Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Email Content Delivery
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 271: C1646-C1651, 1996;
0363-6143/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Khalsa, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Block, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Khalsa, S. B.
Right arrow Articles by Block, G. D.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 271, Issue 5 C1646-C1651, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Evidence for a central role of transcription in the timing mechanism of a circadian clock

S. B. Khalsa, D. Whitmore, B. Bogart and G. D. Block
Department of Biology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22903, USA.

The retinal circadian clock in the isolated in vitro eye of the marine mollusc Bulla gouldiana exhibits a phase-dependent requirement for transcription. The transcription-sensitive phase extends through most of the subjective day and therefore is substantially longer than the previously reported translation-sensitive phase. Lower concentrations of transcription inhibitors yield a significant dose-dependent lengthening of circadian period. Clock motion can be stopped by a high concentration of the transcription inhibitor 5,6-dichlorobenz-imidazole riboside (DRB) when applied during the sensitive phase; after withdrawal of the inhibitor, motion resumes from the phase at which it was stopped. In a double-pulse experiment, phase shifts to light pulses applied after DRB pulses, and not during the translation-sensitive phase, indicate that the inhibition of transcription has immediate effects on the phase of the clock. These data suggest that DRB-induced phase shifts are independent of translation, which implies that the rate of transcription itself plays a significant role in the mechanism underlying the generation of the circadian cycle.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online