Am J Physiol Cell Physiol Fuel your research with LabChart
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 233: C99-C103, 1977;
0363-6143/77 $5.00
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sperelakis, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vogel, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sperelakis, N.

AJP - Cell Physiology, Vol 233, Issue 3 99-103, Copyright © 1977 by American Physiological Society


ARTICLES

Blockade of myocardial slow inward current at low pH

S. Vogel and N. Sperelakis

The effect of low pH on the slow cationic inward current was studied in isolated perfused embryonic chick ventricles (16-21 days old). In order to study the slow current, the fast Na+ current was inactivated by partial depolarization to about -40 mV by elevation of K+ (25 mM). Subsequent exposure of the tissue to catecholamines or methylxanthines allowed slowly rising overshooting electrical responses (the "slow response") with with accompanying contractions to be elicited by electrical stimulation. These slow responses are insensitive to tetrodotoxin and are Na+- and Ca2+-dependent. It was found that the isoproterenol- and caffeine-induced slow responses were abolished at about pH 6.1; 50% inhibition occurred at about pH 6.5. The rate of rise of the normal action potential, which is dependent on a fast Na+ current, was only slightly affected at these same pH levels; however, electromechanical uncoupling occurred, as expected from inhibition of the slow current. Therefore, the slow current was blocked at an acid pH that did not block the fast Na+ current.





HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Visit Other APS Journals Online