Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 293: C493-C508, 2007. First published May 2, 2007; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00131.2007
0363-6143/07 $8.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
293/2/C493    most recent
00131.2007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Eddinger, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meer, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Eddinger, T. J.
Right arrow Articles by Meer, D. P.

INVITED REVIEW

Myosin II isoforms in smooth muscle: heterogeneity and function

Thomas J. Eddinger1 and Daniel P. Meer2

1Biological Sciences, Marquette University, and 2Biological Sciences, Cardinal Stritch University, Milwaukee, Wisconsin

Both smooth muscle (SM) and nonmuscle class II myosin molecules are expressed in SM tissues comprising hollow organ systems. Individual SM cells may express one or more of multiple myosin II isoforms that differ in myosin heavy chain (MHC) and myosin light chain (MLC) subunits. Although much has been learned, the expression profiles, organization within contractile filaments, localization within cells, and precise roles in various contractile functions of these different myosin molecules are still not well understood. However, data supporting unique physiological roles for certain isoforms continues to build. Isoform differences located in the S1 head region of the MHC can alter actin binding and rates of ATP hydrolysis. Differences located in the MHC tail can alter the formation, stability, and size of the myosin thick filament. In these distinct ways, both head and tail isoform differences can alter force generation and muscle shortening velocities. The MLCs that are associated with the lever arm of the S1 head can affect the flexibility and range of motion of this domain and possibly the motion of the S2 and motor domains. Phosphorylation of MLC20 has been associated with conformational changes in the S1 and/or S2 fragments regulating enzymatic activity of the entire myosin molecule. A challenge for the future will be delineation of the physiological significance of the heterogeneous expression of these isoforms in developmental, tissue-specific, and species-specific patterns and or the intra- and intercellular heterogeneity of myosin isoform expression in SM cells of a given organ.

nonmuscle myosin; expression



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: T. J. Eddinger, Biological Sciences, Marquette Univ., 530 N. 15th St., Milwaukee, WI 53233 (e-mail: thomas.eddinger{at}marquette.edu)




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
K. Lange, M. Kammerer, F. Saupe, M. E. Hegi, S. Grotegut, E. Fluri, and G. Orend
Combined Lysophosphatidic Acid/Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Signaling Triggers Glioma Cell Migration in a Tenascin-C Microenvironment
Cancer Res., September 1, 2008; 68(17): 6942 - 6952.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2007 by the American Physiological Society.