|
|
||||||||
INVITED REVIEW
Department of Cellular and Integrative Physiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
250 kb and comprising at least 31 exons. The mylk1 gene encodes at least four protein products: two isoforms of the 220-kDa myosin light chain kinase (MLCK), a 130-kDa MLCK, and telokin. Transcripts encoding these products are derived from four independent promoters within the mylk1 gene. The kinases expressed from the mylk1 gene have been extensively characterized and function to regulate the activity of nonmuscle and smooth muscle myosin II. Activation of these myosin motors by MLCK modulates a variety of contractile processes, including smooth muscle contraction, cell adhesion, migration, and proliferation. Dysregulation of these processes contributes to a number of diseases. The noncatalytic gene product telokin also has been shown to modulate contraction in smooth muscle cells through its ability to inhibit myosin light chain phosphatase. Given the crucial role of the products of the mylk1 gene in regulating numerous contractile processes, it seems intuitive that alterations in the transcriptional activity of the mylk1 gene also will have a significant impact on many physiological and pathological processes. In this review we highlight some of the recent studies that have described the transcriptional regulation of mylk1 gene products in smooth muscle tissues and discuss the implications of these findings for regulation of expression of other smooth muscle-specific genes. myocardin; serum response factor; GATA; gene expression; Hox genes
|
| MLCK FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Although the 220- and 130-kDa MLCKs have distinct intracellular localizations and cell-specific expression patterns (4), both of the MLCK products of the mylk1 gene have an identical catalytic domain. It remains unclear whether each of the MLCK isoforms have distinct or overlapping functions (Fig. 1). Mice harboring a specific knockout of the 220-kDa MLCK (both isoforms shown in Fig. 1) exhibited no gross morphological abnormalities, were viable and fertile, and exhibited no major cardiovascular defects (61, 79). However, the 220-kDa MLCK knockout mice exhibited decreased susceptibility to lung injury and an impairment of shear stress-induced vasodilatation (61, 79). These data suggest that the 220- and 130-kDa MLCKs exhibit at least some nonredundant functions. As a result of the overlapping structures of the mylk1 gene products, to generate specific knockouts of the 130-kDa MLCK and telokin without altering expression of other products of the mylk1 gene, it is necessary to delete key promoter elements responsible for their expression. This approach was recently used to generate telokin knockout mice (38).
| TELOKIN FUNCTION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The biochemical and physiological functions of MLCK and telokin in regulation of contractile processes have been studied extensively, and numerous reports have highlighted changes in the activity of the mylk1 gene in pathological processes. The mechanisms responsible for mediating the changes in mylk1 gene expression, however, have only recently begun to be scrutinized.
| MYLK1 GENE STRUCTURE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
250 kb and comprising at least 31 exons, located on mouse chromosome 16. Sequence analysis, together with RNA and protein analysis, suggests that the gene encodes at least four protein products: two isoforms of the 220-kDa MLCK [also known as endothelial (22), long (36), or nonmuscle MLCK (70)], a 130-kDa MLCK [also known as short (36) or smooth muscle MLCK (19)], and telokin [also known as kinase-related protein (85)]. Transcripts encoding these products are derived from four independent promoters within the gene (Figs. 1 and 2). The published mouse 220-kDa MLCK cDNA begins in exon 1*; however, a number of mouse EST clones skip this exon and include a more 5' exon 1 instead, suggesting that there are two distinct isoforms of the 220-kDa MLCK. The genomic sequences immediately 5' of exon 1 and exon 1* both exhibit promoter activity, suggesting that the two 220-kDa MLCK isoforms likely arise from alternative promoter usage rather than alternative splicing (Fig. 2). Recently, work in our laboratory (90) showed that intron 14 of the mylk1 gene contains the proximal promoter that drives expression of the 130-kDa MLCK. It also has been shown that telokin mRNA is transcribed from a promoter, located in intron 28 of the mylk1 gene, that interrupts exons encoding the calmodulin-binding domain of the kinase (Fig. 1 and Refs. 12, 18, 31, 94). In addition to the mouse MLCK transcripts produced by the independent promoters, it is likely that additional transcripts are derived by alternative splicing within the mylk1 gene, as described for the human MYLK1 locus (41). Each of the promoters within the mylk1 gene exhibits cell-specific differences in their activity. For example, in 10T1/2 fibroblasts, the 220-kDa MLCK E1 promoter exhibits the highest level of activity, whereas in A10 smooth muscle cells, the telokin promoter has the highest levels of activity (Fig. 2). In the current review, we summarize results from studies aimed at unraveling the transcription regulatory network that controls the activity of the mylk1 gene, and we highlight how these studies have provided important paradigms central to our understanding of the general mechanisms that regulate gene expression in smooth muscle cells.
|
| AN AT-RICH ELEMENT AND CARG BOX ARE CRITICAL FOR TELOKIN PROMOTER ACTIVITY |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
| TELOKIN AT/CARG MOTIF ACTS AS A BLADDER SMOOTH MUSCLE CELL-RESTRICTED ENHANCER |
|---|
|
|
|---|
promoter (475 to +61 bp) increased the activity of the SM22
promoter in visceral smooth muscle cells (33). This fragment of the SM22
gene normally directs transgene expression exclusively to arterial smooth muscle (33, 39, 42). Of the 10 AT-CArG/SM22
promoter transgenic lines that transmitted and expressed
-galactosidase activity, all exhibited staining in bladder smooth muscle cells in addition to vascular smooth muscle cells (33). Interestingly, this chimeric promoter fragment did not increase transgene expression in intestinal or reproductive tract smooth muscle cells. These data suggest that other elements, outside the 49 to 94-bp region of the telokin promoter, are required for transcription in intestinal and reproductive tract smooth muscle cells (Fig. 4A). These findings also highlight an important paradigm in which a single promoter uses distinct cis-acting regulatory elements to drive expression in different smooth muscle tissues. This raises the exciting possibility that it may be possible to develop reagents that specifically alter expression of a protein, in a single smooth muscle cell type, through targeting the tissue-specific elements.
|
| SERUM RESPONSE FACTOR PLAYS A CENTRAL ROLE IN REGULATING EXPRESSION OF MYLK1 GENE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
- and
-actin, SM22
, and calponin, in addition to 130-kDa MLCK and telokin (53, 90). SRF is an evolutionarily conserved MADS (MDM1, agamous, deficiens, SRF) domain-containing protein that is required for specification of smooth, cardiac, and skeletal muscle lineages from early mesoderm (2). SRF is a multifunctional protein that binds a highly conserved cis-regulatory element, CC(A/T)6GG, termed a CArG box, found in the promoters of most cardiac and smooth muscle-specific genes. SRF also provides docking surface, within the conserved core MADS domain, for interaction with a wide variety of accessory cofactors. Although SRF expression is greatest in muscle tissues and plays an important role in the differentiation of smooth, cardiac, and skeletal muscle tissues, it is expressed in all tissues, where it is important for the growth factor-mediated induction of immediate-early genes (53). To perform this myriad of functions, SRF associates with various cell-restricted and/or signal-dependent accessory factors that confer coactivator or corepressor activity via ternary complex formation. A number of different SRF-complexes have been shown to regulate the activity of smooth muscle-specific genes. For example, Nkx3.1 and Nkx2.3 are tissue-restricted homeodomain-containing proteins that have been shown to interact with SRF and cooperatively activate the smooth muscle
-actin promoter (6, 64). Several other homeodomain transcription factors, including Barx1b, Barx2b, and Prx (MHox), have been shown to enhance the DNA binding activity of SRF (26, 28, 57, 91). An architectural transcription factor, HMGI(Y), also has been reported to interact with SRF and activate the SM22
promoter (9). In addition, a trimeric complex of SRF-GATA6-CRP2 has been reported to be required for the induction of smooth muscle differentiation in cells from the proepicardial organ, which give rise to coronary artery smooth muscle cells (7), and a complex of Nkx3.2/SRF/GATA-6 has been shown to cooperatively activate the SM22
promoter (58). However, none of these trimeric complexes has yet been shown to regulate either MLCK or telokin promoters. On the other hand, GATA-6 has been shown to repress the activity of the 130-kDa MLCK and telokin promoters, possibly through disruption of SRF-myocardin complexes (Figs. 4 and 5) (90). The myocardin family of SRF-associated proteins are very powerful activators of many smooth muscle-specific promoters, including both the 130-kDa MLCK and telokin promoters (Figs. 4A and 5A) (8, 14, 15, 43, 45, 84, 90, 92, 93, 96).
|
| MYOCARDIN, AN SRF-DEPENDENT COACTIVATOR, IS IMPORTANT FOR MLCK AND TELOKIN GENE EXPRESSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin promoter in transgenic mice demonstrated that a promoter fragment containing two CArG boxes was not sufficient to drive smooth muscle cell-specific transgene expression (49). Myocardin differentially affects the promoters within the mylk1 gene and is able to induce expression of the 130-kDa MLCK and telokin in many cell types without altering expression of the 220-kDa MLCK (90, 96). Although the telokin promoter, which contains only a single CArG box, is activated several hundredfold by myocardin (Fig. 3), the proximal 130-kDa MLCK promoter, which also contains a single CArG box, is only activated two- to threefold (90). In addition, depletion of myocardin in A10 smooth muscle cells by short hairpin RNA significantly decreased telokin expression but did not affect 130-kDa MLCK expression (96). These data could simply reflect a longer half-life of the 130-kDa MLCK protein compared with telokin. Alternatively, it is more likely that telokin is more dependent on myocardin for expression in A10 smooth muscle cells compared with 130-kDa MLCK. In fact, the broad tissue distribution of 130-kDa MLCK compared with telokin would suggest that myocardin-independent pathways must exist for activating this promoter in other cell types (Fig. 5A). Nevertheless, the ability of myocardin to induce 130-kDa MLCK expression in 10T1/2 fibroblasts without significantly activating the promoter in transient reporter assays suggests that the elements required for myocardin to activate this promoter may be located a large distance from the promoter (>6 kb). This arrangement would be unique among myocardin-stimulated genes. Alternatively, the 130-kDa MLCK promoter might be activated indirectly by another myocardin-stimulated transcription factor. Careful analysis of myocardin binding to the endogenous 130-kDa MLCK promoter is required to distinguish between these possibilities.
How myocardin distinguishes smooth muscle-restricted genes from growth factor-responsive SRF-dependent genes remains elusive. Data obtained from analysis of the telokin and c-fos promoters suggest that additional cis elements and trans factors contribute to myocardins promoter-specific effects (96). For example, binding of Elk-1 adjacent to the CArG box, within the c-fos serum response element, may in part prevent myocardin from activating this promoter (Fig. 4). Although Elk-1 and myocardin have been shown to compete for binding to SRF, the binding of Elk-1 to the c-fos promoter is not sufficient to explain why myocardin does not activate this promoter. In fact, Elk-1 also has been shown to bind to the telokin and SM22
promoters and to partially block myocardins interaction with SRF on these promoters, leading to downregulation of their activity (83, 98). In addition, a chimeric telokin promoter containing the Elk-1 binding site and CArG box from the c-fos promoter was still strongly activated by myocardin, suggesting that the presence of these elements alone is not sufficient to prevent myocardin from activating the promoter (96). Identification of additional factors that bind to the telokin promoter and cooperate with myocardin is required to help unravel the mechanisms of promoter selectivity by myocardin.
| ACTIVATION OF MYLK1 GENE BY THYROTROPH EMBRYONIC FACTOR |
|---|
|
|
|---|
upregulated endogenous telokin and 130-kDa MLCK expression in A10 smooth muscle cells without affecting expression of other smooth muscle-restricted proteins, such as smooth muscle
-actin or calponin (97). Although overexpression of a dominant negative TEF repressed telokin and 130-kDa MLCK expression, no studies have examined the expression of these proteins following knockdown or knockout of endogenous TEF. The physiological role of TEF in regulating expression of the mylk1 gene in different smooth muscle tissues thus remains to be determined. | REGULATION OF MYLK1 GENE BY HOMEOBOX PROTEINS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and smooth muscle
-actin (5). However, a comparison of the increased expression of HOXB7 RNA in human atherosclerotic plaques to normal adult smooth muscle tissue suggests that HOXB7 plays a role in either smooth muscle cell proliferation or dedifferentiation under pathological conditions. Within the mylk1 gene, Hoxa10 has been shown to bind directly to multiple sites in the telokin promoter and to specifically regulate telokin promoter activity (16) (Fig. 4A). Hoxa10 is expressed in adult uterine, colonic, and bladder smooth muscle tissues and cells. Several studies have indicated that Hoxa10-1 is important for the process of uterine epithelium cell differentiation and the development of subcellular structures required for implantation (73). In addition, the expression of Hoxa10-1 in the myometrium is regulated during the menstrual cycle, with high levels of estrogen increasing Hoxa10 expression (46). Previously we have shown that telokin expression is also regulated during the menstrual cycle, with high levels of expression being observed during the estrogen-dominant follicular phase and low levels of expression during the progesterone-dominant luteal phase. Telokin expression is also elevated in the uterus during pregnancy (71). A link between Hoxa10-1 and telokin expression in uterine smooth muscle was established by studies in which small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of Hoxa10-1, in uterine smooth muscle cells, resulted in decreased telokin expression (16). Previous studies also demonstrated that the telokin promoter is directly regulated by estrogen bound to the estrogen receptor (71). Together, these studies suggest that both Hoxa10 and estrogen receptor may synergize with each other to mediate hormone-dependent changes in telokin expression in the uterus (Fig. 4). Because telokin has been shown to play a role in decreasing the calcium sensitivity of contraction through its activation of myosin light chain phosphatase (10, 38), the elevated levels of telokin in the myometrium during pregnancy may contribute to the maintenance of uterine quiescence. In contrast to Hoxa10, Hoxb8 inhibits the activity of the telokin promoter as well as the promoters of a number of other smooth muscle-specific genes (16). The expression of both Hoxa10 and Hoxb8 mRNA in some of the same smooth muscle cells suggests that the regulation of telokin gene activity is determined by the relative ratio of Hoxa10 and Hoxb8 or that the activity of these proteins is modified posttranscriptionally. In support of this latter possibility, a microRNA has been identified that specifically represses Hoxb8 expression at the posttranscriptional level (88). The physiological significance of Hoxb8 in regulating the expression of smooth muscle-specific genes currently remains unclear. It will be interesting to determine whether increases in the level of Hoxb8 protein expression occur in pathological conditions associated with downregulation of smooth muscle-specific gene expression, as reported previously for HOXB7 (5). Finally, the restricted expression of Hox proteins along the AP axis suggests that other Hox proteins may be playing similar roles in regulating telokin expression in more anterior or posterior tissues. This spatial pattern of expression of the Hox proteins makes these proteins excellent candidates for helping to specify the unique identity of smooth muscle cells in different smooth muscle tissues.
| INHIBITORY FACTORS CONTRIBUTE TO CELL-SPECIFIC TRANSCRIPTION OF TELOKIN |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| REGULATION OF MLCK AND TELOKIN EXPRESSION BY GATA FAMILY MEMBERS IN SMOOTH MUSCLE CELLS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-actin, calponin, vinculin, and metavinculin expression that is normally associated with injury-induced vascular smooth muscle cell phenotypic modulation (50). In addition to the critical role of GATA-6 in the maintenance of the differentiated phenotype in vascular smooth muscle cells, a recent report has revealed that GATA-6 may act as the predominant GATA factor in the maintenance of endodermal gene expression by TGF-
signaling in gastrulating embryos (1).
Recent studies have shown that the transcripts of the mylk1 gene are differentially regulated by GATA-6 (89, 90). Overexpression of GATA-6, by adenoviral transduction, significantly decreased endogenous telokin and 130-kDa MLCK expression in A10 vascular smooth muscle cells. In contrast, expression of the 220-kDa MLCK, SM22
, and calponin were markedly increased (89, 90). GATA-6 has been shown to bind directly to the telokin and 130-kDa MLCK promoters at consensus binding sites that are closely opposed to the CArG boxes within these promoters (Figs. 4 and 5). In addition to being recruited to promoters through binding to consensus GATA sites, GATA-6 also can be recruited to promoters through its binding to the MADS domain of SRF (60). Because both GATA-6/4 and myocardin interact with same domain of SRF, it is likely that a single SRF molecule is able to interact with either GATA-6/4 or myocardin but not with both molecules at the same time (Fig. 4). Whether GATA-6/4 or myocardin are bound to SRF appears to depend on the specific promoter context. In the case of telokin and 130-kDa MLCK promoters, there is a consensus GATA binding site adjacent to a CArG box, which would greatly facilitate the ability of GATA factors to compete with myocardin for interacting with SRF by increasing the local effective concentration of GATA-6. In contrast, GATA-6 binding to a more distal site in the smMHC promoter can activate the promoter synergistically with myocardin (78). In support of this model, the activation of both the 130-kDa MLCK and telokin promoters by myocardin can be blocked by GATA-6, and overexpression of GATA-6 also attenuates the ability of myocardin to induce expression of the endogenous 130-kDa MLCK and telokin genes (89, 90). This mechanism to explain the GATA-6-mediated repression of the 130-kDa MLCK should be interpreted with caution, because myocardin has not yet been shown to directly activate this promoter or to bind to the promoter in vivo.
Through its interaction with SRF, GATA-6 also has been shown to form complexes with other proteins to regulate expression of a number of smooth muscle-specific genes. For example, an SRF-GATA-6-Nkx3.2 complex cooperatively transactivated
-integrin, SM22
, and caldesmon promoters. This activation also required direct binding of each of these factors to their respective consensus sequences within the promoters (58). It has been reported that cysteine-rich protein 1/2 (CRP1/2) may act as scaffold protein that can stabilize SRF and GATA-6 into a transcriptosome that confers strong activation of smooth muscle-specific promoters (7). However, there have been no reports demonstrating that any of these complexes regulate the activity of the mylk1 gene. Unpublished studies from our laboratory have failed to show any differences in the regulation of the telokin promoter by a GATA-6-SRF-CRP2 complex compared with GATA-6 alone. It should be noted, however, that in our hands, adenovirus-mediated overexpression of SRF, GATA-6, and CRP2 together in 10T1/2 cells was not sufficient to induce expression of any of the smooth muscle-specific genes tested.
A number of other transcription cofactors also have been reported to be involved in GATA-induced smooth muscle-specific gene expression. For instance, the transcriptional coactivator p300, together with GATA-6 and NFATc1, form a large complex during the transcription of the smMHC gene. This complex has been shown to play a role in the maintenance of the differentiated phenotype of vascular smooth muscle cells (77, 78). In contrast, the basic helix-loop-helix (bHLH) transcription factor CHF1/Hey2 can suppress the smMHC promoter activity by interacting with GATA-6 through its bHLH domain (69), and LMCD1/Dyxin has been identified to repress GATA-6 function by inhibiting its ability to bind to DNA (66). It will be important to determine whether these cofactors also are involved in GATA-6-mediated regulation of 130-kDa MLCK and telokin expression.
| SUMMARY OF MECHANISMS REGULATING TISSUE-SPECIFIC EXPRESSION OF MYLK GENE |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| SUMMARY AND PERSPECTIVES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| NOTE ADDED IN PROOF |
|---|
|
|
|---|
(Graham WV, Wang F, Clayburgh DR, Cheng JX, Yoon B, Wang Y, Lin A, and Turner JR. TNF induced long myosin light chain kinase transcription is regulated by differentiation-dependent signaling events: Characterization of the human long myosin light chain kinase promoter. J Biol Chem 2006). Han et al. demonstrated that the rat 130-kDa MLCK promoter is also SRF dependent (Han YJ, Hu WY, Chernaya O, Antic N, Gu L, Gupta M, Piano M, and de Lanerolle P. Increased Myosin Light Chain Kinase Expression in Hypertension: Regulation by SRF via an Insertion Mutation in the Promoter. Mol Biol Cell 17:40394050, 2006). | GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ACKNOWLEDGMENTS |
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The online version of this article contains supplemental data.
1 In this review we have used the 220-kDa MLCK and 130-kDa MLCK terminology to described the MLCK products of the mylk gene for simplicity. This terminology is derived from the apparent molecular masses of the mouse MLCK molecules determined by SDS-PAGE. The true molecular masses of these molecules predicted from their cDNA sequences are 213 and 214 kDa for the two forms of the 220-kDa MLCK and 114 kDa for the 130-kDa MLCK. ![]()
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
maintenance of endodermal gene expression in Xenopus embryos. Development 132: 763774, 2005.2. Arsenian S, Weinhold B, Oelgeschlager M, Ruther U, and Nordheim A. Serum response factor is essential for mesoderm formation during mouse embryogenesis. EMBO J 17: 62896299, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
3. Blair SA, Kane SV, Clayburgh DR, and Turner JR. Epithelial myosin light chain kinase expression and activity are upregulated in inflammatory bowel disease. Lab Invest 86: 191201, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
4. Blue EK, Goeckeler ZM, Jin Y, Hou L, Dixon SA, Herring BP, Wysolmerski RB, and Gallagher PJ. 220- and 130-kDa MLCKs have distinct tissue distributions and intracellular localization patterns. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 282: C451C460, 2002.
5. Bostrom K, Tintut Y, Kao SC, Stanford WP, and Demer LL. HOXB7 overexpression promotes differentiation of C3H10T1/2 cells to smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem 78: 210221, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
6. Carson JA, Fillmore RA, Schwartz RJ, and Zimmer WE. The smooth muscle
-actin gene promoter is a molecular target for the mouse bagpipe homologue, mNkx31, and serum response factor. J Biol Chem 275: 3906139072, 2000.
7. Chang DF, Belaguli NS, Iyer D, Roberts WB, Wu SP, Dong XR, Marx JG, Moore MS, Beckerle MC, Majesky MW, and Schwartz RJ. Cysteine-rich LIM-only proteins CRP1 and CRP2 are potent smooth muscle differentiation cofactors. Dev Cell 4: 107118, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
8. Chen J, Kitchen CM, Streb JW, and Miano JM. Myocardin: a component of a molecular switch for smooth muscle differentiation. J Mol Cell Cardiol 34: 13451356, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
9. Chin MT, Pellacani A, Wang H, Lin SS, Jain MK, Perrella MA, and Lee ME. Enhancement of serum-response factor-dependent transcription and DNA binding by the architectural transcription factor HMG-I(Y). J Biol Chem 273: 97559760, 1998.
10. Choudhury N, Khromov AS, Somlyo AP, and Somlyo AV. Telokin mediates Ca2+-desensitization through activation of myosin phosphatase in phasic and tonic smooth muscle. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 25: 657665, 2004.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
11. Clayburgh DR, Barrett TA, Tang Y, Meddings JB, Van Eldik LJ, Watterson DM, Clarke LL, Mrsny RJ, and Turner JR. Epithelial myosin light chain kinase-dependent barrier dysfunction mediates T cell activation-induced diarrhea in vivo. J Clin Invest 115: 27022715, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
12. Collinge M, Matrisian PE, Zimmer WE, Shattack RL, Lukas TJ, Van Eldik LJ, and Watterson DM. Structure and expression of a calcium-binding protein gene contained within a calmodulin-regulated protein kinase gene. Mol Cell Biol 12: 23592371, 1992.
13. Dalla Libera L, Podhorska-Okolow M, Martin B, Massimino ML, Brugnolo R, and Cantini M. Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is transiently expressed in skeletal muscle during embryogenesis and muscle regeneration both in vivo and in vitro. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 18: 295303, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
14. Du KL, Chen M, Li J, Lepore JJ, Mericko P, and Parmacek MS. Megakaryoblastic leukemia factor-1 transduces cytoskeletal signals and induces smooth muscle cell differentiation from undifferentiated embryonic stem cells. J Biol Chem 279: 1757817586, 2004.
15. Du KL, Ip HS, Li J, Chen M, Dandre F, Yu W, Lu MM, Owens GK, and Parmacek MS. Myocardin is a critical serum response factor cofactor in the transcriptional program regulating smooth muscle cell differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 23: 24252437, 2003.
16. El-Mounayri O, Triplett JW, Yates CW, and Herring BP. Regulation of smooth muscle-specific gene expression by homeodomain proteins, Hoxa10 and Hoxb8. J Biol Chem 280: 2585425863, 2005.
17. Fisher SA and Ikebe M. Developmental and tissue distribution of expression of nonmuscle and smooth muscle isoforms of myosin light chain kinase. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 217: 696703, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
18. Gallagher PJ and Herring BP. The carboxyl terminus of the smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is expressed as an independent protein, telokin. J Biol Chem 266: 2394523952, 1991.
19. Gallagher PJ, Herring BP, Griffin SA, and Stull JT. Molecular characterization of a mammalian smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase. J Biol Chem 266: 2393623944, 1991.
20. Gallagher PJ, Herring BP, and Stull JT. Myosin light chain kinases. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 18: 116, 1997.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
21. Gallagher PJ, Jin Y, Killough G, Blue EK, and Lindner V. Alterations in expression of myosin and myosin light chain kinases in response to vascular injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279: C1078C1087, 2000.
22. Garcia JG, Lazar V, Gilbert-McClain LI, Gallagher PJ, and Verin AD. Myosin light chain kinase in endothelium: molecular cloning and regulation. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 16: 489494, 1997.[Abstract]
23. Giorgi D, Ferraz C, Mattei MG, Demaille J, and Rouquier S. The myosin light chain kinase gene is not duplicated in mouse: partial structure and chromosomal localization of Mylk. Genomics 75: 4956, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
24. Gorski DH, LePage DF, and Walsh K. Cloning and sequence analysis of homeobox transcription factor cDNAs with an inosine-containing probe. Biotechniques 16: 856858, 860852, 865, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
25. Grueneberg DA, Simon KJ, Brennan K, and Gilman M. Sequence-specific targeting of nuclear signal transduction pathways by homeodomain proteins. Mol Cell Biol 15: 33183326, 1995.[Abstract]
26. Hautmann MB, Thompson MM, Swartz EA, Olson EN, and Owens GK. Angiotensin II-induced stimulation of smooth muscle
-actin expression by serum response factor and the homeodomain transcription factor MHox. Circ Res 81: 600610, 1997.
27. Herring BP, Dixon S, and Gallagher PJ. Smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase expression in cardiac and skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 279: C1656C1664, 2000.
28. Herring BP, Kriegel AM, and Hoggatt AM. Identification of Barx2b, a serum response factor-associated homeodomain protein. J Biol Chem 276: 1448214489, 2001.
29. Herring BP, Lyons GE, Hoggatt AM, and Gallagher PJ. Telokin expression is restricted to smooth muscle tissues during mouse development. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 280: C12C21, 2001.
30. Herring BP and Smith AF. Telokin expression in A10 smooth muscle cells requires serum response factor. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 272: C1394C1404, 1997.
31. Herring BP and Smith AF. Telokin expression is mediated by a smooth muscle cell-specific promoter. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 270: C1656C1665, 1996.
32. Hoggatt AM, Kriegel AM, Smith AF, and Herring BP. Hepatocyte nuclear factor-3 homologue 1 (HFH-1) represses transcription of smooth muscle-specific genes. J Biol Chem 275: 3116231170, 2000.
33. Hoggatt AM, Simon GM, and Herring BP. Cell-specific regulatory modules control expression of genes in vascular and visceral smooth muscle tissues. Circ Res 91: 11511159, 2002.
34. Ito M, Dabrowska R, Guerriero V Jr, and Hartshorne DJ. Identification in turkey gizzard of an acidic protein related to the C-terminal portion of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase. J Biol Chem 264: 1397113974, 1989.
35. Jiang H, Rao K, Liu X, Halayko AJ, Liu G, and Stephens NL. Early changes in airway smooth muscle hyperresponsiveness. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 72: 14401447, 1994.[Web of Science][Medline]
36. Kamm KE and Stull JT. Dedicated myosin light chain kinases with diverse cellular functions. J Biol Chem 276: 45274530, 2001.
37. Katayama E, Scott-Woo G, and MI. Effect of caldesmon on the assembly of smooth muscle myosin. J Biol Chem 270: 39193925, 1995.
38. Khromov AS, Wang H, Choudhury N, McDuffie M, Herring BP, Nakamoto R, Owens GK, Somlyo AP, and Somlyo AV. Smooth muscle of telokin-deficient mice exhibits increased sensitivity to Ca2+ and decreased cGMP-induced relaxation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 24402445, 2006.
39. Kim S, Ip HS, Lu MM, Clendenin C, and Parmacek MS. A serum response factor-dependent transcriptional regulatory program identifies distinct smooth muscle cell sublineages. Mol Cell Biol 17: 22662278, 1997.[Abstract]
40. Komatsu S, Miyazaki K, Tuft RA, and Ikebe M. Translocation of telokin by cGMP signaling in smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 283: C752C761, 2002.
41. Lazar V and Garcia JG. A single human myosin light chain kinase gene (MLCK; MYLK). Genomics 57: 256267, 1999.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
42. Li L, Miano JM, Mercer B, and Olson EN. Expression of the SM22
promoter in transgenic mice provides evidence for distinct transcriptional regulatory programs in vascular and visceral smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biol 132: 849859, 1996.
43. Li S, Wang DZ, Wang Z, Richardson JA, and Olson EN. The serum response factor coactivator myocardin is required for vascular smooth muscle development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 93669370, 2003.
44. Liu ZP, Wang Z, Yanagisawa H, and Olson EN. Phenotypic modulation of smooth muscle cells through interaction of Foxo4 and myocardin. Dev Cell 9: 261270, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
45. Lockman K, Hinson JS, Medlin MD, Morris D, Taylor JM, and Mack CP. Sphingosine 1-phosphate stimulates smooth muscle cell differentiation and proliferation by activating separate serum response factor co-factors. J Biol Chem 279: 4242242430, 2004.
46. Ma L, Benson GV, Lim H, Dey SK, and Maas RL. Abdominal B (AbdB) Hoxa genes: regulation in adult uterus by estrogen and progesterone and repression in mullerian duct by the synthetic estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES). Dev Biol 197: 141154, 1998.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
47. Ma TY, Boivin MA, Ye D, Pedram A, and Said HM. Mechanism of TNF-
modulation of Caco-2 intestinal epithelial tight junction barrier: role of myosin light-chain kinase protein expression. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 288: G422G430, 2005.
48. Ma X, Wang Y, and Stephens NL. Serum deprivation induces a unique hypercontractile phenotype of cultured smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C1206C1214, 1998.
49. Mack CP and Owens GK. Regulation of smooth muscle
-actin expression in vivo is dependent on CArG elements within the 5' and first intron promoter regions. Circ Res 84: 852861, 1999.
50. Mano T, Luo Z, Malendowicz SL, Evans T, and Walsh K. Reversal of GATA-6 downregulation promotes smooth muscle differentiation and inhibits intimal hyperplasia in balloon-injured rat carotid artery. Circ Res 84: 647654, 1999.
51. Mark M, Rijli FM, and Chambon P. Homeobox genes in embryogenesis and pathogenesis. Pediatr Res 42: 421429, 1997.[Web of Science][Medline]
52. McGinnis W and Krumlauf R. Homeobox genes and axial patterning. Cell 68: 283302, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
53. Miano JM. Serum response factor: toggling between disparate programs of gene expression. J Mol Cell Cardiol 35: 577593, 2003.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
54. Miano JM, Firulli AB, Olson EN, Hara P, Giachelli CM, and Schwartz SM. Restricted expression of homeobox genes distinguishes fetal from adult human smooth muscle cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 900905, 1996.
55. Molkentin JD. The zinc finger-containing transcription factors GATA-4, -5, and -6. Ubiquitously expressed regulators of tissue-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem 275: 3894938952, 2000.
56. Morrisey EE, Ip HS, Lu MM, and Parmacek MS. GATA-6: a zinc finger transcription factor that is expressed in multiple cell lineages derived from lateral mesoderm. Dev Biol 177: 309322, 1996.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
57. Nakamura M, Nishida W, Mori S, Hiwada K, Hayashi K, and Sobue K. Transcriptional activation of
-tropomyosin mediated by serum response factor and a novel Barx homologue, Barx1b, in smooth muscle cells. J Biol Chem 276: 1831318320, 2001.
58. Nishida W, Nakamura M, Mori S, Takahashi M, Ohkawa Y, Tadokoro S, Yoshida K, Hiwada K, Hayashi K, and Sobue K. A triad of serum response factor and the GATA and NK families governs the transcription of smooth and cardiac muscle genes. J Biol Chem 277: 73087317, 2002.
59. Numata T, Katoh T, and Yazawa M. Functional role of the C-terminal domain of smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase on the phosphorylation of smooth muscle myosin. J Biochem (Tokyo) 129: 437444, 2001.
60. Oh J, Wang Z, Wang DZ, Lien CL, Xing W, and Olson EN. Target gene-specific modulation of myocardin activity by GATA transcription factors. Mol Cell Biol 24: 85198528, 2004.
61. Ohlmann P, Tesse A, Loichot C, Ralay Ranaivo H, Roul G, Philippe C, Watterson DM, Haiech J, and Andriantsitohaina R. Deletion of MLCK 210 induces subtle changes in vascular reactivity but does not affect cardiac function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 289: H2342H2349, 2005.
62. Owens GK, Kumar MS, and Wamhoff BR. Molecular regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell differentiation in development and disease. Physiol Rev 84: 767801, 2004.
63. Patient RK and McGhee JD. The GATA family (vertebrates and invertebrates). Curr Opin Genet Dev 12: 416422, 2002.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
64. Phiel CJ, Gabbeta V, Parsons LM, Rothblat D, Harvey RP, and McHugh KM. Differential binding of an SRF/NK-2/MEF2 transcription factor complex in normal versus neoplastic smooth muscle tissues. J Biol Chem 276: 3463734650, 2001.
65. Pipes GC, Sinha S, Qi X, Zhu CH, Gallardo TD, Shelton J, Creemers EE, Sutherland L, Richardson JA, Garry DJ, Wright WE, Owens GK, and Olson EN. Stem cells and their derivatives can bypass the requirement of myocardin for smooth muscle gene expression. Dev Biol 288: 502513, 2005.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
66. Rath N, Wang Z, Lu MM, and Morrisey EE. LMCD1/Dyxin is a novel transcriptional cofactor that restricts GATA6 function by inhibiting DNA binding. Mol Cell Biol 25: 88648873, 2005.
67. Scott MP, Tamkun JW, and Hartzell GW III. The structure and function of the homeodomain. Biochim Biophys Acta 989: 2548, 1989.[Medline]
68. Shirinsky VP, Vorotnikov AV, Birukov KG, Nanaev AK, Collinge M, Lukas TJ, Sellers JR, and Watterson DM. A kinase-related protein stabilizes unphosphorylated smooth muscle myosin minifilaments in the presence of ATP. J Biol Chem 268: 1657816583, 1993.
69. Shirvani S, Xiang F, Koibuchi N, and Chin MT. CHF1/Hey2 suppresses SM-MHC promoter activity through an interaction with GATA-6. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 339: 151156, 2006.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
70. Shoemaker MO, Lau W, Shattuck RL, Kwiatkowski AP, Matrisian PE, Guerra-Santos L, Wilson E, Lukas TJ, Van Eldik LJ, and Watterson DM. Use of DNA sequence and mutant analyses and antisense oligodeoxynucleotides to examine the molecular basis of nonmuscle myosin light chain kinase autoinhibition, calmodulin recognition, and activity. J Cell Biol 111: 11071125, 1990.
71. Smith AF, Bigsby RM, Word RA, and Herring BP. A 310-bp minimal promoter mediates smooth muscle cell-specific expression of telokin. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 274: C1188C1195, 1998.
72. Stephens NL and Halayko AJ. Airway smooth muscle contractile, regulatory and cytoskeletal protein expression in health and disease. Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol 119: 415424, 1998.[CrossRef][Medline]
73. Taylor HS. The role of HOX genes in the development and function of the female reproductive tract. Semin Reprod Med 18: 8189, 2000.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
74. Taylor HS, Vanden Heuvel GB, and Igarashi P. A conserved Hox axis in the mouse and human female reproductive system: late establishment and persistent adult expression of the Hoxa cluster genes. Biol Reprod 57: 13381345, 1997.[Abstract]
75. Van Tuyn J, Knaan-Shanzer S, van de Watering MJ, de Graaf M, van der Laarse A, Schalij MJ, van der Wall EE, de Vries AA, and Atsma DE. Activation of cardiac and smooth muscle-specific genes in primary human cells after forced expression of human myocardin. Cardiovasc Res 67: 245255, 2005.
76. Ventura C. Forced myocardin expression primes cardiac and smooth muscle transcription patterning in human mesenchymal stem cells. Cardiovasc Res 67: 182183, 2005.
77. Wada H, Hasegawa K, Morimoto T, Kakita T, Yanazume T, Abe M, and Sasayama S. Calcineurin-GATA-6 pathway is involved in smooth muscle-specific transcription. J Cell Biol 156: 983991, 2002.
78. Wada H, Hasegawa K, Morimoto T, Kakita T, Yanazume T, and Sasayama S. A p300 protein as a coactivator of GATA-6 in the transcription of the smooth muscle-myosin heavy chain gene. J Biol Chem 275: 2533025335, 2000.
79. Wainwright MS, Rossi J, Schavocky J, Crawford S, Steinhorn D, Velentza AV, Zasadzki M, Shirinsky V, Jia Y, Haiech J, Van Eldik LJ, and Watterson DM. Protein kinase involved in lung injury susceptibility: evidence from enzyme isoform genetic knockout and in vivo inhibitor treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 62336238, 2003.
80. Walker LA, MacDonald JA, Liu X, Nakamoto RK, Haystead TA, Somlyo AV, and Somlyo AP. Site-specific phosphorylation and point mutations of telokin modulate its Ca2+-desensitizing effect in smooth muscle. J Biol Chem 276: 2451924524, 2001.
81. Wang D, Chang PS, Wang Z, Sutherland L, Richardson JA, Small E, Krieg PA, and Olson EN. Activation of cardiac gene expression by myocardin, a transcriptional cofactor for serum response factor. Cell 105: 851862, 2001.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
82. Wang F, Graham WV, Wang Y, Witkowski ED, Schwarz BT, and Turner JR. Interferon-gamma and tumor necrosis factor-
synergize to induce intestinal epithelial barrier dysfunction by up-regulating myosin light chain kinase expression. Am J Pathol 166: 409419, 2005.
83. Wang Z, Wang DZ, Hockemeyer D, McAnally J, Nordheim A, and Olson EN. Myocardin and ternary complex factors compete for SRF to control smooth muscle gene expression. Nature 428: 185189, 2004.[CrossRef][Medline]
84. Wang Z, Wang DZ, Pipes GC, and Olson EN. Myocardin is a master regulator of smooth muscle gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 71297134, 2003.
85. Watterson DM, Collinge M, Lukas TJ, Van Eldik LJ, Birukov KG, Stepanova OV, and Shirinsky VP. Multiple gene products are produced from a novel protein kinase transcription region. FEBS Lett 373: 217220, 1995.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
86. Weiss MJ and Orkin SH. GATA transcription factors: key regulators of hematopoiesis. Exp Hematol 23: 99107, 1995.[Web of Science][Medline]
87. Wu X, Haystead TA, Nakamoto RK, Somlyo AV, and Somlyo AP. Acceleration of myosin light chain dephosphorylation and relaxation of smooth muscle by telokin. Synergism with cyclic nucleotide-activated kinase. J Biol Chem 273: 1136211369, 1998.
88. Yekta S, Shih IH, and Bartel DP. MicroRNA-directed cleavage of HOXB8 mRNA. Science 304: 594596, 2004.
89. Yin F and Herring BP. GATA-6 can act as a positive or negative regulator of smooth muscle-specific gene expression. J Biol Chem 280: 47454752, 2005.
90. Yin F, Hoggatt AM, Zhou J, and Herring BP. 130-kDa smooth muscle myosin light chain kinase is transcribed from a CArG-dependent, internal promoter within the mouse mylk gene. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 290: C1599C1609, 2006.
91. Yoshida T, Hoofnagle MH, and Owens GK. Myocardin and Prx1 contribute to angiotensin II-induced expression of smooth muscle alpha-actin. Circ Res 94: 10751082, 2004.
92. Yoshida T, Kawai-Kowase K, and Owens GK. Forced expression of myocardin is not sufficient for induction of smooth muscle differentiation in multipotential embryonic cells. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 24: 15961601, 2004.
93. Yoshida T, Sinha S, Dandre F, Wamhoff BR, Hoofnagle MH, Kremer BE, Wang DZ, Olson EN, and Owens GK. Myocardin is a key regulator of CArG-dependent transcription of multiple smooth muscle marker genes. Circ Res 92: 856864, 2003.
94. Yoshikai S and Ikebe M. Molecular cloning of the chicken gizzard telokin gene and cDNA. Arch Biochem Biophys 299: 242247, 1992.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
95. Zhi G, Ryder JW, Huang J, Ding P, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Kamm KE, and Stull JT. Myosin light chain kinase and myosin phosphorylation effect frequency-dependent potentiation of skeletal muscle contraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 1751917524, 2005.
96. Zhou J and Herring BP. Mechanisms responsible for the promoter-specific effects of myocardin. J Biol Chem 280: 1086110869, 2005.
97. Zhou J, Hoggatt AM, and Herring BP. Activation of the smooth muscle-specific telokin gene by thyrotroph embryonic factor (TEF). J Biol Chem 279: 1592915937, 2004.
98. Zhou J, Hu G, and Herring BP. Smooth muscle-specific genes are differentially sensitive to inhibition by Elk-1. Mol Cell Biol 25: 98749885, 2005.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. P. Gayer, L. S. Chaturvedi, S. Wang, B. Alston, T. L. Flanigan, and M. D. Basson Delineating the signals by which repetitive deformation stimulates intestinal epithelial migration across fibronectin Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, April 1, 2009; 296(4): G876 - G885. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Madden, M. W. Dantuma, E. A. Sorokina, D. Weihrauch, and J. G. Kleinman Telokin expression and the effect of hypoxia on its phosphorylation status in smooth muscle cells from small and large pulmonary arteries Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol, June 1, 2008; 294(6): L1166 - L1173. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Touw, A. M. Hoggatt, G. Simon, and B. P. Herring Hprt-targeted transgenes provide new insights into smooth muscle-restricted promoter activity Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, March 1, 2007; 292(3): C1024 - C1032. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |