Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 291: C1405-C1411, 2006. First published July 5, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00519.2005
0363-6143/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/6/C1405    most recent
00519.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.

RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION

Involvement of stretch-activated cation channels in hypotonically induced insulin secretion in rat pancreatic beta-cells

Miki Takii, Tomohisa Ishikawa, Hidetaka Tsuda, Kazumitsu Kanatani, Takaaki Sunouchi, Yukiko Kaneko, and Koichi Nakayama

Department of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Shizuoka, Shizuoka City, Shizuoka, Japan

Submitted 17 October 2005 ; accepted in final form 22 June 2006


    ABSTRACT
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
In isolated rat pancreatic beta-cells, hypotonic stimulation elicited an increase in cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) at 2.8 mM glucose. The hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was significantly suppressed by nicardipine, a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker, and by Gd3+, amiloride, 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborate, and ruthenium red, all cation channel blockers. In contrast, the [Ca2+]c elevation was not inhibited by suramin, a P2 purinoceptor antagonist. Whole cell patch-clamp analyses showed that hypotonic stimulation induced membrane depolarization of beta-cells and produced outwardly rectifying cation currents; Gd3+ inhibited both responses. Hypotonic stimulation also increased insulin secretion from isolated rat islets, and Gd3+ significantly suppressed this secretion. Together, these results suggest that osmotic cell swelling activates cation channels in rat pancreatic beta-cells, thereby causing membrane depolarization and subsequent activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels and thus elevating insulin secretion.

calcium ion; swelling; patch-clamp; gadolinium


EXPOSURE OF CELLS to hypotonic solution increases cell volume, which recovers via a mechanism known as regulatory volume decrease (RVD). RVD involves a swelling-induced efflux of K+, Cl, or HCO3 via K+ or anion channels or ion transporters (15, 24). In pancreatic beta-cells, osmotic cell swelling also induces insulin secretion (2, 4, 6, 12, 22). Because high concentrations of glucose have been shown to increase beta-cell volume (18, 20), cell swelling may be involved in the glucose-induced insulin secretion. Several studies have suggested that cell swelling releases insulin by activating volume-sensitive Cl channels, thus depolarizing the beta-cell membrane and increasing the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) via the activation of voltage-dependent Ca2+ channels (VDCC) (2, 3, 6, 13, 21). However, several reports have argued against this proposition by showing that hypotonically induced insulin secretion persists even in the presence of Cl channel blockers such as niflumic acid and DIDS (12, 22). Thus the possibility remains that a mechanism independent of Cl channels is involved in hypotonically induced insulin secretion.

Osmotic cell swelling mechanically stretches the plasma membrane. It is thus possible that stretch-activated cation channels participate in the responses to hypotonic stimulation in beta-cells. However, little information exists about stretch-activated cation channels in beta-cells. In the present study, therefore, we investigated the possible involvement of stretch-activated cation channels in the responses to hypotonic stimulation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. The data shown here provide direct evidence for a contribution of cation channels to beta-cell swelling-induced responses.


    METHODS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Chemicals. The following drugs were used: amiloride hydrochloride hydrate, fura PE3 acetoxymethyl ester (fura PE3-AM), gadolinium chloride, nicardipine hydrochloride, and ruthenium red (Sigma, St. Louis, MO); streptomycin and penicillin (Meiji Seika, Tokyo, Japan); 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborate (2-APB; Calbiochem, San Diego, CA); and collagenase-Yakult (Yakult, Tokyo, Japan).

Measurement of [Ca2+]c. Pancreatic beta-cells were isolated from male Wistar rats (9–13 wk old, 200–300 g; SLC, Hamamatsu, Japan) with a previously described collagenase digestion technique (11). Rats were treated as approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and according to the Guidelines for Animal Experiments established by the Japanese Pharmacological Society. The isolated beta-cells were plated on coverslips and cultured for 1 day in RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin.

[Ca2+]c was measured in fura PE3-loaded cells by dual-wavelength fluorometry as described previously (11). The cells were loaded with 4 µM fura PE3-AM for 3 h at 37°C and then mounted in a chamber on the stage of an inverted microscope (Diaphot TMD 300, Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The cells were continuously superfused with isotonic solution (in mM: 85 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, 2.8 glucose, and 100 mannitol; 290 mosmol/l, pH 7.4) maintained at 37°C with the use of a peristaltic pump at a flow rate of 2 ml/min. [Ca2+]c was measured by an Argus-50/CA system (Hamamatsu Photonics, Hamamatsu, Japan), with alternating excitation of cells at 340 ± 10 and 380 ± 10 nm. The resultant emission was monitored at 510 ± 20 nm. Pairs of 340- and 380-nm fluorescence images were captured every 6 s and were converted to 340-to-380 ratio images. The 340-to-380 ratio was used to indicate the relative [Ca2+]c. Drugs were applied in the superfusing solution. Hypotonic stimulation was performed by exchanging the superfusing isotonic solution for 35% hypotonic solution (in mM: 85 NaCl, 5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl2, 1.2 CaCl2, 10 HEPES, and 2.8 glucose; 190 mosmol/l, pH 7.4).

Measurements of cell volume, membrane potential, and ion currents. The isolated beta-cells were mounted in a chamber on the stage of an inverted microscope (Diaphot TMD 300, Nikon) and were continuously superfused with the isotonic solution at a flow rate of 1 ml/min at room temperature. Hypotonic stimulation was performed by exchanging the superfusing solution for the hypotonic solution.

For the measurement of cell volume, images of beta-cells were recorded with a digital camera (Coolpix 990, Nikon) connected to the microscope. The digital images were analyzed with graphic software (Canvas 7, Deneba Software, Miami, FL). Cell volume was calculated under the assumption that the cells were spherical and was expressed relative to volume with respect to the volume measured during exposure to the isotonic solution according to the method of Miley et al. (18).

The membrane potential of isolated beta-cells was measured with the whole cell patch-clamp technique. Patch pipettes, which were pulled from borosilicate glass capillaries and fire polished before use, had a resistance of 2–5 M{Omega} when filled with pipette solution containing (in mM) 140 KCl, 5 K2-ATP, 0.1 EGTA, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.2). The measurement of membrane potential was made in the I = 0 mode of a patch-clamp amplifier (Axopatch 200B, Axon Instruments, Foster City, CA).

Ion currents were also measured with the whole cell patch-clamp technique. Patch pipettes had a resistance of 2–5 M{Omega} when filled with pipette solution containing (in mM) 130 KCl, 10 tetraethylammonium chloride, 5 K2-ATP, 1 BAPTA, and 10 HEPES (pH 7.2). The ion currents were recorded in the voltage-clamp mode of the patch-clamp amplifier. pCLAMP software (version 8.1.0, Axon Instruments) was used for generating command pulses and recording data. Current records were low-pass filtered at 1 kHz (–3 dB), digitized at 5 kHz by an analog-to-digital converter (DigiData 1200A, Axon Instruments), and stored on a computer (Endeavor Pro-500L, Epson, Nagano, Japan). Membrane voltages were corrected for the liquid junction potential between the pipette and bath solutions. Leak subtraction was not performed.

Measurement of insulin secretion. Rat pancreatic islets isolated with the collagenase digestion technique were cultured for 1 day in RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 µg/ml streptomycin, and 100 U/ml penicillin. Insulin secretion was analyzed by a perifusion method as described previously (10). Fifty islets were placed in the chamber (1 ml) and perifused with isotonic solution containing 5.5 mM glucose at 37°C at a rate of 1 ml/min. After preincubation for 30 min, the isotonic solution was exchanged for the hypotonic solution for 10 min. The hypotonic stimulation was repeated in the absence of Gd3+ and then, after a 30-min interval, in the presence of Gd3+. The perifusate was collected every 2 min and kept at –70°C for later assay. Insulin released into the perifusate was assayed with a radioimmunoassay (Insulin Radioimmunoassay Kit, Eiken Chemical, Tokyo, Japan).

Statistics. Data are expressed as means ± SE. The effect of each treatment was analyzed with the paired Student’s t-test. A probability of P < 0.05 was accepted as the level of statistical significance.


    RESULTS
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
Changes in beta-cell volume induced by hypotonic stimulation. Exposure of beta-cells to 35% hypotonic solution resulted in an increase in cell volume (Fig. 1). Swelling began at 2–4 min and reached a maximum within 8 min after exposure to the hypotonic solution. The increase in cell volume was followed by a small decrease in it, i.e., RVD. Gd3+ (1 µM) did not affect the hypotonically induced volume increase (data not shown).


Figure 1
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Effect of hypotonic stimulation on cell volume of rat pancreatic beta-cells. The cell volume of beta-cells was measured before (Cont) and after (Hypo) exposure to a 35% hypotonic solution. Relative cell volume is expressed as % of the control (in an isotonic solution). A: average of the maximum swelling response induced by a 35% hypotonic solution. Columns represent means ± SE of 7 experiments. B: time course of changes in beta-cell volume. beta-Cells were exposed to a 35% hypotonic solution as indicated. Each point represents the mean ± SE of 7 experiments.

 
Changes in [Ca2+]c of beta-cells induced by hypotonic stimulation. In isolated rat pancreatic beta-cells, [Ca2+]c was stable in isotonic solution at 2.8 mM glucose. Exposing beta-cells to 35% hypotonic solution caused an increase in [Ca2+]c (Fig. 2). [Ca2+]c was rapidly returned to basal level when the superfusing solution was returned to the isotonic solution. The [Ca2+]c response was reproducible (Fig. 2A), and was largely suppressed by nicardipine (1 µM), a VDCC blocker (Fig. 2B; see GoFig. 4). Although a similar [Ca2+]c elevation was produced by exposure to 15% or 25% hypotonic solution, the response was not reproducible when stimulated repetitively (data not shown). Therefore, the following analyses were performed with 35% hypotonic stimulation.


Figure 2
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. Typical traces showing the effect of hypotonic stimulation on the cytosolic Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]c) of rat pancreatic beta-cells. A: reproducible increases in [Ca2+]c were induced by 35% hypotonic stimulation (Hypo) as indicated. B: [Ca2+]c elevation induced by the hypotonic stimulation was nearly abolished by nicardipine (1 µM), a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker. F340/F380, ratio of fluorescence at 340 and 380 nm.

 

Figure 3
View larger version (11K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Typical traces showing the effects of 1 µM Gd3+ on [Ca2+]c elevation induced by 35% hypotonic stimulation (A) and by 30 mM K+ (B) in rat pancreatic beta-cells.

 

Figure 4
View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 4. Effects of a voltage-dependent Ca2+ channel blocker, cation channel blockers, and a P2Y purinoceptor antagonist on [Ca2+]c elevation induced by 35% hypotonic stimulation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. The peak amplitude of hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was measured in the absence and presence of 1 µM nicardipine (Nicar), 1 µM Gd3+, 3 µM amiloride (Amilo), 100 µM 2-aminoethoxydiphenylborate (2-APB), 3 µM ruthenium red (RR), or 50 µM suramin (Sura). Each value was normalized to 100% of the corresponding control (Cont; in the absence of each drug). Each column represents mean ± SE of 2–4 experiments. Numbers above the columns represent numbers of cells examined. **P < 0.01.

 
Gd3+ (1 µM), a cation channel blocker, significantly suppressed the hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation (Figs. 3A and 4). Although 20 µM Gd3+ has been suggested to block VDCC of beta-cells (21), Gd3+ at 1 µM had no significant effect on 30 mM K+-induced [Ca2+]c elevation (Fig. 3B). Similarly, the hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was significantly reduced by three other cation channel blockers, amiloride (3 µM), 2-APB (100 µM), and ruthenium red (3 µM) (Fig. 4). We also confirmed that each cation channel blocker at the concentration used in the present study had no effects on the 30 mM K+-induced [Ca2+]c elevation (data not shown).

We further investigated the contribution of ATP to the hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation. However, the [Ca2+]c elevation was not inhibited by suramin (50 µM), a P2 purinoceptor antagonist (Fig. 4). The same concentration of suramin completely abolished the [Ca2+]c elevation induced by ATP (30 µM; data not shown).

Changes in membrane potential of beta-cells induced by hypotonic stimulation. The results of the [Ca2+]c measurements suggest that hypotonic stimulation activates cation channels, thereby depolarizing the beta-cell membrane and opening VDCC. To confirm this hypothesis, the effect of hypotonic stimulation on membrane potential was investigated with the patch-clamp technique. When the patch membrane was ruptured, the membrane potential of beta-cells exhibited oscillations, but they ceased within 10 min. At that time, the membrane potential was –53.9 ± 2.8 mV (n = 7). Exposure of beta-cells to 35% hypotonic solution depolarized the membrane significantly, by ~20 mV (Fig. 5A). In most cases, the gigaohm seal could not be maintained for a long time because of cell swelling. Therefore, the effect of Gd3+ on hypotonically induced depolarization was examined in a separate series of experiments, in which the gigaohm seal was formed in hypotonic solution within 10 min after the superfusing solution was exchanged for the hypotonic solution. As shown in Fig. 5B, the membrane potential in the hypotonic solution measured in this procedure was somewhat more depolarized than that shown in Fig. 5A, but the difference was not significant. Under this condition, the membrane potential was significantly polarized by Gd3+ (1 µM; Fig. 5B). These results suggest that hypotonic stimulation leads to membrane depolarization of beta-cells by opening Gd3+-sensitive cation channels.


Figure 5
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 5. Changes in membrane potentials induced by 35% hypotonic stimulation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. A: membrane potential (V) of beta-cells was significantly depolarized by hypotonic stimulation. B: depolarization induced by hypotonic stimulation was nearly recovered by 1 µM Gd3+. In this series of experiments, a gigaohm seal was formed in the hypotonic solution, as described in RESULTS. Membrane potential was measured in the current-clamp I = 0 mode under the conventional whole cell configuration of the patch-clamp technique. Each column in A and B represents the mean ± SE of 7 and 4 experiments, respectively. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

 
Ion currents activated by hypotonic stimulation. Figure 6A shows representative current traces elicited by 250-ms voltage pulses ranging from –100 to +40 mV in 20-mV increments from a holding potential of –70 mV. After exposure to 35% hypotonic solution, inward and outward currents were activated (Fig. 6B). The currents activated by the hypotonic stimulation were time independent over the voltage range studied and showed no evidence of inactivation during the voltage pulses. Therefore, the following analyses investigating the voltage-current relationship were carried out with voltage ramp protocols.


Figure 6
View larger version (9K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 6. Whole cell currents elicited by hypotonic stimulation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. Typical current traces evoked by 250-ms voltage steps from –100 to +40 mV in 20-mV increments from a holding potential of –70 mV before (A) and after (B) exposure to a 35% hypotonic solution are shown.

 
Whole cell currents were recorded by the application of voltage ramp pulses from –100 mV to +50 mV. In isotonic solution, a small outwardly rectifying current was recorded (Fig. 7A). Exposure of beta-cells to 35% hypotonic solution increased both inward and outward currents. Figure 7B represents the difference current, which shows the current elicited by the hypotonic stimulation. The difference current exhibited small outward rectification, and the reversal potential of the current was –6.7 ± 2.4 mV (n = 4). When NaCl concentration in the bath solution was reduced from 85 to 35 mM by the substitution of NaCl with mannitol, the reversal potential of the difference current was shifted toward a more negative potential, i.e., –32.5 ± 2.3 mV (n = 4; Fig. 7, C and D).


Figure 7
View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 7. Whole cell currents elicited by hypotonic stimulation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. Typical current traces evoked by 1-s voltage ramps from –100 to +50 mV from a holding potential of –70 mV are shown. A: current-voltage relationship for the whole cell currents was obtained before (Iso) and after (Hypo) exposure to a 35% hypotonic solution. B: difference current obtained by subtraction of whole cell currents in the isotonic solution from those in the hypotonic solution shown in A. C and D: current-voltage relationship for the whole cell currents was obtained before and after exposure to a 35% hypotonic solution with external NaCl concentrations of 35 mM. The difference current (D) was obtained by the same method as in B. E: current-voltage relationship for the whole cell currents was obtained before (Hypo) and after (Hypo + Gd3+) the application of 1 µM Gd3+ in a 35% hypotonic solution. F: difference current obtained by subtraction of whole cell currents in the presence of Gd3+ from those in the absence of Gd3+ in E.

 
The effect of Gd3+ on the currents activated by hypotonic stimulation was investigated next. As mentioned above, the gigaohm seal could not be maintained for a long time because of cell swelling. Therefore, the effect of Gd3+ on the currents was also examined in a separate series of experiments, in which the gigaohm seal was formed in the hypotonic solution. After the currents elicited by voltage ramp pulses were recorded, the superfusing hypotonic solution was exchanged for the solution containing Gd3+ (1 µM). Gd3+ decreased both inward and outward currents (Fig. 7E). Figure 7F represents the difference current, which is sensitive to Gd3+. The difference current exhibited small outward rectification, and the reversal potential of the current was –6.6 ± 1.5 mV (n = 4).

Changes in insulin secretion induced by hypotonic stimulation. Finally, we investigated the contribution of cation channels to hypotonically induced insulin secretion from isolated rat pancreatic islets. Exposing islets to 35% hypotonic solution caused an increase in insulin secretion at 5.5 mM glucose (Fig. 8). The insulin secretion increased gradually until it peaked 6–8 min after the start of hypotonic stimulation. The insulin secretion induced by the hypotonic stimulation was reproduced at least twice. Gd3+ (1 µM) significantly inhibited the hypotonically induced insulin secretion (Fig. 8). The Cl channel blocker DIDS (100 µM) also inhibited the hypotonically induced insulin secretion, although the inhibition by DIDS was smaller than that by Gd3+.


Figure 8
View larger version (8K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 8. Effect of osmotic cell swelling on insulin secretion from isolated rat islets. Batches of 50 intact islets were continuously perifused. The perifusing solution was collected every 2 min, and the concentration of insulin in it was measured by radioimmunoassay. Islets were exposed to a 35% hypotonic solution twice with a 30-min interval. Graphs show the time course of insulin secretion induced by the hypotonic stimulation in the absence ({circ}) and presence (bullet) of 1 µM Gd3+ (A) or 100 µM DIDS (B). Each point represents the mean ± SE of 4 experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01.

 

    DISCUSSION
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
The present study provides evidence to support the hypothesis that cation channels are involved in osmotic cell swelling-induced insulin secretion from rat pancreatic beta-cells. The cation channel blocker Gd3+ at 1 µM suppressed hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation, membrane depolarization, and insulin secretion. The involvement of cation channels was also supported by experiments with other cation channel blockers, such as amiloride, 2-APB, and ruthenium red. Moreover, hypotonic stimulation elicited cation currents sensitive to Gd3+. These results suggest a novel mechanism involving cation channels for swelling-induced insulin secretion from rat pancreatic beta-cells.

We show here that isolated rat pancreatic beta-cells respond to hypotonic stimulation with an increase in [Ca2+]c. Similar [Ca2+]c elevation induced by hypotonic stimulation has been reported in isolated mouse beta-cells (6) and the RINm5F beta-cell line (21). Swelling may increase [Ca2+]c by activation of Ca2+-permeable channels and/or Ca2+ release from intracellular stores (15, 24). The hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation in rat pancreatic beta-cells was nearly abolished by the VDCC blocker nicardipine, in accordance with earlier studies (6, 21), indicating that the [Ca2+]c elevation results from the Ca2+ influx through VDCC. The results of the present study also confirm that hypotonic stimulation induces membrane depolarization of beta-cells (2, 6). It is thus likely that hypotonic stimulation causes beta-cell depolarization, thereby activating VDCC. Several studies have suggested that activation of volume-sensitive Cl channels is responsible for the membrane depolarization of beta-cells induced by hypotonic stimulation (2, 3, 6, 13). However, a recent study in HIT clonal beta-cells clearly demonstrated that Cl channel blockers such as niflumic acid and DIDS potentiate cell swelling and block RVD induced by hypotonic stimulation, but the insulin secretion persists even in the presence of the Cl channel blockers (12). It has also been shown that hypotonically induced insulin secretion from the betaHC9 beta-cell line is inhibited by the VDCC blockers nitrendipine and calciseptine, but not by the Cl channel blocker DIDS (22). Thus there should be another pathway involved in hypotonically induced insulin secretion. The present study proposes a novel mechanism involving cation channels, which are probably activated by the stretching of the membrane resulting from cell swelling.

In several cell types, such as epithelial and endothelial cells, osmotic cell swelling causes increases in [Ca2+]c via the activation of cation channels (5, 16). We have also demonstrated (25) the contribution of cation channels to hypotonically induced contraction of basilar artery myocytes. Moreover, some members of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family of nonselective cation channels have recently been shown to be sensitive to mechanical stresses, including hyposmolarity (1, 17). However, little information is available about the cation channels sensitive to hyposmolarity in pancreatic beta-cells. Sheader et al. (21) reported that 20 µM Gd3+ inhibited swelling-induced [Ca2+]c elevation in RINm5F cells; however, the same concentration of Gd3+ also blocked high K+-induced Ca2+ entry. Therefore, those authors did not conclude as to whether or not Gd3+-sensitive cation channels contribute to the swelling-induced response. The present study clearly shows that hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was partly suppressed by a lower concentration of Gd3+ (1 µM). In addition, this concentration of Gd3+ did not inhibit 30 mM K+-induced [Ca2+]c elevation, indicating that 1 µM Gd3+ has no direct inhibitory effect on VDCC of beta-cells. Furthermore, the [Ca2+]c elevation in response to hypotonic stimulation was also inhibited by other cation channel blockers, amiloride, 2-APB, and ruthenium red. These results support the hypothesis that cation channels participate in hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation in rat pancreatic beta-cells. Our patch-clamp data also show that cation channels primarily mediate the outwardly rectifying currents elicited by hypotonic stimulation, because the reversal potential of the currents shifted toward negative potentials when external Na+ and Cl concentrations were reduced. If Cl is a main carrier of the current, then the reversal potential ought to be shifted toward positive potentials according to the reduction of the external Cl concentration. Therefore, under our experimental conditions, hypotonic stimulation seems to activate cation channels, thereby depolarizing the membrane of rat pancreatic beta-cells.

However, these results are not compatible with those of earlier studies that suggest that the activation by cell swelling of volume-sensitive Cl channels is responsible for hypotonically induced responses in beta-cells (2, 3, 6, 13). The discrepancy may be due to the differences in experimental conditions. For example, the glucose concentrations in external solutions differed: 2.8 mM in the present study and 4, 11.1, and 15 mM in previous studies (2, 3, 6, 13). In a study in which the Cl channel blocker DIDS did not inhibit hypotonically induced insulin secretion, an external solution containing 0.1 mM glucose was used for the insulin secretion assay (22). Because volume-sensitive Cl channels of beta-cells have been shown to be sensitive to intracellular cAMP and ATP (13, 18), metabolic conditions, which are drastically changed by glucose in beta-cells, may affect the activity of the Cl channels. Alternatively, the discrepancy may be due to the method for hypotonic stimulation. In most studies on hypotonically induced responses in beta-cells, hypotonic stimulation was achieved by reducing the NaCl concentration in external solutions (2, 6, 12, 21, 22). The reduction of the external NaCl concentration would decrease the concentration gradients of Na+ and Cl, which would in turn lead to a decrease in inward Na+ currents and an increase in inward Cl currents. Thus this method would lead to underestimation and overestimation of the responses induced by cation and Cl currents, respectively. In the present study, a hypotonic solution was prepared by removing mannitol from an isotonic solution; thus there were no changes in the concentrations of Na+ and Cl from before to after hypotonic stimulation. Although there remains the possibility that the resultant low-Na+ external solution affected the reactivity, we confirmed that the hypotonic stimulation achieved by reducing NaCl also caused an increase in [Ca2+]c in rat beta-cells, which 1 µM Gd3+ inhibited (data not shown). Although the present study suggests that cation channels primarily contribute to beta-cell swelling-induced responses, it does not rule out the possible involvement of Cl channels in the responses: The insulin secretion induced by hypotonic stimulation was partly inhibited by the Cl channel blocker DIDS, and the hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was only partly inhibited by the cation channel inhibitors.

Osmotic cell swelling has been shown to induce ATP release from a variety of cell types, such as hepatoma (23), epithelial (8, 19), and endothelial (14) cells. It is known that ATP stimulates insulin secretion by acting on P2Y receptors (9). Moreover, beta-cells may secrete ATP in response to glucose stimulation, thereby increasing the ATP concentration close to the cell surface sufficiently high to enhance insulin secretion from beta-cells (7). Therefore, it is attractive to speculate that hypotonic stimulation releases ATP, which causes membrane depolarization and an increase in [Ca2+]c via the activation of P2Y receptors. However, the hypotonically induced [Ca2+]c elevation was not affected by the P2 receptor antagonist suramin, which, in contrast, completely abolished the [Ca2+]c elevation induced by ATP. Thus ATP is unlikely to be involved in hypotonically induced responses in beta-cells.

The mechanisms underlying glucose-induced insulin secretion are divided into at least two pathways: the ATP-sensitive K+ (KATP) channel-dependent pathway and the KATP channel-independent pathway. The former is the consensus model for glucose-induced insulin secretion: An increase in ATP resulting from the glucose metabolism closes plasma membrane KATP channels, leading to membrane depolarization, the opening of VDCC, and [Ca2+]c elevation. The latter pathway is estimated under conditions in which the contribution of KATP channels is eliminated by either the KATP channel opener or the blocker. Because high concentrations of glucose have been shown to increase beta-cell volume (18, 20), it is possible that the mechanism for cell swelling-induced insulin secretion is involved in the KATP channel-independent pathway. Thus stretch-activated cation channels may be an important factor in glucose-induced insulin secretion. Further experiments will be required to verify this hypothesis.

In conclusion, we have demonstrated that hypotonic stimulation causes an increase in [Ca2+]c in beta-cells by the following pathway: Osmotic cell swelling activates Gd3+-sensitive cation channels, which are most likely to be stretch-activated cation channels, thereby causing membrane depolarization, which activates VDCC and increases [Ca2+]c, finally leading to insulin secretion.


    FOOTNOTES
 

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. Ishikawa, Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Pharmacology, Graduate School of Pharmaceut. Sci., Univ. of Shizuoka, 52-1 Yada, Suruga-Ku, Shizuoka City, Shizuoka 422-8526, Japan (e-mail:ishikat{at}u-shizuoka-ken.ac.jp)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.


    REFERENCES
 TOP
 ABSTRACT
 METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 REFERENCES
 
1. Beech DJ, Muraki K, and Flemming R. Non-selective cationic channels of smooth muscle and the mammalian homologues of Drosophila TRP. J Physiol 559: 685–706, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Best L, Miley HE, and Yates AP. Activation of an anion conductance and beta-cell depolarization during hypotonically induced insulin release. Exp Physiol 81: 927–933, 1996.[Abstract]

3. Best L, Sheader EA, and Brown PD. A volume-activated anion conductance in insulin-secreting cells. Pflügers Arch 431: 363–370, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

4. Blackard WG, Kikuchi M, Rabinovitch A, and Renold AE. An effect of hyposmolarity on insulin release in vitro. Am J Physiol 228: 706–713, 1975.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Christensen O. Mediation of cell volume regulation by Ca2+ influx through stretch-activated channels. Nature 330: 66–68, 1987.[CrossRef][Medline]

6. Drews G, Zempel G, Krippeit-Drews P, Britsch S, Busch GL, Kaba NK, and Lang F. Ion channels involved in insulin release are activated by osmotic swelling of pancreatic beta-cells. Biochim Biophys Acta 1370: 8–16, 1998.[Medline]

7. Hazama A, Hayashi S, and Okada Y. Cell surface measurements of ATP release from single pancreatic beta cells using a novel biosensor technique. Pflügers Arch 437: 31–35, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

8. Hazama A, Shimizu T, Ando-Akatsuka Y, Hayashi S, Tanaka S, Maeno E, and Okada Y. Swelling-induced, CFTR-independent ATP release from a human epithelial cell line: lack of correlation with volume-sensitive Cl channels. J Gen Physiol 114: 525–533, 1999.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

9. Hillaire-Buys D, Chapal J, Bertrand G, Petit P, and Loubatieres-Mariani MM. Purinergic receptors on insulin-secreting cells. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 8: 117–127, 1994.[ISI][Medline]

10. Ishikawa T, Iwasaki E, Kanatani K, Sugino F, Kaneko Y, Obara K, and Nakayama K. Involvement of novel protein kinase C isoforms in carbachol-stimulated insulin secretion from rat pancreatic islets. Life Sci 77: 462–469, 2005.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

11. Ishikawa T, Kaneko Y, Sugino F, and Nakayama K. Two distinct effects of cGMP on cytosolic Ca2+ concentration of rat pancreatic beta-cells. J Pharmacol Sci 91: 41–46, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

12. Kinard TA, Goforth PB, Tao Q, Abood ME, Teague J, and Satin LS. Chloride channels regulate HIT cell volume but cannot fully account for swelling-induced insulin secretion. Diabetes 50: 992–1003, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

13. Kinard TA and Satin LS. An ATP-sensitive Cl channel current that is activated by cell swelling, cAMP, and glyburide in insulin-secreting cells. Diabetes 44: 1461–1466, 1995.[Abstract]

14. Koyama T, Oike M, and Ito Y. Involvement of Rho-kinase and tyrosine kinase in hypotonic stress-induced ATP release in bovine aortic endothelial cells. J Physiol 532: 759–769, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

15. Lang F, Busch GL, Ritter M, Volkl H, Waldegger S, Gulbins E, and Haussinger D. Functional significance of cell volume regulatory mechanisms. Physiol Rev 78: 247–306, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

16. Ling BN and O’Neill WC. Ca2+-dependent and Ca2+-permeable ion channels in aortic endothelial cells. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 263: H1827–H1838, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Martinac B. Mechanosensitive ion channels: molecules of mechanotransduction. J Cell Sci 117: 2449–2460, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

18. Miley HE, Sheader EA, Brown PD, and Best L. Glucose-induced swelling in rat pancreatic beta-cells. J Physiol 504: 191–198, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI]

19. Mitchell CH, Carre DA, McGlinn AM, Stone RA, and Civan MM. A release mechanism for stored ATP in ocular ciliary epithelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95: 7174–7178, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

20. Semino MC, Gagliardino AM, Bianchi C, Rebolledo OR, and Gagliardino JJ. Early changes in the rat pancreatic B cell size induced by glucose. Acta Anat (Basel) 138: 293–296, 1990.[ISI][Medline]

21. Sheader EA, Brown PD, and Best L. Swelling-induced changes in cytosolic [Ca2+] in insulin-secreting cells: a role in regulatory volume decrease? Mol Cell Endocrinol 181: 179–187, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

22. Straub SG, Daniel S, and Sharp GW. Hyposmotic shock stimulates insulin secretion by two distinct mechanisms. Studies with the betaHC9 cell. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 282: E1070–E1076, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

23. Wang Y, Roman R, Lidofsky SD, and Fitz JG. Autocrine signaling through ATP release represents a novel mechanism for cell volume regulation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 12020–12025, 1996.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

24. Wehner F, Olsen H, Tinel H, Kinne-Saffran E, and Kinne RK. Cell volume regulation: osmolytes, osmolyte transport, and signal transduction. Rev Physiol Biochem Pharmacol 148: 1–80, 2003.[ISI][Medline]

25. Yano S, Ishikawa T, Tsuda H, Obara K, and Nakayama K. Ionic mechanism for contractile response to hyposmotic challenge in canine basilar arteries. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 288: C702–C709, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]





This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/6/C1405    most recent
00519.2005v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Takii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Takii, M.
Right arrow Articles by Nakayama, K.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.