Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 255: C43-C50, 1988;
0363-6143/88 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Edgerton, V. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, T. P.
Right arrow Articles by Edgerton, V. R.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 255, Issue 1 C43-C50, Copyright © 1988 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Metabolic and fiber size properties of cat tibialis anterior motor units

T. P. Martin, S. Bodine-Fowler, R. R. Roy, E. Eldred and V. R. Edgerton
Department of Kinesiology, University of California, Los Angeles 90024-1568.

The variability among single muscle fiber enzymatic activities and fiber size within a motor unit was studied in the cat tibialis anterior (TA) muscle. Fourteen units were isolated for physiological testing using standard ventral root filament stimulation techniques, and the muscle fibers of these units were identified by glycogen depletion. The cross-sectional areas, succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) and alpha-glycerolphosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) activities, and the relative alkaline myofibrillar adenosine triphosphate staining densities of a sample of glycogen-depleted and -nondepleted muscle fibers were determined using quantitative histochemical techniques. Each of the unit types previously identified to be present in the TA, based on physiological criteria, were represented by the sample population. The variability among the fibers of a unit was significantly more than the variability among repeated measures on a single fiber for cross-sectional area and SDH and GPD activities. The mean coefficients of variation for SDH and GPD activity within motor unit fibers were 29 and 56%, respectively, whereas the variability between fibers of different units within a muscle was significantly greater (53 and 69%, respectively). Additionally, the mean coefficient of variation for cross-sectional area among motor unit fibers was less than that among fibers not depleted of glycogen (25 vs. 46%). These data suggest that although there is clear evidence for some level of neural control of the properties of a muscle unit (variation within a unit was less than the variation across units), this control is not complete, since the variability among fibers of a single unit was significantly more than the variability found between repeated measurements on a single fiber.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
J. S. Carp, P. A. Herchenroder, X. Y. Chen, and J. R. Wolpaw
Sag During Unfused Tetanic Contractions in Rat Triceps Surae Motor Units
J Neurophysiol, June 1, 1999; 81(6): 2647 - 2661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
T. Gordon, N. Tyreman, V. F. Rafuse, and J. B. Munson
Fast-to-Slow Conversion Following Chronic Low-Frequency Activation of Medial Gastrocnemius Muscle in Cats. I. Muscle and Motor Unit Properties
J Neurophysiol, May 1, 1997; 77(5): 2585 - 2604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online