|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
METHODS IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY
1Departamento de Matemáticas, Estadística y Computación, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander; and 2CABINER, Américo Vespucio S/N, Seville, Spain
Submitted 20 February 2006 ; accepted in final form 26 August 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
modeling of exocytosis; Monte Carlo methods
When the secretory machinery of vesicles enters into play, the influence of the geometrical aspects becomes even more important; in this case, the relative position of the calcium channels (organized or not in clusters) and the secretory sensors of the vesicles are crucial parameters of the system. To incorporate information on the geometry of the system, the use of microscopic models, such as those based on Monte Carlo (MC) methods (see Ref. 2, for example), is particularly appropriate. However, because of the complexity of the algorithms involved, MC methods are probably not as popular as differential methods. A "raw" MC code is not an easy thing to use, whereas many mathematical packages are equipped with friendly differential equation solvers. In trying to overcome this limitation, we have built a user-friendly software environment based on the use of MC methods for simulating calcium-triggered secretory processes (from readily releasable vesicles) in cells.
A first version of the software (Calcium3D) for simulating calcium dynamics was presented previously (1). The program now has been enhanced by incorporating the simulation of secretory events from readily releasable pools of vesicles; in this way, accumulated secretory event time courses (proportional to capacitance) can be obtained as outputs. The resulting software (Ca3D_Exolab) includes the following features: different geometrical configurations for both channels and vesicles can be chosen by using a graphical interface, and calcium and buffer concentrations at different depths from the cellular membrane and accumulated secretory event time courses (proportional to capacitance time courses) are obtained as outputs, as well as a descriptive statistical data analysis of the different output data.
| MATHEMATICAL MODELS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Domain of Simulation
A three-dimensional (3-D) orthogonal grid maps the (by now) two possible choices of the domain for the simulations: a conical domain and a cylindrical domain. The size
x of the lateral sides of the cubic compartments of the grid can be selected by the user of the program. This size represents the spatial resolution for the simulations.
The choice of a conical domain is appropriated for simulating secretory events in spherical cells, assuming that the portion of the membrane represented by the base of the cone is embedded inside a larger portion of the membrane where the calcium channels are, on average, uniformly distributed. In this way, one can consider that the net flux of ions and buffers through the lateral sides of the cone is zero. This approximation is also safe for smoothly nonuniform configurations of channels in which the conical domain is placed inside a region where the distribution of channels is sufficiently uniform. The choice of a cylindrical domain seems appropriated for simulating calcium processes in cilliar cells or presynaptic terminals.
Calcium Current
We consider a simple model for calcium influx in which the calcium current is constant during a pulse. The selection of different shapes of the current and the stochastic modeling of channel gating will be considered in future versions of the software.
Diffusion of Mobile Particles
For modeling the 3-D diffusion of calcium and mobile buffers, we use a random walk algorithm (2). In this way, calcium ions and mobile buffers move in intervals of time:
t = (
x)2/4D, where
x is the spatial resolution for the simulations and D is the diffusion coefficient of the mobile particle.
Secretory Vesicles and Buffers
For simulating the kinetic reactions of the secretory sensors of vesicles and buffers with calcium, we consider a discrete (stochastic) modeling (2, 10). For the secretory vesicles, a noncooperative scheme with a variable number of binding sites (n) is considered:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
The spatial distribution of the binding sites of buffers is randomly and uniformly distributed over the 3-D domain, whereas the binding sites of the secretory vesicles are spatially restricted to the location of the vesicles. The mechanism for secretion is simulated by placing the number of binding sites, initially free, corresponding to the kinetic scheme considered, in each of the submembrane compartments where the protein lies. In Fig. 1, a schematic representation of the location of vesicles below the membrane is shown. In this representation, a five-binding sites kinetics scheme per vesicle is considered. The calcium channels are also shown.
|
Replenishment of the RRP is not considered in this model. The simulations are restricted to trains of pulses in the subsecond range. Endocytosis and the mobilization of additional vesicles can then be thought to be too slow to be noticed.
| DESCRIPTION OF THE SOFTWARE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The MC code for simulating calcium dynamics that, in an improved version, form the core of Ca3D_Exolab, was extensively tested, and its results were proved to match with theoretical expectations at long times (2). Explicit tests for the routines implementing the random walk algorithm and the kinetic reactions of calcium with buffers can be found in Ref. 3.
The outputs of Ca3D_Exolab are calcium and buffer concentration time courses at different depths from the cellular membrane and the number of secretory events as a function of time. For the different output data, a descriptive statistical data analysis is available.
Two Illustrative Examples
As a practical example, consider two different case studies of secretion: chromaffin cells (see Ref. 11, for example) and calyx of Held (see Refs. 5, 6).
For chromaffin cells, differential methods are generally able to describe the time course of average calcium concentrations below the membrane. Concentrations are high enough so that the averages make sense, and so does the differential modeling of these average values. When high concentrations occur, the MC method implemented uses average descriptions when suitable (see Refs. 2 and 3 for further details).
The calyx of Held is a good example showing when it is not so clear that average descriptions are valid, as commented in Ref. 6. Indeed, calcium concentrations are so low that, for the spatial resolutions considered, very few or no calcium ions may be found, as the results show. This fact, together with the fact that the binding of calcium to vesicle sensors also affects calcium concentration, poses a serious limitation on differential models, which are overcome by the MC approach.
Chromaffin Cells
We followed descriptions in Refs. 2 and 10 for modeling of these cells. An appropriate domain for simulating localized submembrane time courses is a conical domain. We chose, for example, a cone with a 1-µm radius of base (representing the radius of a portion of the membrane) and 5 µm in height. The spatial resolution
x was set to 50 nm.
Initial conditions and reaction-diffusion parameters. We considered the following input data for the initial conditions and reaction-diffusion parameters (2, 10): for calcium, initial concentration ([Ca2+]rest) = 0.1 µM, and diffusion coefficient (DCa) = 220 µm2/s; for the endogenous fixed buffer (EFB), total concentration ([EFB]total) = 500 µM, affinity (Kd) = 10 µM, and forward Ca2+ binding rate (k+) = 5 x 108 M1·s1; for the exogenous mobile buffer fura-2, total concentration ([fura-2]total) = 100 µM, diffusion coefficient (DFura-2) = 42 µm2/s, Kd = 0.24 µM, and k+ = 5 x 108 M1·s1; and for the kinetic release model for vesicles, there were five independent binding sites, where Kd = 10 µM and k+ = 3 x 108 M1·s1. In addition, we considered a fusion rate of p = 40,000 s1. The parameters of the system are summarized in Table 1.
|
|
|
|
Calyx of Held
The parameters for the simulation of the calyx of Held presynaptic terminal were taken from Ref. 5. Because the release topography of the system cannot be inferred from experimental studies, the modeling can be used for testing different topographies.
Domain of simulation. In the case of the calyx of Held, we chose as domain for the simulations a cylindrical domain of 400 nm in height and 130 nm in radius (5). This last parameter corresponds approximately to the mean radius of the active zones in the presynaptic membrane, which are the regions of interest.
Initial conditions and reaction-diffusion parameters. We considered the following input data for the initial conditions and reaction-diffusion parameters (5): for calcium, [Ca2+]rest = 50 nM and DCa = 220 µm2/s; for endogenous fixed buffer, [EFB]total = 80 µM, Kd = 2 µM, and k+ = 5 x 108 M1·s1; for ATP, total concentration ([ATP]total) = 580 µM, diffusion coefficient (DATP) = 220 µm2/s, Kd = 200 µM, and k+ = 5 x 108 M1·s1; and for the kinetic release model for vesicles, there were five independent binding sites, where Kd = 10 µM and k+ = 3 x 108 M1·s1. In addition, we considered a fusion rate of p = 40,000 s1.
Topography of channels and vesicles. As mentioned previously, the release site topography at most synapses, including the calyx of Held, cannot be measured experimentally. According to the theoretical study in Ref. 5, at each active zone, the Ca2+ that controls phasic release is supplied by 10 or more calcium channels. These channels are grouped into one or a few clusters, with a channel cluster covering an area of <50 nm across. Let us consider a RRP composed of three vesicles associated to this active zone.
We simulated the secretory response of the RRP under two different topographical configurations of vesicles (Fig. 5, A and B) and a topographical configuration of channels consisting in a single cluster of 12 channels (Fig. 6). The spatial resolution
x was set to 10 nm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Gil A, Segura J, Pertusa JAG, Soria B. Monte Carlo simulation of 3-D buffered Ca2+ diffusion in neuroendocrine cells. Biophys J 78: 1333, 2000.
3. Gil A, Segura J. Ca3D: a Monte Carlo code to simulate 3D buffered calcium diffusion of ions in sub-membrane domains. Comput Phys Commun 136: 269293, 2001.[CrossRef]
4. Klingauf J, Neher E. Modeling buffered Ca2+ diffusion near the membrane: implications for secretion in neuroendocrine cells. Biophys J 72: 674690, 1997.
5. Meinrenken CJ, Borst JGG, Sackmann B. Calcium secretion coupling at calyx of Held governed by nonuniform channel-vesicle topography. J Neurosci 22: 16481667, 2002.
6. Meinrenken CJ, Borst JGG, Sackmann B. Local routes revisited: the space and time dependence of the Ca2+ signal for phasic transmitter release at the rat calyx of Held. J Physiol 547: 665689, 2003.
7. McHugh JM, Kenyon JL. An Excel-based model of Ca2+ diffusion and fura 2 measurements in a spherical cell. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 286: C342C348, 2004.
8. Nowycky MC, Pinter MJ. Time courses of calcium and calcium bound buffers following calcium influx in a model cell. Biophys J 64: 7791, 1993.
9. Sala F, Hernández-Cruz A. Calcium diffusion modeling in a spherical neuron Relevance of buffering properties. Biophys J 57: 313324, 1990.
10. Segura J, Gil A, Soria B. Modeling study of exocytosis in neuroendocrine cells: influence of the geometrical parameters. Biophys J 79: 17711786, 2000.
11. Voets T, Neher E, Moser T. Mechanisms underlying phasic and sustained secretion in chromaffin cells from mouse adrenal slices. Neuron 23: 607615, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |