Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Lung Cellular and Molecular Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 291: C1107-C1113, 2006. First published September 13, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00223.2006
0363-6143/06 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/6/C1107    most recent
00223.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balaban, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balaban, R. S.

PERSPECTIVES IN CELL PHYSIOLOGY

Modeling mitochondrial function

Robert S. Balaban

Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, Maryland

Submitted 1 May 2006 ; accepted in final form 17 July 2006

ABSTRACT

The mitochondrion represents a unique opportunity to apply mathematical modeling to a complex biological system. Understanding mitochondrial function and control is important since this organelle is critical in energy metabolism as well as playing key roles in biochemical synthesis, redox control/signaling, and apoptosis. A mathematical model, or hypothesis, provides several useful insights including a rigorous test of the consensus view of the operation of a biological process as well as providing methods of testing and creating new hypotheses. The advantages of the mitochondrial system for applying a mathematical model include the relative simplicity and understanding of the matrix reactions, the ability to study the mitochondria as a independent contained organelle, and, most importantly, one can dynamically measure many of the internal reaction intermediates, on line. The developing ability to internally monitor events within the metabolic network, rather than just the inflow and outflow, is extremely useful in creating critical bounds on complex mathematical models using the individual reaction mechanisms available. However, many serious problems remain in creating a working model of mitochondrial function including the incomplete definition of metabolic pathways, the uncertainty of using in vitro enzyme kinetics, as well as regulatory data in the intact system and the unknown chemical activities of relevant molecules in the matrix. Despite these formidable limitations, the advantages of the mitochondrial system make it one of the best defined mammalian metabolic networks that can be used as a model system for understanding the application and use of mathematical models to study biological systems.

oxidative phosphorylation; enzyme kinetics; nicotine adenine dinucleotide; fluorescence; ATP; nuclear magnetic resonance


AS WE BEGIN to put cells and organelles back together, after decades of dissecting the composition, structure, and function of their individual elements, it is clear that the complexity revealed by our experimental endeavors will expand to the point where it will be difficult to rely on intuition to generate hypotheses or even to interpret experimental data. This emerging acceptance of complexity in biology, often referred to as "systems biology," has also rekindled interest in mathematical modeling as a tool. Several reviews and editorials have recently been constructed that outline the basic goals of this modeling activity (6, 9). Mathematical models are useful in keeping track of complex interactions in a network to aid the interpretation of data, to provide new hypotheses, as well as to suggest how to test a given hypothesis. Finally, the mathematical model is ultimately the final proof that the consensus impression of a metabolic network is correct by providing detailed predictions. That is, by taking all known kinetic and regulatory factors into account, a model can be constructed that accurately predicts the behavior of the network (88). An excellent example of using a consensus model was the study of yeast glycolysis that restricted the analysis to known kinetic parameters and substrate concentrations that was very effective in probing the discrepancies between in vitro kinetic data and in vivo behavior in this simple system (81). Many models have been created with too many parameters that are varied to fit macroscopic fluxes or limited experimental data. Those models rarely fail to fit a set of biological data and are quite prevalent in the literature. However, rarely does fitting a complex model provide much information on how well the current known set of pathways, reactions kinetics, and control mechanisms work, nor does it direct an investigator to an appropriate hypothesis to test or to measurements that need to be made. Running simulations with multiparameter models for finding limits and testing whether a complex hypothesis is theoretically feasible is a proven useful activity. However, I believe a better use of mathematical modeling is the model populated with the best current knowledge of a pathway and allowing the model to find the errors in this knowledge base to direct further efforts.

Many programs are currently underway to initiate quantitative models of cellular functions, and an incomplete list includes the following: the Virtual Cell (http://www.nrcam.uchc.edu/), the IUPS Physiome project (http://www.physiome.org.nz/), the E-Cell Project (http://www.e-cell.org/), the Center for Modeling Integrated Metabolic Systems (http://www.csuohio.edu/mims/index.htm), the Silicon Cell (http://homepages.cwi.nl/~gollum/SiC/) and DiMSim (89). Though most large efforts have focused on the whole cell, the mitochondrion itself is uniquely suited to initiate this type of study on several levels. First, mitochondrion can function as autonomous process with a membrane barrier with measurable fluxes to provide simple limits for a mathematical model. Our knowledge of the molecular machines within mitochondria, although not complete, is extensive and expanding rapidly. This includes many of the enzymes of the citric acid cycle (17, 30, 46, 55, 56, 77, 88), oxidative phosphorylation (2, 25, 29, 39, 43, 57, 70, 84), and many other reaction sequences. Finally, and most importantly, measurements of the behavior of multiple constituents within the organelle can be monitored simultaneously with high temporal resolution to constrain a given model or to provide information about how to test a complex hypothesis generated by a model. In some circumstances it even permits the determination of enzyme kinetic data within the complex environment (19, 44). This latter ability to monitor numerous elements, dynamically, within the mitochondrial metabolic network is quite unique in most physiological or biochemical reaction sequences in mammalian systems. These properties of mitochondria have been appreciated by many investigators over the years who attempted to model one of the major functions, oxidative phosphorylation. Some of the earliest studies were designed to follow the stoichiometries of the reaction sequences as well as attempt to gain insight into control mechanisms (1315), while more recent efforts have had similar goals but incorporated more detail about kinetic regulation and allosteric effectors (1, 4, 8, 26, 27, 49, 58). However, in general, most modeling efforts have simplified many of the reaction steps well beyond the detailed information that is available for given reaction steps, as discussed above, with simple rate equations containing some allosteric regulation with stoichiometric and thermodynamic limits. Though these are useful in establishing the feasibility of a particular mathematical construct to simulate a biological process, they have just begun to install the detailed molecular mechanisms for these reactions that are being currently generated. These simplified models are an important initial step in moving from working on individual proteins to ensembles of proteins with direct and indirect interactions which contribute to the function and regulation of mitochondria. Regrettably, simplification of mathematical models of complex processes is best done once the entire processes, or individual nodes, are well understood revealing the best opportunities for simplification to use in validation as well as ease of use. Many problems stand in the way of achieving the overall goal of an accurate model of mitochondrial function. The current barriers to generating this model, common to all, will be the focus of this review rather than a detailed, technical dissection of previous modeling efforts.

The mitochondrion may be much simpler than a whole cell; however, it is still a highly complex and interactive organelle that will likely require very sophisticated modeling tools to represent mathematically. Recent mitochondrial proteome studies have set the number of mitochondrial proteins on the order of 3,000 (60, 78, 85). To complicate this further, each tissue has a unique set of protein expression levels that will ultimately influence the overall function of the organelle. For example, Fig. 1 shows a two-dimensional (2D) gel dispersion of mitochondrial proteins from the heart and liver of a single pig where the cardiac proteins are labeled with a red fluorescent probe and the liver proteins are labeled with a green fluorescent probe. Since the same amount of protein was used from each tissue, similar protein level contents appear yellow, whereas proteins at higher levels in one of the tissues will reflect the color of that tissue. As seen in Fig. 1, the protein content of the liver and the heart are quite different, with very few proteins having similar expression levels. In general, the heart mitochondria are geared up for oxidative phosphorylation, while the liver has more protein associated with biochemical synthesis. A detailed description of these mitochondrial functional differences between tissues is found in Johnson et al. (43a, 43b) in this call for papers on the Systems Biology of the Mitochondrion. These data suggest that even tissue differences in protein expression will need to be taken into account in any qualitative description of metabolic pathways or quantitative understanding of mitochondrial function.


Figure 1
View larger version (86K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 1. Two-dimensional electrophoresis of mitochondrial proteins from the porcine heart and liver. The proteins were prepared as outlined by Hopper et al. (40) and differentially stained with Cy5 and Cy3 protein stains on lysine groups (Invitrogen) and run simultaneously with the same amount of protein from each tissue. The heart proteins are presented in red, while the liver proteins are presented in green. Since the same amount of total protein was added to the gel, green is dominate proteins in liver mitochondria, red is dominate heart proteins, while yellow is proteins of similar levels. Data collected by D. Johnson and R. S. Balaban.

 
Even more confounding is the recent demonstration that the extent of posttranslational modification that modifies the activity of the matrix enzymes is extensive, especially with regard to protein phosphorylation (40, 72). It has been known for some time that protein phosphorylation is important in regulating mitochondrial enzyme activity, e.g., with the classic example of pyruvate dehydrogenase (38, 52). However, the extent of protein phosphorylation in the mitochondrial matrix has not been greatly appreciated. Figure 2 shows a 2D gel that is an overlay of 32P labeling and Coomassie blue staining of proteins from pig heart mitochondria that had been incubated with carbon substrates and radiolabeled inorganic phosphate (32Pi) as the only source of extracellular phosphate. The 32Pi enters these energized mitochondria and is converted to ATP with 32P in the gamma position at very high (near 100%) specific activity, which permits the direct observation of matrix protein phosphorylation. Using radiolabeling or Pro-Q Diamond (Invitrogen) fluorescent dye approaches, several groups have been able to demonstrate an extensive phosphorylation of matrix proteins (40, 72, 74). Hopper et al. (40) were able to demonstrate extensive and dynamic protein phosphorylation in the mitochondrial matrix that was affected by calcium levels or by energization state. Many new protein phosphorylations have recently been described, although most of the specific sites remain unknown since 32P, and even Pro-Q Diamond labeling, is more sensitive in gels than mass spectroscopy is capable of determining sequences from extracted proteins (40).


Figure 2
View larger version (57K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 2. 32P labeling of porcine heart mitochondrial matrix proteins. Matrix proteins were labeled with 32P-labeled matrix ATP by exposure to extramitochondrial 32P. A: the autoradiogram of the 2D gel of mitochondrial proteins. B: the Coomassie stain of the same gel. C: overlay of the Coomassie-stained and 32P-labeled images. The magnified inset in each panel is meant to provide a better impression of the signal-to-noise ratio of these gels and also isolates the MnSOD region of the gel. Data are adapted from Hopper et al. (40).

 
In these studies of matrix protein phosphorylation all of the complexes of the cytochrome chain reveal dynamic protein phosphorylation sites; however, the functional significance of most of these events, as well as their associated kinases and phosphatases, remains essentially unknown. Indeed, the functional significance of protein phosphorylations throughout most of the metabolic networks of mitochondria, including the citric acid cycle, fatty acid, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and amino acid metabolism, has not yet been fully explored. Even if only a fraction of the dynamic phosphorylations discovered have functional significance, modeling how these phosphorylations influence the net fluxes through this organelle will be a challenging but necessary task to understand the regulation of mitochondrial metabolism.

These proteomic approaches have essentially been providing valuable pieces of the jigsaw puzzle of mitochondrial metabolic pathways and functions. Many of the proteins identified in the mitochondrial matrix perform unknown functions (see Refs. 60, 78; and Johnson et al., Refs. 43a and 43b, in this call for papers), while we know of many important functions that we have not yet associated with a specific protein, such as the Ca2+ uniporter. Thus not all mitochondria metabolic pathways are fully delineated even as a chain of enzymatic activities. In many cases, metabolic activities can be predicted from the functional domains of a protein, rather than by assay, which could rapidly accelerate the functional identification. However, experimental confirmation of an enzyme's activity will need to be performed with the structural analysis helping to decide which assay to perform. With this new information, a quantitative detailed model of the consensus networks would be extremely useful to help assemble this puzzle as new pieces, associated pathways, and regulatory aspects are identified.

Once the pathways have been established, the kinetic properties of the enzymes need to be applied to the model. For this task, classic proteomic analysis is not very helpful. To the credit of most investigators, they have attempted to fill in kinetic properties such as reaction mechanisms, substrate affinities, and allosteric interactions, rather than letting them float to help "fit" the model. However, most of the kinetic and allosteric information for mitochondrial enzymes are only available from purified enzymes. An excellent example of how allosteric and substrate effects can alter enzyme kinetics is the study of NADH generation by isocitrate dehydrogenase by Gabriel et al. (33), who demonstrated that NADH, NAD, ATP, ADP, and Ca2+ all influence the binding and interaction of the other substrates. Thus, for this enzyme alone, it would be difficult to model its ability to generate NADH without tracking all of these complex interactions. If similar data is generated for all the NADH generating enzymes of the citric acid cycle and fatty acid oxidation, then the requirements for a computation model for simple bookkeeping of the interactions of these effectors would almost be mandatory. Good starting points for modeling the citric acid cycle have been generated illustrating this complexity (26, 47). The next issue is to determine whether this in vitro kinetic data, as complicated as the interactions are, is really applicable to the matrix or membrane of mitochondria.

The issue of using in vitro enzymatic data for a model of the intact system is complicated by the fact that the in vitro reaction kinetics are rarely mimicked in the intact system (see examples, Refs. 11, 67, 81, 88). In our own laboratory, we attempted to extract and quantify all of the citric acid cycle enzymes in a single mitochondrial preparation (from porcine heart) using similar extraction procedures and uniform conditions. This approach was abandoned after we found that the extraction procedures affected the enzyme activities differentially, with many never reaching the activity for NADH generation that we know from mitochondrial oxygen consumption (S. French and R. S. Balaban, unpublished observations). In retrospect, this is not a surprising result based on the variability of mitochondrial enzyme activities in the literature. This discrepancy between in vitro and in vivo enzyme properties is likely due to many reasons, e.g., the extraordinary high ratio of substrates/products to enzymes in the matrix (3) and the remarkable low ratio used for in vitro studies. Furthermore, proteins within mitochondria are associated in complexes within and outside of membranes, as elegantly revealed using clear or blue native gel techniques (64). These enzyme complexes have been demonstrated to alter the kinetics of individual enzymes in the citric acid cycle and cytochromes chain (69, 71, 75), confounding the translation of in vitro enzymatic data for modeling purposes.

Another example is the initial oxidation of NADH in the cytochrome chain at complex I. In vitro, the apparent affinity of complex I for NADH is very low (on the order of 20 µM; Ref. 31), while numerous studies have shown that the affinity of NADH for oxidation in intact mitochondria is greater than millimolar (48, 59). Using NADH fluorescence lifetime measurements to estimate the binding of NADH in the mitochondrial matrix and in isolated membranes, the same order of magnitude shift in binding affinity was observed with intact mitochondria (>2 mM) and with isolated membranes (20 µM), matching the steady-state kinetics of oxidation (12). A similar discrepancy exists for inhibitory constants determined in vitro for NADH (on the order of 10–20 µM) that are very unrealistic for a matrix that rarely dips below 1.5 mM under in vivo conditions. The difference in NADH affinity at complex I is apparently not simply due to the presence or absence of a membrane potential and suggests a much more complicated interaction of NADH:NAD with this site. These examples suggest that relying on in vitro data for setting the kinetic parameters of individual enzymes is likely problematic. Thus kinetic measurements within the mitochondrial matrix or in intact physiological complexes are required. Thankfully, there are many measurements that can be made in the intact system that may help resolve some of these issues, as will be discussed below.

One of the unique aspects of studying mitochondria is the ability to simultaneously monitor numerous biochemical events as well as the matrix milieu with excellent time resolution. In addition to conventional rapid extraction biochemical assay approaches, one of the most powerful tools is optical spectroscopy and fluorescence as pioneered by Britton Chance (22, 24). Figure 3 shows a difference (anoxia vs. control) optical spectrum of a mitochondrial suspension in an integrating sphere to minimize scattering artifacts (16), which reveals the ability to, redundantly, monitor the redox state of all complexes involved in proton motive force generation for ATP production, with a time resolution on the order of milliseconds. The redundancy is the result of absorbance differences in the reduced and oxidized forms of many of the cytochromes in the 400–425 nm band as well as in the 500–620 nm band. Though this information is still limited with regard to the detailed mechanisms of ion ejection in oxidative phosphorylation, it is very useful for bounding what these complexes are doing in the intact system for modeling purposes. Other measures of the metabolic network are listed in Fig. 3 with references in the legend. Most of these approaches include the use of exogenously added optical probes for pH (SNARF, BCECF, etc.), Ca2+ (fura-2, indo-1, etc.), Mg2+ (mag-fura-2), ROS (MitoSOX red, Amplex red, etc.), membrane potential (ANNEPS, etc.), oxygen (hemoglobin, etc.) or using extra-mitochondrial electrodes including oxygen, NO, K+, Ca2+, Mg2+, pH, and various organic cations for determination of membrane potential. Other physical measures, such as light scattering for estimating volume and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy to follow several metabolites with 31P or 13C nuclides, fill out the current methodology. Many of these approaches have excellent temporal resolution, especially the optical approaches, and most can be arranged to make simultaneous measurements that are critical in the validation of mathematical models (see Refs. 48, 62, 80, 87). This latter aspect of these measurements is essential in evaluating kinetic parameters linking different aspects of mitochondrial function such as substrate oxidation, NADH and membrane potential generation, along with the ultimate formation of ATP. With the ability to measure these elements, the mitochondrial metabolic pathways are one of the best internally sampled networks available in the mammalian system and are a unique opportunity for modeling efforts.


Figure 3
View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Fig. 3. Monitoring of the metabolic mitochondrial metabolic network. The optical difference absorbance spectrum of control and hypoxic porcine heart mitochondria is adapted from Bose et al. (16). References to the other measurements include the following: original absorption spectroscopy of mitochondrial cytochromes (23), rapid optical monitoring of oxygen consumption (79), matrix pH (7, 28, 63, 76), membrane potential (61, 63), Mg2+ (45), Ca2+ (28, 37, 68), NADH and FADH fluorescence (1921, 50), NADH turnover, ED-FRAP (44), carbon substrates 13C-NMR (51), ATP, ADP, and Pi 31P-NMR (41, 42, 48), volume light scattering (35), ROS formation (53, 54, 73), and NO production (32).

 
Almost all of these measured parameters interact in very complex ways. Let's consider complex I interaction with NADH again, which is a major crossroad of intermediary metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation. The redox state of NADH, potentially at its binding to active sites in the multi-enzyme complex I system, can be monitored via NADH fluorescence measurement using lifetime analysis (11). However, to understand how NADH levels are controlled, one needs to know the activity and kinetics of complex I, the proton motive force (which is a product of the complex I electrogenic reaction), the redox states of complexes II and III that accept reducing equivalents from complex I, the activities of dehydrogenases generating NADH, and potentially, the phosphorylation of complex I and dehydrogenases via kinase phosphatase systems (40). This network rapidly expands to all factors that control these elements directly coupled to NADH production and utilization. These known regulatory factors include elements such as uncoupler proteins acting on membrane potential, calcium levels altering phosphatase/kinase systems, as well as all metabolites that alter the properties of enzyme systems as discussed earlier for isocitrate dehydrogenase. From this simple example, it is easy to see how modeling is almost mandatory to keep track of the interactions as well as to potentially predict the key measurements to make.

Even with the determination of these numerous elements in the network, there are many significant gaps in our measurement capabilities. The most significant are the chemical activities of most metabolites within the matrix and inner space. This is a major limitation, since in contrast to most ion determinations with optical probes and electrodes, we have not developed methods of detecting the chemical activity of metabolites; rather we can generally only measure total content. One approach for determining activity is to use near-equilibrium enzymes to reflect the relative concentration of metabolites (82, 86). However, no suitable enzymes for the NADH/NAD ratio seem to be available in the matrix (44, 66), nor for ATP/ADP and many other metabolites. Potentially, overexpressing reporter enzymes that could report chemical activities in the matrix, as the expression creatine kinase was used in the liver (5, 18) or luciferase for matrix Ca2+ (68), might provide some useful insight. 13C magnetic resonance spectroscopy of metabolites in mitochondria might prove useful (51) since decreasing mobility increases the broadening of the 13C resonance and might provide good estimates of unrestricted metabolite pool sizes. Even useful may be the enhanced sensitivity of hyperpolarized 13C labeling (10, 36) in monitoring the in vivo tracer kinetics of individual metabolic or isotopic fluxes in the matrix. Naturally, the short magnetic lifetime of these hyperpolarized probes in the matrix environment may prove to be problematic when dealing with matrix metabolic rates on the orders of seconds.

The matrix and inner space phosphate and phosphate metabolites have also been the subject of extensive speculation, but very few measurements are available on chemical activity. The 31P-NMR has provided some insight in dense mitochondrial suspensions (41, 42, 65). However, the high viscosity of the matrix (~30% protein), together with paramagnetic metals that bind to most phosphate metabolites (42), makes the interpretation of matrix 31P-NMR line-width difficult with regard to chemical activity under in vivo conditions. One series of studies reported matrix Pi values with 31P-NMR under specialized conditions in the perfused heart (34), but this approach has not been further investigated. As discussed above, genetically expressing enzymes, such as creatine kinase within the matrix where it is usually not expressed, could be used as a probe of metabolite chemical activity or even a perturbation if creatine can also be delivered in the matrix.

Another physical measure of metabolite mobility is fluorescent lifetime. NADH fluorescent lifetimes in the mitochondrial matrix have estimated that totally free NADH (~0.4 ns lifetime) is only ~20% in liver (83) and ~60% in heart (11), even though the concentration of NADH is relatively high (at ~3 mM). Though lifetime is an imperfect measure of chemical activity, these data are consistent with the notion that the activity coefficient of these metabolites low, and using contents of NADH and NAD as surrogates for chemical activities is likely problematic.

The chemical activity of all metabolites and reactive species in the mitochondrial matrix is a fundamental measurement that must be addressed in the future to accurately describe the matrix milieu as well as to characterize the kinetics of various enzyme systems in the complexes likely formed in the matrix. The small volume and high protein/enzyme content of the matrix makes this compartment particularly susceptible to significant metabolite binding issues. The use of even the simplest computational methods, such as a dehydrogenase equilibrium assumption (for discussion, see Ref. 44), for determining activity coefficients is flawed in many cases. The problem is that multiple parameters affect net chemical activity including, transport, metabolism, and binding, which are poorly characterized. It is likely that determining matrix chemical activities directly would be more useful in bounding, if not understanding, the parameters of transport, metabolism, and binding rather than attempting to calculate activity from an incomplete model. Currently, the lack of direct information on the chemical activity of matrix metabolites is one of the major barriers in quantitatively describing the metabolic events in the mitochondrial matrix.

From this brief review, it is clear that we are far from having the information required to create an accurate model of the network associated with energy conversion in mitochondria. Excellent dynamic information is available on the complex redox states, membrane potentials, and ionic milieu of mitochondria. The major limitations are the activities of many of the matrix metabolites and the kinetics of the associated enzymes. However, it is time to begin this process and to incorporate the new information that is rapidly being generated by structural biology, proteomics, and genomics on this best model system of a mammalian biological reaction network. Without this modeling approach to guide the hypothesis-driven portion of this research as well as to prioritize efforts in measurement, it will be difficult to evaluate the consensus view on the operation of this relatively simple but still complex biological organelle.

FOOTNOTES


Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: R. S. Balaban, Laboratory of Cardiac Energetics, National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892 (e-mail: rsb{at}nih.gov)

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.

REFERENCES

1. Achs MJ and Garfinkel D. Metabolism of totally ischemic excised dog heart. I Construction of a computer model. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 237: R318–R326, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

2. Ackrell BA. Progress in understanding structure-function relationships in respiratory chain complex II. FEBS Lett 466: 1–5, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

3. Albe KR, Butler MH, and Wright BE. Cellular concentrations of enzymes and their substrates. J Theor Biol 143: 163–195, 1990.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

4. Aliev MK and Saks VA. Compartmentalized energy transfer in cardiomyocytes: use of mathematical modeling for analysis of in vivo regulation of respiration. Biophys J 73: 428–445, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

5. Askenasy N and Koretsky AP. Transgenic livers expressing mitochondrial and cytosolic CK: mitochondrial CK modulates free ADP levels. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C338–C346, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

6. Bailey JE. Mathematical modeling and analysis in biochemical engineering: past accomplishments and future opportunities. Biotechnol Prog 14: 8–20, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

7. Baysal K, Brierley GP, Novgorodov S, and Jung DW. Regulation of the mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ antiport by matrix pH. Arch Biochem Biophys 291: 383–389, 1991.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

8. Beard DA. A biophysical model of the mitochondrial respiratory system and oxidative phosphorylation. PLoS Comput Biol 1: e36, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]

9. Beard DA, Bassingthwaighte JB, and Greene AS. Computational modeling of physiological systems. Physiol Genomics 23: 1–3, 2005.[Free Full Text]

10. Bhattacharya P, Harris K, Lin AP, Mansson M, Norton VA, Perman WH, Weitekamp DP, and Ross BD. Ultra-fast three dimensional imaging of hyperpolarized 13C in vivo. MAGMA 18: 245–256, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]

11. Blinova K, Carroll S, Bose S, Smirnov AV, Harvey JJ, Knutson JR, and Balaban RS. Distribution of mitochondrial NADH fluorescence lifetimes: steady-state kinetics of matrix NADH interactions. Biochemistry 44: 2585–2594, 2005.[CrossRef][Medline]

12. Blinova K, Combs C, Kellman P, and Balaban RS. Fluctuation analysis of mitochondrial NADH fluorescence signals in confocal and two-photon microscopy images of living cardiac myocytes. J Microsc 213: 70–75, 2004.[ISI][Medline]

13. Bohnensack R. Control of energy transformation of mitochondria. Analysis by a quantitative model. Biochim Biophys Acta 634: 203–218, 1981.[Medline]

14. Bohnensack R. Mathematical modeling of mitochondrial energy metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta 44: 113–125, 1985.

15. Bohnensack R, Kuster U, and Letko G. Rate-controlling steps on oxidative phosphorylation in rat liver mitochondria. A synoptic approach of model and experiment. Biochim Biophys Acta 680: 271–280, 1982.[Medline]

16. Bose S, French S, Evans FJ, Joubert F, and Balaban RS. Metabolic network control of oxidative phosphorylation: multiple roles of inorganic phosphate. J Biol Chem 278: 39155–39165, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

17. Brautigam CA, Wynn RM, Chuang JL, Machius M, Tomchick DR, and Chuang DT. Structural insight into interactions between dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (E3) and E3 binding protein of human pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Structure 14: 611–621, 2006.[Medline]

18. Brosnan MJ, Halow JM, and Koretsky AP. Manipulating creatine kinase activity in transgenic mice to study control of energy metabolism. Biochem Soc Trans 19: 1010–1014, 1991.[ISI][Medline]

19. Chance B. The kinetics of flavoprotein and pyridine nucleotide oxidation in cardiac mitochondria in the presence of calcium. FEBS Lett 26: 315–319, 1972.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

20. Chance B, Schoener B, Oshino R, Itshak F, and Nakase Y. Oxidation-reduction ratio studies of mitochondria in freeze-trapped samples. NADH and flavoprotein fluorescence signals. J Biol Chem 254: 4764–4771, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

21. Chance B and Thorell B. Fluorescence measurements of mitochondrial pyridine nucleotide in aerobiosis and anaerobiosis. Nature 184: 931–934, 1959.[CrossRef][Medline]

22. Chance B and Williams GR. A method for the localization of sites for oxidative phosphorylation. Nature 176: 250–254, 1955.[CrossRef][Medline]

23. Chance B and Williams GR. Respiratory enzymes in oxidative phosphorylation. II. Difference spectra. J Biol Chem 217: 395–407, 1955.[Free Full Text]

24. Chance B and Williams GR. Respiratory enzymes in oxidative phosphorylation. IV. The respiratory chain. J Biol Chem 217: 429–438, 1955.[Free Full Text]

25. Chen C, Ko Y, Delannoy M, Ludtke SJ, Chiu W, and Pedersen PL. Mitochondrial ATP synthasome: three-dimensional structure by electron microscopy of the ATP synthase in complex formation with carriers for Pi and ADP/ATP. J Biol Chem 279: 31761–31768, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

26. Cortassa S, Aon MA, Marban E, Winslow RL, and O'Rourke B. An integrated model of cardiac mitochondrial energy metabolism and calcium dynamics. Biophys J 84: 2734–2755, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

27. Daut J. The living cell as an energy-transducing machine. A minimal model of myocardial metabolism. Biochim Biophys Acta 895: 41–62, 1987.[Medline]

28. Davis MH, Altschuld RA, Jung DW, and Brierley GP. Estimation of intramitochondrial pCa and pH by fura-2 and 2,7-biscarboxyethyl-5(6)-carboxyfluorescein (BCECF) fluorescence. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 149: 40–45, 1987.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

29. Dutton PL, Moser CC, Sled VD, Daldal F, and Ohnishi T. A reductant-induced oxidation mechanism for complex I. Biochim Biophys Acta 1364: 245–257, 1998.[Medline]

30. Estevez M, Skarda J, Spencer J, Banaszak L, and Weaver TM. X-ray crystallographic and kinetic correlation of a clinically observed human fumarase mutation. Protein Sci 11: 1552–1557, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

31. Fato R, Estornell E, Di Bernardo S, Pallotti F, Parenti CG, and Lenaz G. Steady-state kinetics of the reduction of coenzyme Q analogs by complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase) in bovine heart mitochondria and submitochondrial particles. Biochemistry 35: 2705–2716, 1996.[CrossRef][Medline]

32. French S, Giulivi C, and Balaban RS. Nitric oxide synthase in porcine heart mitochondria: evidence for low physiological activity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 280: H2863–H2867, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

33. Gabriel JL, Zervos PR, and Plaut GW. Activity of purified NAD-specific isocitrate dehydrogenase at modulator and substrate concentrations approximating conditions in mitochondria. Metabolism 35: 661–667, 1986.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

34. Garlick PB, Soboll S, and Bullock GR. Evidence that mitochondrial phosphate is visible in 31P NMR spectra of isolated, perfused rat hearts. NMR Biomed 5: 29–36, 1992.[ISI][Medline]

35. Garlid KD and Beavis AD. Swelling and contraction of the mitochondrial matrix. II. Quantitative application of the light scattering technique to solute transport across the inner membrane. J Biol Chem 260: 13434–13441, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

36. Golman K, Olsson LE, Axelsson O, Mansson S, Karlsson M, and Petersson JS. Molecular imaging using hyperpolarized 13C. Br J Radiol 76, Spec No 2: S118–S127, 2003.

37. Gunter TE, Restrepo D, and Gunter KK. Conversion of esterified fura-2 and indo-1 to Ca2+-sensitive forms by mitochondria. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 255: C304–C310, 1988.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

38. Harris RA, Popov KM, Zhao Y, Kedishvili NY, Shimomura Y, and Crabb DW. A new family of protein kinases: the mitochondrial protein kinases. Adv Enzyme Regul 35: 147–162, 1995.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

39. Hinchliffe P and Sazanov LA. Organization of iron-sulfur clusters in respiratory complex I. Science 309: 771–774, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

40. Hopper RK, Carroll S, Aponte AM, Johnson DT, French S, Shen RF, Witzmann FA, Harris RA, and Balaban RS. Mitochondrial matrix phosphoproteome: effect of extra mitochondrial calcium. Biochemistry 45: 2524–2536, 2006.[CrossRef][Medline]

41. Hutson SM, Berkich D, Williams GD, LaNoue KF, and Briggs RW. 31P NMR visibility and characterization of rat liver mitochondrial matrix adenine nucleotides. Biochemistry 28: 4325–4332, 1989.[CrossRef][Medline]

42. Hutson SM, Williams GD, Berkich DA, LaNoue KF, and Briggs RW. A 31P NMR study of mitochondrial inorganic phosphate visibility: effects of Ca2+, Mn2+, and the pH gradient. Biochemistry 31: 1322–1330, 1992.[CrossRef][Medline]

43. Iwata S, Lee JW, Okada K, Lee JK, Iwata M, Rasmussen B, Link TA, Ramaswamy S, and Jap BK. Complete structure of the 11-subunit bovine mitochondrial cytochrome bc1 complex. Science 281: 64–71, 1998.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

43a. Johnson DT, Harris RA, French S, Blair PV, You J, Bemis K, Wang M, and Balaban RS. The tissue heterogeneity of the mammalian mitochondrial proteome. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol August 23, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00108.2006.

43b. Johnson DT, Harris RA, Blair PV, and Balaban RS. Functional consequences of mitochondrial proteome heterogeneity. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol September 13, 2006; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00109.2006.

44. Joubert F, Fales HM, Wen H, Combs CA, and Balaban RS. NADH enzyme-dependent fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (ED-FRAP): applications to enzyme and mitochondrial reaction kinetics, in vitro. Biophys J 86: 629–645, 2004.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

45. Jung DW, Panzeter E, Baysal K, and Brierley GP. On the relationship between matrix free Mg2+ concentration and total Mg2+ in heart mitochondria. Biochim Biophys Acta 1320: 310–320, 1997.[Medline]

46. Karpusas M, Holland D and Remington SJ. 1.9-A structures of ternary complexes of citrate synthase with D- and L-malate: mechanistic implications. Biochemistry 30: 6024–6031, 1991.[CrossRef][Medline]

47. Kohn MC, Achs MJ, and Garfinkel D. Computer simulation of metabolism in pyruvate-perfused rat heart. II. Krebs cycle. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 237: R159–R166, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

48. Koretsky AP and Balaban RS. Changes in pyridine nucleotide levels alter oxygen consumption and extramitochondrial phosphates in isolated mitochondria: a 31P NMR and fluorescence study. Biochim Biophys Acta 893: 398–408, 1987.[Medline]

49. Korzeniewski B and Froncisz W. An extended dynamic model of oxidative phosphorylation. Biochim Biophys Acta 1060: 210–223, 1991.[Medline]

50. Kunz WS and Gellerich FN. Quantification of the content of fluorescent flavoproteins in mitochondria from liver, kidney cortex, skeletal muscle, and brain. Biochem Med Metab Biol 50: 103–110, 1993.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

51. Lewandowski ED, Doumen C, White LT, LaNoue KF, Damico LA, and Yu X. Multiplet structure of 13C NMR signal from glutamate and direct detection of tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates. Magn Reson Med 35: 149–154, 1996.[ISI][Medline]

52. Linn TC, Pettit FH, and Reed LJ. Alpha-keto acid dehydrogenase complexes. X. Regulation of the activity of the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex from beef kidney mitochondria by phosphorylation and dephosphorylation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 62: 234–241, 1969.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

53. Liu Y, Fiskum G, and Schubert D. Generation of reactive oxygen species by the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J Neurochem 80: 780–787, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

54. Loschen G, Flohe L, and Chance B. Respiratory chain linked H2O2 production in pigeon heart mitochondria. FEBS Lett 18: 261–264, 1971.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

55. Machius M, Wynn RM, Chuang JL, Li J, Kluger R, Yu D, Tomchick DR, Brautigam CA, and Chuang DT. A versatile conformational switch regulates reactivity in human branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase. Structure 14: 287–298, 2006.[Medline]

56. Mattevi A, Obmolova G, Schulze E, Kalk KH, Westphal AH, de Kok A, and Hol WG. Atomic structure of the cubic core of the pyruvate dehydrogenase multienzyme complex. Science 255: 1544–1550, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

57. Medvedev DM, Medvedev ES, Kotelnikov AI, and Stuchebrukhov AA. Analysis of the kinetics of the membrane potential generated by cytochrome c oxidase upon single electron injection. Biochim Biophys Acta 1710: 47–56, 2005.[Medline]

58. Meyer RA, Wiseman RW, and Jeneson JAL. Circuit models of muscle metabolism. J Appl Physiol 83: 2169–2170, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

59. Mootha VK, Arai AE, and Balaban RS. Maximum oxidative phosphorylation capacity of the mammalian heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 272: H769–H775, 1997.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

60. Mootha VK, Bunkenborg J, Olsen JV, Hjerrild M, Wisniewski JR, Stahl E, Bolouri MS, Ray HN, Sihag S, Kamal M, Patterson N, Lander ES, and Mann M. Integrated analysis of protein composition, tissue diversity, and gene regulation in mouse mitochondria. Cell 115: 629–640, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

61. Mootha VK, French S, and Balaban RS. Neutral carrier-based "Ca2+-selective" microelectrodes for the measurement of tetraphenylphosphonium. Anal Biochem 236: 327–330, 1996.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

62. Moreno-Sanchez R, Hogue BA, and Hansford RG. Influence of NAD-linked dehydrogenase activity on flux through oxidative phosphorylation. Biochem J 268: 421–428, 1990.[ISI][Medline]

63. Nicholls DG. The influence of respiration and ATP hydrolysis on the proton-electrochemical gradient across the inner membrane of rat-liver mitochondria as determined by ion distribution. Eur J Biochem 50: 305–315, 1974.[ISI][Medline]

64. Nijtmans LG, Henderson NS, and Holt IJ. Blue native electrophoresis to study mitochondrial and other protein complexes. Methods 26: 327–334, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

65. Ogawa S, Rottenberg H, Brown TR, Shulman RG, Castillo CL, and Glynn P. High-resolution 31P nuclear magnetic resonance study of rat liver mitochondria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 75: 1796–1800, 1978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

66. Opie LH and Owen P. Effects of increased mechanical work by isolated perfused rat heart during production or uptake of ketone bodies. Assessment of mitochondrial oxidized to reduced free nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide ratios and oxaloacetate concentrations. Biochem J 148: 403–415, 1975.[ISI][Medline]

67. Rees D, Smith MB, Harley J, and Radda GK. In vivo functioning of creatine phosphokinase in human forearm muscle, studied by 31P NMR saturation transfer. Magn Reson Med 9: 39–52, 1989.[ISI][Medline]

68. Robert V, Gurlini P, Tosello V, Nagai T, Miyawaki A, Di Lisa F, and Pozzan T. Beat-to-beat oscillations of mitochondrial [Ca2+] in cardiac cells. EMBO J 20: 4998–5007, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

69. Robinson JB Jr and Srere PA. Organization of Krebs tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes in mitochondria. J Biol Chem 260: 10800–10805, 1985.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

70. Salomonsson L, Faxen K, Adelroth P, and Brzezinski P. The timing of proton migration in membrane-reconstituted cytochrome c oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 17624–17629, 2005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

71. Schagger H and Pfeiffer K. Supercomplexes in the respiratory chains of yeast and mammalian mitochondria. EMBO J 19: 1777–1783, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

72. Schulenberg B, Aggeler R, Beechem JM, Capaldi RA, and Patton WF. Analysis of steady-state protein phosphorylation in mitochondria using a novel fluorescent phosphosensor dye. J Biol Chem 278: 27251–27255, 2003.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

73. St-Pierre J, Buckingham JA, Roebuck SJ, and Brand MD. Topology of superoxide production from different sites in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J Biol Chem 277: 44784–44790, 2002.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

74. Struglics A, Fredlund KM, Konstantinov YM, Allen JF, and Moller IM. Protein phosphorylation/dephosphorylation in the inner membrane of potato tuber mitochondria. FEBS Lett 475: 213–217, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

75. Sumegi B and Srere PA. Complex I binds several mitochondrial NAD-coupled dehydrogenases. J Biol Chem 259: 15040–15045, 1984.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

76. Takahashi A, Zhang Y, Centonze E, and Herman B. Measurement of mitochondrial pH in situ. Biotechniques 30: 804–8, 810, 812, 2001.[ISI][Medline]

77. Tao X, Yang Z, and Tong L. Crystal structures of substrate complexes of malic enzyme and insights into the catalytic mechanism. Structure 11: 1141–1150, 2003.[Medline]

78. Taylor SW, Fahy E, Zhang B, Glenn GM, Warnock DE, Wiley S, Murphy AN, Gaucher SP, Capaldi RA, Gibson BW, and Ghosh SS. Characterization of the human heart mitochondrial proteome. Nat Biotechnol 21: 281–286, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

79. Territo PR and Balaban RS. Rapid spectrophotometric determination of oxygen consumption using hemoglobin, in vitro: light scatter correction and expanded dynamic range. Anal Biochem 286: 156–163, 2000.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

80. Territo PR, French SA, Dunleavy MC, Evans FJ, and Balaban RS. Calcium activation of heart mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation: rapid kinetics of mVO2, NADH, and light scattering. J Biol Chem 276: 2586–2599, 2001.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

81. Teusink B, Passarge J, Reijenga CA, Esgalhado E, van der Weijden CC, Schepper M, Walsh MC, Bakker BM, van Dam K, Westerhoff HV, and Snoep JL. Can yeast glycolysis be understood in terms of in vitro kinetics of the constituent enzymes? Testing biochemistry. Eur J Biochem 267: 5313–5329, 2000.[ISI][Medline]

82. Veech RL, Lawson JWR, Cornell NW, and Krebs HA. Cytosolic phosphorylation potential. J Biol Chem 254: 6538–6547, 1979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

83. Wakita M, Nishimura G, and Tamura M. Some characteristics of the fluorescence lifetime of reduced pyridine nucleotides in isolated mitochondria, isolated hepatocytes, and perfused rat liver in situ. J Biochem (Tokyo) 118: 1151–1160, 1995.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

84. Wang H and Oster G. Energy transduction in the F1 motor of ATP synthase. Nature 396: 279–282, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]

85. Westermann B and Neupert W. "Omics" of the mitochondrion. Nat Biotechnol 21: 239–240, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

86. Williamson JR, Lund P, and Krebs HA. The redox state of free nicotinamide-adenine dinucleotide in the cytoplasm and mitochondria of rat liver. Biochem J 103: 514–527, 1967.[ISI][Medline]

87. Wilson DF, Owen CS, and Holian A. Control of mitochondrial respiration: a quantitative evaluation of the roles of cytochrome c and oxygen. Arch Biochem Biophys 182: 749–762, 1977.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

88. Wright BE, Butler MH, and Albe KR. Systems analysis of the tricarboxylic acid cycle in Dictyostelium discoideum. I. The basis for model construction. J Biol Chem 267: 3101–3105, 1992.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

89. Xia XQ and Wise MJ. DiMSim: a discrete-event simulator of metabolic networks. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 43: 1011–1019, 2003.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
N. Lai, G. M. Saidel, B. Grassi, L. B. Gladden, and M. E. Cabrera
Model of oxygen transport and metabolism predicts effect of hyperoxia on canine muscle oxygen uptake dynamics
J Appl Physiol, October 1, 2007; 103(4): 1366 - 1378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
291/6/C1107    most recent
00223.2006v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Balaban, R. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Balaban, R. S.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2006 by the American Physiological Society.