The amiloride-sensitive
epithelial sodium channel (ENaC) plays a critical role in fluid and
electrolyte homeostasis and is composed of three homologous subunits:
,
, and
. Only heteromultimeric channels made of 

ENaC
are efficiently expressed at the cell surface, resulting in maximally
amiloride-sensitive currents. To study the relative importance of
various regions of the
- and
-subunits for the expression of
functional ENaC channels at the cell surface, we constructed
hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged
-
-chimeric subunits composed of
-
and
-subunit regions and coexpressed them with HA-tagged 
- and

-subunits in Xenopus laevis oocytes. The whole cell
amiloride-sensitive sodium current (
Iami) and
surface expression of channels were assessed in parallel using the
two-electrode voltage-clamp technique and a chemiluminescence assay.
Because coexpression of 
ENaC resulted in larger
Iami and surface expression compared with
coexpression of 
ENaC, we hypothesized that the
-subunit is
more important for ENaC trafficking than the
-subunit. Using
chimeras, we demonstrated that channel activity is largely preserved
when the highly conserved second cysteine rich domains (CRD2) of the
- and
-subunits are exchanged. In contrast, exchanging the whole
extracellular loops of the
- and the
-subunits largely reduced
ENaC currents and ENaC expression in the membrane. This indicates that
there is limited interchangeability between molecular regions of the
two subunits. Interestingly, our chimera studies demonstrated that the
intracellular termini and the two transmembrane domains of
ENaC are
more important for the expression of functional channels at the cell
surface than the corresponding regions of
ENaC.
epithelial sodium channel domains; chimeras; whole cell
amiloride-sensitive current; surface expression
 |
INTRODUCTION |
THE
AMILORIDE-SENSITIVE EPITHELIAL
NA+ channel (ENaC) is
the rate-limiting step for sodium absorption in a variety of epithelia, including the renal collecting duct (2, 19). The
appropriate regulation of this channel is essential for the maintenance
of renal sodium balance and, hence, for long-term regulation of
arterial blood pressure (39). Indeed, the analysis of two
human genetic diseases, Liddle's syndrome and pseudohypoladosteronism
type 1 (PHA-1), has provided direct evidence that molecular dysfunction of ENaC has severe effects on arterial blood pressure. Although loss-of-function mutations of ENaC cause urinary sodium loss, hyperkalemia, and low blood pressure in patients with PHA-1
(10), gain-of-function mutations in Liddle's syndrome
result in increased sodium reabsorption, hypokalemia, and severe
arterial hypertension (43).
ENaC is composed of three subunits called
,
, and
(7). The expression of the
-subunit in
Xenopus oocytes generated small amiloride-sensitive
currents, whereas expression of the
- and/or
-subunits generated
no currents. Coexpression of either
ENaC or
ENaC with
ENaC
resulted in three- to fivefold larger currents than those seen with
ENaC expressed on its own. When all three subunits were coexpressed,
the currents were at least 100-fold larger than those observed with
ENaC alone (7). By using a quantitative approach to
measure the surface expression of ENaC, it was demonstrated that the
increase in currents was paralleled by a similar increase in channel
surface expression (17). Because the
-subunit can
apparently form functional channels when expressed on its own, it is
thought to play a key role in pore formation. In contrast, the
- and
the
-subunits are thought to be important for efficient trafficking
of the heteromeric channel to the plasma membrane. This interpretation
is consistent with the proposed ENaC stoichiometry of two
-, one
-, and one
-subunit (
2
) (15,
29) and with biochemical studies demonstrating that
-subunits, but not
- or
-subunits, could assemble to homomeric channel complexes (11). However, it has to be acknowledged
that the stoichiometry of ENaC is still a matter of debate and that in
addition to a tetrameric model, a channel arrangement of eight or nine
subunits has been proposed (14, 44).
Amino acid sequence analysis and biochemical studies suggest that the
ENaC subunits have cytoplasmic NH2 and COOH termini, two
hydrophobic transmembrane domains (M1 and M2), and a large extracellular domain (6, 7, 37, 45). Recent studies have
focused on the function of the different domains of ENaC. The
extracellular loop contains two cysteine-rich domains (CRD1 and CRD2)
important for the efficient transport of assembled subunits to the
plasma membrane (16). The region immediately preceding the
second transmembrane domain (pre-M2) contains an amiloride-binding site
and determines ion selectivity, suggesting that it forms part of the
channel pore (41), together with the M2 domain
(18). The NH2 terminus contains two key
regions, one with an endocytic motif important for channel retrieval
from the plasma membrane (8) and a second one, just before
the M1 (pre-M1) domain, involved in channel gating (20).
The COOH terminus contains a proline-rich PPXY motif, which is believed
to be important for interaction with the ubiquitin-protein ligases
Nedd4 and Nedd4-2, promoting the endocytosis of the channel
(23, 42, 47, 48). The importance of these motifs is
illustrated in Liddle's syndrome, in which mutations and/or deletions
of the PPXY motif in
- or
ENaC reduce the endocytic retrieval of
ENaC from the membrane (1, 46). This results in an
increase in the number of ENaC channels in the membrane, which causes
hyperabsorption of Na+ and hypertension (17,
24).
Interestingly, the
- and
-subunits share a higher degree of amino
acid homology between them than with
ENaC (7, 51). As
mentioned above,
and
have common functional domains. However, the finding that the simultaneous presence of both subunits is required
for maximal ENaC surface expression (17) suggests that they have similar but complementary functions. The aim of the present
study was to investigate the distinct roles of the
- and
-subunits for the expression of functional ENaC channels at the cell surface.
To elucidate the relative contributions of various regions of the
-
and
-subunits to ENaC trafficking, we constructed hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged
-
-chimeric subunits composed of molecular regions of
the
- and
-subunits and coexpressed them with HA-tagged 
- and 
-subunits in Xenopus laevis oocytes.
ENaC-mediated whole cell currents and ENaC surface expression were
assessed using the two-electrode voltage-clamp technique and a recently
established chemiluminescence assay (26, 52). Our results
demonstrate that exchanging the whole extracellular loop of the
-
and the
-subunits results in an inefficient surface expression of
the ENaC complex. On the other hand, some well-conserved regions, like
the CRD2, can be exchanged between the
- and the
-subunits, with
most of the channel activity being preserved. Moreover, our results
suggest that the intracellular termini and the two transmembrane domains of
ENaC are more important than the corresponding
ENaC regions to promote the trafficking of the ENaC complex to the plasma membrane.
 |
MATERIALS AND METHODS |
Isolation of oocytes and injection of cRNA.
Xenopus laevis oocytes were prepared and injected as
described (27). Defolliculated stage V-VI oocytes were
injected with 1 ng of cRNA of each ENaC subunit and/or chimera.
Injected oocytes were kept in modified Barth's saline [in mM: 88 NaCl, 1 KCl, 2.4 NaHCO3, 0.3 Ca(NO3)2,, 0.41 CaCl2, 0.82 MgSO4, and 15 HEPES, adjusted to pH 7.6 with Tris]
containing 2 µM amiloride to reduce sodium loading of the oocytes.
Two-electrode voltage-clamp experiments.
Oocytes were studied 2 days after injection using the two electrode
voltage-clamp technique as previously described (27). Oocytes were clamped at a holding potential of
60 mV. The
amiloride-sensitive whole cell current (
Iami)
was determined by subtracting the corresponding current value measured
in the presence of 2 µM amiloride from that measured before the
application of amiloride in a NaCl solution (in mM: 95 NaCl, 2 KCl, 1 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 10 HEPES, adjusted to pH
7.4 with Tris).
Surface labeling of oocytes.
Experiments were performed as recently described (25, 26, 28,
52). Oocytes were incubated for 30 min in ND96 (in mM: 96 NaCl,
2 KCl, 1.8 CaCl2, 1 MgCl2, and 5 HEPES,
adjusted to pH 7.4 with Tris) with 1% bovine serum albumin (BSA) at
4°C to block nonspecific binding of the antibodies. Oocytes were then
incubated for 60 min at 4°C with 1 µg/ml rat monoclonal anti-HA
antibody (3F10, Boehringer, in 1% BSA/ND96), washed eight times at
4°C with 1% BSA/ND96, and incubated with 2 µg/ml horseradish
peroxidase (HRP)-coupled secondary antibody (goat anti-rat Fab
fragments; Jackson ImmunoResearch) in 1% BSA/ND96 for 40 min. Oocytes
were washed thoroughly, initially in 1% BSA/ND96 (4°C, 60 min), and then in ND96 without BSA (4°C, 60 min). Individual oocytes were placed in 50 µl of Power Signal Elisa solution (Pierce, Chester, UK)
and, after an equilibration period of about 10 s,
chemiluminescence was quantified in a Turner TD-20/20 luminometer
(Sunnyvale, CA) by integrating the signal over a period of 15 s.
Results are given in relative light units (RLU).
Construction of chimeras and cRNA synthesis.
The
-,
-, and
-subunits of rat ENaC were extracellularly HA
tagged according to the FLAG-epitope placement into the rat ENaC
sequence (17). The HA epitope (YPYDVPDYA) was
inserted as follows:
191NSSYYPYDVPDYASSR206 in
ENaC,
135NTTSYPYDVPDYATLN141 in
ENaC, and
139EAGSYPYDVPDYAPRF154 in
ENaC. HA-tagged constructs were subcloned into the pGEMHE vector
(gifts from Dr. Blanche Schwappach, Heidelberg, Germany). To
facilitate the construction of the
-
-chimeras, unique restriction sites were created in the
- and
-subunits, resulting in the following alterations in the amino acid sequences: in
ENaC A383I, I455T and M457L (
A383I,I455T,M457L), in
ENaC G617E
and a silent mutation at Y107 (
G617E,Y107). Point
mutations were generated using the QUICKCHANGE XL site-directed
mutagenesis protocol (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA). To confirm that the
point mutations did not affect channel function, the mutant subunits
were expressed in oocytes and
Iami and
channel surface expression were determined. In the same batch of
oocytes,
Iami averaged 1.21 ± 0.18 µA
(n = 7) in 

control oocytes, 1.32 ± 0.20 µA
(n = 7) in 
A383I,I455T,M457L
oocytes, 1.33 ± 0.12 µA (n = 7)


G617E,Y107 oocytes, and 1.29 ± 0.21 µA
(n = 7) in

A383I,I455T,M457L
G617E,Y107 oocytes.
Similarly, the chemiluminescence signals obtained in the surface
expression assay averaged 16.1 ± 3.1 RLU (n = 10) in


-control oocytes, 15.9 ± 2.8 RLU (n = 10) in

A383I,I455T,M457L
oocytes, 16.8 ± 2.4 RLU
(n = 10) 

G617E,Y107 oocytes, and
15.9 ± 3.0 RLU (n = 10) in

A383I,I455T,M457L
G617E,Y107 oocytes.
Thus the
A383I,I455T,M457L and
G617E,Y107
were deemed suitable for the construction of chimeras; they were used
throughout the experiments instead of the wild-type subunits, and, for
simplicity, we refer to them as "
" and "
". The name and
exact amino acid constitution of each chimera (E) is shown in Table
1. Table
2 indicates the percent amino acid identity of the swapped regions. All constructs were verified by DNA
sequencing. Capped cRNAs from linearized cDNAs were synthesized in
vitro using the T7 mMESSAGEmMACHINE (Ambion, Austin, TX), according to
the provider's instructions.
View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Table 2.
Percent amino acid identity of portions of - and ENaC subunits
swapped in epithelial sodium channel(s) ENaC chimeras
|
|
Western blot analysis.
Oocytes were homogenized, separated by SDS electrophoresis, and
transferred to nitrocellulose filters. Primary rat anti-HA monoclonal
antibody (100 ng/ml) and secondary peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rat
antibody (160 ng/ml) were diluted in TBS-blocking solution. Detection
was performed with the enhanced luminol reagent NEN (NEN, Boston, MA).
Data analysis.
To summarize data from different batches of oocytes and to account for
the batch-to-batch variability of overall expression levels, individual
Iami and surface expression values were
normalized to the average
Iami of at least
five control 

ENaC oocytes from the same batch and to the
average surface expression of at least 10 control oocytes,
respectively.
Iami and surface expression were assessed in 14 different batches of oocytes for 

-,

-, and 
ENaC and in at least two different batches of
oocytes for each chimera. Data are given as mean values ± SE,
n indicates the number of oocytes, and N
indicates the number of different batches of oocytes used. Significance
was evaluated by the appropriate version of Student's
t-test using values from individual oocytes.
 |
RESULTS |

ENaC travels to the membrane more efficiently than the

ENaC.
Expression of 

ENaC in Xenopus laevis oocytes
resulted in
Iami averaging 5.60 ± 0.79 µA (n = 70, N = 14) at a holding
potential of
60 mV and also in high chemiluminescence signals in the
surface expression assay consistent with previously reported data
(25, 26, 28). In contrast,
Iami
and surface expression levels were very low in 
ENaC- or

ENaC-expressing oocytes (Fig. 2C). Normalized to the
values obtained in oocytes expressing 

ENaC,
Iami averaged 1.1 ± 0.2% (n
= 70, N = 14) or 3.1 ± 0.4% (n = 70, N = 14) in oocytes expressing 
ENaC or 
ENaC,
respectively. Similarly, the surface expression averaged 1.5 ± 0.2% (n = 144, N = 14) in 
ENaC oocytes and
3.0 ± 0.4% (n = 146, N = 14) in 
ENaC
oocytes (Fig. 2C). Interestingly, both the
Iami and the surface expression values for

ENaC were significantly higher than those for 
ENaC (P
< 0.001). These results confirm the well-known finding that all
three ENaC subunits are required to form a fully functional channel
(7, 17). In addition, they suggest that the

-heteromer travels more efficiently to the plasma membrane than
the 
-heteromer.
The Western blot analysis shown in Fig. 1
confirmed that all the
-
-constructs (E1-E14) could be
expressed in the oocyte system. To assess the function of the various
chimeras,
Iami and the surface expression
values obtained from oocytes coexpressing a construct E with either

or 
were compared with the baseline values determined in

-, 
-, and 

ENaC-expressing oocytes (see above). For
example, if, in 
E oocytes,
Iami and
surface expression values were similar to those in 
-oocytes, then
this particular chimera E could not functionally substitute for
and could not stimulate the trafficking of 
to the plasma membrane. On the other hand, if
Iami and surface
expression values in 
E oocytes were similar to those measured in


ENaC oocytes, then the chimera E could functionally substitute
for
and efficiently assemble with 
to promote trafficking of

E heteromers to the cell surface. Additional information
regarding the importance of channel regions for channel trafficking or
for ion permeation could be gained from chimeras that were able to
stimulate surface expression in the absence of a corresponding increase
in
Iami.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
Similar protein expression of all - -chimeras.
Western blot analysis to detect hemagglutinin (HA)-tagged protein was
performed using total membrane protein from homogenates of oocytes
expressing different - -chimeras (E1 to E14). Each group of
oocytes was injected with only one of the chimeric cRNAs, and 25 oocytes/group were homogenized 2 days after cRNA injection. The bands
at ~70-75 kDa indicate that similar levels of HA-tagged chimeric
proteins are expressed in all 14 groups of oocytes. The band was absent
from noninjected control oocytes, confirming the specificity of the
blot.
|
|
CRD2 substitution chimeras.
The CRD2 domain is highly conserved between the ENaC subunits and is
thought to play an essential role in the efficient transport of
assembled ENaC channels to the plasma membrane (16). Thus we wondered whether functional ENaC channels could be formed when the
CRD2 domains were swapped between
- and
-subunits. Figure 2A illustrates chimeras E9 and
E10, in which the
ENaC CRD2 was substituted by the
ENaC CRD2 and
vice versa.

View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
A: in chimeras E9 and E10, the -epithelial
sodium channel ( ENaC) CRD2 was substituted by the ENaC CRD2 and
vice versa. B: representative whole cell current traces,
recorded at 60 mV holding potential, are shown from 3 individual
oocytes expressing   ,  E10, and  E9, respectively.
Amiloride (2 µM) was present in the bath solution during the periods
indicated. C: in this and in subsequent figures, the
amiloride-sensitive whole cell currents
( Iami, open bars) were assessed in 10-70
oocytes from each group, and surface expression (filled bars) was
assessed in 19-146 oocytes from each group, from at least 2 different batches of oocytes. Iami and
surface expression values are normalized for each group according to
the values obtained for   ENaC control oocytes.
|
|
Representative whole cell current recordings from oocytes expressing


, 
E10, and 
E9 are shown in Fig. 2B. In

E10 oocytes,
Iami and surface
expression averaged 97.2 ± 9.1% (n = 10, N
= 2) and 105.6 ± 11.1% (n = 22, N =
2), respectively, of the corresponding values obtained in 

ENaC
oocytes (Fig. 2C). These results suggest that
CRD2 can
fully substitute for
CRD2. In contrast, in 
E9 oocytes,
Iami and surface expression averaged
30.7 ± 7.2% (n = 10, N = 2) and 74.1 ± 5.1% (n = 21, N = 2), respectively. This indicates that the chimera E9 efficiently assembles with 
and that the 
E9 heteromer is transported to the plasma membrane almost as well as 

ENaC. However, the currents mediated by the 
E9 heteromeric channel are significantly smaller than those observed with 

ENaC (P < 0.01), and there
appears to be a dissociation between the ability of E9 to promote
channel trafficking and current flow through the channel (Fig.
2C). Although replacing
CRD2 by
CRD2 had little effect
on channel trafficking, it apparently reduced the ability of the
expressed channel complex to carry sodium currents. Theoretically, a
reduced
Iami may also be due to a decrease of
the amiloride sensitivity of the 
E9 channel complex. However, as
illustrated in Fig. 2B, the amiloride-insensitive whole cell
current measured in 
E9 oocytes in the presence of 2 µM
amiloride was slightly smaller than that measured in 

-control oocytes averaging 0.10 ± 0.01 µA (n = 10, N = 2) and 0.20 ± 0.02 µA (n = 10, N = 2), respectively. This essentially rules out
the possibility that the E9 chimera alters the amiloride sensitivity of
the channel complex. Taken together, these findings indicate that the
presence of the
CRD2 region within the channel complex may be
important for ion permeation.
Coexpression of 
E9 or of 
E10 resulted in similar
Iami and surface expression values as
observed with 
or 
, respectively (Fig. 2C). This
indicates that E9 cannot functionally substitute for the
-subunit
and that E10 cannot substitute for the
-subunit. This is plausible,
because with the exception of the CRD2 domains, the structure of E9
corresponds to that of the
-subunit, whereas the structure of E10
corresponds to that of the
-subunit (Fig. 2A).
Extracellular loop substitution chimeras.
In the next pair of chimeras, the complete extracellular loop, except
the pre-M2 domain of
ENaC, was substituted by the corresponding loop
of
ENaC (E1) and vice versa (E2) (Fig.
3A). As shown in Fig.
3B, the
Iami and the surface
expression resulting from the coexpression of each chimera with either

or 
were very low and similar to the values obtained for

and 
alone.

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Extracellular loop substitution chimeras. A:
chimeras had the extracellular loop of ENaC substituted by the
corresponding loop of ENaC (E1) and vice versa (E2). The other two
chimeras (E11 and E12) had similar extracellular loop substitutions as
E1 and E2, respectively, but the CRD2 region of the loop was not
included in the substitution domain. B:
Iami (open bars) and surface expression
(filled bars) are illustrated for each group of oocytes tested.
|
|
Chimeras E11 and E12 had similar extracellular loop substitutions as E1
and E2, respectively, except that the CRD2 region of the loop was not
included in the substitution (Fig. 3A). The results obtained
with E11 and E12 chimeras were essentially identical to those obtained
with E1 and E2 (Fig. 3B). These findings indicate that the
extracellular loops (with or without the CRD2 domains) cannot be
swapped between the
- and the
-subunits without loss of function.
This indicates that their precise localization within the ENaC channel
complex is functionally important for the assembly and trafficking of
the complex.
M2 and COOH termini substitution chimeras.
Chimeras E7 and E8 (Fig. 4A)
had the pre-M2 domain, the M2 domain, and the COOH terminus of
ENaC
substituted by the corresponding regions of
ENaC (E7) and vice versa
(E8). In 
E8 oocytes,
Iami and surface
expression averaged 16.5 ± 1.5% (n = 10, N
= 2) and 28.7 ± 4.6% (n = 19, N = 2),
respectively (Fig. 4B). This indicates that E8 can at least
partially substitute for
ENaC. In 
E7 oocytes,
Iami and surface expression averaged
75.9 ± 10.7% (n = 10, N = 2) and 86.9 ± 4.7% (n = 23, N = 2), respectively, reaching
similar levels as observed in 

ENaC oocytes. This suggests that
the E7 chimera can almost fully substitute for the function of the
-subunit.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
M2 and COOH termini substitution chimeras. A:
chimeras E7 and E8 had the pre-M2 domain, the M2, and the COOH terminus
of ENaC substituted by the corresponding regions of ENaC and vice
versa. B: Iami (open bars) and
surface expression (filled bars) are illustrated for each group of
oocytes tested.
|
|
It is surprising that although E8 and E7 are converse chimeras (Fig.
4A), their ability to functionally substitute for the
-
and
-subunits, respectively, is remarkably different (Fig. 4B). This could be due to a different ability of the
chimeras to promote channel delivery to the plasma membrane or to a
different effect of the chimeras on channel retrieval rate. Indeed,
because the COOH termini of the
- and
-subunits have been
reported to be essential for an efficient retrieval of ENaC channels
from the plasma membrane (24, 42), arrangements with a
duplication of the
- or the
-COOH termini (as in 
E7 and

E8) may alter the rate of channel retrieval.
To assess the rate of channel retrieval in 

, 
E8, and

E7 oocytes, delivery of new channels to the plasma membrane was inhibited by adding 18 µM brefedin A (BFA) to oocytes 2 days after cRNA injection. BFA is a fungal metabolite that inhibits the secretory pathway of newly synthesized proteins without affecting
clathrin-mediated endocytosis (36). Figure
5 illustrates the effect of BFA on
Iami, in 

-, 
E8, and 
E7
oocytes. In 

-oocytes,
Iami decreased
by about 85% within 4 h after addition of BFA (Fig. 5A). This BFA-induced decline of
Iami reflects the rate of channel retrieval
and is in good agreement with previously reported data (42). In nontreated oocytes,
Iami continued to increase throughout the
20-h period examined, suggesting that in nontreated oocytes, channel
insertion exceeded channel retrieval during this period. BFA had
essentially the same effect on
Iami in

E8 and 
E7 oocytes (Fig. 5, B and C,
respectively). The similar susceptibility of
Iami to BFA in 
E8 and 
E7 oocytes
indicates that 
E8 and 
E7 have similar retrieval rates as


ENaC. Hence, the higher surface expression detected in

E7 oocytes compared with that in 
E8 oocytes has to be due
to enhanced delivery of 
E7 heteromeric channels to the plasma
membrane.

View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Effect of brefedin A (BFA) on
Iami in   -control oocytes
(A), in  E8 oocytes (B), and  E7
oocytes (C). Two days after cRNA injection, oocytes were
divided into a control group (open circles) and a BFA-treated group
(filled circles). BFA (18 µM) was added at time zero as
indicated by the arrow pointing down, and
Iami was subsequently assessed in 4- and 12-h
intervals. Each value represents the mean
Iami of 10 oocytes.
|
|
In 
E7 oocytes, which are assumed to express channels with a
predicted stoichiometry of 2
:1
:1E7, the
-subunit is
essentially duplicated in each channel complex except for the pre-M2
domain, the M2 domain, and the COOH terminus of E7, which are derived from
ENaC (Fig. 4A). Therefore, it is not surprising that
in 
E7 oocytes, the
Iami and surface
expression values were similar to those in 
-oocytes expected to
form 2
:2
-complexes (Fig. 4B). In analogy to the
situation with 
E7, coexpression of 
E8 is expected to result
in a quasi-duplication of the
-subunit within the channel complex
(Fig. 4B). Indeed, in 
E8 oocytes,
Iami was found to be as low as that detected
in 
-oocytes likely to express channel complexes with
2
:2
-subunits. However, in 
E8 oocytes, a substantial surface
expression was observed averaging 43.9 ± 4.7% (n =
22, N = 2) of that of 

-oocytes (Fig.
4B). This high level of surface expression in the presence
of a low
Iami indicates that 
E8
heteromeric complexes are expressed at the cell surface but do not show
proper ion channel function. An alternative explanation for a low
Iami would be a reduced sensitivity to
amiloride of the 
E8 channel complex. However, this explanation
can be ruled out because the inward currents observed in the presence
of amiloride were very similar in 
E8 oocytes and in 
matched control oocytes averaging 23 ± 3 nA (n = 10, N = 2) and 21 ± 4 nA (n = 10, N = 10), respectively .
The high level of surface expression of 
E8 is of particular
interest because it suggests that even in an arrangement where the
-subunit is supplemented with a
-subunit and a chimera that contains large parts of the
-subunit, the resulting heteromeric channel complex can be transported efficiently to the plasma membrane. This is not the case with the 
E7 complex containing mainly
-subunit components. This suggests that the
-subunit has a more
potent role than the
-subunit in assembly and/or trafficking the
ENaC complexes to the plasma membrane. However, in terms of its
ion-conducting property, the function of the 
E8 heteromeric
complex is poor, which suggests an important role of the missing
-subunit regions for ion permeation.
The permissive substitutions of CRD2 in E9 and E10 (Fig. 2) and of the
M2 and COOH termini in E7 and E8 (Fig. 4B) pointed to the
possibility that substitutions of all the above domains may still
result in functional channels. To test this hypothesis, we constructed
E3 and E4 that had the CRD2, the pre-M2 domain, M2, and the COOH
terminus of
ENaC substituted by the corresponding regions of
ENaC
and vice versa. However, the
Iami and the
surface expression of E3 and E4 chimeras, when coexpressed with either 
or 
, were very low and similar to the values obtained for 
and 
alone (data not shown). This indicates that
-
-chimeras with such large substituted regions, including the
CRD2 domain, the pre-M2 domain, the M2 domain, and the COOH terminus,
cannot functionally replace the native
- or
-subunits.
NH2 termini and M1 substitution chimeras.
In chimeras E5 and E6 (Fig.
6A), the NH2
terminus and M1 domain of
ENaC were substituted by the corresponding
regions of
ENaC (E5) and vice versa (E6). In 
E5 oocytes,
Iami and surface expression averaged
52.3 ± 11.5% (n = 10, N = 2) and 53.3 ± 10.1% (n = 20, N = 2), respectively. This
indicates that E5 can replace
ENaC function to a large extent (Fig.
6B). In contrast, in 
E6 oocytes,
Iami and surface expression were very low and
not significantly different from the value measured in 
oocytes
(Fig. 6B). Hence, although the NH2 terminus and
the M1 region of
can be substituted by the corresponding regions of
, the reverse substitution fails to produce functional channels.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
NH2 termini and M1 substitution chimeras.
A: chimeras E5 and E6 had the NH2 terminus and
M1 of ENaC substituted by the corresponding regions of ENaC and
vice versa. B: Iami (open bars)
and surface expression (filled bars) are illustrated for each group of
oocytes tested.
|
|
NH2 and COOH termini substitution chimeras.
Both the NH2 and COOH termini of
- and
-subunits have
been shown to be important for the retrieval/endocytosis of the ENaC channels from the plasma membrane (8, 42). We speculated that chimeras with both intracellular
- or
-termini substituted by the corresponding
- or
-termini, respectively, may still be
efficiently expressed at the plasma membrane when coexpressed with

or 
. These chimeras are illustrated in Fig.
7A, and are named E13 and E14.
Figure 7B shows that the
Iami and
the surface expression of each chimera when coexpressed with either 
or 
were very low and similar to the values obtained for 
and 
alone. Therefore, it is apparently not possible to
efficiently transport an ENaC complex to the plasma membrane when all
intracellular termini are contributed by the 
- or

-subunits. This finding, in combination with the results in Figs.
4 and 6, suggests that at least one of the intracellular termini must
be contributed from
and at least another one from
in order for
the ENaC complex to be transported to the plasma membrane.

View larger version (24K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
NH2 and COOH termini substitution chimeras.
A: chimeras E13 and E14 had the intracellular ENaC
termini substituted by the corresponding ENaC termini and vice
versa. B: Iami (open bars) and
surface expression (filled bars) are illustrated for each group of
oocytes tested.
|
|
 |
DISCUSSION |
In this study, we used a chimera approach to investigate the
relative importance of several domains of the
- and
-subunits to
promote the expression of functional ENaC channels in the plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes. The main findings of the
present study are the following: 1) replacing the
extracellular loop of
ENaC by that of
ENaC or vice versa results
in a very inefficient surface expression of ENaC, 2) the
CRD2 region and the
CRD2 region can efficiently substitute for
each other, 3) the M2 and COOH terminus of
ENaC have a
more potent role than the corresponding regions of
ENaC in the
assembly/trafficking of the ENaC complex and its expression at the
plasma membrane, and 4) the NH2 terminus and the
M1 region of
ENaC are more important for the formation of a
functional ENaC channel than the corresponding regions of
ENaC.
Functional role of extracellular domains of the
- and
-subunits of ENaC.
The inability of the chimeras E1 and E2 to increase the surface
expression of 
and 
, respectively, suggests that the
extracellular loops of both the
- and the
-subunits have to be
simultaneously present to allow a fully functional ENaC channel complex
to form. An alternative interpretation is the possibility that chimeras with an inability to increase surface expression do not fold properly due to some misfit between the extracellular, intracellular, and transmembrane domains and that this causes their retention in the ER
(i.e., an "intrasubunit" problem rather than an "intersubunit" problem). At present, the functional role of the large extracellular loops of ENaC and the relative importance of the
-,
-, and
-subunit loops are still poorly understood (5). It is
possible that a distinct glycosylation pattern of the
- and
-subunits is essential for the efficient assembly of the channel and
its translocation to the plasma membrane. It has also been suggested
that the extracellular loops may contain important target sites for
ENaC-activating proteases (12, 50). Our study provides
evidence that the extracellular loops of the
- and
-subunits each
have unique and distinct functional features because both loops are
required for proper channel function.
The two highly conserved cysteine-rich domains (CRD1 and CRD2) spanning
nearly 50% of the extracellular loop are a distinguishing feature of
the extracellular loop of ENaC (7). Chimeras E11 and E12
with partial substitutions of the extracellular loops not affecting the
CRD2 region also failed to promote the trafficking of 
and

, respectively, to the plasma membrane. This result suggests that
there are important extracellular domains before the CRD2 region and
including the CRD1 region that cannot be exchanged between the
- and
-subunits without loss of function of the subunits to promote
expression of a heteromeric ENaC channel complex.
Interestingly, ENaC channels were efficiently translocated to the cell
surface when the CRD2 was exchanged between the
- and
-subunits
in E9 and E10. It has been proposed that cysteines in a CRD domain form
disulfide bonds with cysteines in another CRD domain on the same
subunit (intrasubunit bonds) (16). Thus our results
suggest that the CRD2 regions in the
- and
-subunits have such a
similar arrangement of cysteines that the
CRD2 can form successful
intrasubunit disulfide bonds with the
CRD1 in E9 and the
CRD2
with
CRD1 in E10. The finding that, in 
E9 oocytes,
Iami was relatively small compared with the
substantial level of ENaC surface expression suggests that the
substitution of the
CRD2 by the
CRD2 alters the ion conducting
properties of the channel complex. This indicates a possible
involvement of the CRD2 region in the function of the pore region or
the gating mechanism of the channel.
Preferential role of the
-subunit in the trafficking of ENaC.
A series of results suggests that several domains of the
ENaC have a
more potent role in trafficking the channel complex to the plasma
membrane than the corresponding regions of
ENaC. First, expression
of 
E5 resulted in surface expression and
Iami values that were substantially greater
than those obtained with 
, whereas 
E6 failed to increase
expression levels above those observed with 
. Hence, the
NH2 terminus and the M1 region of
can successfully
replace the corresponding regions of the
-subunit, whereas the
reverse substitution fails to produce fully functional channels.
Second, 
E7 produced higher
Iami and
surface expression values than 
E8. This indicates that the
combined pre-M2 region, M2 domain, and COOH terminus of
ENaC can
substitute for the corresponding regions of
ENaC more efficiently
than the combined pre-M2 region, M2 domain, and COOH terminus of
ENaC can substitute for the corresponding regions of
ENaC. Third,

E8, which essentially represents a duplication of most of the
-subunit except the pre-M2 region, M2 domain, and the COOH terminus
of E8 that are from
ENaC, can be transported efficiently to the
plasma membrane. This is not the case with 
E7 representing a
similar duplication of most of the
-subunit, indicating once more
the primacy of the
-subunit over the
-subunit in promoting the
formation of ENaC channel complexes that can efficiently traffic to the
plasma membrane.
The interpretation that regions of the
-subunit are more important
for ENaC trafficking than corresponding regions of the
-subunit is
consistent with our finding that the 
-heteromer (probably as
2
:2
) travels more efficiently to the plasma membrane than the

-heteromer and produces larger
Iami.
However, conflicting results have been reported on this issue. Two
studies reported similar
Iami and surface
expression values for 
and 
(7, 17), but more
recent studies found higher values for 
compared with 
(9, 34), consistent with our results. The failure to
detect a significant difference between 
and 
expression levels in some of the earlier studies may be due to the limited number
of oocytes used. We examined 70 matched oocytes for each of the two
groups from 14 different batches of oocytes. Thus we are confident that
there is a small but significant difference between the
Iami and surface expression levels of

ENaC and 
ENaC. The higher values obtained with 
ENaC
support the conclusion form our chimera studies that the
-subunit
plays a particularly important role for the assembly and/or trafficking
of ENaC.
Physiological significance of the present results.
Interestingly, the BFA experiments demonstrated that 
E7 and

E8 have a rapid retrieval rate similar to that of 

ENaC controls. This result is of significance because it indicates that the
PPXY motifs of the
- and
-COOH termini are recognized equally
well from the endocytic machinery (i.e., Nedd4/Nedd4-2). As a
result, channel complexes are internalized efficiently even in subunit
arrangements in which there are two
ENaC PPXY motifs and not a
single
ENaC PPXY motif present and vice versa. Therefore, the
COOH-terminal PPXY motifs are apparently functionally interchangeable between the
- and the
-subunits. This conclusion is in good agreement with a recent study suggesting that each of the second and
the third WW motifs of Nedd4 binds both to
- and
-COOH termini (21). It is probably the absence of any preference of the
binding of these two WW motifs to the
- and
-COOH termini that
makes the COOH termini interchangeable between the two subunits and, on
the other hand, also explains why truncation of both
- and
-COOH
termini has an additive effect regarding the hyperactivity of the
channel (40).
Aldosterone stimulates the functional expression of ENaC in several
different tissues (19). So far, the majority of the results have suggested that the
ENaC mRNA has a different pattern of
response to aldosterone compared with
- and
ENaC mRNAs that share
a similar profile. Aldosterone administration markedly elevated
ENaC
mRNA and protein expression in the distal nephron, whereas neither
-
nor
ENaC mRNA expression was altered (3, 13, 31, 35).
In contrast, in the distal colon, the abundance of
- and
ENaC
mRNA was increased by aldosterone, whereas
ENaC mRNA was not changed
(3, 13, 35, 38). A recent study suggested that aldosterone
enhanced ENaC activity in mouse endometrial endothelium by upregulating
only the
ENaC subunit (49). Thus the regulation of the
expression of the three subunits seems to vary between tissues. The
situation is further complicated by the fact that changes observed at
the mRNA level may not necessarily reflect concomitant changes at the
protein level and vice versa (32). Moreover, a
differential subcellular distribution of ENaC subunits and
redistribution of all three subunits to the apical region in response
to aldosterone stimulation has been reported (30, 31). At
present, it is not quite clear which of the subunit is rate limiting
for the assembly of fully functional ENaC complexes and for their
efficient trafficking to the plasma membrane. The results of the
present study suggest that
ENaC makes a particularly important
contribution to ENaC trafficking and that some of its regions are
essential and cannot be substituted by corresponding regions of the
-subunit.
Studies of ENaC subunit knockout mice provide additional support for
the conclusion that
ENaC is of key importance for ENaC trafficking.
ENaC knockout neonates failed to clear their lungs of liquid and
died within 40 h after birth from respiratory distress (22). In contrast,
ENaC-deficient mice did not show a
lung phenotype but died within 2 days after birth because of an acute PHA1 phenotype, most likely of hyperkalemia (33). Hence,
ENaC is essential for ENaC function in the renal collecting duct
but, in contrast to
ENaC, does not seem to be required for the
transition from a liquid-filled to an air-filled lung. Newborn
ENaC
knockout mice also exhibited a PHA 1 phenotype but, in addition, had an impaired lung water clearance (4). The above results
indicate that the presence of
ENaC is probably more important for
neonatal lung liquid clearance than the presence of the
ENaC. This
is consistent with our results that the 
![]()