Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 261: C461-C466, 1991;
0363-6143/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzenberg, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berry, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schwarzenberg, S. J.
Right arrow Articles by Berry, S. A.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 261, Issue 3 C461-C466, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Developmental regulation of the hepatic acute phase response

S. J. Schwarzenberg, C. J. Potter and S. A. Berry
Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

For evaluation of the ontogenetic regulation of the acute phase response, inflammation was induced in Fischer rat litters at different postnatal ages. Four homologous rat hepatic serine protease inhibitor (Spi 2.1, Spi 2.2, Spi 2.3, and alpha 1-antitrypsin) mRNAs were measured in livers 24 h after injection. Animals mounted both positive and negative acute phase responses at all ages, but responses were blunted in young animals, reaching adult levels by days 7-19. alpha 1-Antitrypsin mRNA had no response, and Spi 2.2 mRNA had 50% the rise seen in adults on days 3 and 7. Spi 2.1 and 2.3 mRNAs, negative acute phase reactants, showed attenuation of adult response to inflammation in infant animals of 33% (Spi 2.1) and 40% (Spi 2.3). In hypophysectomized animals, the responses of Spi 2.2, 2.3, and alpha 1-antitrypsin mRNAs after turpentine stimulation were similar to that of normal animals, whereas Spi 2.1 mRNA did not change. In conclusion, infant animals mount a blunted response to tissue injury; multiple factors may be involved in the development of the full adult response. Immaturity of the pituitary may play a role in the suppression of Spi 2.1 mRNA's response during inflammation in infant animals. These highly evolutionary related genes will be helpful in identifying specific factors regulating gene expression in inflammation and development.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Cell Physiol.Home page
S. A. Berry, P. L. Bergad, A. M. Stolz, H. C. Towle, and S. J. Schwarzenberg
Regulation of Spi 2.1 and 2.2 gene expression after turpentine inflammation: discordant responses to IL-6
Am J Physiol Cell Physiol, June 1, 1999; 276(6): C1374 - C1382.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online