|
|
||||||||
VASCULAR BIOLOGY
Davis Heart and Lung Research Institute, Departments of 1Pharmacology and 2Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University College of Medicine; and 3Columbus Children's Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
Submitted 29 March 2007 ; accepted in final form 10 September 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
nitric oxide; endothelial nitric oxide synthase; asymmetric dimethly araginine; 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal; dimethyarginine dimethylamine hydrolase
6 polyunsaturated fatty acids, which has been shown to accumulate in membranes at concentrations from 10 µm to 5 mM (40). There is a body of evidence that suggests that reactive aldehydes such as 4-HNE play a role in the progression of atherosclerosis. Plasma concentrations of these reactive aldehydes are known to increase relative to the progression of aortic atherosclerosis, and during the oxidation of LDL, high concentrations of the reactive aldehydes are generated (9, 30). It has been suggested that the elevations in these highly reactive lipid hydroperoxide degradation products result in impaired endothelial function and atherosusceptibility, secondary to NOS impairment (32, 35, 44). In support of the importance of the reactive aldehyde involvement in endothelial dysfunction, here we demonstrate that exposure of aortic endothelial cells to 4-HNE dose dependently inhibits NO bioavailability. We hypothesize that the decrease in NO bioavailability is a result of increased levels of the NOS inhibitors asymmetric dimethly arginine (ADMA) and NG-monomethyl arginine (NMMA).
ADMA has been shown to be increased in conditions associated with increased risk of atherosclerosis and independently predicts total and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with angiographic coronary artery disease (2, 27, 28, 33, 36, 38). However, little is known with regard to the pathways leading to the methylarginine accumulation observed in cardiovascular diseases. These endogenous inhibitors of NOS are derived from the proteolysis of methylated arginine residues in various proteins. The methylation is carried out by a group of enzymes referred to as protein-arginine methyl transferases. Subsequent proteolysis of proteins containing methylarginine groups leads to the release of free methylarginine into the cytoplasm where NO production from NOS is inhibited (4, 11, 23). These methylarginines are subsequently degraded by the enzyme dimethylarginine dimethylamine hydrolase (DDAH), which hydrolyzes the conversion of ADMA to L-citrulline and dimethylamine (19, 25). The activity of DDAH has been shown to be decreased by oxidized LDL and tumor necrosis factor-
, yielding increased methylarginine levels with subsequent impairment of NOS-derived NO generation (8, 12, 16, 24). Because NO is known to possess anti-proliferative and anti-atherogenic properties, methylarginine accumulation in response to the decreased DDAH expression/activity has been proposed to be involved in the vascular pathophysiology observed in a variety of cardiovascular diseases (3, 5, 23, 41, 42). However, the mechanisms as to how methylarginines are modulated and what role they play in disease progression are not understood. Therefore, the current studies were performed to establish the effects of the lipid peroxidation degradation product 4-HNE on NO production and determine whether methylarginines are involved in the lipid peroxidation-mediated pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture. Bovine aortic endothelial cells (BAECs) were purchased from Cell Systems and cultured in DMEM containing 10% fetal bovine serum, 1% nonessential amino acid solution, 0.2% endothelial cell growth factor supplement, and 1% antibotic-antimyotic and incubated at 37°C under a humidified environment containing 5% CO2-95% O2. For experiments involving exposure to 4-HNE, 4-HNE was prepared as a stock solution in ethanol at a concentration of 50 mM. The 4-HNE was then added to the media of BAECs and incubated for 24 h. Dilutions of 4-HNE were performed to maintain the final ethanol concentration below 0.2%.
Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and spin trapping. Spin-trapping measurements of NO were performed using a Bruker EPR 300 spectrometer with Fe-N-methyl-D-glucamine dithiocarbamate (Fe-MGD) as the spin trap (5, 7). For measurements of NO produced by BAECs, cells were cultured as described above, and spin-trapping experiments were performed on cells grown in six-well plates (1 x 106 cells/well). In these studies, cells attached to the substratum were utilized since scraping or enzymatic removal leads to injury and membrane damage with impaired NO generation. The medium from each well was removed, and the cells were washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (without CaCl2 or MgCl2). Next, 0.3 ml of PBS containing glucose (1 g/l), CaCl2, MgCl2, the NO spin-trap FE-MGD (0.5 mM Fe2+, 5.0 mM MGD), and calcium ionophore (1 µM) was added to each well, and the plates were incubated at 37°C under a humidified environment containing 5% CO2-95% O2 for 30 min. After incubation, the medium from each well was removed, and the trapped NO in the supernatants was quantified using electron paramagnetic resonance. Spectra recorded from these cellular preparations were obtained using the following parameters: microwave power, 20 mW; modulation amplitude, 3.16 G; and modulation frequency, 100 kHZ.
Measurement of endothelial cell ADMA and L-Arg levels. BAECs were collected from confluent 75-cm2 culture flask by gentle scraping followed by sonication in PBS followed by extraction using a cation-exchange column. Samples were derivatized with OPA and separated on a Supelco LC-DABS column (4.6 mm x 25 cm ID, 5 µm particle size), and L-Arg and methylarginines were separated and detected using an ESA (Chelmsford, MA) HPLC system with electrochemical detection at 400 mV (7). Intracellular levels of L-Arg and methylarginines were determined from values derived from standard curves of each analyte using the ESA peak integration software assuming intracellular water content of 2 pL.
DDAH-1 and eNOS expression. DDAH-1 was detected by anti-DDAH-1 goat IG purchased from IMGENEX and diluted 1:2,000 (San Diego, CA). eNOS was detected using an anti-eNOS antibody purchased from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). The secondary antibodies were donkey anti-goat IgG-horseradish peroxidase and goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidas, respectively, and purchased from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA). The secondary antibodies were diluted 1:2,000. Western blot detection was performed using an enhanced chemiliumnesece kit purchased from Amersham Biosciences (Piscataway, NJ).
DDAH activity. DDAH activity was measured from the conversion of L-[14C]NMMA to L-[14C]citrulline. BAECs grown to confluence in T-75 flasks were trypsinized, pelleted, and resuspended in 150 µl of 50 mM Tris (pH 7.4). The cells were then sonicated 4 x 2 s, and 150 µl of the reaction buffer (50 mM Tris, 20 µM L-[14C]NMMA, 180 µM L-NMMA, pH 7.4) were added to each sample. The samples were then incubated in a water bath at 37°C for 90 min. After the incubation, the reaction was stopped with 1 ml of ice-cold stop buffer using 20 mM HEPES with 2 mM EDTA, pH 5.5. Separation of L-[14C]citrulline from L-[14C]NMMA was performed using the cation exchange resin Dowex AG50WX-8 (0.5 ml, Na+ form, Pharmacia). The L-[14C]citrulline in the eluent was then determined using a liquid scintillation counter.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
50 µM. Control studies using the nonoxidized carbonyl hexanol demonstrated no significant inhibition in cellular NO production with concentrations up to 50 µM. The concentration of 4-HNE (50 µM) used for subsequent studies represents pathologically relevant levels of this reactive lipid oxidation product as previous studies have shown concentrations exceeding 50 µM 4-HNE in the plasma of dogs following reperfusion injury (26, 34).
|
|
|
|
|
|
50%, and this increase in activity was reduced by 25% following exposure of BAECs to 4-HNE. Although DDAH activity was significantly higher in the DDAH-overexpressing cells exposed to 4-HNE compared with the control, this increase in DDAH activity was not accompanied by an in increased NO production (Fig. 6). Treatment of BAECs with the antioxidant GSH had modest effect on the DDAH activity and did not significantly prevent the loss of DDAH activity following 4-HNE challenge, whereas the combination of DDAH overexpression and GSH increased DDAH activity by
50% (Fig. 7) with near-complete restoration of NO production (Fig. 6). These results suggest that 4-HNE causes NOS impairment through multiple mechanisms involving methylarginine accumulation and possibly NOS uncoupling. Evidence for NOS uncoupling is supported by our data demonstrating that DDAH overexpression in the presence of 4-HNE actually exacerbates the effects of 4-HNE on NO production (Fig. 6). In this regard, we have previously reported that methylarginines inhibit NOS-derived superoxide, and as such, overexpression of DDAH would reduce this inhibitory effect resulting in increased NOS-derived superoxide and reduced NO bioavailability (6). Evidence for the multiple mechanisms through which 4-HNE mediates its effects are supported by our results demonstrating that GSH treatment alone or DDAH overexpression alone has only moderate protection from 4-HNE-induced NOS dysfunction. However, in combination, these two treatments largely restored endothelial NO generation (Fig. 6). Therefore, complete protection of endothelium-derived NO generation from 4-HNE damage can only be achieved by both preventing NOS uncoupling (GSH treatment) and methylarginine accumulation (DDAH overexpression).
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Therefore, studies were performed to determine the effects of the highly reactive lipid peroxidation product 4-HNE on endothelium-derived NO generation. Results demonstrated that the exposure of BAECs to 4-HNE caused a dose-dependent inhibition of cellular NO production. The observed 4-HNE effects were independent of changes in either NOS expression or phosphorylation state, because the Western blot analysis revealed no changes in either endpoint. These results suggested that the observed NOS impairment involved mechanisms other than those related to protein expression. As such, subsequent experiments were performed to determine whether alterations in NOS cofactors or substrate may be involved in the decreased NO bioavailability. In this regard, oxidant stress, which has been shown to occur following exposure to lipid peroxidation products, has been shown to reduce the bioavailability of the critical NOS cofactor BH4 (21, 40). Loss of this cofactor results in NOS uncoupling evident by impaired NO synthesis and enhanced superoxide production from the enzyme (43). Moreover, oxidant injury has also been demonstrated to increase the cellular levels of the endogenous methylarginine ADMA (23). Therefore, cellular studies were carried out to investigate the effects of adding both an antioxidant (GSH) to prevent BH4 oxidation as well as the eNOS substrate L-Arg to overcome endogenous methylarginine-mediated NOS inhibition. Our data demonstrate that the addition of either GSH or L-Arg alone had only modest NO-enhancing effects; however, coincubation with both GSH and L-Arg was able to almost completely restore endothelial NO production. These data suggest that the observed NOS impairment involves both oxidant-induced NOS inhibition (alleviated by the addition of GSH) as well as methylarginine accumulation (alleviated by the addition of excess substrate).
Direct measurement of ADMA levels and DDAH activity within cells by HPLC demonstrated that following 4-HNE challenge, intracellular ADMA levels were increased greater than twofold. Based on previously published studies demonstrating the kinetics of ADMA-mediated cellular inhibition, a twofold increase in methylarginine levels would be expected to inhibit NOS-dependent NO generation by 20–30% (5). The additional inhibition observed could be due to compartmentalization or NOS uncoupling and increased NOS-derived superoxide production in the presence of ADMA. To test this hypothesis, we used luminescence and Western blot studies to measure ONOO– levels and nitrotyrosine formation, respectively. Although no significant increase in ONOO– formation was observed, this does not rule out NOS uncoupling as superoxide generation from the enzyme is likely below detection limits. In this regard, we have also employed EPR spin-trapping techniques to measure eNOS-derived endothelial superoxide production. These studies demonstrated increased levels of oxygen radicals that were inhibited by
20% by L-NAME. L-NAME is currently the only known specific inhibitor of NOS-derived superoxide production; however, this observation is based primarily on studies from purified enzyme. Because L-NAME is a methyl ester and is subject to modification by cellular esterases, its intracellular kinetics on NOS-derived superoxide production are not well characterized. Nevertheless, increased endothelial superoxide production was observed form BAECs exposed to 4-HNE; however, the source of this radical generation is unclear.
To determine whether the increased levels of ADMA observed following 4-HNE exposure resulted from changes in the activity of the ADMA metabolizing enzyme DDAH, its activity was measured. Studies of DDAH activity demonstrated a 40% decrease in hydrolytic activity, suggesting that the mechanism for the observed 4-HNE-directed NOS impairment was via an inhibition of DDAH. Additional studies were performed on purified recombinant hDDAH-1 to determine whether 4-HNE effects were through direct interaction with the enzyme. Results demonstrated that incubation of hDDAH-1 with 4-HNE (50 µM) resulted in a >40% decrease in enzyme activity. These effects were specific to 4-HNE as incubation with the nonoxidized carbonyl hexanol (10–500 µM) had no effect on DDAH activity. Similar studies were performed with purified recombinant eNOS and no inhibition was observed following 4-HNE exposure. 4-HNE forms Michael adducts with histindine and cysteine residues on proteins. In this regard, the catalytic triad of DDAH contains both cysteine and histidine residues, and mutation of either amino acid has been demonstrated to render the enzyme inactive (14, 37, 39).
As further support to the role of DDAH in mediating the inhibitory effects of 4-HNE on endothelial NO production, studies were performed using DDAH overexpressing BAECs. Overexpression of DDAH should lead to a decrease in cellular methylarginines with the concomitant increase in NOS-derived NO. DDAH overexpression was induced using an adenoviral construct carrying the human DDAH-1 gene (adDDAH1). Preliminary studies demonstrated that incubation of BAECs with adDDAH1 at 25 MOI, resulted in a threefold increase in protein expression and a >50% increase in DDAH activity following a 48-h incubation period. DDAH overexpression increased cellular DDAH activity in control cells by 50% and resulted in a 22% increase in cellular NO production (Figs. 6 and 7), demonstrating that the endogenous levels of ADMA and L-NMMA are sufficient to significantly inhibit endothelial NO generation. If one then considers the twofold increase in the levels of ADMA observed following the 4-HNE treatment, a
40% inhibitory effect would be predicted (5). These data support previous studies implicating ADMA in the "arginine paradox" (1). The arginine paradox is a phenomenon in which supplementation with exogenous L-Arg enhances NO-mediated vascular function despite the fact that endothelial L-Arg concentrations are 50- to 100-fold above the Km. These results, for the first time, directly demonstrate that the endogenous methylarginines are able to basally regulate endothelial NO and implicate the methylarginines as direct mediators of the "arginine paradox," acting as competitive inhibitors of NOS and increasing the effective Km for L-Arg.
Subsequently, a series of studies were performed using this same transduction protocol to examine the effects of DDAH overexpression on 4-HNE-mediated endothelial NO inhibition. Although DDAH overexpression did increase DDAH activity and decrease endogenous methylarginines, the overexpression of the enzyme alone was not sufficient to prevent the 4-HNE-induced decrease in NO production. In fact, our results demonstrated that exposure of DDAH-overexpressing cells to 4-HNE resulted in worsened outcome as NO levels were significantly lower than that in the control cells exposed to 4-HNE. Although these results may appear contradictory to our hypothesis, they in fact support it and demonstrate that NOS uncoupling is likely occurring. We have previously demonstrated that ADMA inhibits NOS-derived superoxide, and as such, DDAH overexpression in the presence of uncoupled NOS would be expected to eliminate ADMA and thus prevent ADMA-mediated inhibition of NOS-derived superoxide. The outcome of this would be reduced NO bioavailability through the reaction of available NO with superoxide, a reaction that occurs at diffusion limited rates.
Our hypothesis would predict that treatment of DDAH-overexpressing cells with an antioxidant would restore NO to levels similar to those observed with L-Arg and GSH treatment, if in fact, methylarginines are contributing to the inhibition in NO generation seen with 4-HNE challenge. Indeed, we have demonstrated almost complete protection of cellular NO production following 4-HNE challenge using a combination of viral overexpression of DDAH and treatment with GSH, compared with the respective control. These results would indicate that GSH alone reduces NOS uncoupling but not the methylarginine accumulation, whereas L-Arg supplementation and/or DDAH overexpression overcomes the 4-HNE-induced increase in methylarginines but not the NOS uncoupling.
In conclusion, our results demonstrate for the first time that the lipid peroxidation product 4-HNE can inhibit the endothelial NO production. The doses used in this study represent pathological levels of this highly reactive lipid peroxidation product and suggest that this bioactive molecule may play a critical role in the endothelial dysfunction observed in a variety of cardiovascular diseases. The inhibitory effects of 4-HNE appear to be mediated through both oxidant stress and elevated levels of the endogenous NOS inhibitors ADMA and L-NMMA, as either L-Arg supplementation or DDAH overexpression in the presence of an antioxidant were able to restore NO production. Furthermore, DDAH-overexpressing cells exhibited significantly increased levels of NO and implicate the methylarginines as mediators of the "L-arginine paradox." Together, these results represent a major step forward in our understanding of the regulation, impact, and role of methylarginines and lipid peroxidation in cardiovascular disease.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Boger RH, Bode-Boger SM, Brandes RP, Phivthong-ngam L, Bohme M, Nafe R, Mugge A, Frolich JC. Dietary L-arginine reduces the progression of atherosclerosis in cholesterol-fed rabbits: comparison with lovastatin. Circulation 96: 1282–1290, 1997.
3. Boger RH, Cooke JP, Vallance P. ADMA: an emerging cardiovascular risk factor. Vasc Med 10, Suppl 1: S1–S2, 2005.
4. Boger RH, Vallance P, Cooke JP. Asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA): a key regulator of nitric oxide synthase. Atheroscler Suppl 4: 1–3, 2003.[Medline]
5. Cardounel AJ, Cui H, Samouilov A, Johnson W, Kearns P, Tsai AL, Berka V, Zweier JL. Evidence for the pathophysiological role of endogenous methylarginines in regulation of endothelial NO production and vascular function. J Biol Chem 282: 879–887, 2007.
6. Cardounel AJ, Xia Y, Zweier JL. Endogenous methylarginines modulate superoxide as well as nitric oxide generation from neuronal nitric-oxide synthase: differences in the effects of monomethyl- and dimethylarginines in the presence and absence of tetrahydrobiopterin. J Biol Chem 280: 7540–7549, 2005.
7. Cardounel AJ, Zweier JL. Endogenous methylarginines regulate neuronal nitric-oxide synthase and prevent excitotoxic injury. J Biol Chem277: 33995–34002. Epub 32002 Jun 33928, 2002.
8. Chen Y, Li Y, Zhang P, Traverse JH, Hou M, Xu X, Kimoto M, Bache RJ. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase and endothelial dysfunction in failing hearts. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2212–H2219, 2005.
9. Chisolm GM, Steinberg D. The oxidative modification hypothesis of atherogenesis: an overview. Free Radic Biol Med 28: 1815–1826, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
10. Cohen RA. The role of nitric oxide and other endothelium-derived vasoactive substances in vascular disease. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 38: 105–128, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Cooke JP. Does ADMA cause endothelial dysfunction? Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 20: 2032–2037, 2000.
12. Dayoub H, Achan V, Adimoolam S, Jacobi J, Stuehlinger MC, Wang BY, Tsao PS, Kimoto M, Vallance P, Patterson AJ, Cooke JP. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase regulates nitric oxide synthesis: genetic and physiological evidence. Circulation108: 3042–3047. Epub 2003 Nov 3024, 2003.
13. Esterbauer H, Schaur RJ, Zollner H. Chemistry and biochemistry of 4-hydroxynonenal, malonaldehyde and related aldehydes. Free Radic Biol Med 11: 81–128, 1991.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Frey D, Braun O, Briand C, Vasak M, Grutter MG. Structure of the mammalian NOS regulator dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase: a basis for the design of specific inhibitors. Structure 14: 901–911, 2006.[Medline]
15. Guerra R Jr, Brotherton AF, Goodwin PJ, Clark CR, Armstrong ML, and Harrison DG. Mechanisms of abnormal endothelium-dependent vascular relaxation in atherosclerosis: implications for altered autocrine and paracrine functions of EDRF. Blood Vessels 26: 300–314, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
16. Ito A, Tsao PS, Adimoolam S, Kimoto M, Ogawa T, Cooke JP. Novel mechanism for endothelial dysfunction: dysregulation of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase. Circulation 99: 3092–3095, 1999.
17. Jurgens G, Chen Q, Esterbauer H, Mair S, Ledinski G, Dinges HP. Immunostaining of human autopsy aortas with antibodies to modified apolipoprotein B and apoprotein(a). Arterioscler Thromb 13: 1689–1699, 1993.
18. Keaney JF Jr, Xu A, Cunningham D, Jackson T, Frei B, Vita JA. Dietary probucol preserves endothelial function in cholesterol-fed rabbits by limiting vascular oxidative stress and superoxide generation. J Clin Invest 95: 2520–2529, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
19. Kimoto M, Miyatake S, Sasagawa T, Yamashita H, Okita M, Oka T, Ogawa T, Tsuji H. Purification, cDNA cloning and expression of human NG,NG-dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase. Eur J Biochem 258: 863–868, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
20. Konishi H, Sydow K, Cooke JP. Dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase promotes endothelial repair after vascular injury. J Am Coll Cardiol 49: 1099–1105, 2007.
21. Landmesser U, Dikalov S, Price SR, McCann L, Fukai T, Holland SM, Mitch WE, Harrison DG. Oxidation of tetrahydrobiopterin leads to uncoupling of endothelial cell nitric oxide synthase in hypertension. J Clin Invest 111: 1201–1209, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Leiper J, Murray-Rust J, McDonald N, Vallance P. S-nitrosylation of dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase regulates enzyme activity: further interactions between nitric oxide synthase and dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99: 13527–13532, 2002.
23. Leiper J, Vallance P. Biological significance of endogenous methylarginines that inhibit nitric oxide synthases. Cardiovasc Res 43: 542–548, 1999.
24. Leiper JM. The DDAH-ADMA-NOS pathway. Ther Drug Monit 27: 744–746, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Leiper JM, Santa Maria J, Chubb A, MacAllister RJ, Charles IG, Whitley GS, Vallance P. Identification of two human dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolases with distinct tissue distributions and homology with microbial arginine deiminases. Biochem J 343: 209–214, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Lieners C, Redl H, Molnar H, Furst W, Hallstrom S, Schlag G. Lipidperoxidation in a canine model of hypovolemic-traumatic shock. Prog Clin Biol Res 308: 345–350, 1989.[Medline]
27. Meinitzer A, Seelhorst U, Wellnitz B, Halwachs-Baumann G, Boehm BO, Winkelmann BR, Marz W. Asymmetrical dimethylarginine independently predicts total and cardiovascular mortality in individuals with angiographic coronary artery disease (the Ludwigshafen Risk and Cardiovascular Health study). Clin Chem 53: 273–283, 2007.
28. Miyazaki H, Matsuoka H, Cooke JP, Usui M, Ueda S, Okuda S, Imaizumi T. Endogenous nitric oxide synthase inhibitor: a novel marker of atherosclerosis. Circulation 99: 1141–1146, 1999.
29. Palmer RM, Ferrige AG, Moncada S. Nitric oxide release accounts for the biological activity of endothelium-derived relaxing factor. Nature 327: 524–526, 1987.[CrossRef][Medline]
30. Quinn MT, Parthasarathy S, Fong LG, Steinberg D. Oxidatively modified low density lipoproteins: a potential role in recruitment and retention of monocyte/macrophages during atherogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 2995–2998, 1987.
31. Radomski MW, Moncada S. Regulation of vascular homeostasis by nitric oxide. Thromb Haemost 70: 36–41, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
32. Sawamura T, Kume N, Aoyama T, Moriwaki H, Hoshikawa H, Aiba Y, Tanaka T, Miwa S, Katsura Y, Kita T, Masaki T. An endothelial receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein. Nature 386: 73–77, 1997.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Schulze F, Lenzen H, Hanefeld C, Bartling A, Osterziel KJ, Goudeva L, Schmidt-Lucke C, Kusus M, Maas R, Schwedhelm E, Strodter D, Simon BC, Mugge A, Daniel WG, Tillmanns H, Maisch B, Streichert T, Boger RH. Asymmetric dimethylarginine is an independent risk factor for coronary heart disease: results from the multicenter Coronary Artery Risk Determination investigating the Influence of ADMA Concentration (CARDIAC) study. Am Heart J 152: 493 e491–e498, 2006.
34. Siakotos AN, Bray R, Dratz E, van Kuijk F, Sevanian A, Koppang N. 4-Hydroxynonenal: a specific indicator for canine neuronal-retinal ceroidosis. Am J Med Genet Suppl 5: 171–181, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
35. Simon BC, Cunningham LD, Cohen RA. Oxidized low density lipoproteins cause contraction and inhibit endothelium-dependent relaxation in the pig coronary artery. J Clin Invest 86: 75–79, 1990.[Web of Science][Medline]
36. Smith CL, Anthony S, Hubank M, Leiper JM, Vallance P. Effects of ADMA upon gene expression: an insight into the pathophysiological significance of raised plasma ADMA. PLoS Med 2: e264, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
37. Stone EM, Costello AL, Tierney DL, Fast W. Substrate-assisted cysteine deprotonation in the mechanism of dimethylargininase (DDAH) from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochemistry 45: 5618–5630, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
38. Tsao PS, Cooke JP. Endothelial alterations in hypercholesterolemia: more than simply vasodilator dysfunction. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 32, Suppl 3: S48–S53, 1998.[Web of Science][Medline]
39. Uchida K. 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal: a product and mediator of oxidative stress. Prog Lipid Res 42: 318–343, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
40. Usatyuk PV, Parinandi NL, Natarajan V. Redox regulation of 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal-mediated endothelial barrier dysfunction by focal adhesion, adherens, and tight junction proteins. J Biol Chem 281: 35554–35566, 2006.
41. Vallance P, Leiper J. Cardiovascular biology of the asymmetric dimethylarginine:dimethylarginine dimethylaminohydrolase pathway. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 1023–1030, 2004.
42. Wojciak-Stothard B, Torondel B, Tsang LY, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Leiper JM, Vallance P. The ADMA/DDAH pathway is a critical regulator of endothelial cell motility. J Cell Sci 120: 929–942, 2007.
43. Xia Y, Tsai AL, Berka V, Zweier JL. Superoxide generation from endothelial nitric-oxide synthase. A Ca2+/calmodulin-dependent and tetrahydrobiopterin regulatory process. J Biol Chem 273: 25804–25808, 1998.
44. Yla-Herttuala S, Palinski W, Rosenfeld ME, Parthasarathy S, Carew TE, Butler S, Witztum JL, Steinberg D. Evidence for the presence of oxidatively modified low density lipoprotein in atherosclerotic lesions of rabbit and man. J Clin Invest 84: 1086–1095, 1989.[Web of Science][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Rudolph and B. A. Freeman Cardiovascular Consequences When Nitric Oxide and Lipid Signaling Converge Circ. Res., September 11, 2009; 105(6): 511 - 522. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Wang, W. H. W. Tang, L. Cho, D. M. Brennan, and S. L. Hazen Targeted Metabolomic Evaluation of Arginine Methylation and Cardiovascular Risks: Potential Mechanisms Beyond Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibition Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, September 1, 2009; 29(9): 1383 - 1391. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Desai Reply Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., April 1, 2009; 24(4): 1350 - 1351. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |