| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CELLULAR METABOLISM
Department of Physiology, Dartmouth Medical School, Lebanon, New Hampshire
Submitted 21 July 2006 ; accepted in final form 28 December 2006
 |
ABSTRACT |
|---|
 TOP ABSTRACT METHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
mitochondria; localization
The subcellular location of SGK1 has not yet been conclusively established. In the majority of the studies, SGK1 was localized to the cytoplasm but not the nucleus (1, 9, 31). However, studies by Firestone and colleagues (11, 33, 40) found SGK1 to be present in the nucleus of rat mammary epithelial tumor cells, but only after serum stimulation. In addition, SGK1 was found to be in the vicinity of the basolateral membranes in rat kidney sections (1). One likely reason for these controversial results is that the half-life of SGK1 protein is very short (8, 9), and thus its endogenous levels may be below the detection limit afforded by available SGK1 antibodies.
Therefore, the goal of this study was to determine the subcellular location of SGK1 in epithelial cells by using SGK1 fused to autofluorescent proteins (SGK1-AFP). We presently report that SGK1-AFP is enriched in the mitochondria of both renal CCD cells (RCCT-28A) and human mammary epithelial cells (MCF10A). In addition, we also have determined that the first 60-amino acid region of SGK1 is necessary and sufficient for its mitochondrial localization. Parts of our findings have been published previously in abstract form (14).
|
METHODS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
60-SGK1-GFP constructs (generous gifts of Dr. Suzanne Conzen, University of Chicago) were described previously (9). SGK1-enhanced cyan fluorescent protein (SGK1-ECFP) and SGK1-enhanced yellow fluorescent protein (SGK1-EYFP) constructs were generated by subcloning a 1,320-bp XhoI/BamHI fragment of SGK1-GFP into pEYFP-N and pECFP-N expression vectors (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA) between the SalI and BamHI sites, resulting in fusion proteins in which the fluorescent protein is at the COOH terminus of SGK1. A construct encoding only the NH2-terminal 60 amino acids of SGK1 fused to the NH2 terminus of EYFP (called SGK1-N60-EYFP) was generated by inserting the XhoI/BglII fragment of SGK1 into pEYFP-N. To generate a retroviral construct, we subcloned the XhoI/BsaBI fragment of SGK1-N60-EYFP into the pLNCX vector (Clontech). In addition, we generated a retroviral construct in which the coding region EYFP was inserted between codons 60 and 61 of SGK1 (called SGK1-EYFP-middle). Details of the preparation of the constructs are available on request.
|
For transient transfection, RCCT-28A cells were grown on glass coverslips until they were 70–90% confluent and then transfected with different SGK1 constructs and various subcellular compartmental markers by using Lipofectamine Plus reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA), following the manufacturer's protocol. After 24–36 h, either the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at room temperature for 10 min and mounted with Vectashield (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA) or live cells were observed by placing the coverslip into a heated chamber maintained at 37°C. The chamber was perfused with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) that contained 0.9 mM Ca2+, 0.5 mM Mg2+, and 2 mM glucose.
Generation of cell lines stably expressing SGK1 constructs.
Amphotropic Phoenix cells were transiently transfected with retroviral expression vectors by using Lipofectamine Plus reagent. After 48 h, the medium was collected and filtered. Subconfluent RCCT-28A or MCF10A cells were incubated in a 1:1 mixture of the retrovirus-containing medium and fresh DMEM-F-12 to which polybrene (4 ng/ml; Sigma, Palo Alto, CA) was added for 24 h. The medium was then replaced with a fresh aliquot of virus and medium and incubated for another 24 h. Cells stably expressing the desired proteins were selected using G418 (500 µg/ml; Sigma), and pools of clones (
500–1,000) were expanded and used as polyclonal cell lines to avoid artifacts due to clonal selection.
Fluorescence microscopy. The subcellular location of the various SGK1 fusion proteins was visualized by fluorescence microscopy using an Olympus IMT2 microscope with a x60 PlanApo oil-immersion objective (numerical aperture 1.4; Nikon). The images were captured with a PXL-cooled charge-coupled device camera (Photometrics, Tucson, AZ) and processed using IPLab (Scanalytics, Fairfax, VA). Confocal images were taken using a Zeiss LSM 510 meta confocal microscope. A Bioptech FCS2 chamber (Bioptech, Butler, PA) maintained at 37°C was used to examine live cells grown on glass coverslips. To visualize different subcellular compartments, we used Rab 4, 5, and 11 fused to CFP as endosomal markers, and we used pECFP-ER and pECFP-Golgi vectors as markers for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and the Golgi apparatus, respectively (Clontech). LysoTracker red (50 nM; Molecular Probes, Eugene, OR) was used as a marker for lysosomes. To visualize mitochondria in live cells, we stained cells with the vital dye rhodamine 123 (500 ng/ml; Eastman Kodak, New York, NY) or with MitoTracker red CMXRos (0.25 nM; Molecular Probes) for 15 min at 37°C. To visualize nuclei in live cells, we stained cells with the cell-permeable DNA dye Hoechst 33342 (10 µM; Polysciences, Warrington, PA) for 15 min at 37°C.
For immunocytochemistry, RCCT-28A cells were fixed using periodate-lysine-paraformaldehyde for 10 min and then permeabilized with 0.5% Nonidet P-40 for 15 min followed by a 5-min incubation in PBG (0.5% BSA and 0.1% gelatin in PBS). The permeabilized cells were then incubated with an anti-GFP antibody (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:200 for 1 h at room temperature and then with Alexa 568 red-conjugated anti-rabbit antibody (Molecular Probes) diluted 1:3,000 for 1 h at room temperature. The cells were rinsed again with PBS, refixed with 4% paraformaldehyde, and mounted onto slides using the anti-fade medium Vectashield (Vector Laboratories). Nonspecific binding was determined by incubating cells with the secondary antibody only.
Photobleaching experiments were performed on RCCT-28A cells stably expressing SGK1-AFP chimeras with a Zeiss LSM 510 meta confocal microscope. Cells were grown on glass coverslips and maintained at 37°C during the experiments in a Bioptech FCS2 chamber (Bioptech).
Subcellular fractionation. The mouse kidney and liver were removed and rinsed in chilled PBS, weighed, minced, and homogenized using a Potter-Elvehjem homogenizer in an isolation buffer (0.2 mM EDTA, 10 mM Tris·HCl, pH 7.8, and 0.25 M sucrose) supplemented with protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma). The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,000 g for 10 min at 4°C to remove unbroken cells and nuclei. The supernatant was then centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min at 4°C to pellet the mitochondria. The pellet was washed twice by being resuspended in the isolation buffer, centrifuged at 12,000 g for 15 min, and resuspended again in the same buffer (mitochondrial fraction). The supernatant of the 12,000-g spin was further centrifuged at 100,000 g for 30 min to separate "cytosol" (supernatant) and "microsome" (pellet, resuspended in the isolation buffer) fractions. Protein concentration of the lysate and subcellular fractions was determined with BCA protein assay reagent (Pierce Biotechnology, Rockford, IL).
To assess the purity of the mitochondrial fraction, we performed immunoblotting for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH, a cytosolic marker) using an antibody from American Research Products (Belmont, MA). The mitochondrial fraction contained no detectable GAPDH signal. The enrichment of the mitochondrial fractions was evaluated by determining citrate synthase activity, as previously described (43), as well as by Western blot analysis using antibodies against two other mitochondrial marker proteins, mitochondrial heat shock protein 70 (mtHsp70); Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO) and cyclooxygenase IV Cox IV; Cell Signaling Technology, Beverly, MA). Citrate synthase activity was approximately fourfold higher in the mitochondrial fraction compared with the supernatant after broken cells were pelleted out ("total" fraction). Similar enrichment was found by immunoblot analysis with mtHsp70 and Cox IV antibodies.
Western blot analysis. Protein samples (6–20 µg) were electrophoresed in 10% SDS-PAGE gels and transferred to Immobilon-P membranes (Millipore, Billerica, MA). Ponceau S dye (Sigma) was used to confirm equal loading of the protein. The membranes were blocked in SuperBlock blocking buffer (Pierce Chemical) containing 0.5% Tween 20 or 5% dry milk in TBST (10 mM Tris, pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 0.05% Tween, and 124 µM thimerosal) for 1 h at room temperature and incubated with the primary antibodies diluted in blocking reagent under the following conditions. Rabbit SGK1 antibodies (Epitomics, Beverly, MA; Cell Signaling Technology; Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY; and Sigma) were applied at a 1:500 dilution (except the Sigma SGK antibody, which was used at 1:5,000 dilution) and incubated overnight at 4°C. A rabbit antibody against Cox IV (Cell Signaling Technology; 1:2,000) and mouse monoclonal antibodies against GAPDH (American Research Products; 1:10,000) and mtHsp70 (Affinity BioReagents; 1:2,000) were incubated at room temperature for 1–3 h. After a series of washes with TBST, the membranes were incubated for 1–2 h at room temperature with either an anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-linked antibody (Cell Signaling Technology) diluted 1:5,000 for SGK1 and 1:2,000 for Cox IV or with an anti-mouse HRP-linked antibody (Zymed Laboratories, San Francisco, CA) diluted to 1:5,000. Finally, after a series of washes with TBST, blots were visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescent substrate (SuperSignal West Dura extended duration substrate; Pierce Biotechnology). The membranes were imaged with a charge-coupled device camera (ChemiImager 5500; Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA).
|
RESULTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data shown in Fig. 8 demonstrate that elimination of the first 60 amino acids resulted in a dramatic change in subcellular localization of SGK1 (compare Figs. 4 and 5 with Fig. 8A). In contrast with the full-length SGK1, 60-SGK1-EGFP did not colocalize with MitoTracker, but rather it was distributed throughout the cell, in both the cytoplasm and the nucleus (Fig. 8A). The localization of 60-SGK1-EGFP is similar to that previously observed by Brickley et al. (9) in transiently transfected breast cancer cells. These results suggest that the NH2-terminal 60-amino acid region is necessary for mitochondrial targeting of SGK1. Interestingly, this NH2-terminally truncated SGK1, although maintaining its kinase activity, fails to increase ENaC currents when stably expressed in M1 cells, whereas the full-length SGK1 significantly increases Na+ transport (23).
|
Finally, we examined the subcellular location of a mutant in which we inserted EYFP in the middle of SGK1 (SGK1-EYFP-middle). Our rationale for testing this chimera was that the subcellular location of SGK1 varies depending on whether the fluorescent protein is fused to its COOH or NH2 terminus (Ref. 38 and unpublished data), probably due to interference with possible targeting domains such as the COOH-terminal PDZ binding domain (38) or the NH2-terminal region of SGK1. However, this fusion protein also was enriched in mitochondria (Fig. 8, G–I), and its localization was indistinguishable from that of the full-length SGK1 or the NH2-terminal 60-amino acid region of SGK1. These data suggest that the COOH-terminal fusion of the fluorescent protein does not cause artificial localization to the mitochondria due to disruption of the PDZ binding domain.
To assess the dynamics of SGK1's mobility in mitochondria, we performed fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) experiments in RCCT-28A cells stably expressing SGK1-EGFP. Initial FRAP experiments with a bleach spot diameter of 2 µm resulted in only partial fluorescence recovery. Approximately 30% of the lost fluorescence in the bleached area was regained within 15 s with a half-time of recovery of 3–5 s. However, no further recovery occurred during the subsequent observation period, indicating that roughly 70% of the fluorescence is present in a practically immobile form (Fig. 9). To identify the mechanism responsible for the initial recovery phase, we performed photobleachings with various spot sizes. These experiments revealed that the size of the mobile fraction was dependent on the bleach area and that with bleach diameters >5 µm, no significant fluorescence recovery occurred within 6–8 min. These studies also showed that recovery occurred primarily at the boundary of the bleached and unbleached areas, suggesting that it most likely originates from either mitochondrial movement and/or recovery within partially bleached mitochondria and/or fusion of bleached with unbleached mitochondria. Time-lapse experiments indeed demonstrated that movement as well as fusion/fission of mitochondria is quite rapid. In addition, FRAP with a diffraction-limited spot size showed that the intramitochondrial lateral diffusion of SGK1-EGFP was quite rapid, as demonstrated in Supplemental Movie 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1. (The online version of this article contains supplemental data.) These data indicate that the lateral mobility of SGK1 in mitochondria is quite high; however, the rate of exchange between a cytoplasmic and mitochondrial compartment is rather slow.
|
|
DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
SGK1 has several additional domains that could determine its intracellular localization. The main finding of this study is that SGK1 localizes to mitochondria and that the NH2-terminal region of SGK1 is necessary and sufficient for this localization. In addition, SGK1 contains a COOH-terminal conserved PDZ binding domain (38) and an unconventional nuclear localization signal in its catalytic domain (33). Recent work also identified an NH2-terminal hydrophobic motif that targets SGK1 for proteosomal degradation (6, 8). The presence of multiple targeting signals is not unusual, since many proteins express more than one targeting motif that may compete with each other. This process may be involved in the regulation of the localization and function of proteins.
The presence of competing targeting motifs and the possibility that these might be utilized depending on cell type and stimulus may be one reason why thus far no consensus has emerged regarding the subcellular localization of SGK1. Although our study showed mitochondrial localization, previous reports have localized SGK1 to the cytoplasm (1, 9), nucleus (11, 33, 40), or the ER (6, 8).1
Based on our data, it seems that the NH2-terminal region is the most important for subcellular targeting of SGK1. Our previous work showed that when AFP was fused to the NH2 terminus of SGK1, its localization was cytoplasmic and endosomal (38). This is in strong contrast with the mitochondrial location of the COOH-terminally fused AFP (present data). This phenomenon is most likely due to interference of the NH2-terminal tag with the mitochondrial localization signal. In support of this interpretation, the probability of mitochondrial localization using Mitoprot II 1.0a4 program is 85% for SGK-1 with AFP fused to its COOH terminus, but this probability drops to only 8% if the tag is fused to the NH2 terminus of SGK1 and to 0.3% if the NH2-terminal 60 amino acids are removed. If the PDZ binding domain were important for subcellular localization of SGK1, a COOH-terminal fusion would also interfere with localization. Therefore, to assess the relative contribution of the NH2-terminal mitochondrial targeting signal vs. the COOH-terminal PDZ binding domain, we determined the subcellular distribution of a fusion protein in which the AFP was inserted into the middle of SGK1. The localization of this fusion protein was indistinguishable from that of the COOH-terminal GFP fusion, indicating that the dominant subcellular localization signal in SGK1 is the NH2-terminal mitochondrial signal.
In the present study, we never observed nuclear localization of SGK1 in renal or mammary epithelia, independent of stimulation with serum or other agents. In contrast, work from Firestone and colleagues (11) using a polyclonal antibody found SGK1 in the nucleus of 30% of mammary tumor cells and equally localized between the cytoplasm and nucleus of 50% of the cells after serum stimulation. However, SGK1 was found to be excluded from the nucleus in several studies by other laboratories using different antibodies or GFP-tagged-SGK1 (2, 8, 9, 15). In addition, using the same antibody as Firestone and colleagues (11), Loffing et al. (31) failed to observe nuclear localization of SGK1 in rat kidney sections. The resolution in this study was insufficient to determine whether the staining over the cytoplasm was associated with mitochondria (31).
Besides the differential utilization of multiple targeting motifs, another possible reason for these apparently contradictory results is the different methodology used in the different studies, i.e., immunohistochemistry with different antibodies vs. subcellular localization of SGK1-AFP fusion proteins. The advantage of using immunohistochemistry is that one detects the endogenous protein, which is biologically more relevant. However, if the half-life of the protein is very short, as is the case with SGK1 (30 min), the antibodies will recognize all SGK1 proteins pools, including the pool of ubiquitinated SGK1 that is targeted for rapid proteosomal degradation (8, 9, 52). If this pool is much larger than the fraction of SGK1 that is not ubiquitinated and consequently has a longer half-life, the latter protein pool may be difficult to detect.
A further consequence of the short half-life is that endogenous SGK1 levels are very low, and this fact combined with the poor quality of available SGK1 antibodies may be another reason for the controversial localization data. For instance, using two different SGK1 antibodies, immunohistochemical studies gave diverging results on the intrarenal distribution of SGK1 in the same species. Whereas Loffing et al. (31) showed that SGK1 is highly expressed in the connecting and collecting tubules, Alvarez de la Rosa et al. (1) showed the highest expression of SGK1 in the thick ascending limb. An additional technical problem may be that the mitochondrial membrane is not permeabilized by the usual techniques applied for immunohistochemistry.
To circumvent these problems, we and others used AFP-tagged SGK1 to determine its subcellular localization. In general, this is a valid approach, since previous work has demonstrated an excellent correlation between the subcellular location of AFPs and the corresponding endogenous proteins (13). This approach can be used in live cells, and there are no membrane permeability problems involved. Since AFPs become fully fluorescent only after a maturation period of hours (16, 30), this approach is especially well suited to studying proteins with longer half-lives. Thus, in theory, the mitochondrial localization of SGK1-AFP in our study may have been accentuated, because short-lived molecules in other compartments may not have been detected. However, our immunocytochemical experiments using an AFP antibody as the AFP-associated fluorescence (Fig. 7) suggest that there are no large pools of shorter-lived SGK1 molecules in other compartments, or we would have detected these compartments with the anti-AFP antibody.
On the other hand, if the mitochondrial localization protects SGK1 from proteosomal degradation, this would lead to an enrichment of fully functional SGK1 in the mitochondria. Previous work has demonstrated that the NH2-terminal region in SGK1 is critical for ubiquitination and subsequent degradation (8, 9). Most interestingly, this is also the region that we identified as being responsible for mitochondrial targeting. We speculate that this overlap between mitochondrial targeting and degradation signal is biologically relevant, because it could ensure that the pool of synthesized SGK1 molecules that is not destined to import into mitochondria is rapidly degraded. This idea is supported by the current FRAP experiments showing that the rate of exchange between cytoplasmic and mitochondrial pools is very slow compared with the overall half-life of SGK1 in the cell, confirming that mitochondrial SGK1 is protected from rapid degradation. This conclusion is in agreement with recent findings that ubiquitination of SGK1 occurs primarily on the cytoplasmic surface of the ER (8).
SGK1's localization to the mitochondria is congruous with previous work that has found SGK1 not in the cytosol but in a 250,000-g pellet that contained mitochondria and from which nuclei were preisolated, prepared from various rat tissues including the kidney, jejunum, ileum, distal colon, and whole brain (1, 15). Similarly, Brickley et al. (9) found SGK1-FLAG to be enriched in a 100,000-g pellet (from which mitochondria were not preseparated) in breast cancer cells.
Previous work also has suggested that the subcellular location of SGK1 may be stimulus dependent: following osmotic stress and dexamethasone, SGK1 was predominantly in the cytoplasm, whereas under heat shock, UV irradiation, or H2O2 treatment, it was heterogeneously expressed (11). The same study suggested that location of SGK1 might be cell cycle dependent, given that in mammary tumor cells, SGK1 was cytoplasmic in the G1 phase and nuclear in the S and G2/M phases (11). In contrast, Coric et al. (15) failed to observe any nuclear localization of SGK1 in either the proliferating or resting cells of the distal colon. Similarly, we did not observe differences in subcellular location of SGK1-EGFP in unsynchronized RCCT-28A cells or after serum stimulation or phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibition. Under all these conditions, SGK1 showed typical mitochondrial localization (data not shown). A possible explanation of this apparent controversy is that mitochondrial localization is a regulated process that may depend on the actual postsynthetic modifications on SGK1. For instance, SGK1 contains a conserved PKC-
phosphorylation site at T11, and if this site is mutated to the phosphomimic asparate, the predicted mitochondrial localization probability falls from 94.7% (T11, no phosphorylation) to 13.7% (T11D).
An obvious question is: What is the function of SGK1 in the mitochondria? A logical assumption is that SGK1 is involved in the regulation of energy production and metabolism. SGK1 was found to regulate many ion channels and transporters when overexpressed in Xenopus oocytes (46). In native epithelia some of these transporters are located in the apical membrane, whereas others, such as Na+-K+-ATPase, are located in the basolateral membrane. Since apical and basolateral targeting of membrane occurs via distinct vesicle trafficking events, it seems unlikely that SGK1 regulates a common trafficking mechanism. On the other hand, an increased function of such overexpressed transporters is dependent on the cells' energy status, and thus ATP generation is likely to be rate limiting. Increased mitochondrial energy production by SGK1 could be the common mechanism involved in the increased activity observed with these ectopically overexpressed transporters.
The mitochondrial targets of SGK1 remain to be identified, but PKB/Akt is known to increase mitochondria-associated hexokinase activity (21) and phosphorylate the 
-subunit of ATP synthase and mitochondrial glycogen synthase kinase (7). Another possibility for such a mechanism could be via the stimulatory effect of SGK1 on potassium channel Kv1.3 (24). Recently, Szabò et al. (44) reported that Kv1.3 is present in the inner mitochondrial membrane of T lymphocytes, in addition to its well-established location in the plasma membrane. K+ is required for optimal oxidative phosphorylation (26), and in energized mitochondria there is a significant K+ flux (44). Studies with Kv1.3-deficient mice (27) suggest that Kv1.3 regulates energy homeostasis and body weight (50). Thus SGK1, via the regulation of the activity of mitochondrial Kv1.3, may regulate basal metabolic rate.
SGK1, like Akt, has been shown to play a role in cell survival. The localization of SGK1 to the mitochondria could also play a role in cell survival. This was demonstrated in breast cancer cell lines, HEK-293 T cells, a CCL39 fibroblast cell line, and a rat mammary epithelial cell line (10, 11, 34, 49). The mitochondrial membrane contains a number of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins (20). Thus a mitochondrially localized SGK1 could be involved in the inhibition of proapoptotic proteins or activation of antiapoptotic proteins.
One of the best-known functions of SGK1 is regulation of ENaC-mediated Na+ transport in kidney cells. Interestingly, in contrast to stably overexpressed SGK1, an NH2-terminally truncated SGK1 mutant, which does not localize to mitochondria (present study), failed to increase transepithelial Na+ current in renal collecting duct cells even though it is expressed at much higher levels than the full-length SGK1 (23), suggesting a link between mitochondrial localization and function. On the other hand, our previous studies showed that SGK1 in which the COOH-terminal PDZ binding domain was removed, when coexpressed with ENaC in Xenopus oocytes, had the same stimulating effect on ENaC function as the full-length protein, indicating that this domain is not essential for SGK1's increase in ENaC activity (38).
Finally, it must be emphasized that although our data provide strong evidence for the mitochondrial localization of the SGK1-EGFP fusion protein, they do not exclude the localization of SGK1 to other cellular compartments that may have been below the limit of detection in our studies. In fact, the proposed interaction of SGK1 with Nedd4-2 (which thus far has been demonstrated only with overexpressed proteins) is more likely to take place in the cytoplasm. It also should be noted that the observation that the same protein has multiple localizations within the cell would not be unique for SGK1.
In summary, we have shown that transiently and stably expressed SGK1 is enriched in the mitochondria of renal and mammary epithelial cells. This finding sheds new light on the possible functions and substrates of SGK1. The mitochondrial localization may help to explain the apparent multifunctional nature of SGK1. SGK1 may be involved in a more general cellular process that is necessary for channel activation, preventing apoptosis, neuronal excitability, and regulating cell volume.
|
GRANTS |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
|
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
|
FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
1 While this work was in progress, an article published online also showed that SGK1 localizes to mitochondria (18). 
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPABSTRACTMETHODSRESULTSDISCUSSIONGRANTSREFERENCES |
|---|
2. Alvarez de la Rosa D, Zhang P, Náray-Fejes-Tóth A, Fejes-Tóth G, Canessa CM. The serum and glucocorticoid kinase sgk increases the abundance of epithelial sodium channels in the plasma membrane of Xenopus oocytes. J Biol Chem 274: 37834–37839, 1999.
3. Aoyama T, Matsui T, Novikov M, Park J, Hemmings B, Rosenzweig A. Serum and glucocorticoid-responsive kinase-1 regulates cardiomyocyte survival and hypertrophic response. Circulation 111: 1652–1659, 2005.
4. Arend LJ, Handler JS, Rhim JS, Gusovsky F, Spielman WS. Adenosine-sensitive phosphoinositide turnover in a newly established renal cell line. Am J Physiol Renal Fluid Electrolyte Physiol 256: F1067–F1074, 1989.
5. Arteaga MF, Canessa CM. Functional specificity of Sgk1 and Akt1 on ENaC activity. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 289: F90–F96, 2005.
6. Arteaga MF, Wang L, Ravid T, Hochstrasser M, Canessa CM. An amphipathic helix targets serum and glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 to the endoplasmic reticulum-associated ubiquitin-conjugation machinery. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 11178–11183, 2006.
7. Bijur GN, Jope RS. Rapid accumulation of Akt in mitochondria following phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation. J Neurochem 87: 1427–1435, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
8. Bogusz AM, Brickley DR, Pew T, Conzen SD. A novel N-terminal hydrophobic motif mediates constitutive degradation of serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase-1 by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. FEBS J 273: 2913–2928, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
9. Brickley DR, Mikosz CA, Hagan CR, Conzen SD. Ubiquitin modification of serum and glucocorticoid-induced protein kinase-1 (SGK-1). J Biol Chem 277: 43064–43070, 2002.
10. Brunet A, Park J, Tran H, Hu LS, Hemmings BA, Greenberg ME. Protein kinase SGK mediates survival signals by phosphorylating the forkhead transcription factor FKHRL1 (FOXO3a). Mol Cell Biol 21: 952–965, 2001.
11. Buse P, Tran SH, Luther E, Phu PT, Aponte GW, Firestone GL. Cell cycle and hormonal control of nuclear-cytoplasmic localization of the serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible protein kinase, Sgk, in mammary tumor cells. A novel convergence point of anti-proliferative and proliferative cell signaling pathways. J Biol Chem 274: 7253–7263, 1999.
12. Chen SY, Bhargava A, Mastroberardino L, Meijer OC, Wang J, Buse P, Firestone GL, Verrey F, Pearce D. Epithelial sodium channel regulated by aldosterone-induced protein sgk. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 2514–2519, 1999.
13. Chiesa A, Rapizzi E, Tosello V, Pinton P, de Virgilio M, Fogarty KE, Rizzuto R. Recombinant aequorin and green fluorescent protein as valuable tools in the study of cell signalling. Biochem J 355: 1–12, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Cordas E, Náray-Fejes-Tóth A, Fejes-Tóth G. Subcellular location of serum and glucocorticoid induced kinase-1 (SGK1) in rabbit cortical collecting duct (RCCT) cells. ENDO Abstracts: P1–P125, 2004.
15. Coric T, Hernandez N, Alvarez de la Rosa D, Shao D, Wang T, Canessa CM. Expression of ENaC and serum- and glucocorticoid-induced kinase 1 in the rat intestinal epithelium. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 286: G663–G670, 2004.
16. Cubitt AB, Heim R, Adams SR, Boyd AE, Gross LA, Tsien RY. Understanding, improving and using green fluorescent proteins. Trends Biochem Sci 20: 448–455, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Embark HM, Bohmer C, Vallon V, Luft F, Lang F. Regulation of KCNE1-dependent K+ current by the serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) isoforms. Pflügers Arch 445: 601–606, 2003.[Web of Science][Medline]
18. Engelsberg A, Kobelt F, Kuhl D. The N-terminus of the serum and glucocorticoid inducible kinase Sgk1 specifies mitochondrial localization to rapid turnover. Biochem J 399: 69–76, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
19. Faletti CJ, Perrotti N, Taylor SI, Blazer-Yost BL. sgk: an essential convergence point for peptide and steroid hormone regulation of ENaC-mediated Na+ transport. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C494–C500, 2002.
20. Goldenthal MJ, Marin-Garcia J. Mitochondrial signaling pathways: a receiver/integrator organelle. Mol Cell Biochem 262: 1–16, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Gottlob K, Majewski N, Kennedy S, Kandel E, Robey RB, Hay N. Inhibition of early apoptotic events by Akt/PKB is dependent on the first committed step of glycolysis and mitochondrial hexokinase. Genes Dev 15: 1406–1418, 2001.
22. Haslam RJ, Koide HB, Hemmings BA. Pleckstrin domain homology. Nature 363: 309–310, 1993.[Medline]
23. Helms MN, Fejes-Tóth G, Náray-Fejes-Tóth A. Hormone-regulated transepithelial Na+ transport in mammalian CCD cells requires SGK1 expression. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 284: F480–F487, 2003.
24. Henke G, Maier G, Wallisch S, Boehmer C, Lang F. Regulation of the voltage gated K+ channel Kv1.3 by the ubiquitin ligase Nedd4–2 and the serum and glucocorticoid inducible kinase SGK1. J Cell Physiol 199: 194–199, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
25. Imaizumi K, Tsuda M, Wanaka A, Tohyama M, Takagi T. Differential expression of sgk mRNA, a member of the Ser/Thr protein kinase gene family, in rat brain after CNS injury. Brain Res Mol Brain Res 26: 189–196, 1994.[Medline]
26. Kimmich GA, Rasmussen H. Inhibition of mitochondrial respiration by loss of intra-mitochondrial K+. Biochim Biophys Acta 131: 413–420, 1967.[Medline]
27. Koni PA, Khanna R, Chang MC, Tang MD, Kaczmarek LK, Schlichter LC, Flavella RA. Compensatory anion currents in Kv1.3 channel-deficient thymocytes. J Biol Chem 278: 39443–39451, 2003.
28. Lang F, Klingel K, Wagner CA, Stegen C, Warntges S, Friedrich B, Lanzendorfer M, Melzig J, Moschen I, Steuer S, Waldegger S, Sauter M, Paulmichl M, Gerke V, Risler T, Gamba G, Capasso G, Kandolf R, Hebert SC, Massry SG, Broer S. Deranged transcriptional regulation of cell-volume-sensitive kinase hSGK in diabetic nephropathy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97: 8157–8162, 2000.
29. Lee EH, Hsu WL, Ma YL, Lee PJ, Chao CC. Enrichment enhances the expression of sgk, a glucocorticoid-induced gene, and facilitates spatial learning through glutamate AMPA receptor mediation. Eur J Neurosci 18: 2842–2852, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
30. Lippincott-Schwartz J, Patterson GH. Development and use of fluorescent protein markers in living cells. Science 300: 87–91, 2003.
31. Loffing J, Zecevic M, Feraille E, Kaissling B, Asher C, Rossier BC, Firestone GL, Pearce D, Verrey F. Aldosterone induces rapid apical translocation of ENaC in early portion of renal collecting system: possible role of SGK. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 280: F675–F682, 2001.
32. Maiyar AC, Huang AJ, Phu PT, Cha HH, Firestone GL. p53 stimulates promoter activity of the sgk serum/glucocorticoid-inducible serine/threonine protein kinase gene in rodent mammary epithelial cells. J Biol Chem 271: 12414–12422, 1996.
33. Maiyar AC, Leong ML, Firestone GL. Importin-
mediates the regulated nuclear targeting of serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible protein kinase (Sgk) by recognition of a nuclear localization signal in the kinase central domain. Mol Biol Cell 14: 1221–1239, 2003.
34. Mikosz CA, Brickley DR, Sharkey MS, Moran TW, Conzen SD. Glucocorticoid receptor-mediated protection from apoptosis is associated with induction of the serine/threonine survival kinase gene, sgk-1. J Biol Chem 276: 16649–16654, 2001.
35. Mizuno H, Nishida E. The ERK MAP kinase pathway mediates induction of SGK (serum- and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase) by growth factors. Genes Cells 6: 261–268, 2001.[Abstract]
36. Náray-Fejes-Tóth A, Canessa C, Cleaveland ES, Aldrich G, Fejes-Tóth G. sgk is an aldosterone-induced kinase in the renal collecting duct. Effects on epithelial Na+ channels. J Biol Chem 274: 16973–16978, 1999.
37. Náray-Fejes-Tóth A, Fejes-Tóth G. sgk, an aldosterone-induced gene in mineralocorticoid target cells, regulates the epithelial sodium channel. Kidney Int 57: 1290–1294, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
38. Náray-Fejes-Tóth A, Helms MN, Stokes JB, Fejes-Tóth G. Regulation of sodium transport in mammalian collecting duct cells by aldosterone-induced kinase, SGK1: structure/function studies. Mol Cell Endocrinol 217: 197–202, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
39. Palmada M, Speil A, Jeyaraj S, Bohmer C, Lang F. The serine/threonine kinases SGK1, 3 and PKB stimulate the amino acid transporter ASCT2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 331: 272–277, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
40. Park J, Leong ML, Buse P, Maiyar AC, Firestone GL, Hemmings BA. Serum and glucocorticoid-inducible kinase (SGK) is a target of the PI 3-kinase-stimulated signaling pathway. EMBO J 18: 3024–3033, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
41. Setiawan I, Henke G, Feng Y, Bohmer C, Vasilets LA, Schwarz W, Lang F. Stimulation of Xenopus oocyte Na+,K+ ATPase by the serum and glucocorticoid-dependent kinase sgk1. Pflügers Arch 444: 426–431, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
42. Soule HD, Maloney TM, Wolman SR, Peterson WD Jr, Brenz R, McGrath CM, Russo J, Pauley RJ, Jones RF, Brooks SC. Isolation and characterization of a spontaneously immortalized human breast epithelial cell line, MCF-10. Cancer Res 50: 6075–6086, 1990.
43. Srere PA. Citrate synthase. Methods Enzymol 13: 3–11, 1969.[CrossRef]
44. Szabo I, Bock J, Jekle A, Soddemann M, Adams C, Lang F, Zoratti M, Gulbins E. A novel potassium channel in lymphocyte mitochondria. J Biol Chem 280: 12790–12798, 2005.
45. Tessier M, Woodgett JR. Role of the Phox homology domain and phosphorylation in activation of serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase-3. J Biol Chem 281: 23978–23989, 2006.
46. Vallon V, Wulff P, Huang DY, Loffing J, Volkl H, Kuhl D, Lang F. Role of Sgk1 in salt and potassium homeostasis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 288: R4–R10, 2005.
47. Waldegger S, Barth P, Raber G, Lang F. Cloning and characterization of a putative human serine/threonine protein kinase transcriptionally modified during anisotonic and isotonic alterations of cell volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 4440–4445, 1997.
48. Warntges S, Friedrich B, Henke G, Duranton C, Lang PA, Waldegger S, Meyermann R, Kuhl D, Speckmann EJ, Obermuller N, Witzgall R, Mack AF, Wagner HJ, Wagner A, Broer S, Lang F. Cerebral localization and regulation of the cell volume-sensitive serum- and glucocorticoid-dependent kinase SGK1. Pflügers Arch 443: 617–624, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
49. Webster MK, Goya L, Ge Y, Maiyar AC, Firestone GL. Characterization of sgk, a novel member of the serine/threonine protein kinase gene family which is transcriptionally induced by glucocorticoids and serum. Mol Cell Biol 13: 2031–2040, 1993.
50. Xu J, Koni PA, Wang P, Li G, Kaczmarek L, Wu Y, Li Y, Flavell RA, Desir GV. The voltage-gated potassium channel Kv1.3 regulates energy homeostasis and body weight. Hum Mol Genet 12: 551–559, 2003.
51. Yoo D, Kim BY, Campo C, Nance L, King A, Maouyo D, Welling PA. Cell surface expression of the ROMK (Kir 1.1) channel is regulated by the aldosterone-induced kinase, SGK-1, and protein kinase A. J Biol Chem 278: 23066–23075, 2003.
52. Zhou R, Snyder PM. Nedd4-2 phosphorylation induces serum and glucocorticoid-regulated kinase (SGK) ubiquitination and degradation. J Biol Chem 280: 4518–4523, 2005.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |
