HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) All Versions of this Article: 293/4/C1319    most recent 00100.2007v1 Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Putzke, C. Articles by Eberhart, L. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Putzke, C. Articles by Eberhart, L.

MEMBRANE TRANSPORTERS, ION CHANNELS, AND PUMPS

Differential effects of volatile and intravenous anesthetics on the activity of human TASK-1

¹Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Philipps-University Marburg, Germany and ²Institut für Physiologie II, Universitätsklinikum Münster; ³Institute of Physiology, Philipps-University Marburg; ⁴Klinik und Poliklinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg; and ⁵Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

Submitted 13 May 2007 ; accepted in final form 7 August 2007

Volatile anesthetics have been shown to activate various two-pore (2P) domain K⁺ (K_2P) channels such as TASK-1 and TREK-1 (TWIK-related acid-sensitive K⁺ channel), and mice deficient in these channels are resistant to halothane-induced anesthesia. Here, we investigated whether K_2P channels were also potentially important targets of intravenous anesthetics. Whole cell patch-clamp techniques were used to determine the effects of the commonly used intravenous anesthetics etomidate and propofol on the acid-sensitive K⁺ current in rat ventricular myocytes (which strongly express TASK-1) and selected human K_2P channels expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes. In myocytes, etomidate decreased both inward rectifier K⁺ (K_ir) current (I_K1) and acid-sensitive outward K⁺ current at positive potentials, suggesting that this drug may inhibit TASK channels. Indeed, in addition to inhibiting guinea pig Kir2.1 expressed in oocytes, etomidate inhibited human TASK-1 (and TASK-3) in a concentration-dependent fashion. Propofol had no effect on human TASK-1 (or TASK-3) expressed in oocytes. Moreover, we showed that, similar to the known effect of halothane, sevoflurane and the purified R-(–)- and S-(+)-enantiomers of isoflurane, without stereoselectivity, activated human TASK-1. We conclude that intravenous and volatile anesthetics have dissimilar effects on K_2P channels. Human TASK-1 (and TASK-3) are insensitive to propofol but are inhibited by supraclinical concentrations of etomidate. In contrast, stimulatory effects of sevoflurane and enantiomeric isoflurane on human TASK-1 can be observed at clinically relevant concentrations.

volatile anesthetics; etomidate; propofol; ion channels