|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERS, ION CHANNELS, AND PUMPS
1Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, 2Departamento de Biofísica, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, 3Departamento de Microbiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuidad de México; and 4Posgrado en Ciencias Genómicas, Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Submitted 11 December 2006 ; accepted in final form 11 January 2008
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90- and
120-kDa proteins in samples from inner medulla and cultured cells. Immunocytochemical analysis of cell cultures and inner medulla showed the presence of HCN immunoreactivity partially colocalized with the Na+-K+-ATPase at the basolateral membrane of collecting duct cells. This is the first evidence of an Ih-like cationic current and HCN immunoreactivity in either kidney or any other nonexcitable mammalian cells. kidney; hyperpolarization-activated current; nonselective cation channel; sodium transport
Although Ih and HCN gene expression is observed, almost exclusively, in excitable cells, a Northern blot study performed in mouse has shown the expression in liver and kidney of a splice variant of the HCN3 mRNA expressed in brain (44) while, more recently, the presence of mRNA encoding HCN2 and HCN3 in the kidney-derived transformed HEK293 cell was reported (57). If nonexcitable cells may express HCN genes, then the presence of the corresponding Ih current and HCN channels in such cells is a possibility deserving careful attention.
In a previous work (12), we have shown that inner medullary collecting duct cells in primary culture exhibit outward- and inward-rectifying cationic currents, and we identified the outward-rectifying current as a voltage-dependent K+ current, flowing through basolateral voltage-gated K+ channels. In the present work, we use the perforated-patch and conventional whole cell clamp to demonstrate that inward rectification is due to the presence of a hyperpolarization-activated, cyclic nucleotide-gated, nonselective cationic current that exhibits many similarities with Ih. We detect transcripts corresponding to the Ih channel genes (HCN1, -2, and -4) in both the cultured cells and kidney inner medulla. Western blot showed HCN2 immunoreactive proteins in cell cultures and inner medulla. Immunocytochemistry analysis showed the presence of HCN2 immunoreactivity in the cytoplasm and at the basolateral membrane of collecting duct cells. We propose that, in inner medullary collecting duct, the functional expression of HCN channels gives rise to this hyperpolarization-activated cationic current, and we discuss the possible participation of these cationic channels in cell-interstitium osmotic equilibrium and in the generation of the intracellular osmotic force required to drive vasopressin-stimulated water and urea reabsorption.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Primary cultures of rat inner medullary collecting duct (IMCD) cells were obtained using a modified hypotonic lysis method as described previously (12). Cells were plated on glass cover slips contained in 35-mm petri culture dishes and cultured in DMEM (GIBCO) supplemented with 10% FBS (GIBCO), antibiotics, and insulin at 37°C with an air-5% CO2 atmosphere as described (7, 12). Cells were studied 6–11 days after plating. At this time, cells formed confluent cell monolayers exhibiting blister formation, an evidence of cell polarization and transepithelial transport. As described (12), electrophysiological recordings were performed in cells exhibiting (principal or IMCD cell) morphology (as evidenced by positive Dolichos biflorus lectin binding), the main cell population in our cultures.
RT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from primary cultures and rat kidney inner medulla with the RNeasy Protect Mini Kit (Qiagen). After conventional reverse transcription with oligo(dT)15 primer and SuperScript III RT (Invitrogen), HCN gene transcripts were detected by PCR using the following primers: for HCN1 (HCN1 forward 5'-CCAGCCCGGAGACTATATCA-3' and HCN1 reverse 5'-GATTGGAGGGATCGCTTGTA-3'), for HCN2 (HCN2 forward 5'-GTGGAGCGAAGTCTATTCGT-3' and HCN2 reverse 5'-GTCCTCGTCAAACATCTTCC-3'), for HCN3 (HCN3 forward 5'-TCGGACACTTTCTTCCTGCT-3' and HCN3 reverse 5'-GGTTGAAGATGCGAACCACT-3') and for HCN4 (HCN4 forward 5'-CGGCATGGTGAATAACTCCT-3' and HCN4 reverse 5'-CCGCAACTTGTCAGCATAGA-3'). All primers were designed according to HCN sequences published in Genebank.
Amplification was initiated by denaturizing the sample for 5 min at 92°C, followed by 40 cycles of 1 min at 92°C, 1 min at 58°C, and 1 min at 72°C. Finally, samples were held at 72°C for 10 min to complete extension of all PCR products. The PCR products were purified with the PCR purification kit (Roche) and then were cloned into the pGEM-T Easy Vector System (Promega). The cloned DNAs were sequenced using the ABI PRISM 310 Genetic Analyzer to confirm HCN identity.
Immunocytochemistry
The distribution of HCN channel immunoreactivity in IMCD cultures and renal inner medulla was analyzed using an affinity-purified specific rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against human HCN2 (anti-HCN2; Alomone Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel). In these experiments, glass cover slips previously coated with collagen (Type I; Sigma) were used to grow the cell cultures. Confluent IMCD cultures were fixed overnight with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS (GIBCO). Renal inner medulla sections were prepared as previously described (12). Samples were preincubated 30 min in PBS with BSA (10 mg/ml) and then incubated 18–24 h at 4°C in PBS containing 0.25% Triton and the HCN2 antibody (4 µg/ml). After three washes with PBS (10 min each), samples were incubated with fluorescein isothiocyanate-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit IgG 1:100; Vector Laboratories) for 1 h. Additional experiments involved dual labeling of HCN channels with mouse anti-Na+-K+-ATPase (1:1,000; ab2867; Abcam). This labeling was visualized using CY3-conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary antibodies (1:100; Jackson Immunoresearch). Samples were mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories) and viewed using standard epifluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopy (Olympus FV-1000). Negative controls were IMCD cultures and renal inner medullary slices with either the omission of the primary antibody or with the primary antibody previously incubated with its control antigenic peptide (2 µg peptide/1 µg antibody; see Refs. 28 and 58).
Western Blot
HCN channel proteins also were detected in cell extracts from cerebral cortex, IMCD cultures, and renal inner medulla prepared as described briefly. Cells and tissues were homogenized in a lysis buffer (0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 10 mM Tris·HCl; pH 7.6) by ultrasonic treatment. Next, samples were centrifuged at 10,000 g, and the supernatant was recovered. To enrich membrane fractions, extracts were centrifuged at 17,000 g for 20 min at 4°C; supernatant was discarded, and pellets were suspended in PBS. Protein concentration in samples was measured using the Coomassie method. From each sample, 50 µg of protein were size separated in a 10% SDS-PAGE and electroblotted to nitrocellulose membrane (Millipore). HCN2 were detected using standard methodology and the anti-HCN2 antibody (1:500; Alomone Laboratories). Protein bands were visualized with a chemoluminescent reaction system (Millipore). To confirm specificity of antibody, the same samples were incubated with antibody previously incubated with the control antigenic peptide (2 µg peptide/1 µg antibody).
Whole Cell Clamp Recordings
Membrane currents were routinely studied with the perforated-patch whole cell clamp technique, but a few experiments were performed with the conventional whole cell clamp technique, as previously described (12). Cover slips with a confluent cell monolayer were placed in a superfusion chamber and maintained in a standard (chloride-free) bath solution containing (in mM): 157 gluconic acid, 146 NaOH, 5 KOH, 2 Ca(OH)2, 1 Mg(OH)2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, and 30 µM amiloride, pH 7.4. Other bath solutions were used in some experiments: 1) a "no Ca2+ bath solution" containing no Ca(OH)2; 2) a "K+-rich bath solution" containing 1 mM NaOH and 150 mM KOH; and 3) a "NMG-rich bath solution" containing 1 mM NaOH and 145 mM N-methyl-D-glucamine. Some experiments were performed in the chloride equivalents of the control (Cl– control solution, see below) and NMG-rich bath (Cl– NMG solution) solutions containing, in addition, 1 mM diphenyl-2-carboxylate (DPC) to avoid the contribution of Cl– currents (39, 55). In conventional whole cell recordings, cells were maintained in a chloride bath solution (Cl– control solution) containing (in mM): 146 NaCl, 5 KCl, 2 Ca(Cl)2, 1 Mg(Cl)2, 10 HEPES, 10 glucose, 1 DPC, and 30 µM amiloride, pH 7.4. Two other bath solutions were used in these experiments: a "45 mM K+ solution" containing 106 mM NaCl and 45 mM KCl; and a "146 mM K+ solution" containing 5 mM NaCl and 146 mM KCl. All experiments were performed at room temperature (20–25°C). Micropipettes, from Kimax-51 glass (Kimble), were filled from the tip with a pipette solution composed of (in mM): 156 gluconic acid, 141 KOH, 10 NaOH, 1.54 Ca(OH)2, 1 Mg(OH)2, 2.3 EGTA, and 10 HEPES, pH 7.4. Pipette filling was completed, from the back, with the same pipette solution containing, in addition, 200 µg/ml amphotericin B. In conventional whole cell clamp experiments, micropipettes were filled with a solution containing (in mM): 136.5 KCl, 4.5 KOH, 6 NaH2PO4, 0.1 Mg(Cl)2, 0.1 EGTA, 2 Na2ATP, 0.2 Nax-GTP, 0.3 Na-cAMP, and 0.03 Na-cGMP, pH 7.3. Once filled, micropipettes had a resistance of 2–4 M
. Seals of at least 1 G
were obtained after pipettes had contacted the cell membrane and a gentle suction had been applied. Perforated-patch whole cell clamp configuration was obtained 4–8 min after the membrane contact, as monitored when a voltage square pulse (20 mV, 5 ms) evoked a capacitative current transient shorter than 4 ms, and a series resistance (Rs) smaller than 20 M
was measured. In conventional whole cell recordings, the membrane was ruptured by suction. Membrane potential was clamped at –50 mV. Membrane capacitance and Rs were compensated (80%) and measured using the Axopatch-1D compensation systems. The voltage-clamp protocols were generated, and the membrane currents were acquired with the Axopatch-1D under the control of the pClamp software (v.6; Axon Instruments) running in a Pentium 1 personal computer (Gateway 200) and using a Digidata 1200 A/D converter (Axon Instruments). Membrane currents were low-pass filtered (usually at 2 kHz), digitized (usually at a sampling rate of 416.7 Hz), and stored on the hard disk of the computer for subsequent analysis (12). Analysis was performed using the Clampfit module of pClamp, and curve fitting was performed using Sigmaplot (Jandel Scientific). As previously reported, the time course of the capacitative current (evoked by a pulse from –50 to –60 mV) exhibited a monoexponential decay, evidencing the absence of electrical coupling between cells, an indispensable condition for achieving space clamp. As reported, membrane capacitance was 24.3 ± 0.7 pF, and cell input resistance was 1.23 ± 0.12 G
(n = 121). A basic stimulation protocol was used in every cell: from a holding potential of –50 mV, a series of 720-ms voltage steps between –160 and 80 mV were applied in 20-mV increments and with 4-s intervals between the steps. The other protocols used are described below.
Current Kinetics Analysis
Hyperpolarization-activated current. The hyperpolarization-activated current was obtained from current recorded at membrane potentials between –160 and –80 mV by subtracting instantaneous current (current values obtained within the first 0.4 ms of voltage pulses).
Instantaneous current. Current recorded during the second half of voltages steps from –40 to 40 mV was plotted against voltage, and instantaneous linear slope conductance was calculated by linear regression. Cells exhibiting outward rectification (12) were excluded. Instantaneous linear current at voltages from –60 to –160 mV and at voltages of 60 and 80 mV was calculated by extrapolation. Inward-rectifying instantaneous current was calculated by subtracting linear current from the current measured at the onset of the voltage pulses.
Time course of the hyperpolarization-activated inward current.
The time course of the hyperpolarization-activated inward current was studied using instantaneous current-subtracted traces. The time course of current activation was fitted with a sum of two exponential functions
![]() | (1) |
f and
s are the time constants of activation, with
f being faster than
s. At membrane potentials more positive than –120 mV the time-dependent kinetics of the current could often be fitted with a single exponential function (Eq. 1 without the second exponential term).
Voltage dependence of the hyperpolarization-activated inward current activation.
Tail currents (at –50 mV) after each voltage step were linear current subtracted. The resultant tail currents (iv) corresponding to each voltage step (V) were normalized as fractions of the tail current corresponding to the –160 mV step (i-160). The normalized values were fitted with the following (Boltzmann type) equation
![]() | (2) |
Tail currents and reversal potential. From a holding potential of –50 mV, the current was activated with a prepulse to –160 mV during 1 s, and voltage then was returned to various test potentials ranging from –60 to 40 mV in 10-mV increments for 90 ms. Time-independent linear current, as measured from the recordings obtained with a similar voltage protocol in which the prepulse to –160 mV was omitted, was subtracted. The measured tail currents were plotted against voltage. The reversal potential of the tail currents was measured at the point where the curve that best fitted the plotted current points crossed the voltage axis.
Voltage ramps and reversal potential. From a holding potential of –50 mV, the current was activated with a prepulse to –160 mV during 1.15 s. Voltage was returned to –60 mV for 3 ms, allowing occurrence of capacitative current, and then voltage was ramped to 60 mV over 30 ms. Time-independent linear current, as measured from the recordings obtained with a similar voltage protocol in which a prepulse to –40 mV was applied, was subtracted. The measured current response to the voltage ramps was plotted against voltage; the reversal potential was measured at the point where the current value crossed the voltage axis.
Statistical Analysis
All experimental results are expressed as means ± SE. Comparison among mean values was made by Student's t-test for paired or unpaired data. In some experiments, comparison among values was made by Wilcoxon signed test (Wst). Values of P < 0.05 were considered as an indication of a significant difference.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A hyperpolarization-activated, time-dependent, inward current (Ivti) was observed in
50% of the studied cells (Fig. 1A). They activate at a potential close to –60 mV, require >720 ms to complete its activation at potentials between –80 and –160 mV, and appear to activate more quickly with larger hyperpolarizations (see below). Figure 1B shows the currents observed in Ivti-expressing cells: an instantaneous current (Iins) exhibiting linear and inward-rectifying components and Ivti. Iins has a rough voltage dependence, exhibiting inward rectification at potentials below –60 mV (Fig. 1C) and a time-dependent deactivation at potentials >20 mV (Fig. 1A). A current-voltage (I-V) relationship of the averaged total current amplitude of 40 Ivti-expressing cells is shown in Fig. 1C; note the presence of inward rectification and the zero current potential (E0cur) close to 0 mV (–4.2 ± 1.3 mV) of the instantaneous linear current. This figure also shows the averaged amplitude of the inward rectification due to Ivti and Iins; both currents exhibited inward rectification at potentials below –60 mV. An instantaneous current exhibiting inward rectification at potentials below –60 mV has been related to the cationic current Ih (4, 28, 31, 34, 42). To determine whether, in IMCD cells, Iins was related to Ivti, we looked for a correlation between them. Figure 1D shows a plot of single cell Iins linear slope conductance as a function of the corresponding Ivti chord conductance [determined at –140 mV, assuming a reversal potential (Erev) = 0 mV, see below]. This plot revealed a significant correlation between the two currents (r = 0.79, slope = 0.47, P < 0.0001, n = 40). It suggests that both Iins and Ivti may flow through the same channels, as suggested with respect to Ih and its related instantaneous current (25, 34, 42). Considering the ionic conditions in our experiments (virtual absence of any potentially permeating anion in the presence of 30 µM amiloride), it can be expected that Ivti is a K+ current or an amiloride-insensitive Na+ or a nonselective cation current. On the other hand, the E0cur of Iins suggests a basal activity of a nonselective channel exhibiting little or null discrimination between K+ and Na+.
|
|
|
f and
s becoming smaller at more negative membrane potentials (Fig. 4B). From the time constants at –160 mV (mean: 71 and 342 ms), it can be calculated that, at the end of the 720-ms pulse,
93% of total time-dependent activation has occurred. Therefore, this pulse duration is adequate to study the Ivti time-dependent kinetics (8, 14, 62). On the other hand, the mean values of Ivti time constants at –120 mV (156 and 679 ms) are comparable to those reported for Ih at room temperature (4, 14, 51, 53, 58, 59, 62).
|
90% of its full activation (note: when pulse duration was augmented to 4 or 6 s, n = 8, similar values for the activation parameters were obtained). As reported for Ih and If, the activation of Ivti starts at a potential close to –40 mV; however, Ivti does not become fully activated, even at –160 mV. Consequently, the k value of Ivti is larger than that of Ih and If, but its Vo is within the range reported for these currents (11, 14, 28, 31, 51, 58, 59, 62).
Despite the use of the perforated-patch whole cell clamp technique, Ivti characteristically suffers an apparently complete rundown 10–20 min after seal formation (Fig. 5, A–D). After complete rundown, inward rectification was almost undetectable, and Iins linear slope conductance decreased from 3.42 ± 0.25 to 0.77 ± 0.09 nS (n = 5, P < 0.002). Figure 5, A and B, shows the initial (at t = 0 min) and final (at t = 20 min) recordings obtained in a representative cell. Figure 5C shows the subtraction (A – B) illustrating the currents abolished by rundown. Figure 5D illustrates the continuous decrement in total current observed in five cells during a period of 10 min and the final level reached by current after complete disappearance of Ivti (after 20 min). Figure 5E shows the continuous decrement observed (during the initial 10 min) in Ivti chord conductance (determined at –140 mV) and in Iins linear slope conductance. During rundown development Ivti time-dependent activation became progressively slower; Fig. 5F shows the progressive increment observed in
f during the initial 10 min. Ivti voltage-dependent activation parameters were not affected by rundown during the initial 10 min of recording (data not shown). Rundown of Ivti made our inhibitor and stimulator studies more difficult.
|
|
f became smaller in this condition. The slow component of this activation showed no consistent change. In the presence of 8-Br-cAMP, the Ivti voltage-dependent activation curve started at more positive values (Fig. 7F), without a change in the voltage of maximal activation, so that, while Vo shifted to the right (from –90.3 ± 2.5 to –79.4 ± 2.7 mV, n = 6; P < 0.03, Wst), k increased from 18.8 ± 1.3 to 21.5 ± 1.8 mV (P < 0.03, Wst). The presence of 8-Br-cAMP had no effect on the rundown of Ivti, as has been reported to occur in the rundown of Ih (4). These results indicate that Ivti channels can be regulated by cAMP. Ivti responded to cAMP stimulation in a similar way as Ih and If (14, 40, 42, 53, 56, 59, 62). Furthermore, the instantaneous conductance associated with Ivti, like that associated with Ih (34, 35, 42), increased also in response to cAMP. It supports our proposition that Ivti is a Cs+-resistant Ih-like current closely related to an instantaneous current.
|
f became smaller.
s also changed from 530 ± 68 to 269 ± 53 ms at –140 mV (P < 0.02, Wst; data not shown). However, this ion substitution had no effect on the voltage-dependent activation curve of Ivti. These results indicate that the Ivti channels can be regulated by the extracellular K+ concentration, as has been reported to occur with the If and Ih channels (11, 10, 14, 40).
|
|
120 kDa (as expected for HCN2; see Refs. 30, 38, 61, and 62), and a weak
90-kDa band was, also, detected in cell cultures. However, in the inner medulla, an
90-kDa band was mainly observed, probably representing a modified or variant form of the HCN2 protein, whereas a weakly labeled
120-kDa band was also observed. Next, our Western blot results show that, in the renal inner medulla and in our cultured cells, the HCN genes are translated to proteins. They also suggest that, in renal medullary extract, the HCN2 polypeptide undergoes proteolytic or posttranslational modification, or possibly represents a transcriptional variant. To further support the proposal that Ivti flows through HCN channels, we looked for the presence of HCN proteins at the membrane of the IMCD cells. Using confocal microscopy, HCN2 immunoreactivity was detected both at the membrane and in the cytoplasm of IMCD cells, as has been reported to occur in excitable cells and in nonexcitable transfected cells (28, 34, 38, 61, 62). Figures 10 and 11 show that HCN2 immunolabeling partially colocalized with that of the Na+-K+-ATPase both in the cultured cells (Fig. 10, A, B, and C) and the "in situ" IMCD (Fig. 11, A, B, and D). Interestingly, this partial colabeling was also present at the papillary epithelium (Fig. 11D), suggesting the presence of HCN channels (and expression of Ivti) in this epithelium. Colabeling of a protein with the Na+-K+-ATPase is usually interpreted as evidence of its localization at the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells (37, 60), and it seems to be the case in the in situ IMCD. However, because in our cultured cells the Na+-K+-ATPase labeling seems to be distributed mainly inside the cell, we cannot rigorously apply this interpretation to our cultures. Anyhow, our results are consistent with mediation of Ivti by HCN channel polypeptide(s) located at or mobilizable to the basolateral membrane of IMCD cells.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
90- and
120-kDa HCN2 immunoreactive proteins in inner medulla and primary cultures, as well as the presence of HCN2 immunoreactivity in the IMCD cells both in situ and in culture. Ivti exhibits some characteristics resembling those of Ih and If, and some features that differentiate it from those currents, nonetheless, the presence of HCN transcripts and HCN immunoreactivity in the IMCD cells, lead us to propose that Ivti flows trough HCN channels. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study reporting an Ih-like cationic current (probably mediated by HCN channels) in either kidney epithelial cells or any other nonexcitable mammalian cell. Like Ih and If observed in brain and heart (11, 14, 58, 62), Ivti activates at hyperpolarizing voltages in a time-dependent manner, exhibits a slow time course, and may be carried by Na+ and K+, showing a higher conductance to K+. Like Ih and If, Ivti starts its activation at a potential close to –40 mV, but in the presence of a high cAMP concentration its activation starts close to 0 mV. This range may have a remarkable physiological role in the nonexcitable cells of the IMCD. According to the observed basal activation onset potential, it is possible that a fraction of the Ivti channels may be active at our basal holding potential of –50 mV, and this fraction may explain, at least partially (70–90%, as inferred from our NMG and Cd2+ results), the instantaneous current we observed. That Ivti and a cation-nonselective Iins may flow through the same channels is suggested by: 1) the positive correlation between linear instantaneous conductance and hyperpolarization-activated, time-dependent conductance; 2) their parallel abolition when most extracelullar Na+ was replaced by NMG; 3) their similar Erev, which exhibited a similar change when extracelullar K+ was increased; 4) their higher conductance for K+ than for Na+; 5) their parallel decrement during Ivti rundown development; 6) their increment in the presence of 8-Br-cAMP; and 7) their similar blockade by Cd2+. Regarding Ih and its related instantaneous current, they are produced by two functionally distinct populations of the same channel (25, 34, 35), with the instantaneous current being Cs+ insensitive. On the other hand, introduction of a cysteine residue in the HCN2 channel pore renders the instantaneous current sensitive to Cd2+ blockade (35). Our results do not support the hypothesis that, in our cultured cells, two distinct populations of the channel produce Ivti and its related cation-nonselective Iins because all experimental maneuvers, and rundown, affecting Ivti had similar effects on Iins. The proposal that a single population of Ivti channels produces both currents is also supported by the Iins time-dependent deactivation observed at potentials more positive than 20 mV. This time-dependent deactivation seems similar to that observed in Ih when membrane potential is changed from a hyperpolarized one to a depolarized one (34, 25).
This study demonstrates the presence of mRNA corresponding to HCN1, -2, and -4 in our cultured cells and inner medulla. In a general way, this result agrees with previous observations of HCN-RNA in kidney cells (44, 57). We also show that IMCD cells express antigens compatible with the presence of HCN2 channel proteins at the basolateral membrane. HCN proteins may form heteromeric channels with a possible tetrameric structure (3, 27, 54); hence, it is conceivable that Ivti channel is a heteromultimer composed by
-subunits of HCN1, HCN2, and HCN4. An alternative hypothesis could be that Ivti is a mixed current flowing through HCN1, HCN2, and HCN4 homomeric channels, but this would imply that all of them are Cs+-resistant and Cd2+-sensitive channels. The block characteristics of Ivti may arise from the presence of splice variants of the HCN channels expressed in excitable cells or from posttranslational modification of channel proteins, as suggested by our Western blot results (45). In this regard, intracellular Cd2+ blocks the Ih current from HCN2 and spHCN, and addition of cysteine residues to the HCN pore increases its sensitivity to Cd2+ block (15, 16, 43).
To explore possible physiological roles for Ivti channels, we have to focus our attention on Ivti voltage-dependent activation onset potential. It is close to –40 mV in our control condition and close to 0 mV during cAMP stimulation. These values are within the range of basolateral membrane potential (–80 to 20 mV) exhibited by the IMCD cells (20, 48, 52). Ivti channels may thus activate in physiological conditions and play a role in determining the basolateral membrane potential. Due to the nonexcitable nature of IMCD cells, an Ivti pacemaker function seems unlikely. However, a cyclic contractile activity of pelvocalyceal smooth muscle has been related to inner medullary urine concentrating ability (23, 36, 46), and one may speculate that Ivti channels in IMCD (and, probably, papillary epithelium) exhibit a cyclic activity somehow related with that smooth muscle contraction pattern.
According to a "classic" point of view, if Ivti channels influence the basolateral membrane ionic permeability, they may participate in the IMCD cell-interstitium osmotic equilibration. IMCD basolateral membrane is immersed in a hyperosmotic interstitial fluid with a high Na+, Cl–, K+, and urea concentration (5, 9, 18, 22, 24). When the kidney acutely passes from a chronic diuresis state to an antidiuresis state, the inner medullary interstitial solute concentration is slowly raised (6, 18, 47). Based on previous observations (2, 13, 47), it may be proposed that the Na+ and Cl– transport activity of the thin ascending limb of Henle's loop provides the basis for an early increment in inner medullary interstitial Na+ and Cl– concentration. Next, during the early phase of acute antidiuresis, the IMCD cells become exposed to a slowly developing interstitial hypertonicity, and its membrane transport characteristics become influenced by vasopressin and its second messenger cAMP (6, 18, 47, 49). In this situation, an Na+ and Cl– influx through the basolateral membrane of IMCD is thought to allow a rapid cell-interstitium osmotic equilibration, with only minimal and transient cell volume change (6, 17, 47, 50). Na+ and Cl– influx may endow the IMCD cells with the necessary osmotic force to drive the vasopressin-stimulated apical water and urea reabsorption (13, 29). At least a small fraction of this Na+ influx may occur through the Ivti channels now stimulated by the increased cAMP levels. Alternatively, one may propose that an important fraction of this Na+ influx occurs through Ivti channels, accompanied by an anion influx through the basolateral HCO3– conductance previously described (20, 48). The resulting Na+ and HCO3– intracellular concentration increase could then stimulate the activity of both the Na+/H+ and the Cl–/HCO3– exchanger at the basolateral membrane, alleviating the induced cell alkalinization. This proposal would explain the previously observed participation of those mechanisms in IMCD cell volume regulation (17, 50), as well as the observed increment in intracellular Cl– concentration (6, 17, 47). Intracellular Na+ increment, and a mild cell alkalinization, may also stimulate the basolateral Na+-K+-ATPase, conducting to replacement of Na+ by K+, and to an increment in intracellular K+ concentration, as previously observed (6, 47). The functional coupling of channel-mediated Na+ and HCO3– fluxes could explain the absence of intracellular K+ content increment observed, in isolated cells, in presence of no added HCO3– external solutions (17). Finally, this hypothesis is also in accordance with an IMCD basolateral membrane Na+-dependent HCO3– influx previously observed (19, 33).
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Akizuki N, Uchida S, Sasaki S, Marumo F. Impaired solute accumulation in inner medulla of Clenk1-/- mice kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F79–F87, 2001.
3. Altomare C, Terragni B, Brioschi C, Milanese R, Pagliuca C, Viscomi C, Moroni A, Baruscotti M, DiFrancesco D. Heteromeric HCN1-HCN4 channels: a comparison with native pacemaker channels from the rabbit sinoatrial node. J Physiol 549: 347–359, 2003.
4. Bal R, Oertel D. Hyperpolarization-activated, mixed-cation current (Ih) in octopus cells of the mammalian cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 84: 806–817, 2000.
5. Beck F, Dörge A, Rick R, Thurau K. Intra- and extracellular element concentrations of rat renal papilla in antidiuresis. Kidney Int 25: 397–403, 1984.[Web of Science][Medline]
6. Beck FX, Schmolke M, Guder WG, Dörge A, Thurau K. Osmolytes in renal medulla during rapid changes in papillary tomicity. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 262: F849–F856, 1992.
7. Bolívar JJ, Cereijido M. Voltage Ca2+-activated K+ channel in cultured epithelial cells (M.DCK) J Membr Biol 97: 43–51, 1987.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Bräuer AU, Savanskan NE, Kole MHP, Plschke M, Monteggia LM, Nestler EJ, Simbürger E, Desz RA, Ninnenmann O, Nitsch R. Molecular and functional analysis of hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels in the hippocampus after entorhinal cortex lesion. FASEB J 15: 2689–2701, 2001.
9. Bulger RE, Beeuwkes IIIR, Saubermann AJ. Application of scanning electron microscopy to X-ray analysis of frozen- hydrated sections III. Elemental content of cells in the rat renal papillary tip. J Cell Biol 88: 274–280, 1981.
10. Dickson CT, Magistretti J, Shalinsky MH, Frasén E, Hasselmo ME, Alonso A. Properties and role of Ih in the pacing of subthreshold oscillations in entorhinal cortex layer II neurons. J Neurophysiol 83: 2562–2579, 2000.
11. DiFrancesco D, Ferroni A, Mazzanti M, Tromba C. Properties of the hyperpolarizing-activated current (if) in cells isolated from the rabbit sino-atrial node. J Physiol 377: 61–88, 1986.
12. Escobar LI, Martínez-Téllez JC, Salas M, Castilla SA, Carrisoza R, Tapia D, Vázquez M, Bargas J, Bolívar JJ. A voltage-gated K+ current in renal inner medullary collecting duct cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286: C965–C974, 2004.
13. Fenton RA, Knepper MA. Urea and renal function in the 21st century: insights from knockout mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 18: 679–688, 2007.
14. Funahashi M, Mitoh Y, Kohjitani A, Matsuo R. Role of the hyperpolarization-activated cation current (Ih) in pacemaker activity in area postrema neurons of rat brain slices. J Physiol 552: 135–148, 2003.
15. Gauss R, Seifert R, Kaupp UB. Molecular identification of a hyperpolarization-activated channel in sea urchin sperm. Nature 393: 583–587, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Giorgetti A, Carloni P, Mistrik P, Torre V. A homology model of the pore region of HCN channels. Biophys J 89: 932–944, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Grunewald JM, Grunewald RW, Kinne RKH. Regulation of ion content and cell volume in isolated rat renal IMCD cells under hypertonic conditions. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 267: F13–F19, 1994.
18. Hai MA, Thomas S. The time-course of changes in renal tissue composition during lysine vasopressin infusion in the rat. Pflügers Arch 310: 297–319, 1969.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Hart D, Nord EP. Polarized distribution of Na+/H+ antiport and Na+/HCO3- cotransport in primary cultures of renal inner medullary collecting duct cells. J Biol Chem 266: 2374–2382, 1991.
20. Imai M, Yoshitomi K. Electrophysiological study of inner medullary collecting duct of hamsters. Pflügers Arch 416: 180–188, 1990.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Kaupp BU, Seifert R. Molecular diversity of pacemaker ion channels. Annu Rev Physiol 63: 235–257, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Knepper MA. Measurement of osmolality in kidney slices using vapor pressure osmometry. Kidney Int 21: 653–655, 1982.[Web of Science][Medline]
23. Knepper MA, Saidel GM, Hascall VC, Dwyer T. Concentration of solutes in the renal inner medulla: interstitial hyaluronan as a mechano-osmotic transducer. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F433–F446, 2003.
24. Koepsell H, Nicholson WAP, Kriz W, Höhling HJ. Measurements of exponentials gradients of sodium and chlorine in the rat kidney medulla using the electron microprobe. Pflügers Arch 350: 167–184, 1974.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Macri V, Accili EA. Structural elements of instantaneous and slow gating in hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. J Biol Chem 279: 16832–16846, 2004.
26. Martínez-Palomo A, Meza I, Beaty G, Cereijido M. Experimental modulation of occluding junctions in a cultured transporting epithelium. J Cell Biol 87: 736–745, 1980.
27. Michels G, Fikret E, Khan I, Südkamp M, Herzig S, Hoppe UC. Single-channel properties support a potential contribution of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and If to cardiac arrhythmias. Circulation 111: 399–404, 2005.
28. Morris NP, Fyffe REW, Robertson B. Characterization of hyperpolarization-activated currents (Ih) in the medial septum/diagonal band complex in the mouse. Brain Res 1006: 74–86, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
29. Nielsen S, Frokiaer F, Marples D, Kwon TH, Agre P, Knepper MA. Aquaporins in the kidney: from molecules to medicine. Physiol Rev 82: 205–244, 2002.
30. Notomi T, Shigemoto R. Immunohistochemical localization of Ih channel subunits, HCN1–4, in the brain. J Comp Neurol 471: 241–276, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
31. Pál B, Pór A, Szucs G, Kovács I, Ruznák Z. HCN channels contribute to the intrinsic activity of cochlear pyramidal cells. Cell Mol Life Sci 60: 2189–2199, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
32. Pape HC. Queer current and pacemaker: the hyperpolarization-activated cation current in neurons. Annu Rev Physiol 58: 299–327, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
33. Praetorius J, Kim YH, Bouzinova EV, Frische S, Rojek A, Aalkær C, Nielsen S. NBCn1 is a basolateral Na+-HCO3– cotransporter in rat kidney inner medullary collecting ducts. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F903–F912, 2004.
34. Proenza C, Angoli D, Agranovich E, Macri V, Accili EA. Pacemaker channels produce an instantaneous current. J Biol Chem 277: 5101–5109, 2002.
35. Proenza C, Yellen G. Distinct populations of HCN pacemaker channels produce voltage-dependent and voltage-independent currents. J Gen Physiol 127: 183–190, 2006.
36. Pruitt MEC, Knepper MA, Graves B, Schmidt-Nielsen B. Effect of peristaltic contractions of the renal pelvic wall on solute concentrations of the renal inner medulla in the hamster. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 290: F892–F896, 2006.
37. Pu HX, Cluzeaud F, Goldschleger R, Karlish SJD, Farman N, Blodstein R. Functional role and Immunocytochemical localization of the
a and
b forms of the Na,K-ATPase
subunit. J Biol Chem 276: 20370–20378, 2001.
38. Qu J, Kryukova Y, Potapova IA, Doronin SV, Larsen M, Krishnamurthy G, Cohen IS, Robinson RB. MiRP1 modulates HCN2 channel expression and gating in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem 279: 43497–43502, 2004.
39. Qu Z, Wei RW, Hartzell C. Characterization of Ca2+-activated Cl– currents in mouse kidney inner medullary collecting duct cells. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 285: F326–F335, 2003.
40. Rateau Y, Ropert N. Expression of a functional hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in the mouse nucleus reticularis thalami. J Neurophysiol 95: 3073–3085, 2006.
41. Robinson RB, Siegelbaum SA. Hyperpolarization-activated cation currents: from molecules to physiological function. Annu Rev Physiol 65: 453–480, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
42. Rodrigues ARA, Oertel D. Hyperpolarization-activated currents regulate excitability in stellate cells of the mammalian ventral cochlear nucleus. J Neurophysiol 95: 76–87, 2006.
43. Rothberg BS, Shin KS, Phale PS, Yellen G. Voltage-controlled gating at the intracellular entrance to a hyperpolarization-activated cation channel. J Gen Physiol 119: 83–91, 2002.
44. Santoro B, Liu DT, Yao H, Bartsch D, Kandel ER, Siegelbaum SA, Tibbs GR. Identification of a gene encoding a hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channel of brain. Cell 93: 717–729, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
45. Santoro B, Tibbs GR. The HCN gene family: molecular basis of the hyperpolarization-activated pacemaker channels. Ann NY Acad Sci 868: 741–764, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
46. Schmidt-Nielsen B. The renal concentrating mechanism in insects and mammals: a new hypothesis involving hydrostatic pressures. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 268: R1087–R1100, 1995.
47. Sone M, Albrecht GJ, Dörge A, Thurau K, Beck FX. Osmotic adaptation of renal medullary cells during transition from chronic diuresis to antidiuresis. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 264: F722–F729, 1993.
48. Stanton BA. Characterization of apical and basolateral membrane conductances of rat inner medullary collecting duct. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 256: F862–F868, 1989.
49. Star RA, Nonoguchi H, Balaban R, Knepper MA. Calcium and cyclic adenosine monophosphate as second messengers for vasopressin in the rat inner medullary collecting duct. J Clin Invest 81: 1879–1888, 1988.[Web of Science][Medline]
50. Sun A, Hebert SC. Rapid hypertonic cell volume regulation in the perfused inner medullary collecting duct. Kidney Int 36: 831–842, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
51. Surges R, Brewster AL, Bender RA, Beck H, Feuerstein TJ, Baran TZ. Regulated expression of HCN channels and cAMP levels shape the properties of the h current in developing rat hippocampus. Eur J Neurosci 24: 94–104, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
52. Terreros DA, Tarr M, Grantham JJ. Transmembrane electrical potential differences in cells isolated renal tubules. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 241: F61–F68, 1981.
53. Tian L, Shipston MJ. Characterization of hyperpolarization-activated cation currents in mouse anterior pituitary, AtT20 D16:16 corticotropes. Endocrinology 141: 2930–2937, 2000.
54. Ulens C, Tytgat J. Functional heteromerization of HCN1 and HCN2 pacemaker channels. J Biol Chem 276: 6069–6072, 2001.
55. Vandorpe D, Kizer N, Ciampollilo F, Moyer B, Karlson K, Guggino WB, Stanton BA. CFTR mediates electrogenic chloride secretion in mouse inner medullary collecting duct (mIMCD-K2) cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 269: C683–C689, 1995.
56. Vargas G, Lucero MT. Dopamine modulates inwardly rectifying hyperpolarization-activated current (Ih) in cultured rat olfactory receptor neurons. J Neurophysiol 81: 149–159, 1999.
57. Varghese A, TenBroek EM, Coles J Jr., Sigg DC. Endogenous channels in HEK cells and potential roles in HCN ionic current measurements. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 90: 26–37, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
58. Vasilyev DV, Barish ME. Postnatal development of the hyperpolarization-activated excitatory current Ih in mouse hippocampal pyramidal neurons. J Neurosci 22: 8992–9004, 2002.
59. Wang Z, Van Der Berg RJ, Ypey DL. Hyperpolarization-activated currents in the growth cone and soma of neonatal rat dorsal root ganglion neurons in culture. J Neurophysiol 78: 177–186, 1997.
60. Wetzel RK, Sweadner KJ. Immunocytochemical localization of Na-K-ATPase
- and
-subunits in rat kidney. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 281: F531–F545, 2001.
61. Xiao J, Nguyen TV, Ngui K, Strijbos PJLM, Selmer IS, Neylon CB, Furness JB. Molecular and fuctional analysis of hyperpolarization-activated nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels in the enteric nervous system. Neurosci 129: 603–614, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
62. Yamada R, Kuba H, Ishii TM, Ohmori H. Hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation channels regulate auditory coincidence detection in nucleus laminaris of the chick. J Neurosci 25: 8867–8877, 2005.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |