Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 256: C549-C559, 1989;
0363-6143/89 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scamps, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vassort, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scamps, F.
Right arrow Articles by Vassort, G.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 256, Issue 3 C549-C559, Copyright © 1989 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Inhibition of ICa in single frog cardiac cells by quinidine, flecainide, ethmozin, and ethacizin

F. Scamps, A. Undrovinas and G. Vassort
Laboratoire de Physiologie Cellulaire Cardiaque, INSERM U-241, Universite Paris-Sud, Orsay, France.

The effects of four class I antiarrhythmic compounds on the Ca current (ICa), recorded with whole cell patch clamp in single isolated frog ventricular cells, were compared. Na and K currents were blocked by tetrodotoxin and Cs. Quinidine and flecainide induced an apparent tonic block with a 50% effective dose (ED50) at 10 and 20 microM, respectively; there was no clear use-dependent inhibition. Ethmozin and ethacizin, two phenothiazine derivatives, exhibited both tonic and use-dependent inhibition. Ethacizin was at least 10 times more potent than ethmozin; at 1 microM, it induced a 15% tonic block and 5, 35, and 42% use-dependent block at 0.125, 1, and 2 Hz, respectively. These compounds appeared only 3- to 10-fold less efficient on the ICa than on the Na current recorded in parallel experiments, with flecainide showing the largest different potency. All four compounds shifted the availability curves by a few millivolts toward hyperpolarization, had a clear voltage-dependent inhibition, and slowed reactivation, the latter effect being more marked with less negative holding potential. Consequently, the absence of use-dependence inhibition with quinidine and flecainide could be the consequence of a very fast association of the two compounds with the open channels that would be complete during the 200-ms depolarizing pulse. Since arrhythmias are frequently associated with tissue depolarization and can be related to Ca-dependent action potential and slow conduction, the inhibition of the ICa reported above should account, in part, both for the antiarrhythmic and the negative inotropic effects of these compounds.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Pharmacol.Home page
T. Nagatomo, C. T. January, and J. C. Makielski
Preferential Block of Late Sodium Current in the LQT3 Delta KPQ Mutant by the Class IC Antiarrhythmic Flecainide
Mol. Pharmacol., January 1, 2000; 57(1): 101 - 107.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
A. L. Cogolludo, F. Perez-Vizcaino, and J. Tamargo
Antagonism by Class I Antiarrhythmic Drugs of Levcromakalim-Induced Relaxation in Isolated Rat Aorta
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., October 1, 1998; 287(1): 81 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online