Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 260: C949-C957, 1991;
0363-6143/91 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kusano, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gainer, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kusano, K.
Right arrow Articles by Gainer, H.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 260, Issue 5 C949-C957, Copyright © 1991 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Whole cell current analyses of pancreatic acinar AR42J cells. II. CCK and receptor-activated membrane currents

K. Kusano and H. Gainer
Laboratory of Neurochemistry, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20892.

Receptor currents generated in response to the application of sulfated octa-cholecystokinin (CCK) and various pancreatic secretagogues were studied in AR42J cells, a rat pancreatic acinar cell line. A whole cell configuration of the patch electrode voltage-clamp technique was utilized in these studies. Over 60% of the cells examined responded to 10(-6) M CCK by generating inward current at a membrane holding potential of -70 mV, accompanied by an increased membrane conductance. The CCK-induced receptor current (ICCK) was typically inactivated within 30 s in the presence of the ligand. The reversal potential (Erev) of the ICCK was approximately 0 mV when recorded in control bathing solution with a pipette containing 154 mM Cl-. When Cl- concentration in the bathing solution or in the recording pipette was modified, the Erev of the ICCK shifted toward the predicted Cl- potential. Na+ and K+ did not show significant contributions to the Erev of ICCK. Hence, the ICCK involves an increased Cl- conductance. This increased Cl- conductance appears to be due to an increase in intracellular Ca2+, since the ICCK could not be recorded from cells using pipettes containing 5 mM EGTA. Application of a Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (5 microM) to cells in control saline induced a similar inward current flow. The source of the Ca2+ involved in the ICCK appears to be mainly intracellular, since the ICCK could be recorded under conditions designed to completely block the voltage-dependent Ca2+ entry. These included exposure of the cells to a Ca2(+)-free saline for a brief period or the presence of 500 microM Cd2+ in the control bathing solution.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online