Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Watch the video to learn how APS reaches out to developing nations.
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 258: C248-C257, 1990;
0363-6143/90 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donaldson, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Lewis, S. A.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 258, Issue 2 C248-C257, Copyright © 1990 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Effect of hyperosmotic challenge on basolateral membrane potential in rabbit urinary bladder

P. J. Donaldson and S. A. Lewis
Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston 77550.

In the rabbit urinary bladder, serosal hyperosmotic challenge (SHOC) with either 33 mM NaCl or 66 mM mannitol caused basolateral membrane potential (Vbl) to initially depolarize from -52.6 +/- 1.6 to -48.4 +/- 1.4 mV, followed by a recovery of Vbl to -57.5 +/- 1.3 mV after 13.7 +/- 1.0 min. The voltage recovery was dependent on both serosal HCO3- and Cl-, and in the absence of both, Vbl depolarized to -11.6 +/- 1.5 mV and the ratio of apical-to-basolateral resistance (Ra/Rbl) decreased from 21.0 +/- 3.4 to 8.3 +/- 3.1. This decrease in Ra/Rbl and consequent depolarization of Vbl is caused by a decrease in basolateral K+ conductance. Replacement of serosal Cl- with NO3- or SCN- followed by SHOC caused a sustained depolarization of Vbl to -32.5 +/- 4.4 and -40.9 +/- 0.9 mV, respectively. However, when Br- was used to replace Cl-, voltage recovery occurred but was slowed (24.0 +/- 2.7 min) and reduced in magnitude (-47.5 +/- 3.5 mV). Addition of amiloride (1 mM) or niflumic acid (100 microM), but not bumetanide (1 microM), to the serosal bathing solution inhibited voltage recovery causing Vbl to depolarize to -36.3 +/- 2.6 and -41.5 +/- 4.5 mV, respectively. Serosal addition of ouabain after SHOC caused Vbl to depolarize by 10.8 +/- 0.9 mV in 2 min. We speculate that the SHOC-induced initial depolarization of Vbl is a loss of Ba2(+)-sensitive K+ conductance caused by cell shrinkage. The subsequent repolarization/hyperpolarization of Vbl is caused by an enhanced basolateral membrane Na+ pump current and a reappearance of the Ba2(+)-sensitive K+ conductance. The parallel operation of Na(+)-H+ and Cl(-)-HCO3- exchanges will then supply Na+ for the pump current and, via cellular accumulation of Na+, K+, and Cl-, might result in a partial recovery of cell volume and thus Ba2(+)-sensitive K+ conductance.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online