Am J Physiol Cell Physiol AJP: Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 276: Ca1, 1999;
0363-6143/99 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Vol. 276, Issue 3, Ca1-Ca1, March 1999

CORRIGENDA

Volume 271, December 1996 Volume 40, December 1996 

Pages C2027-C2036: K. E. Conley and C. Jones. "Myoglobin content and oxygen diffusion: model analysis of horse and steer muscle." On page C2031, the units for the y-axes for all three panels in Fig. 3 (A-C) should be divided by 10. For example, the y-axis units in Fig. 3A should read from 0 to 0.3 µmol · ml capillary-1 · s-1 · torr-1. On page C2034, the units for the y-axis of Fig. 6 should be µmol/kg, and the title of Table 3 should read "Correlation coefficients for Mb content vs. O2 demand/O2 diffusion."

Volume 273, July 1997 Volume 42, July 1997

Pages C306-C315: K. E. Conley, M. L. Blei, T. L. Richards, M. J. Kushmerick, and S. A. Jubrias. "Activation of glycolysis in human muscle in vivo." Equations 9, 10, and 13 require corrections from the original publication, but none significantly affect the results or conclusions of the paper. The calculations in the paper using Eq. 9 were correct, but a sign error is present in Eq. 9 on page C309 and in the same equation in Fig. 3B on page C308. The correct equation is
&Dgr;H<SUP>+</SUP> = &Dgr;pH<SUB>e</SUB> ⋅ &bgr;<SUB>tot</SUB> + (−&ggr;) ⋅ &Dgr;PCr<SUB>e</SUB> (9)

Equation 10 should be written as follows
&Dgr;Glu = &Dgr;SP + &Dgr;H<SUP>+</SUP>/2 (10)
This correction increases the calculated glucosyl per twitch for each subject in Fig. 7 by <8%.

Equation 13 and the same equation in Fig. 3C should be written as
&Dgr;H<SUP>+</SUP> = 0.67 ⋅ &Dgr;PCr<SUB>g</SUB> (13)
This correction improves the agreement between calculations based on Eqs. 9 and 13 in Fig. 8. The two methods of calculating glycolytic flux now agree over an additional 100 s of stimulation to 600 s in Fig. 8.

On page C311, right column, second sentence of the second paragraph should now read "The mean of the PCr vs. H+ slopes for our subjects was 1.40 ± 0.19 (SE), which is similar to the canonical ATP/H+ stoichiometry of 1.5 for glycolysis."


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 276(3):Ca1-Ca1




This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online