Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 265: C1479-C1488, 1993;
0363-6143/93 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Candia, O.
Right arrow Articles by Yorio, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Candia, O.
Right arrow Articles by Yorio, T.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 265, Issue 6 C1479-C1488, Copyright © 1993 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Influence of filter supports on transport characteristics of cultured A6 kidney cells

O. Candia, A. J. Mia and T. Yorio
Department of Ophthalmology, Mt. Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029.

Amphibian A6 kidney cells grown on Anocell filters developed a transepithelial potential difference of 37 mV, a short-circuit current (Isc) of 8 microA/cm2, and a resistance of 5 k omega.cm2. Other observations suggested a viable arginine vasopressin (AVP) V2 receptor-second messenger pathway in these cells: 1) AVP increased both an amiloride-sensitive Isc and adenosine 3',5'-cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) formation, and 2) scanning electron micrographs of A6 cells cultured on Anocell and ICN Cellagen filters demonstrated increased microvilli formation on the apical surface after AVP action. However, osmotic water flow (JV) across A6 cells on filter supports was not altered by either AVP or the permeable cAMP analogue dibutyryl cAMP (osmotic permeability coefficient = 2.5 x 10(-3) cm/s). Diffusional water flow (Jdw) measured across A6 cells on Anocell filters using tritiated water (THO) ranged from 6 to 8 microliters.min-1.cm-2. Neither AVP nor the membrane-permeabilizing agents amphotericin B and digitonin were able to enhance unidirectional THO fluxes, although amphotericin B increased the Isc. These results suggested that there was an unknown barrier in series with the A6 cells limiting water flow. THO fluxes across filter supports, without an associated cellular monolayer, gave Jdw values in the range 7-30 microliters.min-1.cm-2. Jv across the bare filter support was in the range of 0.3-1.5 microliters.min-1.cm-2, similar to that measured in the presence of an A6 monolayer. These observations suggest that the filter may be rate limiting for transepithelial water flow. Chloride fluxes across Anocell filters showed a stable value of 5 mu eq.h-1.cm-2. These observations exhibit the limitations of filter supports in the study of transport phenomena in cultured cells.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online