Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 253: C369-C374, 1987;
0363-6143/87 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Scheid, C. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Scheid, C. R.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 253, Issue 3 C369-C374, Copyright © 1987 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Beta-adrenergic relaxation of smooth muscle: differences between cells and tissues

C. R. Scheid

The present studies were carried out in an attempt to resolve the controversy about the Na+ dependence of beta-adrenergic relaxation in smooth muscle. Previous studies on isolated smooth muscle cells from the toad stomach had suggested that at least some of the actions of beta-adrenergic agents, including a stimulatory effect on 45Ca efflux, were dependent on the presence of a normal transmembrane Na+ gradient. Studies by other investigators using tissues derived from mammalian sources had suggested that the relaxing effect of beta-adrenergic agents was Na+ independent. Uncertainty remained as to whether these discrepancies reflected differences between cells and tissues or differences between species. Thus, in the present studies, we utilized both tissues and cells from the same source, the stomach muscle of the toad Bufo marinus, and assessed the Na+ dependence of beta-adrenergic relaxation. We found that elimination of a normal Na+ gradient abolished beta-adrenergic relaxation of isolated cells. In tissues, however, similar manipulations had no effect on relaxation. The reasons for this discrepancy are unclear but do not appear to be attributable to changes in smooth muscle function following enzymatic dispersion. Rather they may be attributable to unique properties of tissues, such as the presence of pacemaker cells, nerves, and so on. Thus the controversy concerning the mechanism of beta-adrenergic relaxation may reflect inherent differences between tissues and cells.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online