|
|
||||||||
CALL FOR PAPERS
Protein and Vesicle Trafficking, Cytoskeleton
2Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, and 1Department of Biological Sciences, Wayne State University and
-Cell Biochemistry Laboratory, John D. Dingell Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Detroit, Michigan
Submitted 30 August 2006 ; accepted in final form 4 October 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cell. We previously reported activation of small G proteins by biologically active lipids via potentiation of relevant GDP/GTP exchange activities within the
-cell. Herein, we studied putative regulatory roles for these lipids in the trafficking and membrane association of Rac1 in cell-free preparations derived from INS 832/13
-cells. Incubation of INS 832/13 cell lysates with polyphosphoinositides (e.g., PIP2), phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylcholine, and phosphatidylserine significantly promoted trafficking of cytosolic Rac1 to the membrane fraction. Lysophosphatidic acid, but not lysophosphatidylcholine or lysophosphatidylserine, also promoted translocation and membrane association of Rac1. Arachidonic acid, diacylglycerol, calcium, and cAMP failed to exert any clear effects on Rac1 translocation to the membrane. Together, our findings provide the first direct evidence in support of our recent hypothesis (Kowluru A, Veluthakal R. Diabetes 54: 35233529, 2005), which states that generation of biologically active lipids, known to occur in the glucose-stimulated
-cell, may mediate targeting of Rac1 to the membrane for optimal interaction with its putative effector proteins leading to GSIS.
pancreatic
-cells; GDP dissociation inhibitor; glucose-stimulated insulin secretion
Experimental data from different laboratories suggest that some of these "lipid second messengers" may regulate the function of specific G proteins in different cell types. For example, mitogenic lipids such as phosphatidic acid and arachidonic acid display inhibitory effects on guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase)-activating proteins in mouse brain cell extracts (34) and may inhibit GDP/GTP exchange activity of purified smg p21 (10). In neutrophils, arachidonic acid appears to promote GTP binding (21). It has also been shown that arachidonic acid and phosphatidic acid accelerate, and may mediate, the generation of the superoxide anion by NADPH oxidase in human neutrophils (21); the stimulation by arachidonic acid appears to require a pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein in addition to one or more small G proteins. Along these lines, we provided the first evidence to indicate regulation of G proteins in islet subcellular fractions by phospholipase-derived lipid mediators of insulin secretion (14). In those studies, using cell-free preparations, we have demonstrated stimulation of GTP binding as well as inhibition of GTPase activities by specific biologically active lipids. On the basis of this evidence, we concluded that the insulinotropic nature of lipids might, in part, be due to their ability to maintain G proteins in their active GTP-bound conformation by enhancing GTP binding and decreasing GTP hydrolysis (14).
More recent studies from our laboratory have identified that Rac1, a member of the Rho subfamily of G proteins, plays a significant contributory role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion (GSIS) (19, 20). Furthermore, we have reported localization of, and regulation by, Rac1 regulatory proteins, such as the GDP dissociation inhibitor (e.g., Rho-GDI) in GSIS (19). The principal objective of the current studies is to examine putative contributory roles, if any, for the known second messengers of insulin secretion (e.g., lipids, cAMP, or calcium) in promoting membrane association of Rac1 in INS 832/13 cells, which we have demonstrated to be a necessary step for GSIS (19, 20). Using INS 832/13 cell lysates, we demonstrate herein that specific lipids, but not calcium or cAMP, promote translocation and membrane association of Rac1.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-phosphatidic acid, L-
-phosphatidylcholine, phospho-L-serine, L-
-lysophosphatidic acid, diacylglycerol (DAG), cAMP, SDS, and deoxycholic acid were purchased from Sigma (St. Louis, MO). L-
-Phosphatidyl-D-myo-inositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2) was obtained from Calbiochem (San Diego, CA). Antisera directed against Rac1 and Rho-GDI were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA). Insulin-secreting cells. INS 832/13 cells were provided by Dr. Chris Newgard (Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC). They were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated fetal bovine serum supplemented with 100 IU/ml penicillin and 100 IU/ml streptomycin, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 50 µM 2-mercaptoethanol, and 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.4). The medium was changed twice weekly and cells were trypsinized and subcloned weekly.
