|
|
||||||||
MUSCLE CELL BIOLOGY AND CELL MOTILITY
1Department of Anatomy and Physiology and 2Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Padova; 3Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Pavia; and 4Italian Institute of Myology, Padova, Italy
Submitted 5 December 2006 ; accepted in final form 22 January 2007
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
dog; muscle fiber types; single fiber mechanics; in vitro motility
An essential feature of mammalian skeletal muscle is fiber heterogeneity. The diversity among fiber types reflects the motoneuron discharge pattern and the loading conditions on the muscles and is a major determinant of the contractile performance (34). Although virtually all structural and functional aspects of muscle fibers exhibit some degree of diversity, the composition in myosin isoforms has a special relevance, since myosin is the most abundant muscle protein and represents the molecular motor of muscle contraction. The initial investigations on fiber type heterogeneity in canine muscles led to controversial conclusions, since the myofibrillar ATPase (m-ATPase) staining did not permit an unambiguous identification of type 1, 2A, and 2B, and, because of the high oxidative metabolism of canine muscles, a clear separation of oxidative and glycolytic fibers was not possible (2, 6, 13, 15, 27, 42). By comparing different protocols of acid or alkali preincubation, Snow and coworkers (37) showed that in canine muscles two distinct types of fast fibers were present, the one corresponding to type 2A and the other not simply corresponding to type 2B. The specific features of this latter type were then carefully described by Latorre et al. (18), who proposed for such fibers the name "2dog fibers." Other workers, however, preferred to maintain the more often-used term "2B" (29). The issue was recently taken up by Strbenc et al. (38) and by Smerdu et al. (36), who, on the basis of reactivity to a panel of monoclonal antibodies, concluded that 2dog fibers express myosin heavy chain (MHC) 2X. A similar conclusion was also reached by Acevedo and Rivero (1) who combined immunostaining with other histochemical approaches and showed that eight distinct fiber types can be identified in canine muscles, in relation to their MHC isoform composition, metabolic properties, SERCA isoforms, and capillary density. Acevedo and Rivero (1) emphasized the presence of hybrid fibers and the high oxidative metabolism of all fiber types. The abundance of hybrid fibers in canine muscles was also observed by Strbenc et al. (38), although their view was later revised after considering the limited specificity of the anti-myosin antibodies (36). The issue is very important since recent studies on fiber types in large mammals (40, 41) suggest that specificity of the monoclonal antibodies prepared to identify myosin isoforms in rodents (22, 33) cannot be transferred to all animal species without careful controls.
MHC isoforms are the markers of fiber types as they determine the pH sensitivity of m-ATPase staining and immunohistochemical reactivity (34). Electrophoretic separation of MHC isoforms in canine skeletal muscles shows three bands, which have been identified by comparison with other animal species as 2A-2X-1 from the slowest to the fastest migration rate (1, 36, 44). An additional, fourth band, likely corresponding to MHC-2B, has been described by Wu et al. (43) in laryngeal muscles. This finding has been recently confirmed by Bergrin and coworkers (3), who used matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF-MS) for electrophoretic band identification, as the results obtained with Western blot were uncertain.
The uncertainties in the use of antibodies to identify dog muscles fiber types in immunohistochemistry (36) and myosin isoforms in immunoblots (3) can be overcome by an alternative approach made possible by the recent sequencing of dog genome (20) and the subsequent identification of the genes coding for MHC isoforms expressed in striated muscles (23). MHC expression can be studied by RT-PCR in muscle samples or even in single fibers and this, as discussed in our previous papers (40, 41), offers a unique chance to overcome all controversies about fiber types. Orthologous MHC isoforms can precisely be identified in various mammalian species by sequence comparison, and their expression can be determined at RNA level in muscle specimens without any ambiguity. RNA can be then associated with the corresponding protein identified in the same specimens with the various methods (histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, electrophoresis) discussed above.
The determination of the contractile properties of canine muscle fibers can further support the identification of the fiber types as a consistent relation exists between some kinetic parameters, such as maximum shortening velocity, and myosin isoforms (34). Little is presently known about the contractility of canine muscles at single fiber level, since data about shortening velocity or mechanical power output are available only for slow and fast 2A fibers (10, 25). The knowledge of the contractile parameters can furthermore provide a starting point for future studies on canine muscle adaptations in relation with development/aging, with disuse/training, or with diseases.
In this study we aimed to examine the open issues about MHC expression in canine skeletal muscle fibers, taking advantage of the combination of mRNA amplification with gel electrophoresis and histochemical/immunohistochemical methods. In particular, we wanted to confirm whether MHC-2X was the isoform expressed in the specific fiber type previously called "2dog" and assess whether the abundant presence of hybrid fibers was a true fact or the consequence of insufficient specificity of anti-myosin antibodies. We also wanted to confirm the presence of fibers expressing MHC-2B. For this reason we extended our investigation to laryngeal and extraocular muscles, whereas masticatory muscles and the fiber expressing the specific masticatory myosin (2M) were deliberately excluded from this study. Moreover, the functional properties of single fibers and purified myosin isoforms were analyzed to further and independently verify the isoform identification and form the basis for future studies on adaptations and diseases in canine muscles.
| METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following muscles were dissected to obtain samples with different composition in myosin isoforms: 1) longissimus dorsi (Ld), diaphragma (D), tibialis cranialis (Tc), and semimembranosus (Sm) were taken as examples of trunk and limb muscles; 2) rectus lateralis (Rl) and retractor bulbi (Rb) were sampled as representative extraocular muscles; 3) three laryngeal muscles were sampled: cricoarytenoideus dorsalis (Cad), arytenoideus transversus (At), and thyroarytenoideus, which was divided in pars ventricularis (Tve) and pars vocalis, in turn divided in the four portions of the caudal part (Tvc), cranial part (Tvcr), lateral part (Tvl), and the medial part (Tvm). Temporalis (T) was sampled as a specific source of 2M myosin.
The samples were divided in parts which were either immersed in ice-cold skinning solution (see below) with 50% glycerol and used for muscle fiber mechanics, or frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen for histochemistry, immunohistochemistry, and protein electrophoresis, or immersed in RNALater reagent (Ambion, Austin, TX) for RT-PCR analysis.
RNA expression analysis.
Samples for RNA analysis were collected in vials containing RNA Later reagent and stored at 20°C. Total RNA was extracted from 100 mg of tissue in TRIzol reagent (GIBCO-BRL, Gaithersburg, MD) and reverse transcribed with SuperScript II protocols (Invitrogen, Life Technologies) using as primers a mixture of random hexamers. The obtained cDNAs were used as templates for RT-PCR analysis. PCR reactions were performed using dog specific primers designed on the recently published dog MHC sequences (23) and listed in Table 1. PCR products were electrophoresed on a 2% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light. A primer pair to amplify a fragment of
-actin gene was used to test the quality of the extracted RNA and the efficiency of reverse transcription (Table 1).
|
Additional serial sections were stained with the following monoclonal antibodies: BA-F8 [specific for MHC-1 or slow in several species from rat (5) to pig (41)], SC-71 [specific for MHC-2A in rat (5) and pig (41), but reactive also with MHC-2X in cow (24) and in dog (1, 36)], BF-35 new clone [specific for MHC-2X in pig (41) and cow (24), but reacting with all fast fibers in rat (41)], BF-35 old clone [positive for type 1, 2A, and 2B but not for 2X in rat (33)], BF- F3 [specific for MHC-2B in rat (33) and in pig (19)], 10F5 and 2F7 [reacting with type 2B and type 2A (22), respectively], and A4.74 [specific for type 2A in human and rat but staining all fast types in dog (36)]. A polyclonal antibody was used to identify fibers expressing neonatal myosin (26). The primary antibodies BA-F8, SC-71, BF-F3, and BF-35 new clone were purchased from DSM (Deutsche Sammlung von Mikroorganismen und Zellkulturen, Braunschweig, Germany), and the antibody A4.74 was from Alexis Biochemical; BF-35 old clone was a gift from Professor S. Schiaffino; and 10F5 and 2F7 were a gift of Professor J. Hoh.
The immunohistochemical staining was performed using the Envision method with the following secondary antibodies: rabbit anti-mouse immunoglobulins for monoclonal antibodies and goat anti-rabbit for polyclonal antibodies both conjugated to peroxidase-labeled complex (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The primary antiserum was applied overnight at room temperature using different dilutions ranging from 1:100 to 1:400 for the A4.74, SC-71, BA-F8, and BF-35 old and new clone antibodies and from 1:20 to 1:40 for the BF-F3 antibody. After rinsing in PBS buffer (pH 7.27.4), we incubated the sections for 30 min at room temperature in the Envision system, rinsed these in PBS, and visualized the immunoreactive sites using a freshly prepared solution of 10 mg of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrahydrochloride (DAB; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in 15 ml of a 0.05 M Tris buffer at pH 7.6, containing 1.5 ml of 0.03% H2O2. The specificity of the immunostaining was verified 1) by incubating sections with PBS instead of the specific primary antiserum, 2) by incubating sections with preimmune serum instead of primary antiserum, or 3) by incubating sections with PBS instead of secondary antibody.
Gel electrophoresis.
Muscle samples for protein electrophoresis were solubilized in Laemmli solution (62.5 mM Tris, pH 6.8, 10% glycerol, 2.3% SDS, 5%
-mercaptoethanol, with 0.1% E-64 and 0.1% leupeptin as anti-proteolytic factors). After heating for 5 min at 80°C, appropriate amounts of the protein suspension were loaded onto polyacrylamide gels (about 1 µg of total protein/lane). For single fibers, a fiber segment of 13 mm was solubilized in 20 µl of Laemmli solution, and 23 µl were loaded onto gels.
The separation of MHC isoforms was obtained on 8% polyacrylamide slab gels with a protocol derived from Talmadge and Roy (39) with some modifications. Slabs 18 cm wide, 16 cm high, and 1 mm thick were used. Electrophoresis was run at 4°C for 24 h, at 70 V for 1 h and 230 V for the remaining time. Gels were silver stained (Bio-Rad Silver stain plus). The identification of the electrophoretic bands as distinct MHC isoforms was achieved by comparing gel electrophoresis with results obtained in RT-PCR, histochemistry, and immunohistochemistry (see RESULTS).
Single fiber mechanics. Muscle fiber bundles were kept at 20°C in skinning solution without ATP mixed with 50% glycerol until the day of the experiment and in no case longer than 2 wk after sampling. On the day of the experiment the skinning-glycerol mixture was washed away and replaced with ice-cold skinning solution containing ATP, and single fibers were manually dissected under a stereomicroscope (x1060 magnification). At the end of the dissection, fibers were bathed for 30 min in skinning solution containing 1% Triton X-100 to ensure complete membrane solubilization; then fiber segments of 12 mm length were cut, and light aluminum clips were applied at both ends.
Skinning, relaxing, preactivating, and activating solutions employed for single fiber experiments were prepared as previously described (4). Their millimolar composition was as follows: 1) skinning solution contained 150 potassium propionate, 5 magnesium acetate, 5 ATP, 5 EGTA, and 5 KH2PO4; 2) relaxing solution contained 100 KCl, 20 imidazole, 5 MgCl2, 5 ATP, and 5 EGTA. Preactivating solution was similar to relaxing solution except that EGTA concentration was reduced to 0.5 mM and 25 mM creatine phosphate and 300 U/ml creatine phosphokinase were added, whereas activating solution was similar to relaxing solution with the addition of 5 mM CaCl2, 25 mM creatine phosphate, and 300 U/ml creatine phosphokinase. The pH of all solutions were adjusted to 7.0 at the temperature at which solutions were used (12°C). Protease inhibitors (10 µM E-64 and 40 µM leupeptin) were added to all solutions.
The fiber segments were transferred to the experimental setup and, with the help of the aluminum clips, mounted between the force transducer (model AME-801; SensorOne, Sausalito, CA) and the electromagnetic puller (SI, Heidelberg, Germany) equipped with a displacement transducer. The signals from the force and displacement transducers, after analog-to-digital conversion (interface CED 1401 plus; Cambridge Electronic Design, Cambridge, UK), were fed into a personal computer and stored in the hard disk. For data storage, recall, and analysis the software Spike2 (Cambridge Electronic Design) was used. The experimental setup consisted of an inverted microscope (Axiovert 25, Zeiss) on which a movable aluminum plate with three pedestals (height 0.5 mm) was placed on the stage: on each pedestal a drop of solution of 70 µl volume was kept between a coverslip glued on the upper surface of the pedestal and a second coverslip connected with a movable arm. The distance between the upper surface of the pedestal and the coverslip was 2 mm. The three drops were composed of relaxing, preactivating, and activating solution, respectively. The upper surface of each pedestal had a central opening; through these openings the fiber segment could be seen via the objective piece of the inverted microscope (x40) combined with a x10 eyepiece. A stereomicroscope (x1060) placed above the inverted microscope was used for mounting and removing the fiber.
The fiber segment was mounted in relaxing solution and, after measuring length, diameters, and sarcomere length at x400 magnification, was stretched by
20%. It was then transferred into the preactivating solution for at least 2 min and finally maximally activated by immersion in the activating solution (pCa 4.6). During maximal activation, isometric tension (Po) was measured, and unloaded shortening velocity (Vo) and series elasticity were determined according to the slack test procedure (12). After the mechanical experiment, fibers were stored in Laemmli solution for electrophoretic analysis.
Myosin extraction and in vitro motility assay. Myosin was extracted and purified from single muscle fibers according to the procedure previously described in detail (9). A fragment of each fiber was cut and immersed in Laemmli solution for electrophoretic identification of MHC isoforms. The myosin sample, suspended in myosin-activity buffer (25 mM MOPS, 600 mM KCl, 2 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, and 4 mM DTT, pH 7.2), was placed as a drop on a coverslip coated with nitrocellulose. The coverslip was then used to construct a flow cell with a 30-µl channel. The assay was carried out as previously described (28). Movement of the actin filaments was initiated by the infusion of 50 µl of buffer containing 2 mM ATP into the flow cell. AF buffer composition was 25 mM MOPS, 25 mM KCl, 4 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EGTA, 4 mM DTT, 2 mM ATP, 0.5 mg/ml BSA, 200 µg/ml glucose oxidase, 36 µg/ml catalase, and 5 µg /ml glucose (pH 7.2, T = 25°C). The flow cell was mounted on the stage of a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axiolab); actin filaments labeled with rhodamine phalloidin were visualized in epifluorescence, and images were recorded at a rate of 50 frames/s by an intensified CCD camera (Extended ISI, Photonic Science) that was connected with video tape recorder, TV monitor, and computer through a frame grabber interface (model PXC200F, Image Nation). Recorded images were analyzed by a software (written by A. Rubini, Pavia, Italy) that allowed us to minimize the background noise, select the rate of acquiring the frames (from 0.5 frames/s for very slow-moving filaments to 25 frames/s for very fast-moving filaments), and choose the duration of data acquisition (from 1 s to 100 s) (28). For each myosin sample the velocities of 50100 filaments were measured and their distribution characterized according to parametric statistics. Velocity was expressed in micrometers per second.
Statistical analysis. Data are expressed as means and standard errors. One-way ANOVA was used for comparison among fiber types. Linear regression analysis was used to study the correlation between parameters determined in single fibers mechanics and in in vitro motility assay.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
A total of about 250 single fibers were analyzed with SDS-PAGE with respect to their MHC isoform composition, most of them being also characterized for their contraction parameters or in in vitro motility assay (see below). Their distribution in seven groups based on MHC isoform composition (1, 1-2A, 2A, 2A-2X, 2X) is shown in Table 2 and points to type 2A as the most abundant fiber type in trunk and limb canine muscles. Examples of electrophoresis on pure and hybrid fibers are shown in Fig. 2.
|
|
|
|
Contractile parameters of single canine muscle fibers containing distinct MHC isoforms. A total of 146 single muscle fibers, dissected from 5 muscles (fiber numbers in parentheses), diaphragma (n = 23), semimembranosus (n = 49), longissimus dorsi (n = 24), tibialis cranialis (n = 22), and pars vocalis of thyroarytenoideus (n = 28), were successfully analyzed in their contractile properties and classified on the basis of their MHC isoform composition as determined by SDS-PAGE in the following groups (number of fibers in parentheses): slow or 1 (n = 24), mixed 1-2A (n = 9), fast 2A (n = 72), mixed 2A-2X (n = 8), fast 2X (n = 23), mixed 2X-2B (n = 6), and fast 2B (n = 4).
The slack sarcomere length did not show significant differences among fiber types, and, after stretching by
20%, the sarcomere length at which contraction was induced was (means ± SE) 2.848 ± 0.017 µm for slow fibers, 2.86 ± 0.051 µm for 2A fibers, 2.839 ± 0.058 µm for 2X fibers, and 2.645 ± 0.113 µm for 2B fibers.
The average values of cross-sectional area (CSA) of the single fibers grouped according to their MHC isoform composition and muscle of origin are shown in Fig. 5A. Large variations occurred between muscles and fiber types, with the fibers from the hind limb muscles tibialis cranialis and semimembranosus being larger than the fibers from diaphragma and longissimus dorsi regardless of the myosin expressed. Fibers from vocalis muscle were smaller.
|
Canine myosin isoforms analyzed with in vitro motility assay. Myosin was prepared from a total of 48 fibers dissected from semimembranosus and tibialis cranialis muscles and identified through SDS-PAGE as slow fibers (13), pure fast 2A fibers (21), and pure fast 2X fibers (14). The determination of the sliding velocity of actin filaments (Vf) in the motility assay yielded the following values (means ± SE, in µm/s): 0.495 ± 0.022 for slow myosin, 1.282 ± 0.064 for fast 2A myosin, and 1.664 ± 0.091 for fast 2X myosin. Variance analysis showed that the differences between the three groups were statistically significant. No significant difference was found between the average values of sliding velocity of myosin of the same type extracted from these two muscles: in semimembranosus, Vf for slow myosin was 0.503 ± 0.025 (n = 10), for 2A myosin 1.205 ± 0.055 (n = 14), and for 2X myosin 1.757 ± 0.167 (n = 6); whereas in tibialis cranialis, Vf for slow myosin was 0.45 ± 0.016 (n = 3), for 2A myosin 1.459 ± 0.154 (n = 7), and for 2X myosin 1.605 ± 0.109 (n = 8).
When the values of Vf were plotted against the Vo values measured in fibers with the same MHC isoform composition and expressed in micrometers per second per half sarcomere (see Fig. 6), the linear regression analysis showed a highly significant correlation (P = 0.0226) with a slope of 0.495 ± 0.020, not significantly different from that (0.529 ± 0.015) calculated by Pellegrino and coworkers (28) for several myosin isoforms extracted from single fibers of mouse, rat, rabbit, and human muscles.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although it is clear that one slow and two fast fiber types are detectable in canine trunk and limb skeletal muscles, the precise identification of the second fast type has been controversial for a long time. This is due to the peculiar histochemical and immunohistochemical characteristics that make this type different not only from the slow fibers and the fast 2A fibers but also from fast 2B fibers (18). The identification of the third MHC isoform with MHC-2X has been first suggested by Zhang et al. (44) based on the electrophoretic pattern and recently confirmed using antibodies in Western blot and immunohistochemistry by (1, 36, 38). Since no antibody specific for MHC-2X was available, identification has been based on the principle of exclusion using the antibody BF-35, which, in the rat (33), reacts with all MHC isoforms except MHC-2X. Antibody specificity changes, however, from species to species: for example, SC-71 is highly specific for MHC-2A in rat and mouse, but reacts also with MHC-2X in cow and dog. To overcome the limits of the antibody specificity in Western blot or in immunohistochemistry, recently MALDI-TOF-MS has been used to study MHC isoforms in canine laryngeal muscles (3). In the present study the RT-PCR has been used to confirm without ambiguity the identification of the canine isoforms with the orthologs present in other species. RT-PCR can be used only when genes coding for specific MHC isoforms have been sequenced and identified. Since MHC isoforms sequences are very similar, with identity often above 90%, a detailed analysis based on BLAST and construction of phylogenetic trees is required. In this case, the identification of canine MHC-2X is supported by 96% identity with human ortholog and 97% with mouse ortholog (23). In addition, the monoclonal antibody BF-35 new clone (see also Ref. 41) has allowed a specific staining of fibers expressing MHC-2X.
Electrophoretic separation of MHC isoforms in canine laryngeal muscles (3, 43) has revealed the presence of a fourth band with migration speed between MHC-2X and MHC-1. The identification of this MHC isoform with MHC-2B has been proposed on the basis of electrophoretic migration and antibody reactivity (3, 43). In this study, RT-PCR combined with electrophoresis and histochemical and immunohistochemical methodologies has demonstrated the expression of MHC-2B in laryngeal muscles and also in extraocular muscles. Occasional presence of MHC-2B messenger has been observed in a limb muscle, the semimembranosus muscle, although the presence of the corresponding protein has not been documented in any muscle samples from limb and trunk examined in this study. The occasional inconsistency between MHC mRNA as detected with RT-PCR and MHC protein identified with gel electrophoresis has been reported previously by us (40). The presence of MHC-2B messenger without the corresponding protein has been described in human masseter (16). A possible explanation is given by the higher sensitivity of the RT-PCR compared with gel electrophoresis, but it is also possible that some posttranscriptional controls inhibit the translation to protein. Why only in two dogs of eight MHC-2B expression was detected remains an intriguing question and possible relation to breed or physiological state might be considered. Interestingly, in both cases, 2B expression was observed in dogs of large body size.
Hybrid fibers, i.e., fibers where more than one MHC isoform is expressed, likely represent an important form of regulation of contractile properties (8). Immunohistochemistry might encounter difficulties in distinguishing hybrid fibers from pure fibers, i.e., fibers where only one MHC isoform is expressed. In fact, the principle of exclusion applied to BF-35 (old clone) antibody allows unambiguous identification of pure 2X fibers (36), provided that its specificity is preserved in dog as in rat muscles, but the lack of an antibody specific for MHC-2A makes it virtually impossible to recognize pure 2A fibers, as both SC-71 and A4-74 react with both MHC-2A and MHC-2X (36). Our data with single fiber electrophoresis, although limited in the number of fibers analyzed, confirmed that pure 2X fibers are frequent in some muscles as semimembranosus and Tc, in agreement with previous studies (1, 36), whereas in other muscles hybrid 2A-2X fibers are more abundant (for example, longissimus dorsi) or even no fibers expressing 2X can be found (for example, diaphragm). As discussed above, the presence of MHC-2X either alone or associated with MHC-2A gives origin to the fiber type indicated as type 2dog (18). Our data suggest that fast 2A fibers are, by far, the most abundant fiber type in dog trunk and limb muscles. Fast 2A fibers are generally associated with aerobic oxidative metabolism (7), and dog muscles are known to rely heavily on mitochondrial ATP production, a metabolic feature that contributes to the high resistance to fatigue in long-lasting exercise (37). Immunohistochemical analysis (1, 38) has suggested that 2A fibers in canine muscles are predominantly pure in fast muscles and represent 3050% of the total fibers according to Acevedo and Rivero (1) and even more according to Strbenc et al. (38). The electrophoretic analysis on single fibers confirms that pure 2A fibers are probably more abundant than hybrid 1-2A and 2A-2X fibers. The distribution is totally different in laryngeal muscles and particularly in thyroarytenoideus, where hybrid 2A-2X and 2X-2B fibers are abundant and pure fibers, especially pure 2B fibers, although rare, are present, in agreement with the findings of Bergrin et al. (3).
In this study we report the first determination of the kinetic parameters, in the dog, of all four myosin isoforms typical of adult skeletal muscle fibers: 1 or slow, 2A, 2X, and 2B. In a recent study (25), values of maximum shortening velocity of canine slow and fast 2A fibers have been obtained at 15°C, sarcomere length 2.8 µm. Such Vo values are perfectly consistent with the values obtained in this study assuming a Q10 value of 4, similar to that previously determined by us in human skeletal muscle fibers (4). The values of tension developed in maximal isometric activation obtained in this study are virtually identical to those reported by Childers et al. (10) but lower than those measured by Marx and coworkers (25). The likely reason of the difference can be found in the CSA values, employed to normalize force and calculate tension. CSA values determined by Marx et al. (25) are about 50% lower than those measured in our specimens. The difference depends on the procedure followed by Marx et al. (25) who measured the depth (vertical diameter) of the fibers, whereas three diameters in the horizontal plane were utilized for calculation in our study.
The determination of the kinetic parameters of all four MHC isoforms provides further support the identification of the isoforms, since the sequence of progressive increase in Vo values found in dog fibers was 1 < 2A < 2X < 2B, similar to that of all other mammalian species until now examined (34). Available evidence suggests that the surface loops of the myosin heads, i.e., loop 1 at the opening of the nucleotide binding site and loops 2 and 3 on the actin-binding interface, play a critical role in determining the differences in Vo between myosin isoforms (see Ref. 23 and references therein). Similar amino acid sequences are present in the surface loops of orthologous myosins in various animal species and guarantee that the relative functional diversity is maintained. The correlation of Vo with the speed of filament translocation in the in vitro motility assay (Vf) confirms the view that, under the experimental conditions used, Vo values are genuine expressions of the functional properties of myosin molecules incorporated in the sarcomeric structure (28). Interestingly, the slope of the regression lines between Vf and Vo is virtually identical in the seven mammalian species up to now analyzed (see Refs. 28, 40, 41).
It can be of interest to compare the values of Vo of canine single muscle fibers with those of other animal species of different body size. It is well known that Vo tends to decrease with increasing body mass (28, 30, 35, 40, 41) or, as recently proposed (25), with increasing limb length. The values of Vo in canine fast fibers fit rather well with the prediction of the scaling relation, being lower than values measured in rat and mouse and lower or similar to values measured in rabbit (Fig. 7). More complex is the scaling relation for slow fibers where canine fibers represent a second exception after the recently published bovine slow fibers (40). The comparison with rabbit, a species that was not considered in the recent paper by Marx and coworkers (25), shows that the average Vo value of dog slow fibers is higher than the Vo value of rabbit slow fibers. The use of femur length (25) would not resolve the inconsistency, since body size and limb length are quite variable in dogs; however, the adults of most canine varieties have heavier body mass and longer limbs than rabbits. Also, the gray wolf, from which the dog branched about 9,000 generations ago due to domestication (see discussion in Ref. 20), has an adult size of
3545 kg. The consistent values of the slope of the linear relation between Vo measured in fibers with intact sarcomeric structure and Vf measured with purified myosins strongly support the view that the differences in Vo among orthologous myosins of different animal species are not due to the interference of other myofibrillar protein or to structural constraints of the sarcomere architecture. It is thus reasonable to conclude that the scaling relation of Vo, although valid in general terms and on a large range, can show exceptions related to specific and still unknown details of the evolutionary history of individual species. In regard to this, it is important to note that slow or beta myosin is also abundantly expressed in ventricular myocardium of the dog (21), and its functional features might be influenced by the requirement of cardiac activity as recently suggested (15).
|
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Aquin L, Banchero N. The cytoarchitecture and capillary supply in the skeletal muscle of growing dogs. J Anat 132: 341356, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
3. Bergrin M, Bicer S, Lucas CA, Reiser PJ. Three-dimensional compartmentalization of myosin heavy chain and myosin light chain isoforms in dog thyroarytenoid muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1446C1458, 2006.
4. Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C. Force-velocity properties of human skeletal muscle fibres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. J Physiol 495: 573586, 1996.
5. Bottinelli R, Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Force-velocity relations and myosin heavy chain isoform compositions of skinned fibres from rat skeletal muscle. J Physiol 437: 655672, 1991.
6. Braund KG, Hoff EJ, Richardson EY. Histochemical identification of fiber types in canine skeletal muscle. Am J Vet Res 39: 561565, 1978.[Web of Science][Medline]
7. Burke RE, Levine DN, Tsairis P, Zajac FE. Physiological types and histochemical profiles in motor units of the cat gastrocnemius. J Physiol 234: 723748, 1973.
8. Caiozzo VJ, Baker MJ, Huang H, Chou H, Wu YZ, Baldwin KM. Single-fiber myosin heavy chain polymorphism: how many patterns and what proportions? Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R570R580, 2003.
9. Canepari M, Rossi R, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C, Bottinelli R. Speeds of actin translocation in vitro by myosins extracted from single rat muscle fibres of different types. Exp Physiol 84: 803806, 1999.[Abstract]
10. Childers MK, Staley JT, Kornegay JN, McDonald KS. Dystrophin-deficient dogs incur comparable stretch-induced force deficit. Muscle Nerve 31: 768771, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Cooper BJ, Winand NJ, Stedman H, Valentine BA, Hoffman EP, Kunkel LM, Scott MO, Fischbeck KH, Kornegay JN, Avery RJ. The homologue of the Duchenne locus is defective in X-linked muscular dystrophy of dogs. Nature 334: 154156, 1988.[CrossRef][Medline]
12. Edman KAP. The velocity of unloaded shortening and its relation to sarcomere length and isometric force in vertebrate muscle fibres. J Physiol 291: 143159, 1979.
13. Gunn HM. Differences in the histochemical properties of skeletal muscles of different breeds of horses and dogs. J Anat 127: 615634, 1978.[Web of Science][Medline]
14. Guy PS, Snow DH. Skeletal muscle fibre composition in the dog and its relationship to athletic ability. Res Vet Sci 31: 244248, 1981.[Web of Science][Medline]
15. Hoh JFY, Kim Y, Lim JHY, Sieber LG, Lucas CA, Zhong WWH. Marsupial cardiac myosins are similar to those of eutherians in subunit composition and in the correlation of their expression with body size. J Comp Physiol [B] 177: 153163, 2007; doi:101007/s00360-006-0117-4.[CrossRef][Medline]
16. Horton MJ, Brandon CA, Morris TJ, Braun TW, Yaw KM, Sciote JJ. Abundant expression of myosin heavy-chain IIB RNA in a subset of human masseter muscle fibres. Arch Oral Biol 46: 10391050, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
17. Kornegay JN, Tuler SM, Miller DM, Levesque DC. Muscular dystrophy in a litter of golden retriever dogs. Muscle Nerve 11: 10561064, 1988.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18. Latorre R, Gil F, Vazquez JM, Moreno F, Mascarello F, Ramirez G. Skeletal muscle fibre types in the dog. J Anat 182: 329337, 1993.[Web of Science][Medline]
19. Lefaucheur L, Ecolan P, Plantard L, Gueguen N. New insights into muscle fiber types in the pig. J Histochem Cytochem 50: 719730, 2002.
20. Lindblad-Toh K et al., Broad Sequencing Platform Members. Genome sequence, comparative analysis and haplotype structure of the domestic dog. Nature 438: 803819, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]
21. Lompre AM, Mercadiera JJ, Wisnewskya C, Bouvereta P, Pantaloni C, D'Albis A, Schwartz K. Species- and age-dependent changes in the relative amounts of cardiac myosin isoenzymes in mammals. Dev Biol 87: 286291, 1981.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
22. Lucas CA, Kang LH, Hoh JF. Monospecific antibodies against the three mammalian fast limb myosin heavy chains. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 272: 303308, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
23. Maccatrozzo L, Caliaro F, Toniolo L, Patruno M, Reggiani C, Mascarello F. The sarcomeric myosin heavy chain gene family in the dog. Analysis of isoform diversity and comparison with other mammalian species. Genomics 89: 224236, 2007.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
24. Maccatrozzo L, Patruno M, Toniolo L, Reggiani C, Mascarello F. Myosin Heavy Chain 2B isoform is expressed in specialized eye muscles but not in trunk and limb muscles of cattle. Eur J Histochem 49: 357366, 2004.
25. Marx JO, Olsson MC, Larsson L. Scaling of skeletal muscle shortening velocity in mammals representing a 100,000-fold difference in body size. Pflügers Arch 452: 222230, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
26. Mascarello F, Rowlerson AM. Myosin isoform transitions during development of extra-ocular and masticatory muscles in the fetal rat. Anat Embryol (Berl) 185: 143153, 1992.[Medline]
27. Maxwell LC, Barclay JK, Mohrman DE, Faulkner JA. Physiological characteristics of skeletal muscles of dogs and cats. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 233: C14C18, 1977.
28. Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, D'Antona G, Reggiani C, Bottinelli R. Orthologous myosin isoforms and scaling of shortening velocity with body size in mouse, rat, rabbit and human muscles. J Physiol 546: 677689, 2003.
29. Rivero JLL, Diz A, Toledo M, Agüera E. Enzyme histochemical profiles of fiber types in mature canine appendicular muscles. Anat Histol Embryol 23: 330336, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
30. Rome LC, Sosnicki AA, Goble DO. Maximum velocity of shortening of three fibre types from horse soleus muscle: implications for scaling with body size. J Physiol 431: 173185, 1990.
31. Rowlerson A, Mascarello F, Veggetti A, Carpene E. The fibre-type composition of the first branchial arch muscles in Carnivora and Primates. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 4: 443472, 1983.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
32. Sampaolesi M, Stephane B, D'Antona G, Granger N, Tonlorenzi R, Innocenzi A, Mognol P, Thibaud J, Galvez B, Bethelemy I, Prerani L, Mantero S, Guttinger M, Pansarasa O, Rinaldi C, De Angelis MG, Torrente Y, Bordignon C, Bottinelli R, Cossu G. Mesoangioblast stem cells ameliorate muscle function in dystrophic dogs. Nature 444: 574579, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]
33. Schiaffino S, Gorza L, Sartore S, Saggin L, Ausoni S, Vianello M, Gundersen K, Lomo T. Three myosin heavy chain isoforms in type 2 skeletal muscle fibres. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 10: 197205, 1989.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
34. Schiaffino S, Reggiani C. Molecular diversity of myofibrillar proteins: gene regulation and functional significance. Physiol Rev 76: 371423, 1996.
35. Seow CY, Ford LE. Shortening velocity and power output of skinned muscle fibers from mammals having a 25,000-fold range of body mass. J Gen Physiol 97: 541560, 1991.
36. Smerdu V, Strbenc M, Meznaric-Petrusa M, Fazarinc G. Identification of myosin heavy chain I, IIa and IIx in skeletal muscles of dog by an electrophoretic and immunoblotting study. Cells Tissues Organs 180: 106116, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
37. Snow DH, Billeter R, Mascarello F, Carpene E, Rowlerson A, Jenny E. No classical type IIB fibres in dog skeletal muscle. Histochemistry 75: 5365, 1982.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
38. Strbenc M, Smerdu V, Zupanc M, Tozon N, Farazinc G. Pattern of myosin heavy chain isoforms in different fibre types of canine trunk and limb skeletal muscles. Cells Tissues Organs 176: 178186, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
39. Talmadge RJ, Roy RR. Electrophoretic separation of rat skeletal muscle myosin heavy-chain isoforms. J Appl Physiol 75: 23372340, 1993.
40. Toniolo L, Maccatrozzo L, Patruno M, Caliaro F, Mascarello F, Reggiani C. Expression of eight distinct MHC isoforms in bovine striated muscles: evidence for MHC-2B presence only in extra-ocular muscles. J Exp Biol 208: 42434253, 2005.
41. Toniolo L, Patruno M, Maccatrozzo L, Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, Rossi R, D'Antona G, Bottinelli R, Reggiani C, Mascarello F. Fast fibres in a large animal: fibre types, contractile properties and MHC expression in pig skeletal muscles. J Exp Biol 207: 18751886, 2004.
42. Trevino GS, Demaree RSJ, Sanders BV, O'Donnell TA. Needle biopsy of skeletal muscle in dogs: light and electron microscopy of resting muscle. Am J Vet Res 34: 507514, 1973.[Web of Science][Medline]
43. Wu YZ, Crumley RL, Caiozzo VJ. Are hybrid fibers a common motif of canine laryngeal muscles? Single-fiber analyses of myosin heavy-chain isoform composition. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 126: 865873, 2000.
44. Zhang KM, Hu P, Wang SW, Feher JJ, Wright LD, Wechsler AS, Spratt JA, Briggs FN. Salbutamol changes the molecular and mechanical properties of canine skeletal muscle. J Physiol 496: 211220, 1996.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Bicer and P. J. Reiser Myosin Isoform Expression in Dog Rectus Muscles: Patterns in Global and Orbital Layers and among Single Fibers Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., January 1, 2009; 50(1): 157 - 167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Toniolo, P. Cancellara, L. Maccatrozzo, M. Patruno, F. Mascarello, and C. Reggiani Masticatory myosin unveiled: first determination of contractile parameters of muscle fibers from carnivore jaw muscles Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2008; 295(6): C1535 - C1542. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |