We examined the functional role
of distinct muscle-CAT (MCAT) elements during non-weight-bearing (NWB)
regulation of a wild-type 293-base pair
-myosin heavy chain
(
MyHC) transgene. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA)
revealed decreased NTEF-1, poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase, and Max binding
at the human distal MCAT element when using NWB soleus vs. control
soleus nuclear extract. Compared with the wild-type transgene,
expression assays revealed that distal MCAT element mutation decreased
basal transgene expression, which was decreased further in response to
NWB. EMSA analysis of the human proximal MCAT (pMCAT) element
revealed low levels of NTEF-1 binding that did not differ between
control and NWB extract, whereas the rat pMCAT element displayed robust
NTEF-1 binding that decreased when using NWB soleus extracts.
Differences in binding between human and rat pMCAT elements were
consistent whether using rat or mouse nuclear extract or in vitro
synthesized human TEF-1 proteins. Our results provide the first
evidence that 1) different binding properties and likely
regulatory functions are served by the human and rat pMCAT elements,
and 2) previously unrecognized
MyHC proximal promoter
elements contribute to NWB regulation.
skeletal muscle hypertrophy; skeletal muscle atrophy; fiber-type
transitions; chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
 |
INTRODUCTION |
ADULT MOUSE HINDLIMB
skeletal muscles express four major myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoforms
(fast IIb, IIx/d, IIa, and slow type I) whose differential expression
pattern has contributed to the broad classification scheme that
distinguishes four primary fiber types termed fast type IIb, IIx/d,
IIa, and slow type I (or
). Each MyHC isoform is thought to serve a
specific physiological role; therefore, variation in the proportion and
spatial arrangement of each fiber type contributes to the biochemical
and functional specialization of each muscle. The notion that each MyHC
serves a physiological role is supported by the classic findings that actin-activated myosin ATPase and unloaded shortening velocity (Vmax) are highly correlated to the amount and
type of native isomyosin or MyHC comprising a given muscle or muscle
fiber (2). For example, type I fibers primarily populate
slow-twitch muscles, rely on oxidative metabolism, and express the
MyHC, which is highly efficient in energy utilization while
maintaining tension. Thus slow-twitch muscles are primarily used in
chronic activities such as posture maintenance and for sustained
locomotor activity. On the other hand, fast type IIb and IIx/d fibers
are used for high-force burst activities, primarily populate
fast-twitch muscles, rely on glycolytic energy production, and are less
efficient in energy utilization while maintaining tension (4,
36).
Once established, the adult skeletal muscle phenotype is not static but
instead retains the ability to adjust to variations in load bearing and
contractile usage patterns, resulting in profound adaptations in
morphology, phenotype, and contractile properties (1, 4).
The removal of body loading in the microgravity environment of space
flight results in decreased bone density, a marked degree of muscle
atrophy, and an altered protein phenotype that correlates with a
slow-to-fast change in contractile and metabolic properties for both
rodents and humans alike (1, 10, 11, 14). Likewise,
qualitatively comparable results have been obtained from animal studies
by using a rodent ground-based model of simulated microgravity imposed
by hindlimb unloading [non-weight bearing (NWB)] (1, 10, 11,
14). In addition to altered muscle mass, strength, and
endurance, alterations in the pattern of motor nerve activity have been
reported (3, 34). Thus it is not surprising that
chronically innervated postural muscles such as the slow-twitch soleus
are most susceptible to the effects of a microgravity or simulated
microgravity environment. In agreement with the aforementioned
findings, our studies on the NWB mouse soleus muscle have documented a
loss in mass, a histochemical slow-to-fast fiber type shift, and a
decrease in endogenous
MyHC mRNA expression (29).
Transcriptional regulation is a fundamental mechanism by which
adult-stage skeletal muscle phenotype and its adaptation are controlled. To identify regulatory elements that control
MyHC gene
transcription during NWB activity, we have performed a transgenic deletion and mutational analysis of the
MyHC promoter. An expression analysis of transgenes comprised of either 5,600 or 600 base pairs (bp)
of wild-type
MyHC promoter revealed that expression had significantly decreased in response to NWB; however, this response was
found to be substantially blunted when the
MyHC proximal promoter
control region (
300/
170; Fig.
1A) distal muscle-CAT (dMCAT),
C-rich, and proximal MCAT (pMCAT) elements were simultaneously mutated
(29). Further analysis of transgenes comprising either 350 or 293 bp of wild-type
MyHC promoter revealed that transgene
350wt, which contains a negative element at its 5'-terminal end, did
not express under basal or malleable (NWB or functional overload) conditions, whereas transgene
293wt was unexpectedly upregulated in
response to NWB activity (30). The latter observation was of particular importance because it revealed that the
600/
294 region of the
MyHC promoter contained a NWB responsive element(s), a
regulatory role possibly served by the negative (
350/
294) element.
Our subsequent biochemical analysis of this sequence led to the
elucidation of the first putative NWB element, termed d
NRE-S
(
332/
311), that bound two distinct proteins highly enriched in NWB
soleus (NWB-S) nuclear extract (Fig. 1A; Ref. 30).

View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 1.
A: schematic representation of -myosin
heavy chain ( MyHC) proximal promoter. Depicted is the
non-weight-bearing (NWB)-responsive region ( 600-294) containing
the d NRE-S site, which may act as a NWB element. Also shown is the
downstream control region ( 300/ 170) comprised of the distal
muscle-CAT (dMCAT), A/T-rich, C-rich, proximal MCAT (pMCAT), and
E-box/nuclear factor of activated T cells (NFAT) elements, which are
highly conserved in sequence and location across species. B:
schematic illustration of human MyHC transgenes. Wild-type transgene
comprises 293 base pairs (bp) of the human MyHC proximal promoter
plus 120 bp of 5'-untranslated region (+1 to +120) linked to the 5'-end
of bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene-simian virus
40 poly(A) cassette (transgene 293wt). The small box to the left of
the CAT gene represents exon 1. Regulatory elements comprising the
MyHC proximal control region are shown from the 5'- to 3'-end and
are termed dMCAT, A/T-rich, pMCAT, and E-box/NFAT. Mutant transgene
293Mm is identical to transgene 293wt, except that it harbors a
mutated dMCAT element that was generated by bp substitution at
nucleotide sites previously shown to be critical for protein-DNA
interaction by footprint and scanning mutagenesis analysis
(44). Bp substitutions (mutation) are depicted by
lowercase letters and are presented 5' to 3'.
|
|
Our current questions regarding
MyHC NWB regulation arise from two
intriguing observations obtained from our above-cited transgenic
analysis. First, the loss of normal NWB regulation of wild-type
transgene
293wt occurred when the upstream NWB-responsive region
(
600/
294, containing d
NRE-S) was eliminated. Thus it is
conceivable that deletion of this NWB-responsive region may have
disrupted critical interactions between this element and those elements
within the
MyHC control region. In support of this notion, numerous
studies using transgenic mice have shown that distinct regulatory
modules (enhancers) and/or individual cis-acting elements are required
to accurately duplicate diverse aspects of endogenous muscle-specific
gene expression (9, 13, 16, 20, 25, 26, 32). Second, the
partial loss of NWB regulation of the 5,600-bp
MyHC promoter
occurred when the
MyHC control region (
300/
170) dMCAT, C-rich,
and pMCAT elements were simultaneously mutated, indicating that
these elements, or some combination of these elements, may provide key
regulatory contributions necessary for complete NWB responsiveness.
Because previous work has shown the involvement of MCAT elements in
mediating both muscle-specific and inducible (muscle loading and
hormonal stimuli) gene expression, they represent likely candidate
elements for a regulatory role during NWB (6, 23, 24, 28,
44). Furthermore, an extensive electrophoretic mobility shift
assay (EMSA) analysis to determine whether MCAT elements might be
involved in NWB regulation has not been investigated. Therefore, one
aim of this study was to investigate by EMSA analysis the potential
contribution of the distal and proximal MCAT elements to the regulation
of
MyHC expression in response to NWB activity. Another goal was to
determine the mechanistic basis underlying the unexpected upregulation
of transgene
293wt after NWB. Thus we performed a transgenic
mutagenesis analysis to test the hypothesis that the strong positive
dMCAT element drives upregulation of transgene
293wt in response to
NWB in the absence of the upstream NWB-responsive region (Fig.
1A).
Our transgenic analyses demonstrate conclusively that the dMCAT element
underlies the atypical NWB response of transgene
293wt and,
importantly, reveal that previously unidentified sequence(s) located
downstream from the dMCAT element participate in NWB regulation. In
addition, our EMSA analyses suggest that the dMCAT element contributes,
at least in part, to NWB regulation of the
MyHC gene by incurring
decreased binding of transcriptional activator proteins, thus allowing
negative regulation to proceed in the presence of other intact
NWB-responsive elements. As regards the proximal MCAT element, our EMSA
results indicate that the rat pMCAT element, but not the human pMCAT
element, is likely involved in NWB regulation. Our EMSA analyses also
reveal that the human and rat
MyHC pMCAT elements display very
different nuclear protein binding properties that are likely due to
differences in nucleotide composition, because these differences were
consistently observed whether using mouse or rat nuclear extract or in
vitro synthesized human TEF-1 proteins. These data provide the first
evidence that combinatorial interactions are required to confer
complete NWB regulation of the human
MyHC gene and that specific
combinatorial interactions may differ with species.
 |
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES |
Transgenes and site-directed mutagenesis.
Wild-type transgene
293wt consists of 293 bp of human
MyHC
promoter sequence and 120 bp of 5'-untranslated region (UTR; includes
exon 1), fused to the 5'-end of the bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) gene (Fig. 1B). The distal MCAT
element within the human
293 promoter was mutated within the plasmid p
293CAT using the QuikChange site-directed mutagenesis kit
(Stratagene) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Detailed
procedures for PCR-mediated incorporation of mutant distal MCAT
sequence have been described elsewhere (44). Briefly,
complementary oligonucleotide primers harboring mutations (bold
lowercase) within the distal MCAT were designed as follows:
5'-GCATAGTTAAGCCAGCCAGCTGcGtctTagGAGGCCTGGCCTGGG-3. Bp substitutions were incorporated at nucleotides determined by our
previous diethylpyrocarbonate interference footprinting to be crucial
DNA protein contact sites (45). Unintentional
transcription factor recognition sites were not created by these
mutations as assessed by cross-referencing the mutated primers against
the Eukaryotic Transcription Factor database (TFD) available on the Wisconsin Package [version 10.0; Genetics Computer Group (GCG), Madison, WI]. Successful incorporation of the mutation was verified via automated sequencing of both strands (Applied Biosystems, model
377). Wild-type (
293wt) and mutant (
293Mm) transgenes were
isolated and purified as described previously (44).
Transgenic mice.
Transgenic mice were generated by microinjection of purified transgene
DNA into pronuclei of zygotes as described previously (40). Transgenic founder mice were identified by Southern
blot analysis, and copy number was then estimated (47).
Transgene-positive offspring were identified by PCR amplification by
using primers specific for the CAT gene (47). All lines
were maintained in a heterozygous state by backcrossing to the
nontransgenic FVB/N parental mouse strain.
Animal care and NWB procedure.
The Animal Care Committee for the University of Missouri-Columbia
approved the NWB procedure used in this study, and the NWB mice were
housed in an Association for the Assessment and Accreditation of
Laboratory Animal Care International-accredited animal facility. All
animals were provided with food and water ad libitum and were housed at
room temperature (24°C) with a 12:12-h light-dark cycle in standard
rodent cages (control animals) or in cages designed for head-down tilt
hindlimb suspension (NWB) as described in detail previously
(29). Adult female wild-type
293 (
293wt) transgenic mice from line 2 are used in this study to show 1) control
vs. NWB body and muscle weight and 2) basal and NWB
expression levels (Tables 1 and 2). Basal
and NWB expression levels for transgenic mice lines 99, 96, and 5 have
been reported previously (30) and are used here to
facilitate comparisons against basal and NWB expression data collected
for transgenic mice carrying mutant transgene
293Mm (Table
2). Adult female
293Mm transgenic mice from lines 4, 6, 7, and 9 (
22 g) were assigned to one of two groups:
1) a NWB group that used 2 wk of hindlimb suspension to impose NWB conditions (NWB; n = 8), and 2) a
group that served as cage ambulatory controls for the NWB group
(control; n = 8). After a 2-wk experimental period,
both cage control and NWB mice were anesthetized and weighed, and their
control soleus (CS) and NWB-soleus (NWB-S) muscles were collected for
further study (Tables 1 and 2). At the same time, we collected
gastrocnemius muscle (
123 mg) from 40 adult (
22g) control mice to
be used for the isolation of nuclear extract. The gastrocnemius muscle
was used for the isolation of nuclear extract because of the small size of the CS (7-8 mg) muscle. All control and NWB muscles were
trimmed clean of fat and connective tissue, weighed, and stored at
80°C until assayed for CAT-specific activity (CS and NWB-S) or used for the isolation of nuclear extract (control gastrocnemius). All mice
designated for terminal sample collection were anesthetized by using
2.5% avertin at a dosage of 0.017 ml/g of body wt. Mice were
euthanized by cervical dislocation while under anesthesia.
Rats were used for the preparation of nuclear extracts utilized in EMSA
studies. Each EMSA was repeated using three to four different nuclear
extracts in which each extract represented either 20 control rats or 30 NWB rats. Adult female Sprague Dawley rats (~230 g) were assigned to
one of two groups: 1) a NWB group that used 2 wk of hindlimb
suspension to impose NWB conditions (NWB; n = 30/extract) and 2) a group that served as cage ambulatory controls for the NWB group (control; n = 20/extract).
Rats were prepared for the NWB experiment by a modification of the
noninvasive tail traction procedure as described previously
(29). After 2 wk of NWB, body weight decreased by 10%
(control = 230 ± 4.68 g vs. NWB = 208 ± 3.42 g), whereas soleus weight decreased by 42% (control = 114.4 ± 1.8 mg vs. NWB = 66.35 ± 2.3). After 2 wk of NWB, both control and NWB rats were anesthetized and weighed, and
their CS and NWB-S muscles were collected for production of nuclear
extracts (30). All rats designated for terminal sample collection were anesthetized by using 0.1 ml/g body wt of anesthetic containing 87 mg/ml ketamine and 13 mg/ml xylazine. Rats were euthanized by CO2 while under anesthesia.
CAT assays.
CAT assays were performed as previously described (41).
Muscle extracts were prepared from transgenic tissues by using a glass
tissue homogenizer to disrupt tissues in 250 mM
Tris · HCL (pH 7.8) and 5 mM EDTA. All muscle
extracts were prepared from frozen tissue, and each n value
represents the number of pooled soleus muscles from one mouse.
The protein concentration of the extracts was determined by the method
of Bradford (5). Muscle extracts were heated at 65°C for
10 min, followed by centrifugation at 10,000 g for 20 min.
Because different transgenic lines exhibit inherently different
transgene expression levels, it was necessary to use different amounts
of tissue extract and variable incubation times so that the CAT enzyme
activities could be determined within a linear range (30% conversion)
as described previously (30, 39, 41, 48). The percent
conversion of [14C]chloramphenicol to the acetylated form
was quantified by using a PhosphorImager (Storm860) with ImageQuant
version 5.1 software. Direct comparisons between and within transgenic
lines representing both control and experimental groups (CS and NWB-S)
were facilitated by presenting the data as specific CAT activity
(picomoles per microgram of protein per minute) (Table 2).
Preparation of nuclear protein extract from adult skeletal
muscle.
Nuclear extracts (NE) were isolated from adult rat CS and NWB-S muscle
and from mouse control gastrocnemius muscle as previously described
(30). Three independent batches of CS, NWB-S, and control
gastrocnemius nuclear extract were isolated and used in EMSA analysis
and yielded the same results. Protein concentration was
determined according to Bradford (5).
EMSA.
All oligonucleotide probes used in this study are listed in Table
3. EMSAs were carried out as previously
described (30, 43, 44). The double-stranded human and rat
proximal MCAT oligonucleotide probes were labeled by fill-in reaction
using Klenow fragment pf Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I
(Stratagene, La Jolla, Ca) and [
-32P]dCTP
(3,000Ci/mmol). The human distal MCAT oligonucleotide probe was
end-labeled by T4 polynucleotide kinase (New England Biolabs, Beverly,
Ma) and [
-32P]dATP (6,000Ci/mmol). All probes were
purified by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis before use in EMSAs.
Binding reactions were performed by using either rat CS or NWB-S
nuclear extract (dMCAT probe = 4.0 µg, pMCAT probe = 5.0 µg) or mouse control gastrocnemius nuclear extract (pMCAT probe = 5.5 µg) and 20,000 cpm of labeled probe for 20 min at room
temperature in a 25-µl total volume. Where indicated, binding
reactions contained 1 µl (rat pMCAT element) or 5 µl (human pMCAT
probe) of in vitro-translated human NTEF-1 protein in place of muscle
nuclear extract. The binding reactions were resolved on a 5%
nondenaturing polyacrylamide gel at 220 volts for 2.5 h at 4°C.
Supershift EMSAs were performed by first preincubating skeletal muscle
nuclear extract with 2 µl of either preimmune serum (PI) or the
corresponding antibody for 30 min at room temperature, followed by the
addition of the 32P-labeled DNA probe. After
electrophoresis, the gels were dried, and DNA protein complexes were
visualized by autoradiography at
80°C.
In vitro transcription/translation.
In vitro-translated protein was produced by using 1 µg of TEF-1
expression plasmid in the T7 transcription/translation
(TNT) rabbit reticulocyte-coupled TnT system according to
the instructions provided by the manufacturer (Promega). The expression
plasmid corresponded to NTEF-1 [pXJ40-TEF-1, open reading frame (ORF) of human TEF-1] (21, 51). Parallel TNT
reactions were performed in the presence of
[35S]methionine (Perkin Elmer). Efficient translation and
expected molecular weights of the protein products were verified by
resolving the radiolabeled reaction products on a sodium dodecyl
sulfate-12% polyacrylamide gel (SDS-PAGE). Equivalent reactions of
lysate not programmed with plasmid DNA were used as negative controls (unprogrammed lysate, UL).
Antibodies.
The antibodies used in this study were as follows: NTEF-1, mouse
polyclonal antibody raised against amino acids 86-199 of human
TEF-1 (BD Transduction Laboratories); poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against full-length human
PARP (Boehringer Mannheim); and Max, rabbit polyclonal antibody raised
against full-length mouse Max (Upstate Biotechnology). All antibodies
listed hereafter were purchased from Santa Cruz Biotechnology and
include MyoD, rabbit polyclonal antibody raised against full-length
(amino acids 1-318) mouse MyoD; myogenin, rabbit polyclonal
antibody raised against full-length (amino acids 1-225) rat
myogenin; upstream stimulatory factor-1 (USF-1), rabbit polyclonal
antibody raised against carboxy-terminal amino acids 291-310 of
human USF-1; E2A.E12, rabbit polyclonal raised against a peptide in the
carboxy terminus of human E47 and corresponding to amino acids
422-439 of human E12; and HEB, rabbit polyclonal antibody raised
against a peptide in the carboxy-terminal domain of human HEB (HTF 4).
Statistical analysis.
All statistical analyses were performed by using SPSS Graduate Pack
10.0 program (SPSS, Chicago, IL). A Levene's test for equality of
variances was performed, followed by a two-tailed independent-samples t-test used to assess differences
between group means. Where the Levene's test was rejected
(significance
0.05), the separate variance t-test
for means was used, where equal variances were not assumed. All data
are reported as means ± SE. The lowest significance level
accepted was P < 0.05.
 |
RESULTS |
The formation of a highly specific and enriched low-mobility
complex at the
MyHC dMCAT decreases after 2 wk of NWB.
To determine whether the binding properties of the
MyHC dMCAT
element differed between control and NWB conditions, we performed a
direct and competition EMSA analysis using either CS or NWB nuclear
extract. Binding reactions containing the 32P-labeled
wild-type dMCAT probe (Table 3) and either CS or NWB-S nuclear extract
showed the formation of multiple binding complexes termed low-mobility
complex (LMC), intermediate-mobility complex (IMC), and high-mobility
complex (HMC) (Fig. 2). The formation of
a LMC when using NWB-S nuclear extract was substantially reduced compared with the LMC formed when using CS nuclear extract, whereas those comprising the HMC increased (Fig. 2, lane 1 vs.
6). The addition of 100-fold molar excess cold wild-type
MyHC dMCAT probe to binding reactions containing either CS or NWB-S
nuclear extract completely abolished complex formation, indicating that
these complexes are specific (Fig. 2, lanes 2 and
7). Interestingly, the addition of 100-fold molar excess
cold cTnT MCAT1 probe [an element previously shown to form LMC, IMC,
and HMC binding complexes (28)] to binding reactions
containing either CS or NWB-S nuclear extract prevented IMC and HMC
formation and partially competed away the LMC formation (Fig. 2,
lane 3 vs. 8). The addition of 100-fold molar
excess cold muscle creatine kinase (MCK) transcriptional regulatory
factor x (Trex) element [an element that has relative sequence
similarity to consensus MCAT site but that is shown not to bind TEF-1
(12)] to binding reactions containing either CS or NWB-S
nuclear extract did not effectively compete for complex formation (Fig.
2, lane 4 vs. 9). Because the
immediate 5'-flanking region of the
MyHC dMCAT element contains a
consensus E-box element, we examined whether E-box binding proteins
were components of the LMC. The addition of 100-fold molar excess
high-affinity MCK E-box as competitor to binding reactions containing
either CS or NWB-S nuclear extract did not alter complex formation
(Fig. 2, lane 5 vs. 10). These data show that
specific binding complex formation at the dMCAT element differed when
using CS vs. NWB-S nuclear extract, and this difference was
characterized by a striking reduction in LMC formation only when using
NWB extract. Also, known muscle regulatory factors (MyoD, myogenin)
previously shown to bind the MCK E-box are likely not components of the
specific binding complex formed at the
MyHC dMCAT element.

View larger version (74K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 2.
Competition electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA)
assessment of sequence-specific DNA-protein binding at the MyHC
distal MCAT element. 32P-labeled MyHC distal MCAT
(dMCAT) oligonucleotide probe was incubated with 4.0 µg of either
control soleus (CS; lanes 1-5) or NWB-soleus
(NWB-S; lanes 6-10) nuclear extract. To
characterize the sequence specificity of binding at the dMCAT, the
following cold (nonradioactive) competitors were added to the reaction
mixture at a 100-fold molar excess before the addition of the probe:
dMCAT (lanes 2 and 7), cardiac troponin T (cTnT)
MCAT (lanes 3 and 8), muscle creatine kinase
(MCK) Trex (lanes 4 and 9), and the MCK
high-affinity right E-box (lanes 5 and 10).
Lane 11 contains no extract (free). Low-, intermediate-, and
high-mobility complexes are designated LMC, IMC, and HMC, respectively.
Free probe represents excess unreacted radiolabeled probe. A decrease
in LMC formation and a concomitant increase in HMC formation was
consistently observed with NWB-S nuclear extract (lane 6)
relative to CS (lane 1). These experiments were repeated
using 3 independent batches of nuclear extracts, which yielded the same
results.
|
|
dMCAT element core nucleotides are required for DNA-protein binding
complex formation.
To determine whether different nucleotides within the 21-bp
MyHC
dMCAT element interact with CS vs. NWB-S nuclear protein, we performed
competition EMSA analysis using scanning mutagenesis. In these
experiments, we introduced nucleotide substitutions 2 bp at a time,
starting within the immediate 5'-flanking region (E-box) and extending
throughout the core MCAT element and its immediate 3'-flanking region
(Fig. 3, A and B).
The resulting unlabeled oligonucleotides were then added in 100-fold
molar excess to binding reactions containing either CS or NWB-S nuclear
extract or the 32P-labeled wild-type dMCAT probe (Fig.
3A). As shown previously, the addition of excess wild-type
MyHC dMCAT probe to binding reactions containing either CS or NWB-S
nuclear extract completely abolished the formation of all binding
complexes (Fig. 3A, lanes 2 and 12).
Similarly, all binding complexes were effectively competed away by the
addition of either dMCAT mut-1, mut-2 (mutations within E-box), or
mut-7 (3'-flanking region) to binding reactions containing either CS
(Fig. 3A, lane 1 vs. 3, 4,
and 9) or NWB-S (Fig. 3A, lane 11 vs.
13, 14, and 19) nuclear extract.
Importantly, mutant MCAT probes carrying nucleotide substitutions
within the core MCAT element (mut-3, 4, 5, and 8) did not act as
effective competitors of complex formation when added to binding
reactions containing CS (Fig. 3A, lane 1 vs.
5-7 and 10) or NWB-S (Fig.
3A, lane 11 vs. 15, 16,
18, and 20) nuclear extract. Interestingly, the
addition of dMCAT mut-6 probe to binding reactions containing CS (Fig. 3A, lane 1 vs. 8) or NWB-S (Fig.
3A, lane 11 vs. 18) nuclear extract partially competed for LMC formation, but not IMC or HMC. These data
show that nucleotides comprising the core
MyHC dMCAT element are
critical for the formation of all binding complexes when using either
CS or NWB-S nuclear extract (Fig. 3C).

View larger version (54K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 3.
Competition EMSA determination of specific nucleotides involved in
DNA-protein interactions at the MyHC dMCAT element. A:
32P-labeled MyHC dMCAT oligonucleotide was incubated
with 4.0 µg of either CS (lanes 1-10) or NWB-S
(lanes 11-20) nuclear extract. Where
indicated, 100-fold molar excess of either competitor
(nonradiolabeled), dMCAT oligonucleotide (lanes 2 and
12) or various dMCAT mutant oligonucleotides (B)
(mut 1-8, lanes 3-10 and
13-20), were added to the reaction before the
addition of the probe. B: summary of competition EMSA with
dMCAT mutant oligonucleotides. Wild-type dMCATwt represents dMCAT
sequence devoid of mutations. The core MCAT sequence is indicated in
gray stipple. Mutated bases are in lowercase and bold type, and bp that
are unchanged from wt sequence are represented as dots. +++,
Competition as effective as dMCATwt sequence; ++, partially effective
competition; , no detectable competition. C: the dMCAT
oligonucleotide is shown with MCAT core sequence in gray, and E-box is
in bold face. The 2-bp numbering (1-7) above the oligonucleotide
sequence corresponds to that particular mutant oligonucleotide shown in
B. The heavy underline under LMC delineates nucleotides
whose mutation renders the dMCAT an ineffective competitor, especially
of the LMC, and suggests that this region is the putative binding site
for the LMC. These results were found for each of 3 independent batches
of isolated nuclear extract.
|
|
NTEF-1, PARP, and Max comprise the LMC formed at the
MyHC distal
MCAT element.
Although we have shown previously that NTEF-1, PARP, and Max comprise
the LMC formed at the dMCAT element when using CS nuclear extract, it
is possible that different nuclear proteins form the LMC under NWB
conditions (44). Thus we performed antibody EMSAs using
polyclonal antibodies that recognize NTEF-1, PARP, or Max to determine
whether these proteins comprised the LMC formed at the
MyHC dMCAT
element when using NWB-S nuclear extract or whether other proteins were
components of this complex. The specific binding complexes formed at
the 32P-labeled human
MyHC dMCAT element when reacted
with NWB-S nuclear extract were not altered by preincubation with PI
(Fig. 4, lane 2 vs.
3). The addition of polyclonal
NTEF-1 antibody to binding reactions containing NWB-S nuclear extract
supershifted only the top band of the IMC doublet and the prominent HMC
band, whereas the LMC was partially abolished (Fig. 4, lane
2 vs. 4). Interestingly, the addition of either
polyclonal PARP or Max antibody to binding reactions using NWB-S
extract essentially immunodepleted the LMC, which resulted in an
embellishment of the top band of the IMC, which entirely comprises
NTEF-1 protein (Fig. 4, lane 2 vs. 5 and
6). When all combinations of the three polyclonal antibodies were added to binding reactions using NWB-S nuclear extract, the LMC
was completely immunodepleted (Fig. 4, lane 2 vs.
7). The preincubation of binding reactions containing either
CS or NWB-S nuclear extract with antibodies recognizing other
E-box-binding bHLH (basic helix-loop-helix) and bHLH-Zip proteins
(MyoD, myogenin, E2A, HEB, and USF) did not alter
MyHC dMCAT element
binding complex formation or mobility (unpublished observation). These
data support several noteworthy conclusions: 1) proteins
antigenically related to NTEF-1, PARP, and Max comprise the LMC formed
at the human
MyHC dMCAT element; 2) protein
antigenically related to NTEF-1 likely constitutes the prominent HMC
band and the top band of the IMC doublet; and 3) decreased binding of
NTEF-1, PARP, and Max at the dMCAT element under NWB conditions may, in
part, contribute to NWB decreases in
MyHC gene expression.

View larger version (69K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 4.
Antibody EMSA analysis of NWB-S nuclear extract binding
complexes at the MyHC dMCAT element. 32P-labeled MyHC
dMCAT oligonucleotide probe was incubated with 4.0 µg of either
CS (lane 1) or NWB-S (lanes 2-7)
nuclear extract. EMSA analysis was performed by preincubation of NWB-S
nuclear extract with 2 µl of either preimmune serum (PI; lane
3), NTEF-1 (lane 4), poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP;
lane 5), or Max (lane 6) antibody for 30 min at
room temperature before the addition of the probe. All 3 antibodies
(NTEF-1, PARP, and Max) were included in the reaction mixture as shown
in lane 7. The addition of an antibody to the reaction
mixture is denoted (+) above the corresponding lane. Transcription
enhancer factor (TEF)-1 SS marks the supershifted TEF-1 components of
the IMC and HMC. Free probe represents excess unreacted radiolabeled
probe. This assay was performed by using 3 different batches of nuclear
extract, which yielded the same results.
|
|
Morphological changes after NWB.
Body and soleus muscle weight data reported for transgenic mice
harboring mutant transgene
293Mm represent pooled weights from
transgenic lines 4, 6, 7, and 9 (Table 1). Compared with control
values, 2 wk of NWB activity imposed by hindlimb suspension resulted in
a significant decrease in the body wt of
293Mm (
15.8%) and
293wt (
19.3%) transgenic mice (Table 1). Similarly, significant decreases were measured in both absolute (
293Mm =
27.1%;
293wt =
31.9%) and normalized (
293Mm =
17.1%;
293wt =
16%) NWB-S muscle weight compared with control
values (Table 1). These data are consistent with our previous findings
showing that a 2-wk NWB treatment produces statistically significant
decreases in both mouse body and muscle mass (29, 30).
Mutation of distal MCAT element restores NWB regulation and alters
basal slow muscle expression of wild-type transgene
293wt.
We examined the hypothesis that the dMCAT element is responsible for
the unexpected upregulation of transgene
293wt in the absence of the
upstream NWB-region by studying multiple independent lines of two
distinct classes of transgenic mice (Fig. 1B). The first
class of transgenic mouse carried a wild-type transgene comprised of
293 bp of human
MyHC promoter fused to the CAT reporter gene
(
293wt). The second class carried the same transgene, except that
the highly conserved dMCAT element was mutated (
293Mm). Importantly,
if this mutation restores NWB regulation, we will have elucidated the
mechanistic basis underlying the atypical response of transgene
293wt after NWB and revealed that previously unidentified
sequence(s) located downstream of the dMCAT element participate in NWB regulation.
To examine the impact of dMCAT element mutation on basal transgene
expression, we performed expression assays. Measured CAT specific
activity (picomoles per microgram of protein per minute) in CS muscle
extract of transgenic mice harboring mutant transgene
293Mm was
significantly decreased compared with CS muscle extract of mice
carrying wild-type transgene
293wt (Table 2). These results confirm
our previous findings by demonstrating that the dMCAT element acted as
a strong positive cis-acting element that is required for high basal
levels of wild-type transgene
293wt expression (44). We
next examined what effect mutation of the dMCAT element would have on
NWB regulation of mutant transgene
293Mm. After 2 wk of NWB, the CAT
specific activity measured in NWB-S muscle extract obtained from
transgenic mice representing each of four independent transgenic lines
carrying mutant transgene
293Mm showed decreases ranging from
33.7
to
54.1% compared with that measured in CS muscle extract of
293Mm mice (Table 2). These results were in sharp contrast to the
CAT-specific activity measured in NWB-S extract of mice carrying
wild-type transgene
293wt, which showed increases ranging from 1.7- to 2.5-fold above those measured in CS muscle extract of
293wt mice (Table 2). Because NWB downregulation was consistently obtained for
each of four independent
293Mm transgenic lines that carried different transgene copy numbers (Table 2), it is unlikely that our
results are due to chromosomal integration site or seldom encountered
copy number effects. Our findings are consistent with the
well-documented fact that not all transgenes express in a copy
number-dependent fashion, in contrast to the claim by Giger et
al. (15). In fact, the incidence of transgenes
that do express in a copy number dependent manner is rare, and these
transgenes have been shown to be associated with a locus control region
(27, 35). Thus our findings indicate the following:
1) the dMCAT element is required for high-level basal slow
muscle expression of wild-type transgene
293wt, 2) the
unexpected upregulation of wild-type transgene
293wt in response to
NWB activity is driven by the dMCAT element, and 3) previously
unidentified element(s) located downstream from the dMCAT (
290/
284)
element contribute to decreases in
MyHC expression under NWB conditions.
Dissimilar binding of rat nuclear extract between human and rat
MyHC pMCAT elements suggests a species difference in regulatory
roles.
The pMCAT element (
210/
203) resides downstream from the dMCAT
element (
290/
284) and has been shown to play a regulatory role in
the downregulation of injected rat
MyHC reporter plasmids in the
soleus muscle of spinal cord isolated rats (19). Because spinal cord isolation and NWB are associated with decreased soleus muscle
MyHC gene expression, we have used an EMSA analysis to evaluate whether the human pMCAT element (
210/
203) serves a regulatory role in response to NWB. Incubation of
32P-labeled human pMCAT element with rat CS nuclear extract
resulted in the formation of three binding complexes (termed C1, C2,
C3) that did not change in intensity when rat NWB-S nuclear extract was
used (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 and
6). The addition of 100-fold
molar excess cold wild-type human pMCAT probe to binding reactions
containing rat CS nuclear extract competed away complex C2 only,
whereas competition with 100-fold molar excess of mutant human pMCAT
(pMCATm) element did not compete away complex C2 but did compete away
complexes C1 and C3, indicating that only complex C2 represents
specific binding (Fig. 5A, lanes 2 and
3). When binding reactions containing rat CS or NWB-S
nuclear extract were preincubated with PI, complex formation at the
human pMCAT element was not altered (Fig. 5A, lanes
1 vs. 4 and 6 vs. 7), whereas
addition of polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody led to a supershift (SS) of only
complex C2 (Fig. 5A, lanes 1 vs. 5 and
6 vs. 8). These data indicate that a nuclear protein antigenically related to NTEF-1 forms the low-intensity C2
specific binding complex at the human pMCAT element. However, because
the intensity of this complex did not differ between control and NWB
conditions, it is unlikely that the human pMCAT element plays a
regulatory role under NWB conditions.

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 5.
Competition and antibody EMSA analysis of human and rat
pMCAT elements using CS or NWB-S extract. A:
32P-labeled human pMCAT probe was incubated with 5.0 µg
of either CS (lanes 1-5) or NWB-S (lanes
6-8) nuclear extract. EMSA analysis of sequence specific
binding at the human pMCAT element was determined by the addition of
100-fold molar excess nonradioactive (cold) wild-type or mutant human
pMCAT element before the addition of the 32P-labeled human
pMCAT probe. Note that only complex C2 is competed away by the addition
of wild-type pMCAT element (lane 1 vs. 2),
whereas the addition of mutant pMCATm probe does not compete for
complex C2 (lane 1 vs. 3). For antibody
supershift, EMSA rat CS or NWB-S nuclear extract was preincubated with
2 µl of PI (lanes 4 and 7) or polyclonal NTEF-1
antibody (lanes 5 and 8) for 30 min at room
temperature before the addition of the probe. B:
32P-labeled rat pMCAT probe was incubated with 5.0 µg of
either CS (lanes 9-13) or NWB-S (lanes
14-16) nuclear extract. Specificity of binding at the
rat pMCAT element was determined by the addition of 100-fold molar
excess nonradioactive (cold) wild-type or mutant rat pMCAT element
before the addition of the 32P-labeled rat pMCAT probe.
Note that only complex C2 is competed away by the addition of wild-type
pMCAT element (lane 1 vs. 2), whereas the
addition of mutant pMCATm probe does not compete for complex C2
(lane 1 vs. 3). For antibody supershift, EMSA rat
CS or NWB-S nuclear extract was preincubated with 2 µl of PI
(lanes 12 and 15) or polyclonal NTEF-1
antibody (lanes 13 and 16) for 30 min at room
temperature before the addition of the probe. The anti-NTEF-1 antibody
produced a supershift of binding complex C2 (human pMCAT, lanes
5 and 8; rat pMCAT, lanes 13 and
16). This assay was performed by using 3 different batches
of nuclear extract which yielded the same results. C:
alignment of MCAT core elements is delineated in bold type. Nucleotide
differences between the human vs. rat pMCAT element are underlined on
the human sequence. The overlapping rat pMCAT element is boxed.
|
|
Our findings for the human pMCAT element prompted us to evaluate
whether the rat pMCAT element contributes to NWB regulation, a role not
yet assessed for this element. Given that the human and rat pMCAT
elements differ in nucleotide composition (Fig. 5C and Table
3), it is possible that the binding properties of these elements may
differ. Thus, to evaluate whether differences in nucleotide composition
between the human and rat pMCAT elements would influence nuclear
protein binding and/or NWB regulation, we performed an EMSA analysis.
Incubation of 32P-labeled rat pMCAT element with either rat
CS or NWB-S nuclear extract resulted in the formation of three binding
complexes (C1, C2, C3); however, the intensity of complex C2 was robust
and decreased considerably when NWB-S nuclear extract was used (Fig.
5B, lane 9 vs. 14). Competition
studies revealed that complex C2 represents specific binding because
the addition of 100-fold molar excess cold wild-type rat pMCAT probe to
binding reactions containing rat CS nuclear extract competed away only
complex C2 (Fig. 5B, lane 9 vs. 10),
whereas 100-fold molar excess mutant rat pMCAT (pMCATm) element did not
compete away complex C2 (Fig. 5B, lane 9 vs.
11). The preincubation of binding reactions containing rat CS or NWB-S nuclear extract with PI did not interfere with complex formation at the rat pMCAT element (Fig. 5B, lanes
9 vs. 12 and 14 vs. 15), whereas
addition of polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody supershifted complex C2 (Fig.
5B, lanes 9 vs. 13 and 14 vs. 16). In contrast to our findings of weak binding at the
human pMCAT element, these data clearly demonstrate that a nuclear
protein antigenically related to NTEF-1 interacts more avidly with the
rat pMCAT element under basal and NWB conditions. Moreover, our EMSA
findings of a decrease in the intensity of specific complex C2 when
using NWB-S nuclear extracts suggest that the rat pMCAT element likely plays a regulatory role in directing decreased rat
MyHC expression under NWB conditions.
Use of mouse nuclear extracts or in vitro-synthesized human TEF-1
proteins confirms a species difference in binding properties of TEF-1
at the human vs. rat
MyHC pMCAT elements.
To clarify whether the dissimilar binding of nuclear TEF-1 at the human
vs. rat pMCAT element was due to differences in nucleotide composition
and not species difference in nuclear TEF-1 protein, we performed an
EMSA analysis using either mouse nuclear extract or in vitro
synthesized human TEF-1 protein. EMSA analysis of binding reactions
containing mouse control gastrocnemius nuclear extract and a
32P-labeled human pMCAT element revealed three binding
complexes (C1, C2, C3; Fig. 6) that were
of very low intensity like those obtained when using rat nuclear
extract. When 100-fold molar excess cold wild-type pMCAT element was
added to the binding reaction, only complex C2 was abolished (Fig. 6,
lanes 1 vs. 2). The addition of PI to the binding reaction
did not alter the complex formation (Fig. 6, lane 3),
whereas addition of polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody resulted in a SS of
complex C2 only (Fig. 6, lane 4). Similarly, three binding
complexes formed at the 32P-labeled rat pMCAT element when
mouse control gastrocnemius nuclear extract was used, and only complex
C2 was competed away with the addition of 100-fold molar excess
unlabeled wild-type pMCAT probe (Fig. 6, lane 5 vs.
6). In contrast, formation of complex C2 at the rat pMCAT
element was highly enriched compared with the formation of complex C2
when using the human pMCAT element (Fig. 6, lane 1 vs.
5). Preincubation of binding reactions with PI did not alter complex formation at the rat pMCAT element (Fig. 6, lane 7),
whereas addition of polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody resulted in a SS of
complex C2 (Fig. 6, lane 8).

View larger version (67K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 6.
Analyses of mouse nuclear extract binding at the human
and rat pMCAT elements. All binding reactions contained 5.5 µg of
control mouse gastrocnemius (CG) nuclear extract and either
32P-labeled human pMCAT (lanes 1-4)
or rat pMCAT (lanes 4-8) element. Specific
binding was determined by the addition of 100-fold molar excess cold
wild-type human (lane 2) or rat (lane 6) pMCAT
before the addition of the 32P-labeled human or rat pMCAT
probe. Note that formation of specific complex C2 is highly enriched
when reacting the rat pMCAT element with control mouse gastrocnemius
nuclear extract, whereas complex C2 is barely detectable when using the
human pMCAT element. Antibody supershift EMSA was performed by
preincubation of mouse control gastrocnemius nuclear extract with 2 µl of PI (lanes 3 and 7) or polyclonal NTEF-1
antibody (lanes 4 and 8) for 30 min at room
temperature before the addition of the probe. Free probe
(lane 9) represents the rat pMCAT probe resolved
in the absence of mouse nuclear extract.
|
|
We next performed an EMSA analysis using in vitro-synthesized human
NTEF-1 protein. EMSA analysis of binding reactions containing in
vitro-translated human NTEF-1 (Fig. 7,
inset, [35S]methionine-labeled NTEF-1) and the
32P-labeled human pMCAT element revealed the formation of a
binding complex whose intensity was barely detectable and distinct from the complex observed when UL was used (Fig. 7, lane 1 vs.
2). The addition of 100-fold molar excess unlabeled
wild-type human pMCAT probe to binding reactions inhibited complex
formation (Fig. 7, lane 3). Preincubation of binding
reactions with PI did not interfere with complex formation at the human
pMCAT element (Fig. 7, lane 4), whereas addition of
polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody resulted in a supershifted complex (Fig. 7,
lane 5). In contrast, EMSA analysis using the
32P-labeled rat pMCAT element in binding reactions
containing in vitro-translated human NTEF-1 showed the formation of a
very robust binding complex distinct from the complex observed when UL
was used (Fig. 7, lane 6 vs. 7). When
100-fold molar excess cold rat pMCAT probe was added to binding
reactions, complex formation was abolished (Fig. 7, lane 8).
The preincubation of binding reactions with PI did not alter complex
formation (Fig. 7, lane 9), whereas addition of
polyclonal NTEF-1 antibody led to a supershifted complex (Fig. 7,
lane 10). When NTEF-1 antibody was reacted with either the
human or rat pMCAT element (Fig. 7, lanes 12 and
13), complex formation was not observed, revealing that the
supershifted bands shown in Fig. 7, lanes 5 and
10, are not due to antibody-DNA complex formation.

View larger version (80K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
|
Fig. 7.
EMSA analyses of human and rat pMCAT element binding of
recombinant NTEF-1. Inset reveals the correct size of
[35S]methionine-labeled human NTEF-1. Rabbit reticulocyte
lysate system was programmed with 1 µg of circular NTEF-1 in the
presence of [35S]methionine. The
transcription/translation product was resolved by sodium dodecyl
sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) and exposed to
film. Molecular weight markers (in kDa) are shown at left.
The lane marked UL (unprogrammed lysate) represents parallel reaction
not programmed with TEF-1 expression plasmid. EMSA of
32P-labeled human pMCAT and rat pMCAT element reacted with
in vitro-translated human NTEF-1 TnT product. Binding assays contained
1 µl of UL (lanes 1 and 6) or 5 µl of NTEF-1
TnT protein for the human pMCAT probe (lanes
2-5) or 1 µl of NTEF-1 TnT protein for the rat pMCAT
probe (lanes 7-10). Sequence specific binding
was determined by the addition of 100-fold molar excess cold wild-type
human (lane 3) or rat (lane 8) pMCAT before the
addition of the 32P-labeled human or rat pMCAT probe. Note
the enriched binding of NTEF-1 at the rat pMCAT element (lane
7) vs. the human pMCAT element (lane 2). Antibody
supershift EMSA was performed by preincubation of in vitro synthesized
human NTEF-1 antibody(lanes 5 and 10) for 30 min
at room temperature before the addition of the probe. Lane
11 represents free labeled human pMCAT probe, whereas lanes
12 and 13 show that NTEF-1 antibody reacted with either
the human or rat pMCAT element, respectively, does not form a
complex.
|
|
Collectively, our EMSA results conclusively show that when using rat or
mouse nuclear extract or in vitro-synthesized human NTEF-1 protein, the
rat pMCAT element binds more avidly than does the human pMCAT
element, supporting the notion that the difference in nucleotide
composition between these elements underlies this dissimilar binding.
 |
DISCUSSION |
The genetic regulatory programs that control the adaptation of
adult-stage skeletal muscle phenotype in response to decreased weight
bearing are complex and remain incompletely understood. To gain insight
into this process, our current study utilizes a transgenic mutagenesis
and EMSA analysis to investigate whether two distinct
MyHC proximal
promoter MCAT elements (dMCAT and pMCAT) serve regulatory roles during
NWB. Our transgenic study provides the first in vivo evidence that:
1) the dMCAT element is responsible for the unexpected
upregulation of human transgene
293wt in response to NWB, and
2) regulatory sequence(s) located downstream from the dMCAT
element are sufficient to direct NWB responsiveness. Our EMSA
experiments are the first to reveal the existence of a species (human
vs. rat) difference in
MyHC pMCAT element binding of NTEF-1 under
both control and NWB conditions, suggesting a possible species
divergence in functional roles served by this element.
Transgenic mutagenesis analysis reveals that the dMCAT element is
required to achieve high-level basal expression of transgene
293wt.
MCAT regulatory elements are frequently found in the control region of
numerous muscle genes and have been shown to mediate muscle-specific
and inducible gene transcription. In our previous transgenic
mutagenesis study, we found that mutation of the dMCAT element did not
abolish induction of transgene
293Mm expression in the functionally
overloaded adult plantaris muscle; however, basal expression levels of
this transgene were significantly reduced (44). Likewise,
our current transgenic analysis shows that mutation of the dMCAT
element significantly decreases transgene
293Mm expression in the
adult CS muscle, indicating that in the context of a 293-bp
MyHC
promoter, this element acts as a strong positive cis-acting sequence
(Table 2).
Transgenic mutagenesis analysis reveals that the dMCAT element is
responsible for the increase in transgene
293wt expression after
NWB.
Our observation that the dMCAT element acts as a strong positive
cis-acting sequence offers insight into how the dMCAT element mediates
the uncharacteristic upregulation of transgene
293wt in response to
NWB. In this regard, it is plausible that in the absence of the
upstream NWB-responsive region (
600/
294; Fig. 1A),
interactions required for NWB downregulation would be disrupted, thereby allowing the dMCAT element (
290/
284) to exert a dominant positive effect on transgene
293wt expression in response to NWB.
The transgenic results presented here support this notion by showing
NWB decreased expression of a transgene containing a mutated dMCAT
element (
293Mm). In fact, decreases in transgene
293Mm expression
were similar to those previously reported by us for larger (5,600 or
600 bp)
MyHC promoter/transgenes (Table 2; Ref. 29), decisively
demonstrating in vivo that the dMCAT element is responsible for the
unexpected upregulation of wild-type transgene
293wt in response to NWB.
Of direct relevance to our current findings are the numerous transgenic
studies showing that gene expression is specified by unique
combinations of regulatory element(s) that, when disrupted by deletion
or mutation, alter the level and pattern of gene expression (Ref. 13
and references within). Specifically, an uncharacteristic fiber
type-specific expression pattern has recently been reported for several
fast myosin light chain-1/3 and troponin I fast transgenes (9,
20, 25, 26, 32). Importantly, these findings were consistently
documented by using multiple independent transgenic lines, thereby
showing that integration site or rarely encountered transgene copy
number effects were not responsible for these observations. Moreover,
the requirement for individual cis-acting regulatory elements and/or
enhancer (module) regions for directing correct patterns of gene
expression have recently been demonstrated by using gene targeting. In
these studies, the homozygous targeted deletion/mutation of distantly
located enhancer regions associated with either the myosin light
chain-1/3 or MyoD gene locus led to defective myosin light chain or
MyoD expression patterns, respectively (8, 22).
EMSA analysis suggests a role for the dMCAT element during NWB
regulation of the
MyHC gene.
In this study, we have used EMSA analysis to investigate how a strong
positive cis-acting regulatory element might function during a
physiological process that normally results in negative regulation. One
conceivable mechanism by which a strong positive cis-acting element can
contribute to decreased expression levels of a given gene is by
incurring changes in the type and/or amount of transcription factor
binding. As concerns change in the type of transcription factor
binding, our current antibody EMSA experiments show that the proteins
interacting at the dMCAT element do not differ between control and NWB
conditions. Specifically, antibody EMSA analysis determined that
proteins antigenically related to PARP, NTEF-1, and Max comprised the
LMC that formed at the
MyHC dMCAT element when using either control
or NWB nuclear extract (Fig. 4). This analysis also showed that other
factors, such as the E-box binding proteins MyoD, myogenin, E2A, HEB,
and USF, were not components of the binding complexes formed at the
dMCAT element (data not shown). Furthermore, we showed by EMSA scanning mutagenesis that no difference existed in protein-DNA interactions at
the dMCAT element because the same nucleotides comprising only the core
MCAT element were involved in both control and NWB nuclear protein
binding (Fig. 3).
The one notable difference observed was the decrease in LMC formation
when using NWB-S nuclear extracts compared with CS nuclear extracts.
Although minor differences in complex formation were observed for the
IMC and HMC, the decrease observed for the LMC was the most striking.
This finding extends our previous observation showing that the
formation of a LMC at the
MyHC dMCAT element varied in accordance
with the proportion of slow type I fibers populating the muscle from
which the nuclear extract was isolated (44). Our EMSA
analysis supports the idea that the dMCAT element contributes, at least
in part, to NWB decreases in
MyHC gene expression as a result of
reduced binding of the positive-acting transcription factors NTEF-1,
PARP, and Max. When considering this potential NWB mechanism in the
context of the endogenous
MyHC gene, it is logical to speculate that
under NWB conditions a decrease in occupancy of transcriptional
activator proteins at a positive cis-acting element would minimize
transcriptional activation sufficiently to allow negative regulation to
proceed in the presence of other NWB element(s). In this manner, global changes in the transcription of genes representative of the slow type I
phenotype could be coordinately downregulated, thereby contributing to
the slow-to-fast fiber type transition induced by NWB. Whether the
decrease of positive cis-acting element occupancy under NWB conditions
occurs by regulation of transcription factor(s) at the level of
transcription and/or posttranscriptional modification remains to be determined.
Previously unidentified NWB element(s) reside downstream of the
dMCAT element.
In addition to determining that the dMCAT element directs the
uncharacteristic upregulation of transgene
293wt, our transgenic analysis showing downregulation of transgene
293Mm expression after NWB provides the first in vivo evidence that previously unidentified NWB responsive element(s) reside downstream from the dMCAT
element (Fig. 1A). Candidate elements that may fulfill this
role that are located downstream from the dMCAT element (
290/
284) are the A/T-rich (
269/
258), C-rich (
242/
231), pMCAT
(
210/
203, examined herein), and E-box/NFAT (
179/
171) elements.
Our previous transgenic analysis revealed that the independent mutation
of the A/T-rich element in the context of a 293-bp
MyHC
promoter/transgene resulted in the complete loss of expression in all
21 independent lines examined (CAT = 15 lines, luciferase = 6 lines) (44, 46). Similarly, E-box/NFAT mutation in 11 independent lines resulted in 4 lines that did not express and 7 lines
whose basal expression levels were very low-rendering results, with NWB
being unreliable (unpublished observation). Interestingly, a molecular
model that accounts for slow fiber-specific gene expression and
involves both A/T-rich and NFAT elements has been recently proposed.
This model suggests that sustained elevations of intracellular calcium coactivate the calcineurin and calmodulin-dependent protein kinase signaling pathways and the subsequent transcriptional activation of
slow fiber genes by various members of the myocyte enhancer factor-2
(MEF-2) and/or nuclear factor of activated T-cell (NFAT) transcription
factor families (31, 33, 49, 50). Because NWB has been
shown to result in a decrease in total muscle electrical activity and a
slow-to-fast fiber-type transition (3, 34), it is
conceivable that a decrease in nuclear protein binding at the A/T-rich
and/or NFAT elements may contribute to reduced
MyHC expression under
NWB conditions. In fact, we have previously reported reduced levels of
NFAT protein binding at the
MyHC NFAT element (46).
Although not all agree with the proposed model of slow fiber-specific
expression (7), it will be instructive to reevaluate the
involvement of the A/T-rich and E-box/NFAT elements in regulating
MyHC expression during the NWB induced slow-to-fast fiber-type by
using larger
MyHC promoter/transgenes.
Divergence in pMCAT element sequences underlies species difference
in NTEF-1 binding.
The pMCAT element (
210/
203) is located downstream from the dMCAT
element and represents a viable element that could confer NWB
regulation. Previous EMSA analysis has revealed robust binding at this
element when reacted with nuclear extracts isolated from a variety of
differentiated myogenic cell lines (37, 38). In addition,
mutation of this element within a 600-bp
MyHC promoter representing
several species (rat, human, rabbit, mouse) resulted in a significant
reduction and/or abolished
MyHC reporter gene expression when
assayed in the in vitro context (37, 38). The pMCAT
element has also been shown to confer inducible expression of the rat
MyHC gene in response to
1-adrenergic treatment of primary rat neonatal cardiomyocytes (23, 24).
Mechanistically, the latter was shown by immunological techniques to
involve the formation of a single binding complex (termed C2) that was
comprised of TEF-1 protein. More recently, it was reported that the
pMCAT element plays a role in the downregulation of rat
MyHC
plasmids injected into the soleus muscle of spinal cord isolated rats
(19).
Although the
MyHC pMCAT element has been shown to contribute to both
basal and inducible expression, a role for this element under NWB
conditions has not been investigated. Our results indicate that the
human
MyHC pMCAT element is unlikely to play a role in NWB
regulation because EMSA analysis detected weak binding of NTEF-1 that
did not differ between rat CS or NWB-S nuclear extract (Fig.
5A). The weak binding of rat NTEF-1 at the human pMCAT
element cannot be attributed to species differences in transcription factors because we also observed weak binding when using either in
vitro synthesized human TEF-1 protein or mouse control gastrocnemius nuclear extract (Figs. 6 and 7). Furthermore, all members of the TEF-1
family are well conserved at the amino acid level and, in particular,
throughout the DNA binding domain (Ref. 6 and references within).
Although our EMSA results suggest that the human pMCAT element does not
serve a regulatory role during NWB, at present we cannot eliminate the
possibility that posttranscriptional modifications of NTEF-1 could
allow NWB regulation to occur through this element without affecting
the degree of NTEF-1 binding. In this regard, various TEF-1 isoforms
have been shown to modulate gene transcription as a result of
posttranscriptional modification (18, 42). Also of
significance, we provide evidence that the two distinct human
MyHC
proximal promoter MCAT elements are not equivalent in that the dMCAT
element binds TEF-1 proteins more avidly than the pMCAT element,
suggesting that the dMCAT element is a stronger activator of muscle
gene transcription.
In striking contrast to our findings with the human pMCAT element, our
EMSA experiments provide evidence in support of a NWB regulatory role
for the rat pMCAT element. In competition and antibody EMSAs, we
detected robust binding of CS nuclear NTEF-1 at the rat pMCAT element
that decreased when using NWB-S nuclear extract (Fig. 5B).
We also found robust binding at this element when using either nuclear
extract isolated from the mouse gastrocnemius muscle or in
vitro-synthesized human NTEF-1 protein (Figs. 6 and 7). Therefore, it
is likely that the difference in NTEF-1 binding at the human vs. rat
pMCAT elements can be attributed to a divergence in nucleotides
comprising the core and flanking regions of these two elements (Fig.
5C). Previous work has illustrated the importance of
flanking sequences in transcription factor binding at regulatory elements (6, 17, 28). In fact, the region located between nucleotides
215 and
203 of the rat proximal promoter contains two
overlapping consensus MCAT elements (Fig. 5C), a
configuration that may contribute to enhanced NTEF-1 binding and thus
regulated expression. Although speculative, this example of a species
difference in cis-acting regulatory element binding, and presumably
function, may partially underlie the difference in
MyHC expression
in the human (predominately
MyHC) vs. small rodent heart
(predominately
MyHC), as well as responses to pathophysiological and
physiological signals.
In summary, our transgenic analysis of the
MyHC dMCAT element
demonstrates that this element functions in a context-dependent manner
because, in the absence of the upstream NWB-responsive region, it
confers a dominant positive effect on transgene
293wt transcription,
resulting in upregulation in response to NWB. Importantly, this
analysis also revealed that previously unidentified NWB responsive element(s) resides further downstream within the ![]()