|
|
||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
1Department of Pharmacology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo; and 2Department of Biological Chemistry, Kyoto University Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyoto, Japan
Submitted 18 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 6 September 2006
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
[3H]ryanodine binding; CICR; stimulation by physiological Mg2+, excitation-contraction coupling in the heart
CICR plays a pivotal role in excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle and is modulated by many endogenous and exogenous agents, including Ca2+, Mg2+, adenine nucleotides, SH-modifying agents, pH, calmodulin (CaM), and FK-506-binding protein (FKBP) 12/12.6, as well as many pharmacological reagents, including caffeine, procaine and halothane, and RyR domain peptides, which may affect interdomain interactions (8, 10, 18, 34, 37, 38). Ca2+ and Mg2+ are of primary importance among these factors. Ca2+ stimulates CICR at low concentrations (µM order), whereas it inhibits CICR at 0.1 mM or higher, showing biphasic Ca2+ dependence. This dependence is explained by the integration of the two independent effects on the activating (A-site) and inactivating (I-site) Ca2+ sites in the RyR molecules (13, 19, 21). In cardiac muscle, however, inhibition by a high Ca2+ concentration was not noticeable up to 0.1 mM, in contrast to the marked inhibition with RyR1 in skeletal muscle (5, 8, 17, 34, 37, 38). Therefore, the affinity for the divalent cation of the I-site of RyR2 was believed to be very low or negligible (5, 8, 17, 34, 37, 38). Mg2+ exerts an effect antagonistic to Ca2+ on the A-site and synergistic with Ca2+ on the I-site, inhibiting CICR (13, 19, 21). Therefore, Mg2+ shifts the pCa-CICR activity relationship to a higher Ca2+ concentration range (the first effect) and reduces the peak value (the second effect) (5, 6, 7, 17, 27, 35, 36, 37). An adenine nucleotide such as ATP or
,
-methylene adenosine triphosphate (AMPPCP), a nonhydrolyzable ATP analog, stimulates CICR without a change in the Ca2+ dependence (21). The stimulation is as great as 10,000-fold (6, 27) in skeletal muscle, whereas it is not as marked (at most several-fold) in cardiac muscle (8, 18, 34, 37). For determination of [3H]ryanodine binding, a biochemical measure of CICR, in a medium simulating the cytoplasmic milieu, the addition of an adenine nucleotide is indispensable with skeletal muscle SR, whereas it is not always required with cardiac SR (5, 17, 27, 34, 35, 36). Recently, RyR1 in the SR was found to be suppressed selectively in Ca2+-dependent [3H]ryanodine binding (to about one-seventh), compared with RyR3 over the entire range of Ca2+ concentrations, without a change in its Ca2+ sensitivity, although purified RyR1 is very similar in activity to purified RyR3 (24, 30). A reduction in the affinity for the ligand, [3H]ryanodine, accompanied this suppression (24). The interdomain interaction between region 1 (the NH2-terminal domain) and region 2 (the central domain) of RyR1 was found to be the main mechanism underlying the suppression (22). This interdomain interaction has also attracted the keen interest of investigators in view of its probable role in malignant hyperthermia (10).
It remains to be clarified whether suppression occurs with RyR2, whose CICR plays a central role in excitation-contraction coupling in cardiac muscle (3). This issue is also critical with respect to elucidation of the etiology of sudden death ascribed to the mutated RyR2, in which the mutation takes place in regions comparable to the sites associated with malignant hyperthermia (10). During the course of our investigation, we found that Mg2+ exerted a third effect of stimulating [3H]ryanodine binding in an intermediate range of Ca2+, roughly 10 to 100 µM, in addition to the antagonistic effect on the A-site (the first effect) and the synergistic effect on the I-site (the second effect) (13, 19, 21). In other words, Mg2+ relieves the partial suppression that becomes evident in the state of partial activation, usually in a limited range of Ca2+. The extent of this suppression was found to differ between rabbit and rat ventricular muscles.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cell culture and generation of an RyR2-inducible stable transfectant. Flp-In T-REx-293 cells were cultured in a high-glucose Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C in a humidified CO2 incubator. The day before transfection, 5 x 105 cells were seeded onto a 12-well cell culture plate. The cells were cotransfected with two expression vectors, pOG44 and pcDNA5 FRT TO/RyR2, in a 3:1 ratio by lipofection. After 48 h, the cells were replated onto a 100-mm tissue culture dish and exposed to a selective medium containing 100 µg/ml hygromycin B. Four independent clones randomly selected among 14 surviving clones were cultured until a sufficient number of cells were grown. For expression, we usually used a 6080% confluent cell layer, induced the protein with 1 µg/ml tetracycline, and harvested the cells after 1820 h. Expression of RyR2 was detected in all clones by Western blot analysis.
Preparation of the SR vesicle fraction. All protocols in this study were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee at the Juntendo University School of Medicine and were in accordance with the Guide for Care and Use of Laboratory Animals in the Institute for Laboratory Animal Research. The SR vesicle fraction was prepared as described previously, with some modifications (4). Briefly, animals (rats or rabbits) were anesthetized by intraperitoneal injection (50 mg/kg) of pentobarbital (50 mg/ml, Dainippon Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan). Their hearts were quickly removed and perfused with 0.9% NaCl to remove the blood. In some cases, the rabbit back muscles were also used to prepare skeletal muscle SR vesicles. Both left and right ventricular muscles of animal hearts were chopped into pieces and homogenized in three volumes of distilled water containing 6.7 mM NaOH and 1 µg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340; Sigma, St. Louis, MO) in a blender-type homogenizer (AM-3; Nihonseiki Seisakusho, Tokyo, Japan), using three 15-s bursts at the maximum speed. The homogenate was centrifuged at a maximum force of 9,000 g for 20 min. The resulting supernatant was filtered with a Whatman no. 41 filter paper (Whatman, Brentford, UK), and the pellets were obtained by centrifugation at a maximum force of 27,000 g for 70 min. The pellets were resuspended in a buffer containing 50 mM KCl, 10 mM 3-(N-morpholino)-2-hydroxypropanesulfonic acid (MOPSO)-KOH, pH 6.8 and 1 µg/ml protease inhibitor cocktail and repelleted. The microsomes were resuspended in the buffer supplemented with 0.18 M sucrose, quick-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80°C until use.
Preparation of the crude endoplasmic reticulum (ER) fraction from HEK-293 cells expressing RyR2.
After being washed once with PBS containing 0.1 mM CaCl2, cells were detached from culture dishes by pipetting and collected by centrifugation at 1,400 rpm for 5 min in a TOMY (Tokyo) TS-7 rotor. Cell pellets were resuspended in PBS containing 0.1 mM CaCl2, 0.5 mM diisopropyl fluorophosphate and 1/200 vol of protease inhibitor cocktail (P8340; Sigma) and homogenized by sonication. The homogenate was centrifuged at 1,400 rpm for 5 min (TS-7 rotor, TOMY), the supernatant was placed carefully onto a solution containing an equal volume of 0.5 M sucrose plus buffer A [50 mM KCl, 20 mM 3-(N-morpholino)propanesulfonic acid (MOPS)-KOH (pH 7.0) and 1/200 vol protease inhibitor cocktail], and recentrifuged at 25,000 rpm for 20 min in a 55T rotor in a Hitachi ultracentrifuge (Hitachi-Seisakusho, Ibaraki, Japan). The pellet was resuspended in 0.3 M sucrose plus buffer A, rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at 80°C until use. Typically,
10 mg of protein of the crude ER fraction was obtained from 18 culture dishes (100 mm in diameter).
[3H]ryanodine binding.
[3H]Ryanodine binding was determined according to the method described by Murayama et al. (21). Briefly, the reaction was started at 25°C by the addition of [3H]ryanodine (specific activity 56 Ci/mmol; Perkin Elmer, Boston, MA) to a final concentration of 4.5 or 8.95 nM in an incubation mixture (total volume of 200 µl) containing 170 mM KCl, 20 mM MOPS-KOH (pH 7.2), CaCl2 [sufficient to get a free Ca2+ concentration of less than 0.1 mM in the presence of 1 mM ethylene glycol-bis(
-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA)], SR vesicles (final concentration, 0.5 mg protein/ml), and other ingredients if necessary. Ca2+ concentrations of 0.1 mM and higher were made by the addition of CaCl2 alone, instead of the Ca2+-EGTA buffer. In experiments with Mg2+, MgCl2 was added to the medium in a manner such that the SR vesicles were exposed to Mg2+ prior to Ca2+, and KCl was reduced to keep the ionic strength constant (21). The reaction was terminated after an 8-h incubation at 25°C by the addition of 3 ml ice-cold distilled water. Bound [3H]ryanodine was collected by filtration with a 5% polyethyleneimine-treated Whatman GF/B glass fiber filter under vacuum, followed by two more washes with 3 ml ice-cold water. The radioactivity of the bound [3H]ryanodine activity trapped on the filter was determined in a liquid scintillation counter (LS 6500, Beckman, Fullerton, CA). Specific [3H]ryanodine binding was obtained after correction for nonspecific binding in the presence of 10 µM unlabeled ryanodine. Free Ca2+ and Mg2+ concentrations were calculated using binding constants for divalent cations of EGTA (9) and AMPPCP (28).
SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis.
To detect RyR2, SDS-PAGE was carried out on a 212% polyacrylamide gradient slab gel using the discontinuous buffer system of Laemmli (12). Molecular mass markers used were myosin heavy chain (205 kDa),
-galactosidase (116 kDa), phosphorylase b (97.4 kDa), bovine serum albumin (66 kDa), ovalbumin (45 kDa), and carbonic anhydrase (29 kDa). The electrophoresed proteins were transferred onto a PVDF membrane, and the membrane was probed with affinity-purified antibodies (1:1,000 dilutions) against NH2-terminal or COOH-terminal RyR2 fragments (4). After washing, the membrane was incubated with secondary antibodies conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (1:3,000 dilutions, Bio-Rad, Hertfordshire, UK). Positive bands were detected by chemiluminescence (SuperSignal West Pico Substrate, Pierce, Rockford, IL) using Fujifilm RX-U (Tokyo). To detect CaM contaminating SR, SDS-PAGE and Western blot analysis were performed in a similar way and probed with a monoclonal antibody, IM7 (11), which was kindly provided by Professor Michio Yazawa, Hokkaido University.
Miscellaneous. Data are expressed as the means ± SE (number of determinations).
In the case of duplicate determinations, half the range of the variance was within the size of a symbol in most cases and was omitted from the plots for clarity. Values of P < 0.05 were considered significant by Student's t-test. Curve-fitting was made by using SigmaPlot software version 8.01 (Systat Software, Point Richmond, CA), where R2 values were 0.990.90 in most cases.
The effects of Ca2+ and Mg2+ on [3H]ryanodine binding were analyzed according to the method of Murayama et al. (21). Briefly, the biphasic Ca2+ dependence can be explained by Ca2+ binding to the A-site and the I-site of RyR, respectively. Mg2+ serves as a competitive antagonist at the A-site and an agonist at the I-site. Thus, [3H]ryanodine binding, B, can be expressed by the following equation:
![]() |
![]() | (1) |
![]() |
|
|
|
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In contrast, rat ventricular SR vesicles showed a peculiar Ca2+ dependence in [3H]ryanodine binding: it increased with increases in Ca2+ concentration up to around 10 µM, where a plateau was formed up to 100 µM. Thereafter, it increased further, and a higher peak was attained at about 1 mM Ca2+, followed by a decrease at higher Ca2+ concentrations (Fig. 1C). [3H]ryanodine binding in the presence of 3.2 µM and 1 mM Ca2+ was monotonically decreased by Mg2+, as shown in Fig. 1D. In the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+, however, it surprisingly increased in the presence of low Mg2+ concentrations, and the decrease was not obvious until Mg2+ concentrations were 3 mM or higher. This Mg2+ dependence of rat SR is in marked contrast to rabbit SR, where the monotonic decrease was observed even in the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+.
The third effect of Mg2+. As shown in Fig. 1D, [3H]ryanodine binding to rat ventricular SR in the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+ was enhanced by 0.3 mM Mg2+. To get a deeper understanding of the finding, we determined the pCa-[3H]ryanodine-binding relationship in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+ (Fig. 2). The relationship became biphasic, which was familiar to us, giving an apparent KA,Ca of 6.46 µM and KI,Ca of 1.66 mM, as shown in Fig. 2. In the presence of Ca2+ concentrations less than 10 µM, Mg2+ shifted the curve rightward, whereas in the presence of Ca2+ concentrations higher than 1 mM, the shift was leftward. With further increases in Mg2+ concentrations, the stimulating curve was shifted more to the right along with the Ca2+ concentrations up to 0.1 mM, and the decreasing curve was shifted more to the left with decreased peak values, although the shift was minor in magnitude (data not shown). These effects were consistent with the predictions of a competitive antagonist effect for Ca2+ at the A-site and a synergistic effect with Ca2+ at the I-site. In the presence of 0.1 mM Mg2+, however, the pCa-binding relationship remained multiphasic, as was the case without Mg2+, although the binding was slightly increased.
Surprisingly, Fig. 2 shows that Mg2+ enhanced [3H]ryanodine binding in the plateau range of 10100 µM Ca2+. This enhancing effect of Mg2+ is entirely new, and is referred to as the third effect of Mg2+ (in addition to its dual inhibitory effects).
It should be explained that rabbit RyR2 expressed in HEK-293 cells showed a multiphasic Ca2+ dependence in the presence of Ca2+ alone (Fig. 3). The presence of Mg2+ caused biphasic Ca2+ dependence with enhancement of [3H]ryanodine binding in the range of 10300 µM Ca2+ (Fig. 3A). The dose-dependent effect of Mg2+ in the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+ was upwardly convex, as is the case with rat cardiac SR: an increase with increases in Mg2+ followed by a decrease (Fig. 3B, compare with Fig. 1D). Although they presented similar results, Meissner and his colleagues (2, 40) made no comment on this matter. Rabbit RyR2, therefore, intrinsically has the potential to show multiphasic Ca2+ dependence.
|
|
|
Effects of CICR modulators in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+. So far, the activity of RyR2 at 0.1 mM Ca2+ appeared as if it would freeze in the absence of Mg2+ and be relieved by 0.3 mM Mg2+. Figure 6 shows the dose-dependent effect of caffeine on [3H]ryanodine binding to rat ventricular SR in the presence of 0.1 mM Ca2+. In the absence of Mg2+, caffeine did not appreciably increase this binding. Addition of Mg2+ increased the binding up to twofold. Caffeine showed a dose-dependent enhancement in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+, and the maximum effect was attained at 310 mM of caffeine. A higher concentration of caffeine was somewhat inhibitory. The summary of this stimulatory effect of 10 mM caffeine at 0.1 mM Ca2+ with and without 0.3 mM Mg2+ is shown with the number of determinations in Fig. 7. Figure 7 also shows similar results with various other kinds of stimulators and inhibitors. They were examined at their optimum concentrations, which were found to be much lower with RyR2 compared with RyR1 of skeletal muscle. The amounts of bound [3H]ryanodine changed little in the absence of Mg2+, whereas they were greatly affected in the presence of Mg2+, as shown in Fig. 7 (see also Fig. 6). In other words, Mg2+ makes RyR2 more reactive to various agents. The enhancing effect of AMPPCP in the absence of Mg2+ was greater than that of caffeine, as is true with RyR1. In the presence of Mg2+, it was more remarkable. Whereas the stimulatory effect of 3-[(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonio]-1-propanesulfonate (CHAPS), which was used to remove the selective suppression of RyR1, was maximum at 2% on mammalian skeletal muscles (22), the maximum effect was obtained at 0.1%-0.2% with rat ventricular SR. CHAPS at 1% was rather inhibitory to rat or rabbit RyR2 (data not shown). It should be pointed out that the stimulatory effect of CHAPS was also dependent on the presence of Mg2+. FK-506, which deprives RyR of FKBP 12/12.6, is reported to increase the activity of RyR. FK-506, however, did not affect [3H]ryanodine binding in the absence or presence of Mg2+, excluding the possibility of the involvement of FKBP 12/12.6 in the third effect of Mg2+ (Fig. 7). FK-506 treatment did not affect the responses of RyR2 to caffeine or AMPPCP, either (data not shown).
|
|
In conclusion, the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+ greatly amplified the responses of RyR2, not only to stimulatory reagents, but also to inhibitory ones, with the exception of FK-506.
RyR2 is in a more activated state in the presence of Mg2+. In the standard assay medium containing 0.17 M KCl and 0.1 mM Ca2+, [3H]ryanodine binding to rat ventricular SR was determined in the presence and absence of 0.3 mM Mg2+ at varied concentrations of the ligand (Fig. 8). As shown in Fig. 8, the results can be explained by the following parameters: Bmax = 2.09 pmol/mg protein, Kd = 33.3 nM in the absence of Mg2+, and Bmax = 1.94 pmol/mg protein, Kd = 16.0 nM in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+. It should be explained that Kd would be 13 nM if determined in a medium containing 1 M KCl as reported (8, 18, 34, 37, 38). These results suggest that the single class of binding sites is homogeneous and that Mg2+ increased the affinity for the ligand without a change in the maximum number of these binding sites (Bmax). The increased affinity of RyR2 for the ligand indicates that RyR2 is more activated in the presence of Mg2+. The results of determinations in the medium containing 0.17 M NaCl instead of KCl (Fig. 9) may help to deepen our understanding of the underlying mechanism of the third effect of Mg2+. As shown in Fig. 5A, rabbit ventricular SR showed a multiphasic Ca2+ dependence in the presence of 10 mM caffeine in the 0.17 M KCl medium. In the 0.17 M NaCl medium, however, the Ca2+ dependence was biphasic, with a broader plateau (11,000 µM Ca2+), even in the presence of 10 mM caffeine. The findings that Ca2+ dependence of [3H]ryanodine binding was changed by monovalent ions were already reported with RyR1 (20, 23) and with RyR2 (15). The results in Fig. 9 fit the following parameters: in the absence of caffeine or Mg2+ (open circles), Bp= 0.42 pmol/mg protein, KA,Ca = 3.89 µM, nA,Ca = 1.46, KI,Ca = 1.91 mM, and nI,Ca = 1.25, whereas in the presence of 10 mM caffeine without Mg2+ (open diamonds), Bp = 0.64 pmol/mg protein, KA,Ca = 0.22 µM, nA,Ca = 1.50, KI,Ca = 6.31 mM, and nI,Ca = 1.69. The effects of caffeine in 0.17 M NaCl medium would be described as follows: Ca2+ sensitization as great as 18-fold, increase in Bp, i.e., increase in CICR activity, and decrease in the affinity of the I-site for Ca2+ with the increase in the Hill coefficient. These effects of caffeine are consistent with the results already reported (1, 6, 18, 27, 29). The supplement of 0.3 mM Mg2+ (closed diamonds) further increased Bp (0.92 pmol/mg protein) and restored the affinity of the I-site for Ca2+(KA,Ca = 0.40 µM, nA,Ca = 1.63, KI,Ca = 1.78 mM, nI,Ca = 0.93). The increase in Bp was due to the increase in the affinity for the ligand, as shown in Fig. 8. These findings indicate that RyR2 may be susceptible to the allosteric change in the conformation and that coexistence of 0.31 mM Mg2+ is necessary for RyR2 to function properly.
|
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Table 1 also summarizes the results of multiple similar determinations with rat ventricular SR in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+. Because Fig. 1, B and D, showed similar effects of Mg2+ on [3H]ryanodine binding in the presence of 3.2 µM and 1 mM Ca2+, the inhibitory effects of Mg2+ on rat ventricular SR may be similar to those for rabbit ventricular SR. The results shown in Table 1 indeed indicate that affinities of the A-site and the I-site for Ca2+ and Mg2+ would be similar between rabbit and rat ventricular SRs. Table 1 also indicates that the properties of frog skeletal muscles may differ from those of rabbit skeletal muscles.
The third, stimulatory effect of Mg2+ on RyR2. Rabbit RyR2 in the ventricular SR shows biphasic Ca2+ dependence in the presence of Ca2+ alone. The effect of Mg2+ on rabbit RyR2 is due to competitive antagonism to Ca2+ at the A-site and synergistic action with Ca2+ at the I-site (Fig. 1, A and B, and Table 1) (1, 13, 19, 21). Rat RyR2 in the ventricular SR, in contrast, showed a peculiar multiphasic Ca2+ dependence, with a plateau of an intermediate level of bound [3H]ryanodine in the range of 10100 µM Ca2+ (Fig. 1, C and D). The presence of Mg2+ at 0.3 mM or higher converted the complexed Ca2+ dependence to a biphasic relationship, with enhanced [3H]ryanodine binding in the intermediate range of Ca2+ (Fig. 2). This biphasic Ca2+ dependence in the presence of Mg2+ can be explained by affinities for Ca2+ and Mg2+ of the A-site and I-site, which are similar to those of rabbit ventricular SR (Table 1). In the presence of an adenine nucleotide or caffeine, the multiphasic Ca2+ dependence with the intermediate level of the plateau was observed, irrespective of rabbit or rat RyR2. Mg2+ was found to exhibit the third effect on RyR2, i.e., enhanced binding in the intermediate Ca2+ concentrations in addition to the actions on the A- and I-sites (Figs. 25). The third, stimulatory effect of Mg2+ on RyR2 is dose-dependent, and its minimum concentration was about 0.3 mM. This prevents us from observing the third effect, if any, with RyR1 or RyR3, which has a KI,Mg of around 0.2 mM (Table 1). Only RyR2, which has a large KI,Mg of 23 mM, can be partly immune to the inhibitory effect of the I-site (Table 1). Furthermore, the third effect of Mg2+ is likely to be independent of the dual inhibitory effects and additive to them.
In the SR membrane of skeletal muscles, on the other hand, the activity of RyR1 is selectively suppressed to about one-seventh over the whole range of Ca2+ concentrations compared with RyR3, as evidenced by a reduced affinity for [3H]ryanodine to a comparable extent without a change in Ca2+ dependence (22, 24, 30). This means that the attenuating coefficient (1/71/8) for RyR1 is constant over the whole range of Ca2+ concentrations, without a change in the affinities for the divalent cations of the A- or I-site. The interdomain interaction between region 1 and region 2 in RyR1 is suggested to be involved primarily in the selective suppression (22). RyR2, in contrast to RyR1, appears to freeze to the state of an intermediate activity in the range of 10100 µM Ca2+. In this sense, RyR2 is subjected to the partial suppression, which is removed by Mg2+. Because CHAPS stimulated RyR2 (Fig. 7), an interdomain interaction such as within RyR1 could be considered, although it is not identical.
Purified RyR2 showed monophasic Ca2+ dependence without inhibition by high Ca2+, independent of animal sources. Similar monophasic Ca2+ dependence was observed in 1 M KCl-containing medium with cardiac SR vesicles (8, 18, 34, 37, 38). These results might strongly suggest the involvement of some accessory proteins in multiphasic Ca2+ dependence. In these cases, however, the activation by Ca2+ was very steep, nearly of an all-or-none type. Because the Hill coefficient for the activating Ca2+ was near 2 with RyR2 in the SR, the allosteric conformation may be changed after purification. Yamaguchi et al. (40) reported that inhibition by CaM can be detected by lipid bilayer experiments only under a charged voltage difference, but not by [3H]ryanodine binding. The effect of CaM may be dependent on the conformation of RyR molecules, as reported by Rodney et al. (32). Addition of exogenous CaM to crude SR intriguingly reduced [3H]ryanodine binding to one-third in the presence of 0.3 mM Mg2+, but caused no inhibition in the absence of Mg2+ (Fig. 7). It could be hypothesized that added Mg2+ would bind to CaM to remove the inhibitory effect. The stimulatory effect of Mg2+ on RyR2, however, was observed in a limited range of Ca2+ concentrations, whereas the inhibitory effect of CaM on RyR2 was homogeneous over the whole range of Ca2+ concentrations (2, 18, 40). CaM (17), therefore, is excluded from the list of candidates for the responsible cofactor. Treatment of the SR with FK-506 did not change [3H]ryanodine binding in the presence or absence of Mg2+(Fig. 7). Washing of rat SR with 0.17 M KCl medium containing 1 mM EGTA, which is effective to deprive sorcin of RyR2 (16), did not change the multiphasic Ca2+ dependence (data not shown). These findings suggest that either FKBP (38) or sorcin (16) would play a minor role in the third effect of Mg2+. The possibility of other unidentified proteins cannot be excluded, and further investigations are required to clarify the underlying mechanism of the third effect of Mg2+.
The third effect of Mg2+ was not detectable at 0.1 mM, but was clearly observed at 0.3 mM or more. Correspondingly, the second increase of [3H]ryanodine binding in multiphasic Ca2+ dependence in the absence of Mg2+, was observed at 0.3 mM Ca2+ and higher, with the apparent peak around 1 mM Ca2+ (Figs. 1C and 25). These findings strongly suggest that Ca2+ and Mg2+ are of equal importance in the third effect.
The regulation will be dependent on the extent of activation of RyR2 molecules, but not on the Ca2+ concentration itself, because the plateau of [3H]ryanodine binding started at a lower Ca2+ concentration in the presence of caffeine with the unchanged plateau level. The results in Figs. 4 and 5A show that the intermediate plateau with rabbit ventricular SR was gradually increased as Ca2+ increased up to 100 µM in the absence of Mg2+, whereas it was not appreciably changed with rat ventricular SR. This gradual increase in the plateau level, with the increase in Ca2+, was also observed with rabbit RyR2 expressed in HEK-293 cells (Fig. 3). These results may suggest that rabbit RyR2 is more vulnerable to the third effect than rat RyR2 or that rabbit RyR2 may be looser in its regulation than rat RyR2. More comparative studies are required, because it is well known that species specificity is great even among mammalian hearts.
Physiological relevance of the current findings. It has so far been claimed that no inhibition of CICR at high Ca2+ concentrations is characteristic of RyR2 (3, 5, 8, 17, 34, 37). We showed clearly the effectiveness of the I-site, although RyR2 shows a lower affinity than RyR1 and RyR3 (Table 1). One explanation for this discrepancy is the difference in experimental conditions: a high salt-medium, 1 M KCl, was used instead of 0.17 M KCl, and/or purified RyR2 was used for the experiments (8, 14, 15, 18, 34, 37). Another explanation is the limited range of Ca2+ concentrations of up to pCa 4 (14, 15). Another intriguing determination was made by Xu et al. (39) in which 5 mM Mg-AMPPCP was used. In this case, the free Mg2+ concentration inevitably amounts to about 0.8 mM, which certainly would exert the third effect.
Mg2+ makes RyR2 sensitive to well-known modulators (Fig. 7); therefore, the presence of Mg2+ is inevitable with experiments on RyR2. In the absence of Mg2+, the partial suppression of RyR2 may be obvious. In the presence of Mg2+, RyR2 is very similar among mammalian hearts by removal of the suppression. The physiological intracellular concentration of Mg2+ in cardiac muscle is assumed to be 0.51 mM (3, 20, 25), which is sufficient for the stimulatory effect of Mg2+ on RyR2. Mg2+, on the other hand, will move the pCa-activity curve about 0.50.7 pCa unit to a higher Ca2+ concentration range. The several-fold enhancement of the activity will compensate for this handicap in the presence of Mg2+ and ATP. The presence of Mg2+ at the physiological intracellular concentration is essential for RyR2 to play a key role in excitation-contraction coupling of cardiac muscle.
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
Present address of O. Sato: Dept. of Physiology, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655.
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Cys mutation on the Ca2+ and Mg2+ dependence of the RyR1. Biophys J 81: 20502058, 2001.2. Balshaw DM, Xu L, Yamaguchi N, Pasek DA, Meissner G. Calmodulin binding and inhibition of cardiac muscle calcium release channel (ryanodine receptor). J Biol Chem 276: 2014420153, 2001.
3. Bers DM. Excitation-Contraction Coupling and Cardiac Contractile Force. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2001.
4. Chugun A, Taniguchi K, Murayama T, Uchide T, Hara Y, Temma K, Ogawa Y, Akera T. Subcellular distribution of ryanodine receptors in the cardiac muscle of carp (Cyprinus carpio). Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 285: R601R609, 2003.
5. Coronado R, Morrissette J, Sukhareva M, Vaughan DM. Structure and function of ryanodine receptors. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 266: C1485C1504, 1994.
6. Endo M. Calcium release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum. Physiol Rev 57: 71108, 1977.
7. Fabiato A. Calcium-induced release of calcium from the cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 245: C1C14, 1983.
8. Fill M, Copello JA. Ryanodine receptor calcium release channels. Physiol Rev 82: 893922, 2002.
9. Harafuji H, Ogawa Y. Re-examination of the apparent binding constant of ethylene glycol bis(beta-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid with calcium around neutral pH. J Biochem (Tokyo) 87: 13051312, 1980.
10. Ikemoto N, Yamamoto T. Regulation of calcium release by interdomain interaction within ryanodine receptors. Front Biosci 7: d671d683, 2002.[ISI][Medline]
11. Kobayashi K, Yoshida M, Shinoda Y, Yazawa M, Yagi K. Monoclonal antibodies toward scallop (Patinopecten yessoensis) testis and wheat germ calmodulins. J Biochem (Tokyo) 109: 551558, 1991.
12. Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227: 680685, 1970.[CrossRef][Medline]
13. Laver DR, Baynes TM, Dulhunty AF. Magnesium inhibition of ryanodine-receptor calcium channels: evidence for two independent mechanisms. J Membr Biol 156: 213229, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
14. Li P, Chen SR. Molecular basis of Ca2+ activation of the mouse cardiac Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor). J Gen Physiol 118: 3344, 2001.
15. Liu W, Pasek DA, Meissner G. Modulation of Ca2+-gated cardiac muscle Ca2+-release channel (ryanodine receptor) by mono- and divalent ions. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C120C128, 1998.
16. Lokuta AJ, Meyers MB, Sander PR, Fishman GI, Valdivia HH. Modulation of cardiac ryanodine receptors by sorcin. J Biol Chem 272: 2533325338, 1997.
17. Meissner G. Ryanodine receptor/Ca2+ release channels and their regulation by endogenous effectors. Annu Rev Physiol 56: 485508, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Meissner G. Molecular regulation of cardiac ryanodine receptor ion channel. Cell Calcium 35: 621628, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
19. Meissner G, Henderson JS. Rapid calcium release from cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum vesicles is dependent on Ca2+ and is modulated by Mg2+, adenine nucleotide, and calmodulin. J Biol Chem 262: 30653073, 1987.
20. Meissner G, Rios E, Tripathy A, Pasek DA. Regulation of skeletal muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) by Ca2+ and monovalent cations and anions. J Biol Chem 272: 16281638, 1997.
21. Murayama T, Kurebayashi N, Ogawa Y. Role of Mg2+ in Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release through ryanodine receptors of frog skeletal muscle: modulations by adenine nucleotides and caffeine. Biophys J 78: 18101824, 2000.
22. Murayama T, Oba T, Kobayashi S, Ikemoto N, Ogawa Y. Postulated role of interdomain interactions within the type 1 ryanodine receptor in the low gain of Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release activity of mammalian skeletal muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288: C1222C1230, 2005.
23. Murayama T, Ogawa Y. Similar Ca2+ dependences of [3H]ryanodine binding to alpha- and beta-ryanodine receptors purified from bullfrog skeletal muscle in an isotonic medium. FEBS Lett 380: 267271, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24. Murayama T, Ogawa Y. RyR1 exhibits lower gain of CICR activity than RyR3 in the SR: evidence for selective stabilization of RyR1 channel. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 287: C36C45, 2004.
25. Murphy E, Steenbergen C, Levy LA, Raju B, London RE. Cytosolic free magnesium levels in ischemic rat heart. J Biol Chem 264: 56225627, 1989.
26. Nakai J, Imagawa T, Hakamat Y, Shigekawa M, Takeshima H, Numa S. Primary structure and functional expression from cDNA of the cardiac ryanodine receptor/calcium release channel. FEBS Lett 271: 169177, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
27. Ogawa Y. Role of ryanodine receptors. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 29: 229274, 1994.[ISI][Medline]
28. Ogawa Y, Kurebayashi N, Harafuji H. Cooperative interaction between Ca2+ and beta,gamma-methylene adenosine triphosphate in their binding to fragmented sarcoplasmic reticulum from bullfrog skeletal muscle. J Biochem (Tokyo) 100: 13051318, 1986.
29. Ogawa Y, Murayama T, Kurebayashi N. Comparison of properties of Ca2+ release channels between rabbit and frog skeletal muscles. Mol Cell Biochem 190: 191201, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30. Ogawa Y, Murayama T, Kurebayashi N. Functions of RyR3 homologues. In: Ryanodine Receptors: Structure, Function and Dysfunction in Clinical Disease, edited by Wehrens XHT, Marks A. New York: Springer Science, 2005, p. 131240.
31. Pessah IN, Waterhouse AL, Casida JE. The calcium-ryanodine receptor complex of skeletal and cardiac muscle. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 128: 449456, 1985.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
32. Rodney GG, Moore CP, Williams BY, Zhang JZ, Krol J, Pedersen SE, Hamilton SL. Calcium binding to calmodulin leads to an N-terminal shift in its binding site on the ryanodine Receptor. J Biol Chem 276: 20692074, 2001.
33. Schneider MF. Control of calcium release in functioning skeletal muscle fibers. Annu Rev Physiol 56: 463484, 1994.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
34. Sitsapesan R, Williams AJ. The Structure and Function of Ryanodine Receptors. London: Imperial College Press, 1998.
35. Sorrentino V. Ryanodine Receptors. New York: CRC Press, 1995.
36. Sutko JL, Airey JA. Ryanodine receptor Ca2+ release channels: does diversity in form equal diversity in function? Physiol Rev 76: 10271071, 1996.
37. Valdivia H. The Structure and Function of Ryanodine Receptors. FBS (http://www.bioscience.org). 2002.
38. Wehrens XHT, Marks AR (Editors). Ryanodine Receptors: Structure, Function and Dysfunction in Clinical Disease. New York: Springer Science, 2005.
39. Xu L, Mann G, Meissner G. Regulation of cardiac Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor) by Ca2+, H+, Mg2+, and adenine nucleotides under normal and simulated ischemic conditions. Circ Res 79: 11001109, 1996.
40. Yamaguchi N, Xu L, Pasek DA, Evans KE, Meissner G. Molecular basis of calmodulin binding to cardiac muscle Ca2+ release channel (ryanodine receptor). J Biol Chem 278: 2348023486, 2003.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||