Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Track the topics, authors and articles important to you
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 248: C88-C101, 1985;
0363-6143/85 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Claire, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossier, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Claire, M.
Right arrow Articles by Rossier, B. C.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 248, Issue 1 88-101, Copyright © 1985 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Cytoplasmic and nuclear uptake of aldosterone in toad bladder: a mathematical modeling approach

M. Claire, J. L. Steimer, M. E. Oblin, H. P. Gaeggeler, A. Venot, P. Corvol and B. C. Rossier

The mechanism of aldosterone uptake in the epithelial cells of toad bladder was studied using mathematical modeling. Two complementary approaches were used. The first involved analysis of cytosolic aldosterone binding at steady state according to models defined by the sum of independent noninteractive binding sites. The best model describing the experimental data corresponded to two specific binding sites with mean dissociation constant values of 0.20 and 60 nM for types 1 and 2, respectively. The second approach was based on the analysis of cytoplasmic and nuclear aldosterone uptake kinetics at 25 and 0 degrees C in intact bladder. Two models (A and B) were studied. They both implied the existence of two types of aldosterone binding sites as precursors of the corresponding chromatin bound complexes. In model A, nuclear translocation of the two types of receptors was assumed to obey first-order kinetics. In model B, the translocation process for type 1 sites involved a time lag leading to delayed binding to chromatin. Both models were found to fit the experimental data satisfactorily. The fit obtained for model B appeared to be better at low aldosterone concentrations.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online