Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 296: C1383-C1390, 2009. First published March 25, 2009; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00022.2009
0363-6143/09 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
296/6/C1383    most recent
00022.2009v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Neti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goll, D. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Neti, G.
Right arrow Articles by Goll, D. E.

MUSCLE CELL BIOLOGY AND CELL MOTILITY

Properties of easily releasable myofilaments: are they the first step in myofibrillar protein turnover?

Girija Neti, Stefanie M. Novak, Valery F. Thompson, and Darrel E. Goll{dagger}

Muscle Biology Group, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona

Submitted 14 January 2009 ; accepted in final form 19 March 2009

Myofibrillar proteins must be removed from the myofibril before they can be turned over metabolically in functioning muscle cells. It is uncertain how this removal is accomplished without disruption of the contractile function of the myofibril. It has been proposed that the calpains could remove the outer layer of filaments from myofibrils as a first step in myofibrillar protein turnover. Several studies have found that myofilaments can be removed from myofibrils by trituration in the presence of ATP. These easily releasable myofilaments (ERMs) were proposed to be intermediates in myofibrillar protein turnover. It was unclear, however, whether the ERMs were an identifiable entity in muscle or whether additional trituration would remove more myofilaments until the myofibril was gone and whether calpains could release ERMs from intact myofibrils. The present study shows that few ERMs could be obtained from the residue after the first removal of ERMs, and the yield of ERMs from well-washed myofibrils was reduced, probably because some ERMs had been removed by the washing process. Mild calpain treatment of myofibrils released filaments that had a polypeptide composition and were ultrastructurally similar to ERMs. The yield of calpain-released ERMs was two- to threefold greater than the normal yield. Hence, ERMs are an identifiable entity in myofibrils, and calpain releases filaments that are similar to ERMs. The role of ERMs in myofibrillar protein turnover is unclear, because only filaments on the surface of the myofibril would turn over, and changes in myofibrillar protein isoforms during development could not occur via the ERM mechanism.

calpain; muscle; proteasome



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: V. F. Thompson, Muscle Biology Group, 626 Shantz, Univ. of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721 (e-mail: valery.thompson{at}arizona.edu)







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2009 by the American Physiological Society.