None of the tested markers showed clear colocalization with the rSGLT1-positive organelles (data not shown).
Figure 4, F–H, shows the rSGLT1-related staining in the macula densa and cortical TALH in female kidney; a relatively weak immunoreactivity was localized to the apical domain of macula densa cells and of the cells in adjacent cortical parts of TALH. However, the parts of TALH in the inner and outer stripe were not stained (data not shown).
Effect of gonadectomy.
Animals from both sexes were sham-operated or gonadectomized at the age of 6 wk and killed 6 wk later to perform immunochemical studies in tissue cryosections and isolated membranes. As shown in Fig. 5A, rSGLT1-related immunostaining in the kidney of sham-operated rats was weak in all proximal tubule profiles localized in the cortex, medullary rays, and outer stripe but exhibited the usual pattern of staining intensity, e.g., S1 < S2 < S3. In castrated males, the staining intensity increased in all proximal tubule profiles, with the same pattern. In sham-operated females, the intensity of staining along the proximal tubule was stronger than in sham-operated males and remained unchanged after ovariectomy. The effects of gonadectomy were confirmed in Western blotting experiments by testing the abundance of rSGLT1 protein in TCM from the outer stripe; as shown in Fig. 5, B and C, the abundance of rSGLT1-related 75-kDa protein band in the membranes from castrated males was
100% higher than that from sham-operated males, whereas the abundance in the membranes from sham-operated and ovariectomized females was similar.
|
|
80-kDa protein band (Fig. 7D) showed that the transporter abundance in isolated membranes followed the immunocytochemical pattern of regional differences (jejunum > duodenum = ileum), but sex differences were absent (Fig. 7C).
|
|
|
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
75 kDa in the renal and
80 kDa in the small intestinal membranes, both sizes being in the range (72–80 kDa) of previous findings in various animal and human organs and cultured cells (Refs. 17, 18, 32, 46, 50, 52, 59 and references therein). The complexity of these bands, manifested by the closely spaced triplet, most probably reflects different glycosylation states of the protein. In denaturing conditions, however, and in both cases, the antibody labeled two protein bands, one at 75–80 kDa (stronger) and another at 65 kDa (weaker), obviously due to splitting of the holoprotein (75–80 kDa) into one larger segment that retained the antibody binding epitope (65 kDa) and one or more smaller segments from the NH2-terminal domain, which was(were) thus not recognized by the rSGLT1-ab. A similar, reducing condition-driven splitting of the holoprotein was recently observed for the organic anion transporter rOat2 protein in the rat kidney (36). The novel rSGLT1-ab, however, did not label the 40-kDa protein band in the renal and intestinal membranes, which was previously identified with our old antibody (50). Therefore, the first three critical amino acid residues (EED), removed from the old immunogen (19-meric peptide), enabled us to generate a more specific antibody that did not recognize the 40-kDa protein band, which most probably came from the CAR-LMPs and did not exhibit the related nonspecific immunostaining. Accordingly, the novel rSGLT1-ab did not stain capillaries and a variety of other structures that had been stained with our old antibody (50). These findings indicate that some previously demonstrated localizations of SGLT1 may be attributed to the cross-reactivity of the antibody with the CAR-LMPs. However, the localization of SGLT1 in endothelial cells of cerebral, renal, coronary, and mesenteric small arteries in rats also has been described in some other studies with different antibodies (20, 21), thus leaving the presence or absence of this glucose transporter in the vascular bed of different rat organs still questionable. On the other hand, consistent with the findings in previous studies (17, 18, 44, 46, 50, 52), our immunostaining experiments with the novel antibody confirmed the presence of rSGLT1 protein in 1) epithelial cells of the rat nephron, 2) absorptive cells of the small intestine, 3) pyramid cells of the brain cortex, 4) choroid plexus epithelium (in an intracellular compartment), and 5) ependymal epithelium in the brain lateral ventricles. In addition, our new rSGLT1-ab also stained a few, thus far unrecognized localizations of this transporter, such as 1) macula densa cells, 2) epithelium of the cortical TALH, 3) luminal membrane of the initial duct epithelium in the submandibular gland, 4) luminal membrane of the bile duct epithelium, 5) individual cells in the intestinal crypts and villi, and 6) myenteric plexus in the small intestine. In kidneys, we confirmed our previous findings (50) of zonal (cortex < outer stripe) and sex (female > male) differences in the rSGLT1 expression at the level of protein by immunocytochemistry and immunoblotting. These differences in protein expression matched the pattern of mRNA expression determined by end-point RT-PCR, thus confirming our previous Northern blotting data. In addition, castration upregulated, whereas ovariectomy had no effect on, rSGLT1 protein expression, whereas the prepubertal rats had low and sex-independent expression of rSGLT1 protein in their renal membranes. The latter data thus confirm our previous conclusions that sex differences (female > male) in the expression of rat renal SGLT1 were determined by the inhibitory action of androgens after puberty (50). However, the missing effects of ovariectomy in adult females (Ref. 50 and this study) and of estrogen and progesterone treatment in castrated rats (50), as well as much lower expression of the transporter in prepubertal females compared with that in an adult female (this study), indicate that the inhibitory action of androgens cannot be the sole regulator (depressor) of the renal rSGLT1 expression, causing sex differences. Some other mechanisms, possibly growth hormone or some other hormones, or a combination of different hormones, may stimulate the rSGLT1 expression in females after puberty.
The immunostaining in adult rats revealed that, similar to the data described by Takata et al. (52), the rSGLT1 protein was localized in all proximal tubule segments but with a distinct, segment-dependent distribution ratio between the BBM and some intracellular organelles. Whereas the immunoreactivity in BBM increased in intensity from the S1 (negative or weak) toward the S3 segments (strong), the abundance of intracellular organelles decreased from the S1 (many brightly stained organelles) toward the S3 (absence of organelles). Double-labeling experiments showed that the rSGLT1-positive organelles were negative for various markers for BBM, BLM, and some other known intracellular organelles, but we cannot exclude the possibility that they contain some of the tested markers in a very low concentration. They also cannot represent glycogen granules, because similar structures were not observed in the liver cells. Similar SGLT1-positive intracellular organelles/vesicles were previously described in Caco-2 cells, a culture cell model for human enterocytes (31, 32). In LLC-PK1 cells, a cell line from the pig kidney proximal tubule, the SGLT1-related immunoreactivity was detected beneath the apical membrane (30), whereas in an early immunogold labeling study with several monoclonal antibodies generated against various rSGLT1 epitopes, gold particles were observed over BBM, apical endocytic vacuoles, apical dense tubules, and lysosomes in the rat renal proximal tubules (25). Our data indicate that the rSGLT1 molecules in intracellular organelles and BBM in proximal tubule cells may be in an inverse correlation regarding distribution; the organelles may represent a vesicular reserve pool (storage) of transporters, which may recycle between this compartment and BBM. Analogously with the data in Caco-2 cells expressing human SGLT1 (31), in Xenopus oocytes expressing rabbit SGLT1 (27), and in jejunal enterocytes in rats in vivo (8), this intracellular pool of vesicles may possibly regulate the abundance of rSGLT1 in and the transport capacity of the BBM for hexoses in the proximal tubule cells by exo- and endocytosis. In enterocytes, the recycling processes can be modulated by glucose, hormones, and/or other compounds via intracellular signaling and protein kinase-mediated processes (8, 27, 31), but similar phenomena in the proximal tubule cells have not been reported thus far. At this point it is worth mentioning our unexpected finding of the rSGLT1 immunoreactivity in the apical domain of macula densa cells. SGLT1 in these cells may represent the uptake mechanism for glucose as an energy donor, but it also may serve as a sensor of the residual (unreabsorbed) glucose/galactose in the luminal fluid. The cells may sense the local hexose concentration and react by some neural and/or humoral messages that could affect the abundance of SGLT1 molecules in the BBM by changing the intracellular trafficking of transporter-containing vesicles and accordingly change the capacity of hexose reabsorption in proximal tubules.
In the small intestine, the rSGLT1 protein was strongly expressed in the BBM of absorptive cells, more in those at the villi tip, and weakly in the apical membrane of crypt cells. The observed increasing staining intensity from the bottom toward the tip of villi in all three small intestinal regions in rats is at variance with the previously described in situ hybridization data, which localized the rSGLT1 mRNA predominantly in the absorptive cells lining the lower two-thirds of the villi but showed its absence in crypts (34). The absence of both SGLT1 mRNA and protein in crypts was also described in rabbits (29), whereas the immunoreactivity with monoclonal antibodies was previously demonstrated in crypts of all three intestinal regions in rats (24). In accordance with the previous transport, immunochemical (with monoclonal antibodies), and in situ hybridization data (15, 24, 34), we presently confirmed segmental differences in the abundance of rSGLT1 protein along the small intestine in adult rats, with the highest being in jejunum. In both male and female rats, the abundance of rSGLT1 protein in the jejunal BBM was approximately threefold above that in duodenum and ileum, thus indicating jejunum as the sex-independent, major place of sugar absorption in the intestine. As expected, the rSGLT1 protein was not detected in the cells of stomach and colon mucosa, thus proving 1) an insignificant role of these two parts of the mammalian gastrointestinal tract in sugar reabsorption and 2) that our new rSGLT1-ab stained only specific localizations of this transporter.
In addition to the reabsorptive cells, a clear rSGLT1-related immunoreactivity was detected in the apical domain and intracellular organelles in the individual cells that were randomly scattered among the epithelium of crypts and villi in all three small intestinal segments. The nature of these cells is not known. They cannot be the Paneth cells, which reside exclusively at the crypt bottom. Rather, they may represent a thus far unrecognized subpopulation of the randomly scattered neuroendocrine (chemosensory) cells in the sugar-absorptive intestinal epithelium that may sense the local concentration of hexoses. They may behave as a kind of sweet taste receptors, which may be activated by the intestinal glucose and produce locally acting (paracrine) hormones. These hormones may activate or inhibit the intracellular signaling-mediated (via protein kinases and regulatory protein RS1) endo- and exocytosis of the transporter-carrying intracellular recycling vesicles. Thus regulated abundance of SGLT1 in the enterocyte BBM may contribute to the well-known rapid adaptation of sugar transport in the mammalian small intestine (8, 12, 27, 28, 39, 40, 57). Furthermore, a limited immunostaining of myenteric plexus (Auerbach) in the muscularis externa indicates that these cells contain SGLT1 in addition to previously demonstrated SGLT3 (Slc5a4) (14). Since SGLT3 was shown to be a glucose sensor rather than a glucose transporter, SGLT1 in the myenteric plexus may principally provide metabolic fuel to these cells. However, since it is present in the muscularis externa of both sugar absorptive (small intestine) and nonabsorptive (stomach, colon) segments, contribution of the myenteric SGLT1 to a hexose-dependent reflex regulation of the intestinal peristalsis and secretion cannot be excluded for now.
Our finding of rSGLT1 immunoreactivity in the apical domain of liver bile ducts and initial (intercalated) ducts of submandibular gland merits a sensible attention. Previous studies demonstrated that in physiological conditions in rats, but not in humans, glucose is secreted into the bile by the liver cells by an unknown mechanism and then partially (re)absorbed along the biliary ducts, thus serving biliohepatic circulation of glucose (9, 23, 33, 41). As estimated in the in situ microperfused bile duct in rats, the rate of glucose transport (absorption) in these ducts matched the rate measured in microperfused proximal convoluted tubules of the rat and rabbit kidneys (41). In normal rats, the concentration of glucose in bile was estimated to be up to 30% (1–2 mM) of that in blood plasma (5–6 mM); it increased in the presence of the SGLT1 inhibitor phlorizin, and in the same time, the bile flow increased (9, 23). On the other hand, with more glucose in bile (absence of phlorizin), the (re)absorption of water increased, resulting in lower bile flow (35). Previous studies in rat liver demonstrated 1) phlorizin-sensitive Na+-monosaccharide cotransport in the apical membrane of cultured cholangiocytes, 2) SGLT1 mRNA by Northern blot analysis in the liver tissue and by RT-PCR in freshly isolated cholangiocytes, and 3) SGLT1 mRNA by in situ RT-PCR exclusively in bile duct cells (33, 34). Therefore, our immunocytochemical finding of the rSGLT protein in the apical membrane of bile ducts is a perfect match with the previous transport and mRNA studies. SGLT1 in these ducts may play a crucial role in regulating ductal bile formation and concentration; glucose reabsorption via SGLT1 may provide a driving force for a direct Na+, glucose, and water cotransport or/and may generate a critical osmotic driving force for water transport via water channels localized to the bile duct apical (aquaporin-1; AQP1) and basolateral (AQP4) membranes (38, 41, 42, 49, 51). The reabsorbed glucose may exit the cells via the basolaterally localized glucose facilitator GLUT1 (33).
The localization of rSGLT1 protein to the apical domain of initial (intercalated) ducts in submandibular gland is in contradiction with the previously described localization of this transporter to the BLM of acinar cells in the rat submandibular gland (18) and sheep parotid gland (53). Although the previous data in rats may be possibly attributed to the use of our old antibody that may have stained CAR-LMP in the plasma membrane of myoepithelial cells and/or capillaries that surround acinar cells, the experiments in sheep parotid gland were performed with a different antibody, which labeled a strong SGLT1-related 75-kDa protein in isolated BLM from the ovine gland. At the present time, without detailed experimentation we cannot answer whether differences exist in the localization of SGLT1 protein in the acini of parotid and submandibular glands in rats and whether the basolateral localization in the parotid gland acini is specific for ruminants. However, localization of rSGLT1 to the luminal membrane of the initial ducts may be highly relevant to the presence of glucose in saliva, a phenomenon detected 100 years ago by Carlson and Ryan (6) in cats and later confirmed and studied in various (patho)physiological conditions in humans (1, 22, 47). Although the exact source of glucose in saliva is not known, it may be isosmotically secreted by serous acini and later largely reabsorbed along the initial ducts by the SGLT1-mediated process similar to that in the small intestine, renal proximal tubules, and liver bile ducts. Accordingly, in the salivary gland initial ducts, glucose transport may contribute to the reabsorption of water, either by simultaneous cotransport with Na+ and glucose (38) and/or by generating the transmembrane osmotic gradient that drives water movement, possibly through the (still controversial) apically located water channel AQP5 (7, 13, 43). It is, however, unclear how glucose can leave the duct cell at the basolateral membrane; glucose transporters in the mammalian salivary glands have not been systematically studied. If the primary secretion by acini contains a concentration of glucose similar to that in plasma, the measured glucose in unstimulated mixed saliva in humans (0.02–0.4 mM, 15–300 times less than in the blood plasma, Ref. 22) indicates strong reabsorptive mechanisms along the salivary ducts, most probably by the apically located SGLT1.
In conclusion, in this report we have described the use of an improved polyclonal anti-peptide antibody highly specific for the rat high-affinity Na+-glucose cotransporter SGLT1. The antibody may be used to identify novel sites of SGLT1 protein localization in rat organs and to study its expression in various physiological, pathophysiological, and toxicological conditions in the rat kidney, small intestine, and other organs.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
) and Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Grant 487/C1 (to H. Koepsell).
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
ak for expert technical assistance. | FOOTNOTES |
|---|
, Molecular Toxicology, Institute for Medical Research and Occupational Health, Ksaverska cesta 2, HR-10001 Zagreb, Croatia (e-mail: sabolic{at}imi.hr)The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Antolovic R, Hamer E, Serpersu EH, Kost H, Linnertz H, Kovarik Z, Schoner W. Affinity labelling with MgATP analogues reveals coexisting Na+ and K+ forms of the
-subunits of Na+/K+-ATPase. Eur J Biochem 261: 181–189, 1999.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Barfuss DW, Schafer JA. Differences in active and passive glucose transport along the proximal nephron. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 241: F322–F332, 1981.
4. Biber J, Stieger B, Haase W, Murer H. A high yield preparation for rat kidney brush-border membranes : different behavior of lysosomal markers. Biochim Biophys Acta 647: 169–176, 1981.[Medline]
5. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248–254, 1976.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
6. Carlson AJ, Ryan JG. Glucose in saliva. Am J Physiol 21: 301–309, 1908.
7. Charron FM, Blanchard MG, Lapointe JY. Intracellular hypertonicity is responsible for water flux associated with Na+/glucose cotransport. Biophys J 90: 3546–3554, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Cheeseman CI. Upregulation of SGLT-1 transport activity in rat jejunum by GLP-2 infusion in vivo. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 273: R1965–R1971, 1997.
9. Crafer SMD, Pryor JS, Dawson AP. Effect of arterial-portal glucose gradients and phloridzin on bile glucose levels in perfused rat liver. J Physiol 479: 281–289, 1994.
10. Cramer SC, Pardrige WM, Hirayama BA, Wright EM. Colocalization of GLUT2 glucose transporter, sodium/glucose cotransporter, and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase in rat kidney with double-peroxidase immunocytochemistry. Diabetes 41: 766–770, 1992.[Abstract]
11. Crljen V, Saboli
I, Susac J, Appenroth D, Herak-Kramberger CM, Ljubojevi
M, Anzai N, Antolovic R, Burckhardt G, Fleck C, Saboli
I. Immunocytochemical characterization of the incubated rat renal cortical slices. Pflügers Arch 450: 269–279, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12. Debnam ES. Rapid adaptation of intestinal sugar transport. News Physiol Sci 9: 84–88, 1994.
13. Delporte C, Steinfeld S. Distribution and roles of aquaporins in salivary glands. Biochim Biophys Acta 1758: 1061–1070, 2006.[Medline]
14. Diez-Sampedro A, Hirayama BA, Osswald C, Gorboulev V, Baumgarten K, Volk C, Wright EM, Koepsell H. A glucose sensor hiding in a family of transporters. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 11753–11758, 2003.
15. Dong R, Srai SK, Debnam E, Smith M. Transcriptional and translational control over sodium-glucose-linked transporter (SGLT1) gene expression in adult small intestine. FEBS Lett 406: 79–82, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
16. Eguchi J, Wada K, Hida K, Zhang H, Matsuoka T, Baba M, Hashimoto I, Shikata K, Pgawa N, Makino H. Identification of adipocyte adhesion molecule (ACAM), a novel CTX gene family, implicated in adipocyte maturation and development of obesity. Biochem J 387: 343–353, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Elfeber K, Köhler A, Lutzenburg M, Osswald C, Galla HJ, Witte OW, Koepsell H. Localization of the Na+-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in the blood-brain barrier. Histochem Cell Biol 121: 201–207, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18. Elfeber K, Stümpel F, Gorboulev V, Matting S, Deussen A, Kaissling B, Koepsell H. Na+-D-glucose cotransporter in muscle capillaries increases glucose permeability. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 314: 301–305, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Frigeri A, Gropper MA, Umenishi F, Kawashima M, Brown D, Verkman AS. Localization of MIWC and GLIP water channel homologs in neuromuscular, epithelial and glandular tissues. J Cell Sci 108: 2993–3002, 1995.[Abstract]
20. Gaudreault N, Scriven DRL, Moore EDW. Asymmetric subcellular distribution of glucose transporters in the endothelium of small contractile arteries. Endothelium 13: 317–324, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Gaudreault N, Scriven DRL, Moore EDW. Characterisation of glucose transporters in the intact coronary artery endothelium in rats: GLUT-2 upregulated by long-term hyperglycemia. Diabetologia 47: 2181–2092, 2004.
22. Gough H, Luke GA, Beeley JA, Geddes DAM. Human salivary glucose analysis by high-performance ion-exchange chromatography and pulsed amperometric detection. Arch Oral Biol 41: 141–145, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Guzelian P, Boyer JL. Glucose reabsorption from bile. Evidence for a biliohepatic circulation. J Clin Invest 53: 526–535, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]
24. Haase W, Heltmann K, Friese W, Ollig D, Koepsell H. Characterization and histochemical localization of the rat intestinal Na+-D-glucose cotransport by monoclonal antibodies. Eur J Cell Biol 52: 297–309, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
25. Haase W, Koepsell H. Electron microscopic immunohistochemical localization of components of Na+-cotransporters along the rat neophron. Eur J Cell Biol 48: 360–374, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
26. Hediger MA, Rhoads DB. Molecular physiology of sodium-glucose cotransporters. Physiol Rev 74, 993–1026, 1994.
27. Hirsch JR, Loo DDF, Wright EM. Regulation of Na+/glucose cotransporter expression by protein kinases in Xenopus laevis oocytes. J Biol Chem 271: 14740–14746, 1996.
28. Hofer D, Asan E, Drenckhahn D. Chemosensory perception in the gut. News Physiol Sci 14: 18–23, 1999.
29. Hwang ES, Hirayama BA, Wright EM. Distribution of the SGLT1 Na+/glucose cotransporter and mRNA along the crypt-villus axis of rabbit small intestine. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 181: 1208–1217, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Ikari A, Nakano M, Kawano K, Suketa Y. Up-regulation of sodium-dependent glucose transporter by interaction with heat shock protein 70. J Biol Chem 277: 33338–33343, 2002.
31. Khoursandi S, Scharlau D, Herter P, Kuhnen C, Martin D, Kinne RKH, Kipp H. Different modes of sodium-D-glucose cotransporter-mediated D-glucose uptake regulation in Caco-2 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287: C1041–C1047, 2004.
32. Kipp H, Khoursandi S, Scharlau D, Kinne RKH. More than apical: distribution of SGLT1 in Caco-2 cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C737–C749, 2003.
33. Lazaridis KN, Pham L, Vroman B, DeGroen PC, LaRusso NF. Kinetic and molecular identification of sodium-dependent glucose transporter in normal rat cholangiocytes. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 272: G1168–G1174, 1997.
34. Lee WS, Kanai Y, Wells RG, Hediger MA. The high affinity Na+/glucose cotransporter. J Biol Chem 269: 12032–12039, 1994.
35. Lira M, Schlesinger CD, Steinbach JH, Lambert K, Microburst JA, Hofmann AF. Sugar absorption by the biliary ductular epithelium of the rat: evidence for two transport systems. Gastroenterology 102: 563–571, 1992.[Web of Science][Medline]
36. Ljubojevi
M, Balen D, Breljak D, Susan M, Anzai N, Bah A, Burckhardt G, Saboli
I. Renal expression of organic anion transporter OAT2 in rats and mice is regulated by sex hormones. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 292: F361–F372, 2007.
37. Ljubojevi
M, Herak-Kramberger CM, Hags Y, Bah A, Endow H, Burckhardt G, Saboli
I. Rat renal cortical OAT1 and OAT3 exhibit gender differences determined by both androgen stimulation and estrogen inhibition. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 287: F124–F138, 2004.
38. Loo DDF, Wright EM, Heathen T. Water pumps. J Physiol 542: 53–60, 2002.
39. Mace OJ, Affleck J, Patel N, Pellet GL. Sweet taste receptors in rat small intestine stimulate glucose absorption through apical GLUT2. J Physiol 582: 379–392, 2007.
40. Margolskee RF, Dyer J, Kokrashvilli Z, Salmon KSH, Ilegems E, Daly K, Maillet EL, Ninomiya Y, Mosinger B, Shirazi-Beechey SP. T1R3 and gustducin in gut sense sugars to regulate expression of Na+-glucose cotransporter 1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104: 15075–15080, 2007.
41. Masyuk AI, Masyuk TV, Tietz PS, Splinter PL, LaRusso NF. Intrahepatic bile ducts transport water in response to absorbed glucose. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283: C785–C791, 2002.
42. Masyuk AI, LaRusso NF. Aquaporins in the hepatobiliary system. Hepatology 43: S75–S81, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
43. Nielsen S, King LS, Christensen BM, Agre P. Aquaporins in complex tissues. II. Subcellular distribution in respiratory and glandular tissues of rat. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 273: C1549–C1561, 1997.
44. Pajor AM, Hirayama BA, Wright EM. Molecular evidence for two renal Na+/glucose transporters. Biochim Biophys Acta 1106: 216–2120, 1992.[Medline]
45. Pajor AM, Wright EM. Cloning and functional expression of a mammalian Na+/nucleoside cotransporter. J Biol Chem 267: 3557–3560, 1992.
46. Poppe R, Karbach U, Gambaryan S, Wiesinger H, Lutzenburg M, Kraemer M, Witte OW, Koepsell H. Expression of the Na+-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 in neurons. J Neurochem 69: 84–94, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
47. Prosser CG, Hartmann PE. Saliva and breast milk composition during the menstrual cycle of women. Aust J Exp Biol Med Sci 61: 265–275, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
48. Raschperger E, Engstrom U, Pettersson RF, Fuxe J. CLMP, a novel member of CTX family and a new component of epithelial tight junctions. J Biol Chem 279: 796–804, 2004.
49. Roberts SK, Yano M, Ueno Y, Pham L, Alpini G, Agre P, LaRusso NF. Cholangiocytes express the aquaporin CHIP and transport water via a channel-mediated mechanism. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91: 13009–13013, 1994.
50. Saboli
I, Skarica M, Gorboulev V, Ljubojevi
M, Balen D, Herak-Kramberger CM, Koepsell H. Rat renal glucose transporter SGLT1 exhibits zonal distribution and androgen-dependent gender differences. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F913–F926, 2006.
51. Splinter PL, Masyuk AI, Marinell RA, LaRusso NF. AQP4 transfected into mouse cholangiocytes promotes water transport in biliary epithelia. Hepatology 39: 109–116, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
52. Takata K, Kasahara M, Ezaki O, Hirano H. Localization of Na+-dependent active type and erythrocyte/HepG2-type glucose transporters in rat kidney: immunofluorescence and immunogold study. J Histochem Cytochem 39: 287–298, 1991.[Abstract]
53. Tarpey PS, Wood IS, Shirazi-Beechey SP, Beechey RB. Amino acid sequence and the cellular location of the Na+-dependent D-glucose symporters (SGLT1) in the ovine enterocyte and the parotid acinar cell. Biochem J 312: 293–300, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
54. Turner RJ, Moran A. Heterogeneity of sodium-dependent D-glucose transport sites along the proximal tubule: evidence from vesicle studies. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 242: F406–F414, 1982.
55. Turner RJ, Moran A. Further studies of proximal tubular brush border membrane D-glucose transport heterogeneity. J Membr Biol 70: 37–45, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
56. Turner RJ, Moran A. Stoichiometric studies of the renal outer cortical brush border membrane D-glucose transporter. J Membr Biol 67: 73–80, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
57. Veyhil M, Wagner CA, Gorboulev V, Schmitt BM, Lang F, Koepsell H. Downregulation of the Na+-D-glucose cotransporter SGLT1 by protein RS1 (RSC1A1) is dependent on dynamin and protein kinase C. J Membr Biol 196:71–81, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
58. Wells RG, Pajor AM, Kanai Y, Turk E, Wright EM, Hediger MA. Cloning of a human kidney cDNA with similarity to the sodium-glucose cotransporter. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 263: F459–F465, 1992.
59. Wright EM. Renal Na+-glucose cotransporters. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F10–F18, 2001.
60. You G, Lee WS, Barros JG, Kanai Y, Huo TL, Khawaja S, Wells RG, Nigam SK, Hediger MA. Molecular characteristics of Na+-coupled glucose transporters in adult and embryonic rat kidney. J Biol Chem 270: 29365–29371, 1995.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
O. J. Mace, N. Lister, E. Morgan, E. Shepherd, J. Affleck, P. Helliwell, J. R. Bronk, G. L. Kellett, D. Meredith, R. Boyd, et al. An energy supply network of nutrient absorption coordinated by calcium and T1R taste receptors in rat small intestine J. Physiol., January 1, 2009; 587(1): 195 - 210. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |