|
|
||||||||
GROWTH, DIFFERENTIATION, AND APOPTOSIS
1Institute of Anatomy, University of Zurich; and 2Institute of Surgical Pathology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Submitted 1 June 2007 ; accepted in final form 19 September 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
kidney; cyclin D1; bromodeoxyuridine; stem cells; regeneration
The source of newly formed renal epithelial cells is debated. Some studies show that novel cells are derived from divisions of differentiated cells (1, 10, 27), and others claim that a subpopulation in the renal tubular epithelial cells function as progenitor cells (5, 9, 16, 19). In addition, hematopoietic stem cells (12, 15, 21, 22) and mesenchymal stem cells (18) have been shown to be able to repopulate the renal tubular system; however, under physiological conditions tubular cells originating from extrarenal stem cells are not detectable in the kidney, and even after severe organ injury these cells constitute only a small population (7).
Our previous studies revealed that tubular cell proliferation in healthy rats rely on the division of differentiated cells (25). Furthermore, we were unable to detect any slow-cycling stem cells or rapidly cycling transit amplifying (TA) cells to support a "classic" stem cell system (26).
In the present study we address the question whether the capacity to divide is restricted to a small subpopulation of the differentiated cells in S3 or whether it is broadly distributed among the cells in that segment. To that aim we investigated the cycling behavior of tubular cells in S3 in juvenile rats and in adult rats, both under physiological conditions and after stimulation of proliferation. The data showed that the bulk of cells in S3 participate in cell proliferation.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Paraffin-embedded human kidney biopsies were supplied by the University Hospital of Zurich. These biopsies were made to monitor organ rejection in kidney-transplanted patients. Only those biopsies showing no signs of rejection were used.
Experimental Protocol Experiment 1: Continuous administration of BrdU for 2 wk. 5'-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO) was added to tap water in a concentration of 0.5 g/l. Three juvenile rats received a 300-µl (10 mg BrdU/ml isotonic saline) loading dose by subcutaneous injection before receiving the BrdU drinking solution over a period of 2 wk up to perfusion fixation.
Experiment 2: Proliferation induction by lead acetate. Six juvenile and six 16-wk-old rats were used. To produce a potent proliferation stimulus, 190 mg of C4H6O4Pb·3H2O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was dissolved in 20 ml distilled H2O and administered intravenously at 3.8 mg/100 g body wt to three animals of each group (2). Three control animals of each group received the corresponding volume of isotonic saline. The rats were perfusion fixed between 9 AM and 11 AM, 36 h after injection.
Experiment 3: Proliferation induction by lead acetate after 2 days of BrdU labeling. Six juvenile rats were injected subcutaneously with 10 mg/kg body wt of BrdU for 2 consecutive days at 7 AM and 7 PM. Twenty four hours after the last BrdU injection, three animals received 3.8 mg/100 g body wt C4H6O4Pb·3H2O and the other three received a corresponding volume of isotonic saline solution. Thirty six hours later the animals were perfusion fixed.
Fixation and Tissue Treatment The rats were anesthetized by an intraperitoneal injection of pentobarbital (100 mg/kg body wt) and fixed by vascular perfusion (4). The fixative contained 3% paraformaldehyde, 0.01% glutardialdehyde, and 0.5% picric acid, dissolved in a 3:2 mixture of 0.1 M cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4, added with sucrose, final osmolality 300 mosmol/kg) and 4% hydroxyl ethyl starch (Fresenius Kabi, Bad Homburg, Germany) in 0.9% NaCl. The kidneys were fixed for 5 min and then rinsed by vascular perfusion with 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 5 min.
Antibodies The antibody used was rabbit polyclonal anti-Ki-67 (Novocastra Laboratories, Newcastle, UK) and anti-p27kip–1 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Anti-cyclin D1 was a rabbit monoclonal antibody (clone SP4) (NeoMarkers).
The following antibodies were mouse monoclonals: anti-BrdU (clone B44; BD Biosciences), anti-Ki-67 (clone MIB-5; DakoCytomation, Glostrup, Denmark), and anti-retinoblastoma (phosphor-specific serine-608, clone 51B7; Thermo Scientific, Fremont, CA).
Immunofluorescence Two-millimeter thick slices of fixed kidney were frozen in liquid propane, cooled down to the temperature of liquid nitrogen, and cut into 4-µm thick cryostat sections. Sections were thawed on slides and microwaved for 10 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer at pH 6.0. After pretreatment for 1 h in 5% normal goat serum in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), the sections were incubated overnight in a humidified chamber at 4°C with the primary antibodies and diluted in PBS supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin.
Binding sites of the primary antibodies were revealed with Cy3-conjugated goat-anti-rabbit IgG (red) and a fluorescein isothyocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat-anti-mouse IgG. Antibodies with minimal cross-reactivity to other secondary antibody species were employed (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA). For nuclear staining, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Sigma) was added to the working dilution of the secondary antibodies. Multiple labeling was performed using cocktails of primary antibodies and of the respective secondary antibodies. Controls without primary antibodies were negative. The sections were coverslipped, using DAKO-Glycergel (Dakopatts), to which 2.5% 1,4-diazabicyclo[2,2,2]octane (DABCO; Sigma) was added as fading retardant.
Fluorescent-labeled specimens were examined using a confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM SP2, Leica, Mannheim, Germany) or a Polyvar microscope (Reichert Jung, Vienna, Austria).
Immunoperoxidase Labeling of Cyclin D1 Three human kidney biopsies were removed and immediately fixed by immersion in phosphate-buffered freshly depolymerized 4% paraformaldehyde for 45 min at room temperature, dehydrated in alcohol series, and embedded in paraffin. Three-micrometer sections were deparaffinized and microwaved for 10 min in 0.0 1 M sodium citrate buffer, pH 6.0. After being blocked with 5% normal goat serum for 30 min at room temperature, the sections were washed in PBS and incubated overnight at 4°C with anti-cyclin D1 1:200 in PBS. The binding sites were revealed by immunoperoxidase using the Vectastain ABC kit (Vector Laboratories, Burlinghame, CA), with 3,3'-diaminobenzidine as the substrate. Nuclei were visualized by counterstaining with hematoxylin.
Quantitative Evaluation of Nuclear Labeling With the use of the nuclear DNA labeling of DAPI, the outer stripe was located, and micrographs were made randomly using the x40 magnification of the laser scanning microscope. The surface area of tissue on each micrograph was 0.38 mm2. The proximal tubule was identified by the brush border, detectable in background fluorescence.
Nuclei of proximal epithelial cells positive for BrdU, Cyclin D1, or Ki-67 were counted on the whole micrographs. Because of the high numbers of DAPI and of cyclin D1-positive cells, these were evaluated in a uniform random systematic sample (10% sampling fraction) of the area of the micrograph.
Statistical analysis of the data was performed with the ANOVA software. Differences were considered significant if P was <0.05 in Student's t-test for unpaired samples. All data are given as means ± SD.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
We found a much lower proliferation rate in S1 and S2 when compared with S3. Here 11.6 ± 2.8% of the tubular epithelial cells were positive for BrdU only, 17.9 ± 4.4% for cyclin D1 only, and 1.4 ± 0.5% double positive for BrdU and cyclin D1, and 69.1 ± 6.0% were negative for both markers. Thus, during the investigated time period, 4.5 times more novel epithelial cells (BrdU+) originated in S3 compared with that with S1 and S2. With only twice as many cells positive for cyclin D1 in S3, the time for a cell to go through G1 appears to be more than twice as long in S1 and S2 compared with S3.
Capacity to React to a Proliferative Stimulus is Age Independent (Expt. 2) The cycling marker Ki-67 (labeling phases S, G2, and M) revealed a much higher proliferation rate in the S3 segment in growing rats (Fig. 2B, 4.8 ± 0.3%) compared with adult rats (Fig. 2D, 0.4 ± 0.1%, P < 0.05). The incidence of cyclin D1-positive cells in S3 on the other hand was similar in both growing (Fig. 2B) and adult (Fig. 2D) rats: 41.7 ± 8.1% and 42.9 ± 1.5%, respectively.
|
|
|
There was no obvious induction of cell proliferation by lead acetate in distal segments of the nephron or in nontubular structures of the kidney.
Since the cycling rate, as indicated by Ki-67, is more than 10 times higher in the whole proximal tubule of growing compared with adult animals, whereas the amount of cyclin D1-positive cells on the other hand is similar, the time span a cell resides in the G1 phase is much longer in grownup than in growing rats.
Cycle Progression in Proximal Tubular Epithelial Cells is Regulated by p27kip-1 (Expt. 2) The immunoreactivity of p27kip-1 and phosphorylation state of retinoblastoma (Rb) was investigated in growing and adult rats that received either lead acetate or isotonic saline solution. The employed antibody against hyperphosphorylated Rb specifically detects the cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4)-dependent phosphorylation at serine-608. CDK4 forms a complex with cyclin D1, which inactivates Rb by hyperphosphorylation leading to a degradation of cycling inhibitors like p27kip-1 and thus progression in the cell cycle (3, 6). In the control adult rat kidney, which displays a very low cycling rate, practically all epithelial cells strongly expressed p27kip-1 (Fig. 4A). After proliferation induction by lead acetate, levels of p27kip-1 were strongly reduced in a large fraction of tubular epithelial cells with a simultaneous hyperphosphorylation of Rb (Fig. 4B).
In untreated growing rats, hyperphosphorylated Rb-positive, p27kip-1-negative nuclei were more abundant than in untreated adult rats (not shown), reflecting the higher rate of cell proliferation (26). After treatment with lead acetate, a comparable picture was observed in growing rats as in adult rats.
After Division, Proximal Epithelial Cells go Through a Period of Quiescence, Which can be Shortened by a Mitotic Stimulus (Expt. 3) After division proximal tubular cells of growing rats are quiescent for more than 1 wk under physiological conditions (26). To test whether a strong mitotic stimulus could induce a cycle reentry shortly after division, we administered BrdU twice daily on day 1 and 2. Twenty-four hours after the last BrdU application, one group received lead acetate and the other received a corresponding volume of isotonic saline solution. Animals of both groups were perfusion fixed 36 h later on day 5. In S3 6.7 ± 0.8% and 5.6 ± 0.1% of the cells were positive for BrdU in the control and lead acetate-treated group, respectively. In the control group, 4.4 ± 1.4% of nuclei were positive for Ki-67. In the lead acetate-treated animals 28.4 ± 1.9% of the overall cell population but only 1.7 ± 1.1% of the BrdU-positive cells were positive for Ki-67 (Fig. 5). Thus a notable level of resistance to reenter the cell cycle after division is evident even after application of a strong mitotic stimulus.
|
Expression of Cyclin D1 in Tubular Cells of Adult Human Kidney In healthy human adult kidneys, cells were frequently positive for cyclin D1 in varying intensities (Fig. 6), which indicates that a reserve pool for rapid division could also be of relevance in humans. However, a word of caution needs to be added. Even though the selected biopsies had been classified as healthy by the pathologist, undetected pathological processes might have induced an abnormal rate of proliferation.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In experiment 1 a majority of cells in the S3 segment of growing rats either divided (BrdU+) or entered the cycle (cyclin D1) within 2 wk and only 11% of cells remained negative for BrdU and cyclin D1. Therefore, the proliferation potential is distributed in a large proportion, possibly the total of cells in S3. In the cell population that did not divide during 2 wk (BrdU negative) 71% of the cells were cyclin D1 positive, compared with 17% in the BrdU-positive population, indicating that the tendency to enter G1 increased with time following division. This likely reflects the obligatory period of quiescence (G0) following division, which was found with a different experimental protocol in a previous study (26).
The cycling behavior is quantitatively different in the cortical labyrinth, comprising the segments S1 and S2 of the proximal tubule, compared with S3. When compared with experiment 1, the fraction of cells in G1 (cyclin D1 positive) and the fraction of cells that divided within 2 wk (BrdU positive), it appeared that the time period to pass through the G1-phase of cycling is more than twice as long in S1 and S2 than in S3. The data above show that a very high proportion of proximal tubular cells are in G1 and that there is no constant relationship between the actual rate of cell division and the fraction of cells in G1. Thus entry in G1 does not seem to serve immediate progression through the cell cycle. This notion is further supported by comparison of growing and adult rats. Cyclin D1 expression was detected in roughly 40% of tubular cells in S3 in both groups, whereas the cycling rate in adult rats was less than a tenth of that during growth. It thus appears that, independently of the actual proliferation rate, a large pool of cells in G1 represents a reserve that stays ready to undergo division if proliferation is urgently required. To test this hypothesis, in experiment 2 we subjected both adult and growing rats to a strong proliferative stimulus by injecting lead acetate (2). This lead to a similar proliferative response in both groups, with about 30% of cells progressing in the cell cycle and becoming Ki-67 positive, a marker of the S, G2, and M-phase. Concurrently, we saw a depletion of the cyclin D1-positive cell pool in both groups, suggesting that the cells progressed from that pool through the cycle with a delayed replenishment of the G1 reserve.
If a large reserve pool of cells in G1 is a vital protective mechanism, one would expect to see an acceleration of the replenishment of that pool after a period of stimulated mitosis. That hypothesis was tested in experiment 3. We applied BrdU on days 1 and 2 and lead acetate on day 3. On day 5 the incidence of cyclin D1 in the BrdU-positive population was roughly three times higher in the lead acetate group than that in the control group. This suggests that the refractory period, in which cells do not reenter G1 after division, can be shortened by a strong proliferative stimulus.
The presence of roughly 40% of cells of the segment S3 are in G1 implicates a potent control of the G1-S progression. The cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p27, which blocks cycle progression at that site, was actually abundant in virtually all nuclei of S3 in adult rats. After induction of proliferation with lead acetate, a large fraction of nuclei displayed no abundance or only low abundance of p27. Those nuclei were positive for hyperphosphorylated Rb, which was hardly detectable in untreated adult rats. Thus it is likely that under normal conditions in adult rats hypophoshorylated Rb inhibits G1-S progression by stabilizing p27. The blockade can be released by hyperphosphorylation of Rb, leading to degradation of p27 (3, 6).
We propose the following model for cell proliferation in the S3 segment. All tubular cells can enter the cell cycle. After division the daughter cells are quiescent for at least a few days under physiological conditions, but they eventually reenter the cell cycle. The reentry into the cell cycle can be accelerated by a strong mitotic stimulus. A large fraction of cells is in the G1-phase of cell cycle, even in adult rats, ensuring a rapid proliferative response when needed.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Choie DD, Richter GW. Dell proliferation in mouse kidney induced by lead. II. Synthesis of ribonucleic acid and protein. Lab Invest 30: 652–656, 1974.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Cobrinik D. Pocket proteins and cell cycle control. Oncogene 24: 2796–2809, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Dawson TP, Gandhi R, Le Hir M, Kaissling B. Ecto-5'-nucleotidase: localization in rat kidney by light microscopic histochemical and immunohistochemical methods. J Histochem Cytochem 37: 39–47, 1989.[Abstract]
5. Dekel B, Zangi L, Shezen E, Reich-Zeliger S, Eventov-Friedman S, Katchman H, Jacob-Hirsch J, Amariglio N, Rechavi G, Margalit R, Reisner Y. Isolation and characterization of nontubular sca-1+lin- multipotent stem/progenitor cells from adult mouse kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 3300–3314, 2006.
6. Diehl JA. Cycling to cancer with cyclin D1. Cancer Biol Ther 1: 226–231, 2002.[Web of Science][Medline]
7. Duffield JS, Bonventre JV. Kidney tubular epithelium is restored without replacement with bone marrow-derived cells during repair after ischemic injury. Kidney Int 68: 1956–1961, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Fujigaki Y, Goto T, Sakakima M, Fukasawa H, Miyaji T, Yamamoto T, Hishida A. Kinetics and characterization of initially regenerating proximal tubules in S3 segment in response to various degrees of acute tubular injury. Nephrol Dial Transplant 21: 41–50, 2006.
9. Gupta S, Verfaillie C, Chmielewski D, Kren S, Eidman K, Connaire J, Heremans Y, Lund T, Blackstad M, Jiang Y, Luttun A, Rosenberg ME. Isolation and characterization of kidney-derived stem cells. J Am Soc Nephrol 17: 3028–3040, 2006.
10. Houghton DC, Hartnett M, Campbell-Boswell M, Porter G, Bennett W. A light and electron microscopic analysis of gentamicin nephrotoxicity in rats. Am J Pathol 82: 589–612, 1976.[Abstract]
11. Ichimura T, Hung CC, Yang SA, Stevens JL, Bonventre JV. Kidney injury molecule-1: a tissue and urinary biomarker for nephrotoxicant-induced renal injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 286: F552–F563, 2004.
12. Kale S, Karihaloo A, Clark PR, Kashgarian M, Krause DS, Cantley LG. Bone marrow stem cells contribute to repair of the ischemically injured renal tubule. J Clin Invest 112: 42–49, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
13. Lieberthal W, Nigam SK. Acute renal failure. I. Relative importance of proximal vs distal tubular injury. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 275: F623–F631, 1998.
14. Lieberthal W, Nigam SK. Acute renal failure. II. Experimental models of acute renal failure: imperfect but indispensable. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 278: F1–F12, 2000.
15. Lin F, Cordes K, Li L, Hood L, Couser WG, Shankland SJ, Igarashi P. Hematopoietic stem cells contribute to the regeneration of renal tubules after renal ischemia-reperfusion injury in mice. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 1188–1199, 2003.
16. Maeshima A, Yamashita S, Nojima Y. Identification of renal progenitor-like tubular cells that participate in the regeneration processes of the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 14: 3138–3146, 2003.
17. Megyesi J, Andrade L, Vieira JM Jr, Safirstein RL, Price PM. Positive effect of the induction of p21WAF1/CIP1 on the course of ischemic acute renal failure. Kidney Int 60: 2164–2172, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18. Morigi M, Imberti B, Zoja C, Corna D, Tomasoni S, Abbate M, Rottoli D, Angioletti S, Benigni A, Perico N, Alison M, Remuzzi G. Mesenchymal stem cells are renotropic, helping to repair the kidney and improve function in acute renal failure. J Am Soc Nephrol 15: 1794–1804, 2004.
19. Oliver JA, Maarouf O, Cheema FH, Martens TP, Al-Awqati Q. The renal papilla is a niche for adult kidney stem cells. J Clin Invest 114: 795–804, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
20. Peters G. The D-type cyclins and their role in tumorigenesis. J Cell Sci Suppl 18: 89–96, 1994.[Medline]
21. Poulsom R, Alison MR, Cook T, Jeffery R, Ryan E, Forbes SJ, Hunt T, Wyles S, Wright NA. Bone marrow stem cells contribute to healing of the kidney. J Am Soc Nephrol 14, Suppl 1: S48–S54, 2003.
22. Poulsom R, Forbes SJ, Hodivala-Dilke K, Ryan E, Wyles S, Navaratnarasah S, Jeffery R, Hunt T, Alison M, Cook T, Pusey C, Wright NA. Bone marrow contributes to renal parenchymal turnover and regeneration. J Pathol 195: 229–235, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Sabolic I. Common mechanisms in nephropathy induced by toxic metals. Nephron Physiol 104: p107–p114, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
24. Trevisan A, Cristofori P, Fanelli G. Glutamine synthetase activity in rat urine as sensitive marker to detect S3 segment-specific injury of proximal tubule induced by xenobiotics. Arch Toxicol 73: 255–262, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Vogetseder A, Karadeniz A, Kaissling B, Le Hir M. Tubular cell proliferation in the healthy rat kidney. Histochem Cell Biol 124: 97–104, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Vogetseder A, Palan T, Bacic D, Kaissling B, Le Hir M. Proximal tubular epithelial cells are generated by division of differentiated cells in the healthy kidney. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 292: C807–C813, 2007.
27. Witzgall R, Brown D, Schwarz C, Bonventre JV. Localization of proliferating cell nuclear antigen, vimentin, c-Fos, and clusterin in the postischemic kidney. Evidence for a heterogenous genetic response among nephron segments, and a large pool of mitotically active and dedifferentiated cells. J Clin Invest 93: 2175–2188, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. H. Little and J. F. Bertram Is There Such a Thing as a Renal Stem Cell? J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., October 1, 2009; 20(10): 2112 - 2117. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. C. Adams and L. Oxburgh The long-term label retaining population of the renal papilla arises through divergent regional growth of the kidney Am J Physiol Renal Physiol, September 1, 2009; 297(3): F809 - F815. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Singh and S. X. Hou Multipotent stem cells in the Malpighian tubules of adult Drosophila melanogaster J. Exp. Biol., February 1, 2009; 212(3): 413 - 423. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. R. Singh and S. X. Hou Lessons Learned About Adult Kidney Stem Cells From the Malpighian Tubules of Drosophila J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., April 1, 2008; 19(4): 660 - 666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |