|
|
||||||||
RECEPTORS AND SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION
Departments of 1Physiology and 2Surgery, The Burn and Shock Trauma Institute, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, Illinois 60153
Submitted 10 December 2003 ; accepted in final form 4 May 2004
| ABSTRACT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6 production by splenic macrophages isolated from a polymicrobial sepsis model. Male B6D2F1 mice were subjected to sham (S), laparotomy (Lap), and cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) under anesthesia. Splenic macrophages were isolated 72 h after the initial injury and were stimulated with endotoxin (LPS) in the presence and absence of epinephrine. Compared with S and Lap, splenic macrophages from the CLP group produced significantly less TNF-
and IL-6 and more IL-10 when stimulated with LPS. Macrophage cultures from CLP animals incubated with either epinephrine or IL-10 for 2 h had significantly reduced TNF-
and IL-6 release in response to LPS. However, similar cultures pretreated with IL-10 antibody before the addition of exogenous epinephrine failed to reverse the attenuation of LPS-stimulated cytokines. Pretreatment of macrophage cultures with
2- (ICI-118551) but not
1-adrenergic (atenolol) receptor antagonists reversed the epinephrine-mediated cytokine attenuation following LPS treatment. Data are also presented that demonstrate the involvement of protein kinase A activation with adrenergic agonist but not with IL-10 stimulation. Taken together, these findings suggest that adrenergic mechanisms may influence peripheral tissue macrophage inflammatory cytokine response following trauma and sepsis, independent of the effects of IL-10.
catecholamines; sympathetic; cecal ligation and puncture; bacterial endotoxin;
-antagonist
Sympathetic activation resulting in the release of catecholamines has been documented in both experimental (13, 14, 39, 40) and clinical (3) studies involving sepsis. However, much of the direct evidence for increased neurotransmitter and hormone release in sepsis has come from experimental paradigms involving spleen, heart, bone marrow, and plasma (13, 14, 39, 40). Our laboratory has previously correlated increased catecholamine release in the bone marrow and enhanced myelopoiesis during sepsis (39). More recently, our laboratory has also demonstrated that bone marrow monocytes developing under the influence of increased sympathetic activation resulting from sepsis are functionally different in terms of their cytokine responses (8). Although sympathetic activation is known to occur in sepsis and may be important for cardiovascular and metabolic compensation, several lines of investigation also suggest that sympathetic activation may mediate immune modulation in sepsis. Maestroni (22, 23) has recently demonstrated that catecholamines modulate the migration and maturation of dendritic cells, which are an important component of both innate and adaptive immune responses and very likely have an important role in the development of sepsis. Equally important is the work of Sanders and coworkers (16, 30, 32) who have presented evidence suggesting that catecholamines may be pivotal in the modulation of Th1 and Th2 cell interactions.
The spleen is one of the lymphoid organs that not only plays an important role in immune regulation following infection but also is highly innervated with sympathetic nerve terminals and, therefore, is an essential target organ for studies involving interactions between the neural and immune systems. Although stimulation of sympathetic nerves to the spleen can mediate the rapid movement of stored red blood cells and leukocytes into the circulation (24, 43), the effect of intense stimulation on innervated immune cells (10) during conditions of sepsis has not yet been elucidated. The potential influence of sympathetic stimulation on immune cell function should be considered in light of the importance of the spleen as an immune organ and its fundamental role in bacterial clearance through antibodies and macrophages, as well as by bacterial endotoxin detoxification (21). Indeed, the significance of the spleen in immune function is highlighted by the incidence of overwhelming postsplenectomy infection, and such occurrences have raised important questions regarding the conditions that warrant splenectomy (12).
In the present study, we have used a murine animal model of surgical trauma and sepsis to assess cytokine-sympathetic neural interactions in splenocyte macrophage cells under closely controlled in vitro conditions. Our goal was to explore macrophage cytokine release by using endotoxin provocation and to define how adrenergic stimulation could modify pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokine interactions, both before and after conditions of injury-induced sepsis. We tested the premise that adrenergic stimulation would enhance anti-inflammatory cytokine release that, in turn, would lead to attenuation of proinflammatory cytokine production. We report that adrenergic stimulation can induce anti-inflammatory cytokine release such as IL-10; however, adrenergic agonist-mediated attenuation of proinflammatory cytokine release may be independent of IL-10.
| MATERIALS AND METHODS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Experimental septic peritonitis.
The procedure of cecal ligation and puncture (CLP) with entry of intestinal flora into the peritoneum was used as a model of "polymicrobial sepsis," as originally described by Wichtermann et al. (44). In brief, mice were randomly divided into sham (S), laparotomy (Lap), and CLP groups. All of the animals were anesthetized with an intraperitoneal injection of ketamine (100 mg/kg) and xylazine (2.5 mg/kg). Whereas the S group was not surgically manipulated, the Lap and the CLP groups were subjected to a midline ventral laparotomy with exposure and isolation of the cecum. The Lap group was not subjected to any further surgical intervention. In the CLP group, the cecum was tied off
1 cm from the end and punctured with a single hole by using a 21-gauge needle. All animals were resuscitated with 2 ml of sterile saline administered subcutaneously. Surviving animals were euthanized 72 h postinjury, and splenic macrophages were isolated for further studies.
Preparation of splenic macrophage cultures. Splenic macrophages were prepared from each of the three treatment groups 72 h after surgical procedures by placing excised spleens in a plastic culture dish containing HBSS and extracting cells with the use of a rubber-tipped plastic 20-ml syringe plunger. Splenocytes were treated with ACK lysing buffer to remove red cells, washed with additional HBSS, counted, and suspended in RPMI-1640 medium with 10% heat-inactivated FBS at 3 x 106 cells/ml in six-well plates (Costar, Cambridge, MA). After 2-h incubation at 37°C with 5% CO2, nonadherent cells were removed from the culture plate by gentle washing with warm HBSS. Fresh RPMI-1640 with 10% FBS covered the adherent spleen cells, which were then used in cell treatment protocols, as described below.
Cell treatment protocols.
1) To determine the cytokine responses, freshly prepared splenic macrophages were treated with bacterial endotoxin (LPS) from E. coli (Difco, Detroit, MI) at 200 ng/ml for 18 h, and conditioned media were collected and stored at 80°C until analysis. 2) The influence of IL-10 on LPS-mediated cytokine response was determined by 2-h incubation with IL-10 (10 ng/ml), with or without IL-10 antibody (PharMingen, San Diego, CA), followed by LPS for 18 h. 3) The influence of epinephrine on LPS-mediated cytokine response was determined by 2-h incubation with variable concentrations of epinephrine (106 to 1012 M; Sigma Chemical, St. Louis, MO), with or without adrenergic antagonists (Atenolol, selective
1, or ICI 118,551, selective
2 antagonist; Sigma Chemical) followed by LPS for 18 h. 4) To determine the ability of epinephrine to stimulate the release of IL-10 in the absence of endotoxin, macrophages from different treatment groups were incubated with epinephrine (106 M) for 2, 4, 8, 24, or 48 h. 5) The influence of epinephrine to indirectly influence LPS-mediated cytokine response by stimulating IL-10 release was determined by 2-h incubation with epinephrine (106 M; Sigma Chemical), with or without IL-10 antibody (PharMingen), followed by LPS for 18 h. 6) To test whether epinephrine or IL-10 inhibits TNF-
production through cAMP-stimulated protein kinase A activation, splenic macrophages were treated with or without the protein kinase A inhibitor H-89 (106 M; Sigma Chemical) for 1 h, followed by either epinephrine or IL-10 for 2 h, after which LPS was added and maintained for 18 h.
Total cellular protein was assayed by bicinchoninic acid protein assay reagent kit (Pierce, Rockford, IL), and the cytokine levels were standardized to the cellular protein concentration.
Cytokine determination.
IL-6, IL-10, and TNF-
levels in conditioned media were determined by standard ELISA techniques (BioSource, Camarillo, CA). All cytokine concentrations are reported as picograms per milligram of protein.
| RESULTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Endotoxin-evoked cytokine responses of splenocyte-derived macrophage cells: modulation by epinephrine and IL-10.
The effect of polymicrobial sepsis on splenic macrophage cytokine production and its modulation by epinephrine was investigated in mice 72 h following CLP. Figure 1 describes the influence of S, Lap, and CLP treatments on LPS-stimulated TNF-
production. TNF-
responses in cells taken from CLP-treated mice were reduced to 70% of that observed in S and Lap-treated animals (P < 0.05). To determine whether adrenergic agonists or IL-10 modulated TNF-
production, splenic macrophages were pretreated with either epinephrine or IL-10 for 2 h before stimulation with LPS. Exogenous addition of both epinephrine and IL-10 resulted in a significant reduction in TNF-
release (P < 0.05), but, at this single concentration, IL-10 treatment resulted in greater reduction than epinephrine. The reduction of TNF-
release with epinephrine appeared to be greater in the CLP group (23% of that with LPS alone) than that in S (34%) and Lap (35%).
|
60% of those from S- and Lap-treated animals (P < 0.05). To determine whether adrenergic agonists or IL-10 modulated IL-6 production, splenic macrophages were pretreated with either epinephrine or IL-10 2 h before stimulation with LPS. Exogenous addition of both epinephrine and IL-10 resulted in a significant reduction in IL-6 release (P < 0.05), but epinephrine and IL-10 treatment reduced IL-6 production by the same percentage in all three groups (see percentage values in Fig. 2).
|
release by conducting dose-response experiments. These results are presented in Fig. 3 and confirm that CLP treatment resulted in decreased TNF-
release in response to endotoxin. These results also demonstrate that endotoxin-stimulated TNF-
release was inhibited in all groups to the same extent (4045%) by 106 M epinephrine, but all groups were insensitive to 109 M epinephrine. Thus polymicrobial sepsis (CLP) reduced the maximal TNF-
response to endotoxin stimulation but did not alter the sensitivity of epinephrine-mediated inhibition of endotoxin stimulation.
|
|
|
and IL-6 production through the release of IL-10 in splenic macrophages. Because there was maximal release of IL-10 as well as maximal epinephrine-mediated inhibition of proinflammatory cytokine release in splenic macrophages following CLP treatment, the results presented in these figures involve macrophages taken exclusively from CLP-treated animals. In both Figs. 6 and 7, four different experimental conditions are contrasted, and each set of experiments was conducted with or without the presence of IL-10 antibody. Comparisons labeled "Endotoxin" indicate that the presence of the IL-10 antibody did not influence either the TNF-
or IL-6 response to 18 h of LPS exposure. Comparisons labeled "Epinephrine + Endotoxin" suggest that epinephrine-induced inhibition of LPS-stimulated TNF-
and IL-6 is not altered by the presence of the IL-10 antibody, and the comparisons labeled "IL-10 + Endotoxin" serve as a positive control (P < 0.05), demonstrating that inhibition of TNF-
and IL-6 release with LPS by IL-10 can be relieved with IL-10 antibody. These results suggest that epinephrine inhibition of LPS-stimulated TNF-
and IL-6 release may involve direct inhibition via adrenergic mechanisms.
|
|
in cells taken from CLP-treated animals in the presence of
-adrenergic agonists and antagonists. Epinephrine inhibition of this response (TNF-
with and without epinephrine pretreatment) was abolished in a dose-response manner by pretreatment with a
2-adrenergic antagonist but was not altered by
1-adrenergic antagonists (note comparisons with P < 0.05).
|
release.
Figure 9 presents results of LPS-stimulated TNF-
release in cells from CLP-treated animals in the presence of protein kinase A inhibitors before stimulation with either epinephrine or IL-10. Epinephrine inhibition of the endotoxin-mediated TNF-
release was abolished by pretreatment with PKA inhibitor H-89. In contrast, IL-10 inhibition was not altered by the PKA inhibitor, suggesting that the epinephrine- but not the IL-10-induced response is mediated by the action of cAMP.
|
| DISCUSSION |
|---|
|
|
|---|
and IL-6 production by ex vivo cultures of splenic macrophages. Because epinephrine treatment induces significant amounts of IL-10 production, independent of LPS, it is possible that epinephrine could mediate its inhibitory effect of proinflammatory cytokine production through IL-10. IL-10 has been previously shown to significantly negate the production of TNF-
and IL-6 in macrophages (9, 11), and our results confirm these findings in using exogenous IL-10. However, our studies with anti-IL-10 antibodies suggest that stimulation of endogenous IL-10 production by epinephrine alone was insufficient to account for the inhibitory effect of epinephrine on LPS-stimulated proinflammatory cytokine production by splenic macrophages.
Although our observed lack of effect of IL-10 to attenuate proinflammatory cytokine release is in contrast to previous works, suggesting their physiological actions (37, 38), the critical in vivo concentration determining this effect is not known. It can be argued that our ex vivo culture conditions may not accurately represent the in vivo milieu. A much higher concentration of IL-10 could be potentially achieved in the microenvironment that includes both release and site of action. Therefore, the physiological action of IL-10 within the spleen during sepsis remains a possibility. Interestingly, both IL-6 and TNF-
production in response to LPS were significantly attenuated in CLP, whereas IL-10 levels were augmented. These findings are consistent with the concept of a progression from proinflammatory to antiinflammatory cytokine responses in developing sepsis (19, 28).
In contrast to our findings, Schwacha et al. (34) have reported ex vivo LPS-stimulated proinflammatroy cytokine responses by splenic macrophages to be exaggerated 7 days after burn injury. These responses, however, involve conditions of thermal injury without infection and may represent a different sequela of responses (34). These authors have attributed the heightened proinflammatory cytokine responses to decreased IL-10 receptor expression, and, therefore, it is important to relate these findings to our data. Although we did not measure them in the present study, a decrease in functional macrophage IL-10 receptors following CLP might explain the lack of IL-10 influence on LPS-stimulated proinflammatory cytokine response. However, similar findings of the lack of IL-10 influence in the uninjured control group (S) seem to make this possibility less likely.
Our pharmacological findings demonstrate that adrenergic inhibition of LPS-mediated cytokine release could be reversed in a dose-dependent manner with selective
2-adrenergic blockade, thus suggesting a clear mechanism for the observed action of epinephrine. Furthermore, our epinephrine dose-response data suggest that inhibition of LPS-stimulated cytokine release occurs at plasma concentrations approximating those reported for mice and at much lower concentrations than would be expected to occur in polymicrobial sepsis based on previous studies in conscious rats (5, 18).
To appreciate the significance of our results, we must view our findings within the framework of other studies involving adrenergic modulation of endotoxin-stimulated TNF-
, IL-6, and IL-10 release in both human and animal tissues. Monocytes have been demonstrated to release IL-10 in response to adrenergic stimulation (45), and this response is greatly augmented in the presence of bacterial endotoxin (37, 38). TNF-
and IL-6 release in whole blood, presumably by monocytic cells, has been shown to be inhibited by catecholamines (4, 41, 42), and similar results were found with the use of a monocytic cell line (35). Although catecholamines have been reported to suppress endotoxin-mediated TNF-
release in liver tissue and Kupfer cells,
-adrenergic stimulation in these preparations has been reported to increase IL-6 release (20). Similar to our present findings,
-adrenergic inhibition of IL-6 has also been reported in spleen tissue (36); however, in the kidney and the skin,
-adrenergic stimulation has been reported to increase IL-6 (15, 25, 26). Collectively, these findings suggest that adrenergic modulation of cytokine release appears to be tissue specific, but how such regulation may be altered during conditions of sepsis is largely unexplored.
Bergmann et al. (4) have examined the adrenergic modulation of endotoxin-induced cytokine release in human whole blood taken from septic patients. Like our findings, they report attenuation of TNF-
and IL-6 production in sepsis; however, the adrenergic suppression of this release is maintained. They also demonstrate increased IL-10 release under conditions of severe sepsis, but, in contrast to our findings, IL-10 release was not increased by epinephrine. Furthermore, prolonged septic shock ablated the ability of epinephrine to inhibit IL-6 release and markedly reduced the epinephrine attenuation of TNF-
. Direct comparisons between these clinically based findings and our results using experimental sepsis, although important, are complicated by differences in the cell source of cytokines, the severity of sepsis, and the possible effect of therapeutically administered catecholamines in the clinical group. However, these findings do suggest the potential importance of catecholamines to modulate cytokine release in the development of sepsis and septic shock, and additional experimental paradigms would seem well suited to extend the clinical observations under controlled conditions.
Although our data demonstrate that epinephrine and IL-10 have a common result, the suppression of TNF-
and IL-6 release, the cell signaling mechanisms involved appear to be quite contrasting. Our results clearly show that, whereas adrenergic stimulation-mediated suppression involves protein kinase A and thus cAMP production, IL-10 suppression of TNF-
does not. Furthermore, previous studies have demonstrated that dibutyryl cAMP inhibits TNF-
synthesis and that this involves the cAMP response element binding protein and interference of the NF-
B nuclear signaling pathway (7, 27, 29). In contrast, cellular mechanisms by which IL-10 has been shown to inhibit TNF-
production are more diverse. These include the absolute requirement for STAT-3 transcription factor (31), inhibition of gene translation through blockade of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase activation (17), as well as posttranslational mechanisms involving the destabilization of TNF-
mRNA (6).
In summary, our work suggests that increased adrenergic activation could play a dual role in sepsis. While on the one hand it may meet the well-recognized rheological and metabolic needs in sepsis, on the other it may signal an anti-inflammatory phase by ameliorating proinflammatory cytokine production and stimulate anti-inflammatory cytokine production. How catecholamines in sepsis among other biological parameters may alter the balance between pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines may hold the key to patient outcome.
| GRANTS |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| FOOTNOTES |
|---|
The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked "advertisement" in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.
| REFERENCES |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2. Angus DC and Wax RS. Epidemiology of sepsis: an update. Crit Care Med 29: S109S116, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
3. Benedict CR and Grahame-Smith DG. Plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline concentrations and dopamine-beta-hydroxylase activity in patients with shock due to septicaemia, trauma and haemorrhage. QJM 47: 120, 1978.
4. Bergmann M, Gornikiewicz A, Sautner T, Waldmann E, Weber T, Mittlbock M, Roth E, and Fugger R. Attenuation of catecholamine-induced immunosuppression in whole blood from patients with sepsis. Shock 12: 421427, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
5. Bottner A, Haidan A, Eisenhofer G, Kristensen K, Castle AL, Scherbaum WA, Schneider H, Chrousos GP, and Bornstein SR. Increased body fat mass and suppression of circulating leptin levels in response to hypersecretion of epinephrine in phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase (PNMT)-overexpressing mice. Endocrinology 141: 42394246, 2000.
6. Brown CY, Lagnado CA, Vadas MA, and Goodall GJ. Differential regulation of the stability of cytokine mRNAs in lipopolysaccharide-activated blood monocytes in response to interleukin-10. J Biol Chem 271: 2010820112, 1996.
7. Chong YH, Shin YJ, and Suh YH. Cyclic AMP inhibition of tumor necrosis factor alpha production induced by amyloidogenic C-terminal peptide of Alzheimer's amyloid precursor protein in macrophages: involvement of multiple intracellular pathways and cyclic AMP response element binding protein. Mol Pharmacol 63: 690698, 2003.
8. Cohen MJ, Shankar R, Stevenson J, Fernandez R, Gamelli RL, and Jones SB. Bone marrow norepinephrine mediates development of functionally different macrophages after thermal injury and sepsis. Ann Surg 240: 132141, 2004.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
9. de Waal Malefyt R, Abrams J, Bennett B, Figdor CG, and de Vries JE. Interleukin 10 (IL-10) inhibits cytokine synthesis by human monocytes: an autoregulatory role of IL-10 produced by monocytes. J Exp Med 174: 12091220, 1991.
10. Felten DL, Ackerman KD, Wiegand SJ, and Felten SY. Noradrenergic sympathetic innervation of the spleen. I. Nerve fibers associate with lymphocytes and macrophages in specific compartments of the splenic white pulp. J Neurosci Res 18: 2836, 118121, 1987.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
11. Fiorentino DF, Zlotnik A, Mosmann TR, Howard M, and O'Garra A. IL-10 inhibits cytokine production by activated macrophages. J Immunol 147: 38153822, 1991.[Abstract]
12. Hansen K and Singer DB. Asplenic-hyposplenic overwhelming sepsis: postsplenectomy sepsis revisited. Pediatr Dev Pathol 4: 105121, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
13. Jones SB, Kovarik MF, and Romano FD. Cardiac and splenic norepinephrine turnover during septic peritonitis. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 250: R892R897, 1986.
14. Jones SB, Westfall MV, and Sayeed MM. Plasma catecholamines during E. coli bacteremia in conscious rats. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 254: R470R477, 1988.
15. Kawakami M, He J, Sakamoto T, and Okada Y. Catecholamines play a role in the production of interleukin-6 and interleukin-1 alpha in unburned skin after burn injury in mice. Crit Care Med 29: 796801, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
16. Kohm AP and Sanders VM. Suppression of antigen-specific Th2 cell-dependent IgM and IgG1 production following norepinephrine depletion in vivo. J Immunol 162: 52995308, 1999.
17. Kontoyiannis D, Kotlyarov A, Carballo E, Alexopoulou L, Blackshear PJ, Gaestel M, Davis R, Flavell R, and Kollias G. Interleukin-10 targets p38 MAPK to modulate ARE-dependent TNF mRNA translation and limit intestinal pathology. EMBO J 20: 37603770, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
18. Kovarik MF, Jones SB, and Romano FD. Plasma catecholamines following cecal ligation and puncture in the rat. Circ Shock 22: 281290, 1987.[ISI][Medline]
19. Lederer JA, Rodrick ML, and Mannick JA. The effects of injury on the adaptive immune response. Shock 11: 153159, 1999.[ISI][Medline]
20. Liao J, Keiser JA, Scales WE, Kunkel SL, and Kluger MJ. Role of epinephrine in TNF and IL-6 production from isolated perfused rat liver. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 268: R896R901, 1995.
21. Lutwick LI. Life threatening infections in the asplenic or hyposplenic individual. Curr Clin Top Infect Dis 22: 7896, 2002.[Medline]
22. Maestroni GJ. Dendritic cell migration controlled by alpha 1b-adrenergic receptors. J Immunol 165: 67436747, 2000.
23. Maestroni GJ. Short exposure of maturing, bone marrow-derived dendritic cells to norepinephrine: impact on kinetics of cytokine production and Th development. J Neuroimmunol 129: 106114, 2002.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
24. Malik KU. Prostaglandin-mediated inhibition of the vasoconstrictor responses of the isolated perfused rat splenic vasculature to adrenergic stimuli. Circ Res 43: 225233, 1978.
25. Murray DR, Prabhu SD, and Chandrasekar B. Chronic beta-adrenergic stimulation induces myocardial proinflammatory cytokine expression. Circulation 101: 23382341, 2000.
26. Nakamura A, Johns EJ, Imaizumi A, Yanagawa Y, and Kohsaka T. Beta(2)-adrenoceptor agonist suppresses renal tumour necrosis factor and enhances interleukin-6 gene expression induced by endotoxin. Nephrol Dial Transplant 15: 19281934, 2000.
27. Newman WH, Zhang LM, Lee DH, Dalton ML, Warejcka DJ, Castresana MR, and Leeper-Woodford SK. Release of tumor necrosis factor-alpha from coronary smooth muscle: activation of NF-kappa B and inhibition by elevated cyclic AMP. J Surg Res 80: 129135, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
28. Oberholzer A, Oberholzer C, and Moldawer LL. Sepsis syndromes: understanding the role of innate and acquired immunity. Shock 16: 8396, 2001.[ISI][Medline]
29. Procopio DO, Teixeira MM, Camargo MM, Travassos LR, Ferguson MA, Almeida IC, and Gazzinelli RT. Differential inhibitory mechanism of cyclic AMP on TNF-alpha and IL-12 synthesis by macrophages exposed to microbial stimuli. Br J Pharmacol 127: 11951205, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
30. Ramer-Quinn DS, Baker RA, and Sanders VM. Activated T helper 1 and T helper 2 cells differentially express the beta-2-adrenergic receptor: a mechanism for selective modulation of T helper 1 cell cytokine production. J Immunol 159: 48574867, 1997.[Abstract]
31. Riley JK, Takeda K, Akira S, and Schreiber RD. Interleukin-10 receptor signaling through the JAK-STAT pathway. Requirement for two distinct receptor-derived signals for anti-inflammatory action. J Biol Chem 274: 1651316521, 1999.
32. Sanders VM, Baker RA, Ramer-Quinn DS, Kasprowicz DJ, Fuchs BA, and Street NE. Differential expression of the beta 2-adrenergic receptor by Th1 and Th2 clones: implications for cytokine production and B cell help. J Immunol 158: 42004210, 1997.[Abstract]
33. Sands KE, Bates DW, Lanken PN, Graman PS, Hibberd PL, Kahn KL, Parsonnet J, Panzer R, Orav EJ, and Snydman DR. Epidemiology of sepsis syndrome in 8 academic medical centers. Academic Medical Center Consortium Sepsis Project Working Group. JAMA 278: 234240, 1997.[Abstract]
34. Schwacha MG, Schneider CP, Bland KI, and Chaudry IH. Resistance of macrophages to the suppressive effect of interleukin-10 following thermal injury. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 281: C1180C1187, 2001.
35. Severn A, Rapson NT, Hunter CA, and Liew FY. Regulation of tumor necrosis factor production by adrenaline and beta-adrenergic agonists. J Immunol 148: 34413445, 1992.[Abstract]
36. Straub RH, Linde HJ, Mannel DN, Scholmerich J, and Falk W. A bacteria-induced switch of sympathetic effector mechanisms augments local inhibition of TNF-alpha and IL-6 secretion in the spleen. FASEB J 14: 13801388, 2000.
37. Suberville S, Bellocq A, Fouqueray B, Philippe C, Lantz O, Perez J, and Baud L. Regulation of interleukin-10 production by beta-adrenergic agonists. Eur J Immunol 26: 26012605, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
38. Szabo C, Hasko G, Zingarelli B, Nemeth ZH, Salzman AL, Kvetan V, Pastores SM, and Vizi ES. Isoproterenol regulates tumour necrosis factor, interleukin-10, interleukin-6 and nitric oxide production and protects against the development of vascular hyporeactivity in endotoxaemia. Immunology 90: 95100, 1997.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
39. Tang Y, Shankar R, Gamboa M, Desai S, Gamelli RL, and Jones SB. Norepinephrine modulates myelopoiesis after experimental thermal injury with sepsis. Ann Surg 233: 266275, 2001.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
40. Tang Y, Shankar R, Gamelli R, and Jones S. Dynamic norepinephrine alterations in bone marrow: evidence of functional innervation. J Neuroimmunol 96: 182189, 1999.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
41. van der Poll T, Coyle SM, Barbosa K, Braxton CC, and Lowry SF. Epinephrine inhibits tumor necrosis factor-alpha and potentiates interleukin 10 production during human endotoxemia. J Clin Invest 97: 713719, 1996.[ISI][Medline]
42. van der Poll T, Jansen J, Endert E, Sauerwein HP, and van Deventer SJ. Noradrenaline inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced tumor necrosis factor and interleukin 6 production in human whole blood. Infect Immun 62: 20462050, 1994.
43. Webb-Peploe MM. The isovolumetric spleen: index of reflex changes in splanchnic vascular capacity. Am J Physiol 216: 407413, 1969.
44. Wichterman KA, Baue AE, and Chaudry IH. Sepsis and septic shocka review of laboratory models and a proposal. J Surg Res 29: 189201, 1980.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
45. Woiciechowsky C, Asadullah K, Nestler D, Eberhardt B, Platzer C, Schoning B, Glockner F, Lanksch WR, Volk HD, and Docke WD. Sympathetic activation triggers systemic interleukin-10 release in immunodepression induced by brain injury. Nat Med 4: 808813, 1998.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. von Montfort, J. I. Beier, L. Guo, J. P. Kaiser, and G. E. Arteel Contribution of the sympathetic hormone epinephrine to the sensitizing effect of ethanol on LPS-induced liver damage in mice Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol, May 1, 2008; 294(5): G1227 - G1234. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
| Visit Other APS Journals Online |