Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Ad Instruments
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 285: C1071-C1081, 2003. First published July 2, 2003; doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00104.2003
0363-6143/03 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
285/5/C1071    most recent
00104.2003v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tuil, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertrand, A.
Right arrow Articles by Tuil, D.

MUSCLE CELL BIOLOGY AND CELL MOTILITY

Muscle electrotransfer as a tool for studying muscle fiber-specific and nerve-dependent activity of promoters

Anne Bertrand, Valérie Ngô-Muller, Danièle Hentzen, Jean-Paul Concordet, Dominique Daegelen, and David Tuil

Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U567, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique Unité Mixte de Recherche 8104, Institut Cochin, Département Génétique, Développement et Pathologie Moléculaire, Université René Descartes Paris V, 75014 Paris, France

Submitted 19 March 2003 ; accepted in final form 26 June 2003

Muscle electrotransfer has recently become a promising tool for efficient delivery of plasmids and transgene expression in skeletal muscle. This technology has been mainly applied to use of muscle as a bioreactor for production of therapeutic proteins. However, it remains to be determined whether muscle electrotransfer may also be accurately used as an alternative tool to transgenesis for studying aspects of muscle-specific gene control that must be explored in fully mature muscle fibers in vivo, such as fiber specificity and nerve dependence. It was also not known to what extent the initial electrical stimulations alter muscle physiology and gene expression. Therefore, optimized conditions of skeletal muscle electroporation were first tested for their effects on muscles of transgenic mice harboring a pM310-CAT transgene in which the CAT reporter gene was under control of the fast IIB fiber-specific and nerve-dependent aldolase A pM promoter. Surprisingly, electrostimulation led to a drastic but transient shutdown of pM310-CAT transgene expression concomitant with very transient activation of MyoD and, mostly, with activation of myogenin, suggesting profound alterations in transcriptional status of the electroporated muscle. Return to a normal transcriptional state was observed 7-10 days after electroporation. Therefore, we investigated whether a reporter construct placed under control of pM could exhibit fiber-specific expression 10 days after electrotransfer in either fast tibialis anterior or slow soleus muscle. We show that not only fiber specificity, but also nerve dependence, of a pM-driven construct can be reproduced. However, after electrotransfer, pM displayed a less tight control than previously observed for the same promoter when integrated in a chromatin context.

fast or slow fibers; aldolase A; MyoD; myogenin



Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: D. Daegelen, département "Génétique, Développement et Pathologie Moléculaire," 24 rue du Faubourg Saint Jacques, 75014 Paris, France (E-mail: daegelen{at}cochin.inserm.fr).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
H. Tang, P. Macpherson, M. Marvin, E. Meadows, W. H. Klein, X.-J. Yang, and D. Goldman
A Histone Deacetylase 4/Myogenin Positive Feedback Loop Coordinates Denervation-dependent Gene Induction and Suppression
Mol. Biol. Cell, February 1, 2009; 20(4): 1120 - 1131.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
C. R. Benton, Y. Yoshida, J. Lally, X.-X. Han, H. Hatta, and A. Bonen
PGC-1{alpha} increases skeletal muscle lactate uptake by increasing the expression of MCT1 but not MCT2 or MCT4
Physiol Genomics, September 17, 2008; 35(1): 45 - 54.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S.-E. Chen, B. Jin, and Y.-P. Li
TNF-{alpha} regulates myogenesis and muscle regeneration by activating p38 MAPK
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, May 1, 2007; 292(5): C1660 - C1671.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
C. Charvet, C. Houbron, A. Parlakian, J. Giordani, C. Lahoute, A. Bertrand, A. Sotiropoulos, L. Renou, A. Schmitt, J. Melki, et al.
New Role for Serum Response Factor in Postnatal Skeletal Muscle Growth and Regeneration via the Interleukin 4 and Insulin-Like Growth Factor 1 Pathways.
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2006; 26(17): 6664 - 6674.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCBHome page
A. Sacco, R. Doyonnas, M. A. LaBarge, M. M. Hammer, P. Kraft, and H. M. Blau
IGF-I increases bone marrow contribution to adult skeletal muscle and enhances the fusion of myelomonocytic precursors
J. Cell Biol., November 7, 2005; 171(3): 483 - 492.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
D. A. Dean
Nonviral gene transfer to skeletal, smooth, and cardiac muscle in living animals
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, August 1, 2005; 289(2): C233 - C245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Physiol.Home page
Z. A Rana, K. Gundersen, A. Buonanno, and D. Vullhorst
Imaging transcription in vivo: distinct regulatory effects of fast and slow activity patterns on promoter elements from vertebrate troponin I isoform genes
J. Physiol., February 1, 2005; 562(3): 815 - 828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
T. Akimoto, B. S. Sorg, and Z. Yan
Real-time imaging of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-{gamma} coactivator-1{alpha} promoter activity in skeletal muscles of living mice
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, September 1, 2004; 287(3): C790 - C796.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Biol. Reprod.Home page
J. L. Kirby, L. Yang, J. C. Labus, R. J. Lye, N. Hsia, R. Day, G. A. Cornwall, and B. T. Hinton
Characterization of Epididymal Epithelial Cell-Specific Gene Promoters by In Vivo Electroporation
Biol Reprod, August 1, 2004; 71(2): 613 - 619.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
R. Grifone, C. Laclef, F. Spitz, S. Lopez, J. Demignon, J.-E. Guidotti, K. Kawakami, P.-X. Xu, R. Kelly, B. J. Petrof, et al.
Six1 and Eya1 Expression Can Reprogram Adult Muscle from the Slow-Twitch Phenotype into the Fast-Twitch Phenotype
Mol. Cell. Biol., July 15, 2004; 24(14): 6253 - 6267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online
Copyright © 2003 by the American Physiological Society.