Translocation and membrane association of Rac1. This was determined according to a method we described earlier (19, 20). In brief, INS 832/13 cells were rinsed briefly in phosphate buffer saline, scraped, and spun at 100 g for 5 min to remove the medium. The cellular pellet was homogenized in an isotonic medium consisting of 250 mM mannitol, 70 mM sucrose, 5 mM HEPES, pH 7.4, containing 1 mM EGTA, 1 mM DTT, and protease inhibitor cocktail. The cell lysates were then incubated with various lipids (dissolved in appropriate solvents) for 15 min at 37°C. After incubation, the lysates were spun at 105,000 g for 60 min (Beckman Ultima TL-100) to separate the total membrane (pellet) and the cytosolic (soluble) fractions (3, 19, 20). The purity of the membrane fraction was determined by the relative enrichment of E-cadherin, a membrane marker protein, as we described earlier (19). Proteins from each of these fractions were separated by SDS-PAGE and transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane. The membranes were then blocked and incubated with anti-Rac1 or anti-Rho-GDI antisera followed by incubation with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (1:1,000 dilution) for 1 h. Immune complexes were detected using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) kit. Intensity of the protein bands was quantitated by densitometry, as we described in Refs. 3, 19, and 20.
Protein assay. Protein concentration in the membrane and cytosolic fractions was determined by the dye-binding method of Bradford using BSA as the standard.
Statistical analyses of experimental data. Statistical significance of differences was determined by ANOVA. A P value < 0.05 was considered significant.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-cells and normal rat islets (19, 29, 32). Of immediate relevance to the current studies are recent observations from our laboratory to directly implicate GDIs in GSIS (19). In the aforementioned studies, we also hypothesized that glucose-mediated ADP-ribosylation factor-6 (ARF-6)-dependent generation of intracellular second messengers, such as polyphosphoinositides (e.g., PIP2) or phosphatidic acid, might facilitate dissociation of the Rac1/GDI complex followed by translocation of Rac1 to the membranous fraction (19). Along these lines, we have also demonstrated that Rac1 activation and membrane association are essential for GSIS (19, 20). With these observations in mind, we designed and utilized an in vitro assay to quantitate potential regulatory role(s) for exogenously added lipids, calcium, or cAMP in the dissociation of the Rac1/GDI complex and subsequent membrane association of Rac1 in INS 832/13 cell lysates. Data in Fig. 1 indicate nearly equal amounts of Rac1 in membranous and cytosolic fractions derived from INS 832/13 cells. However, a brief (15 min; see MATERIALS AND METHODS for additional details) incubation of INS 832/13 cell lysates with PIP2 (30 µM) resulted in translocation of the majority of the cytosolic Rac1 to the membranous fraction.
|
|
-cell (19). Therefore, we examined changes, if any, in the subcellular distribution (membrane vs. cytosolic) of GDI in INS 832/13 cell lysates incubated with various lipids, described under Fig. 2. Under these conditions, the majority of the GDI appeared to remain predominantly in the cytosolic fraction as evidenced by Western blotting, although we observed a modest increase in the membranous association of GDI in the presence of lipids (Fig. 3).
|
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- (INS and
TC3) cell preparations as well as in normal rat islets. On the basis of these data, we hypothesized that Rac1 translocation to the membrane in the glucose-stimulated
-cell may be mediated via biologically active lipid moieties generated by the direct actions of glucose on various phospholipases indigenous to the
-cell (22). This study, therefore, represents a logical extension to our recent attempts to understand mechanisms underlying glucose-mediated activation of specific G proteins endogenous to the islet
-cell. Our principle findings are 1) PIP2, phosphatidic acid, phosphatidylserine, and phosphatidylcholine specifically promote membrane targeting of Rac1 in cell-free preparations of INS cells; 2) lysophosphatidic acid, but not lysophosphatidylcholine or lysophosphatidylserine, is effective in promoting the translocation to the membrane; 3) arachidonic acid, an insulinotropic fatty acid, has no demonstrable effects on membrane association of Rac1 under these conditions; 4) regulatory effects of lipids, as in 1, may not be due to detergent properties of these lipids, since SDS and deoxycholic acid failed to exert any effects on membrane association of Rac1; and 5) neither calcium, cAMP, nor DAG elicited any effects on membrane association of Rac1. On the basis of these data, we conclude that generation of specific lipids via glucose-induced activation of lipid-metabolizing enzymes might represent a regulatory step in the cascade of events leading to membrane association of Rac1 and subsequent hitherto unidentified steps leading to GSIS. Previous studies from our laboratory (14) have demonstrated regulation, by lipid messengers, of endogenous G proteins in various subcellular fractions (e.g., secretory granules) isolated from normal rat islets. For example, we have reported stimulation of GTP binding and inhibition of GTP hydrolysis by insulinotropic lipids in subcellular fractions of the pancreatic islet. On the basis of those data, we proposed that insulinotropic effects of these lipids may, in part, be due to their ability to retain putative G proteins in their GTP-bound active conformation. Again, the major significance of the aforementioned studies (14) and the current investigation may reside in the fact that physiological secretagogues of insulin release do not work via receptor-dependent mechanisms but via the generation of soluble second messengers. Earlier studies have documented the presence of PLA2 and PLD in pancreatic islets. In addition, it has been shown that phospholipid hydrolytic products of PLA2 and PLD stimulate insulin secretion from isolated islets (see Ref. 22 for a review). Data from our earlier studies (14) and the current investigation may thus provide a unifying hypothesis for the insulin-releasing abilities of the lipids, in that they might elicit direct regulatory effects on specific G proteins (e.g., Rac1) whose activation and membrane association are required for GSIS to occur.
Earlier observations in other cell types provide further support to our current findings in insulin-secreting INS 832/13 cells. For example, using human neutrophil cytosolic preparations, Chuang et al. (5) provided evidence to suggest dissociation of Rac1/GDI complexes by biologically active lipids. These studies have demonstrated most noticeable effects by arachidonic acid, phosphatidic acid, and phosphatidylinositols. The concentrations of lipids used in our current studies are similar to those employed by Chuang et al. It is also important to note that the concentrations of lipids used in the current investigation are well within the range reported to occur in the glucose-stimulated islet
-cells (Refs. 14, 15, and 22 and references therein). Moreover, in earlier studies, we have been able to demonstrate significant regulatory effects of these lipids (in the concentration range tested herein) on GTP binding and hydrolytic activities in subcellular fractions derived from insulin-secreting cells (14). It is for these reasons that we believe the current findings are physiologically significant.
It is important to note that the majority of our current findings are in agreement with observations by Chuang et al. (5), the only exception being arachidonic acid, which did not exert any clear effects on translocation of Rac1 to the membrane in INS cells. Using Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts, Fleming et al. (8) demonstrated significant translocation of Cdc42, but not Rac1, RhoB, or Rho-GDI, in the presence of lysophosphatidic acid. Effects of lysophosphatidic acid on Rac1 translocation in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts are in contrast to our observations in INS cells, in which membrane association of Rac1 was significantly promoted by lysophosphatidic acid. More recent studies by Ugolev et al. (33) in artificial liposomal systems have suggested significant Rac1/GDI complex dissociating effects of anionic but not neutral phospholipids. Together, these studies appear to further support our overall conclusions that biologically active lipids promote membrane association of Rac1, albeit the specificity of lipids appears to differ in each study.
Last, using PC3 human carcinoma cells, Price et al. (28) recently reported calcium-dependent activation of Rac1, presumably mediated via the activation of calcium-dependent activation of a conventional protein kinase C. These investigators demonstrated that a forced increase in intracellular calcium concentrations or protein kinase C activation results in the phosphorylation of Rho-GDI, which induces dissociation of Rac1 from the Rac1/GDI complex, thereby enabling Rac1 to translocate to the membrane. However, in our current experimental conditions, we failed to see any clear effects of exogenously provided calcium, cAMP, or DAG on Rac1 association with the membrane. Additional studies are needed to conclusively demonstrate whether Rho-GDI undergoes phosphorylation in the islet
-cell by a protein kinase and whether such a phosphorylation step facilitates dissociation of the Rac1/GDI complex and targeting of the released Rac1 to the membrane fraction.
In conclusion, our current studies provide the first evidence to indicate that specific biologically active lipids, known to be generated within the glucose-stimulated
-cell, may mediate targeting of Rac1 to the membrane for interaction with its putative effector proteins, leading to GSIS. Further studies are needed to elucidate the precise mechanisms through which certain biologically active lipids mediate translocation and membrane association of Rac1 while others lack the specificity in inducing such an effect. Additional studies are needed to conclusively demonstrate whether glucose-induced generation of some of these lipids (e.g., PIP2 or phosphatidic acid) requires ARF-6 activation in the islet
-cell, as we originally proposed in Ref. 19.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Amin R, Chen HQ, Tannous M, Gibbs R, Kowluru A. Inhibition of glucose-and calcium-induced insulin secretion from
TC3 cells by novel inhibitors of isoprenylation. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 303: 8288, 2002.
3. Amin RH, Chen HQ, Veluthakal R, Silver RB, Li J, Li G, Kowluru A. Mastoparan-induced insulin secretion from insulin-secreting betaTC3 and INS-1 cells: evidence for its regulation by Rho subfamily of G proteins. Endocrinology 144: 45084518, 2003.
4. Cerione RA. Cdc42: new roads to travel. Trends Cell Biol 14: 127132, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5. Chuang TH, Bohl BP, Bokoch GM. Biologically active lipids are regulators of Rac. GDI complexation. J Biol Chem 268: 2620626211, 1993.
6. Daniel S, Noda M, Cerione RA, Sharp GW. A link between Cdc42 and syntaxin is involved in mastoparan-stimulated insulin release. Biochemistry 41: 96639671, 2002.[CrossRef][Medline]
7. Dermardirossian C, Bokoch GM. GDIs: central regulatory molecules in Rho GTPase activation. Trends Cell Biol 15: 356363, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
8. Fleming IN, Elliott CM, Exton JH. Lysophosphatidic acid induces threonine phosphorylation of Tiam1 in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts via activation of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 271: 3306733073, 1996.
9. Kang G, Chepurny OG, Holz GG. cAMP-regulated guanine nucleotide exchange factor II (Epac2) mediates calcium-induced calcium release in INS-1 pancreatic beta-cells. J Physiol 536: 375385, 2001.
10. Kawamura S, Kaibushi K, Hiroyushi M, Fujioka H, Mizuno T, Takai Y. Inhibition of the action of a stimulatory GDP/GTP exchange protein for smg p21 by acidic membrane phospholipids. Jpn J Cancer Res 82: 758761, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI]
11. Kowluru A. Regulatory roles for small G proteins in the pancreatic beta-cell: lessons from models of impaired insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 285: E669E684, 2003.
12. Kowluru A, Amin R. Inhibitors of post-translational modifications of G-proteins as probes to study the pancreatic
cell function: potential therapeutic implications. Curr Drug Targets Immune Endocrinol Metabol Disord 2: 129139, 2002.
13. Kowluru A, Chen HQ, Tannous M. Novel roles for the rho subfamily of GTP-binding proteins in succinate-induced insulin secretion from betaTC3 cells: further evidence in support of the succinate mechanism of insulin release. Endocr Res 29: 363376, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14. Kowluru A, Metz SA. Regulation of guanine-nucleotide binding proteins in islet subcellular fractions by phospholipase-derived lipid mediators of insulin secretion. Biochim Biophys Acta 1222: 360368, 1994.[Medline]
15. Kowluru A, Rabaglia ME, Muse KE, Metz SA. Subcellular localization and characterization of guanine nucleotide binding proteins in normal rat and human pancreatic islets and transformed
cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1222: 348359, 1994.[Medline]
16. Kowluru A, Li G, Rabaglia ME, Segu VB, Hofmann F, Aktories K, Metz SA. Evidence for differential roles of the Rho subfamily of GTP-binding proteins in glucose- and calcium-induced insulin secretion from pancreatic
cells. Biochem Pharmacol 54: 10971108, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
17. Kowluru A, Robertson RP, Metz SA. GTP-binding proteins in the regulation of pancreatic
cell function. In: Diabetes MellitusA Fundamental and Clinical Text, edited by LeRoith D, Taylor SI, Olefsky JM. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, 2000, p. 7894.
18. Kowluru A, Seavey SE, Li G, Sorenson RL, Weinhaus AJ, Nesher R, Rabaglia ME, Vadakekalam J, Metz SA. Glucose- and GTP-dependent stimulation of the carboxylmethylation of Cdc42 in rodent and human pancreatic islets and pure
cells: evidence for an essential role for GTP-binding proteins in nutrient-induced insulin secretion. J Clin Invest 98: 540555, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
19. Kowluru A, Veluthakal R. Rho guanosine diphosphate-dissociation inhibitor plays a negative modulatory role in glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Diabetes 54: 35233529, 2005.
20. Li J, Luo R, Kowluru A, Li G. Novel regulation by Rac1 of glucose- and forskolin-induced insulin secretion in INS-1 beta-cells. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 286: E818E827, 2004.
21. Ligeti E, Tardif M, Vagnais PV. Activation of O2
generating oxidase of bovine neutrophils in a cell-free system. Interaction of a cytosolic factor with the plasma membrane and control by G nucleotides. Biochemistry 28: 71167123, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]
22. Metz SA. The pancreatic islet as Rubik's Cube. Is phospholipid hydrolysis a piece of the puzzle? Diabetes 40: 15651573, 1991.[Abstract]
23. Metz SA, Rabaglia ME, Stock JB, Kowluru A. Modulation of insulin secretion from normal islets by inhibitors of posttranslational modifications of GTP-binding proteins. Biochem J 295: 3140, 1993.
24. Nevins AK, Thurmond DC. A direct interaction between Cdc42 and vesicle-associated membrane protein 2 regulates SNARE-dependent insulin exocytosis. J Biol Chem 280: 19441952, 2005.
25. Nevins AK, Thurmond DC. Glucose regulates the cortical actin network through modulation of Cdc42 cycling to stimulate insulin secretion. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C698C710, 2003.
26. Newgard CB, McGarry JD. Metabolic coupling factors in pancreatic
cell signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem 64: 689719, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27. Prentki M, Matschinsky FM. Calcium, cAMP, and phospholipid-derived messengers in coupling mechanisms of insulin secretion. Physiol Rev 67: 12231226, 1987.
28. Price LS, Laneslan M, Klooster JPT, Hordijk PL, Jalink K, Collard JG. Calcium signaling regulates translocation and activation of Rac. J Biol Chem 278: 3941339421, 2003.
29. Regazzi R, Kikuchi A, Takai Y, Wollheim CB. The small GTP-binding proteins in the cytosol are complexed to GDP dissociation inhibitor proteins. J Biol Chem 267: 1751217519, 1992.
30. Sasaki T, Takai Y. The Rho small G protein family-Rho GDI system as a temporal and spatial determinant for cytoskeletal control. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 245: 641645, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
31. Takai Y, Sasaki T, Matozaki T. Small GTP-binding proteins. Physiol Rev 81: 153208, 2001.
32. Tannous M, Veluthakal R, Amin R, Kowluru A. IL-1
-induced nitric oxide release from insulin-secreting
cells: further evidence for the involvement of GTP-binding proteins. Diabetes Metab 28: 3S783S84, 2002.[Medline]
33. Ugolev Y, Molshanski-Mor S, Weinbaum C, Pick E. Liposomes comprising of anionic but not neutral phospholipids cause dissociation of Rac1 or 2-Rho GDI complexes and support amphiphile-independent NADPH activation by such complexes. J Biol Chem 281: 1920419219, 2006.
34. Yu CL, Tsai MH, Stacey DW. Cellular ras activity and phospholipid metabolism. Cell 52: 6371, 1988.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
V. Poitout Phospholipid hydrolysis and insulin secretion: a step toward solving the Rubik's cube Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab, February 1, 2008; 294(2): E214 - E216. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |