Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 271: C486-C494, 1996;
0363-6143/96 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, C. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Reddy, M. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bell, C. L.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 271, Issue 2 C486-C494, Copyright © 1996 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Distinct cellular mechanisms of cholinergic and beta-adrenergic sweat secretion

M. M. Reddy and C. L. Bell
Division of Biomedical Sciences, University of California, Riverside 92521, USA.

The cholinergic and beta-adrenergic sweat secretions from human sweat glands differ with respect to secretory rates and their susceptibility to cystic fibrosis (CF). Using the cultured beta-adrenergic-sensitive sweat secretory cell, we sought to determine the intracellular electrophysiological mechanisms underlying these functional differences. We found that the cholinergic agonist methacholine (10(-6) M) induced a Ca(2+)-dependent biphasic membrane potential (Vm) response: an initial hyperpolarization and a secondary depolarization. The initial hyperpolarization was independent of bath Cl- and dependent on transmembrane K+ gradient. However, the secondary depolarization of Vm was dependent on bath Cl-. In contrast, the beta-adrenergic agonist isoproterenol (10(-5) M) induced a monophasic depolarization of Vm. This depolarization was 1) dependent on bath Cl-, 2) independent of K+ conductance (GK) blocker Ba2+ (5mM), 3) unaffected by the methacholine-induced secondary depolarization of Vm, and 4) absent in cells derived from CF subjects. These results indicated that the cholinergic agonist-induced secretion mainly involves the activation of Ca(2+)-dependent GK and Cl- conductance (GCl), whereas the beta-adrenergic secretion seems to mainly depend on the activation of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator-GCl.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
A. K. M. Shamsuddin, M. M. Reddy, and P. M. Quinton
Iontophoretic {beta}-adrenergic stimulation of human sweat glands: possible assay for cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator activity in vivo
Exp Physiol, August 1, 2008; 93(8): 969 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
P. G. Milhaud, S. R. Pondugula, J. H. Lee, M. Herzog, J. Lehouelleur, P. Wangemann, A. Sans, and D. C. Marcus
Chloride secretion by semicircular canal duct epithelium is stimulated via beta 2-adrenergic receptors
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): C1752 - C1760.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online